A
areayes
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2025
- Posts
- 3,346
- Reputation
- 3,293
- OP
- #151
Yeah nigga, cus u lost the debateI will strangle you with my own hands
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah nigga, cus u lost the debateI will strangle you with my own hands
No it's a completely different thing because they have a conditionLemme break your argument in half.
If so people in anesthesia/coma are less humans because they dont have consciousness.
Absolutly no, now stfu
You pasted it into chatpgtYeah nigga, cus u lost the debate
had to show ur low iq 4 neurones something obvious, thats why i used chat fotPaste that into chat gpt niggero
Yeshad to show ur low iq 4 neurones something obvious, thats why i used chat fot
nigga, alright.You just agreed with me and yapped about it being essential to society working so ig the only thing left which you didn't answer is wtf it's all based on. WHY is everyone just magically worth something and the same and WHY do we "have" rights?
No, but it's also not correct, it just is because there is no correct or incorrect
Here we go again, i argued with a guy that thinks the same as you."Ethical" is subjective.
Abortion is killing another human and anyone who denies that is a goy slave npc sheeple who listens to the government.
In my opinion you should be able to kill your own offspring. If they have some genetic defect or whatever. So killing your own kids is a right in my eyes. ofc not when they are grown.
But I'm also against abortion being accepted by society and practiced on a large scale because it's the depopulation agenda of the Jews to destroy western countries etc.
So I guess it depends. Nothing is white and black everything is gray.
"even if your child has a defect it stills unnethical to kill him, because every human deserves human rights no metter what stage of development, no metter if he got illness etc..."Here we go again, i argued with a guy that thinks the same as you.
Ofc i won but lets do it again.
1- in this case abortion is ethically wrong at any reason.
2- even if your child has a defect it stills unnethical to kill him, because every human deserves human rights no metter what stage of development, no metter if he got illness etc...
/ You cant decide someone most important thing (life) / if he gonna live or not because this is extremally egoist and ethically wrong.
3- your contradicting yourself,
I make you a question, what makes a unborn human being okay to kill but a born human not okay to kill?
Both are homicides and both are ethically wrong + like i said you cant decide someones life, because this is anti ethical and wrong.
Your also not a object, only because your parents made you they dont have the right to take it alway from you.
"even if your child has a defect it stills unnethical to kill him, because every human deserves human rights no metter what stage of development, no metter if he got illness etc..."
That's your subjective opinion buddy. It's not how the world actually works. In reality whoever has power does whatever the fuck they want.
One perfect example is Israel killing tens of thousands. No one can stop them because they own USA and Europe.
The only undeniable truth is MIGHT IS RIGHT. I'm not saying it's fair or that I agree with it I'm telling you how the world works.
"You cant decide someone most important thing (life) / if he gonna live or not because this is extremally egoist and ethically wrong."
Again your opinion.
Actually you can. If you are strong enough to enforce your beliefs on others and make them submit that's literally what happened through all human history.
"your contradicting yourself,
I make you a question, what makes a unborn human being okay to kill but a born human not okay to kill?
Both are homicides and both are ethically wrong + like i said you cant decide someones life, because this is anti ethical and wrong.
Your also not a object, only because your parents made you they dont have the right to take it alway from you."
Again your opinion. Why is it unethical to kill? Maybe you're killing is justified? Everything is subjective. There is no objective morality.
In my opinion for example the ZOG government shouldn't be able to tell you or me how to raise your kids or live life.
im guessing that also includes rape, and prostitution?Exept if the women life is at risk/she has to pick who will live.
No,im guessing that also includes rape, and prostitution?
This entire thing makes no sense bro.your completly wrong
just because someone has the power to do something does not make it morally right.
history is full of powerful people and governments committing atrocities
yet their strength never made those acts justifiable
Morality and ethics exist to protect the innocent, the vulnerable and those who cannot defend themselves, they are principles that hold even when the strong try to impose their will,
+life , dignity, and human rights are not determined by who is strongest lol, they are objective realities that must guide how we treat one another, regardless of force or influence
Power can enforce actions, but it cannot create justice or erase the wrongness of killing oppression, or harm
Claiming that its just my opinion doesnt make it subjective lol. Some things, like killing an innocent bein re objectively wrong, regardless of personal belief, its not a fucking opinion nigga, its a fact.
Just because you call something an opinion doesnt change reality, Life has intrinsic value, and harming the innocent is a factual moral wrong not a matter of taste
your confuses the reality of power (who can enforce their will) with morality (what is right or wrong) And this is incorrect
Btw thanks for proving my point, now we can both agree its ethically wrong to kill a fucking baby and people should be charged for it![]()
This entire thing makes no sense bro.
If someone comes over and kills you. Where are your Rights now? Your Rights only exist when other men with power believe in your Rights. So your Rights are reliant on other men's beliefs.
Now explain to me how human rights are objective if it is reliant on subjective human belief.
Go ahead
Your absolutly weong nigga, you can ask any philosopher, anyone and they will say your logic is terribleThis entire thing makes no sense bro.
If someone comes over and kills you. Where are your Rights now? Your Rights only exist when other men with power believe in your Rights. So your Rights are reliant on other men's beliefs.
Now explain to me how human rights are objective if it is reliant on subjective human belief.
Go ahead
Nigga, WHAT ? Youre confusing power with morality and violation with nonexistence
Rights dont disappear when someone is killed, they are violated. Laws dont vanish when crimes happen, and morality doesnt depend on who is strongest. If power defined what is right slavery, genocide and murder would never be wrong.
The fact that we can condem them proves moral standards exist independently of powr lol,
Your position collapses because it destroys the very ideas of crime, justice, and responsibility
If someone rapes, tortures, or murders a child and gets away with it then nothing immoral happened because no one with power stopped it
Under your logic genocide is not evil slavery was never wrong and murder is only bad when someone stronger disapproves
That doesnt describe morality, it describes a world where ethics dont exist at all only violence
Your logic is absolutly wrong boyo, I guess ill just start raping anyone and killing evb under your logic.
If morality is nothing more than power then words like wrong, crime,jstice and human rights are meaningless sounds.
Lol, okayRaping a child is bad in my mind because I have empathy and Don't like harming humans. But that's my subjective view.
If someone likes torturing others and raping kids then that person might not do it out of fear of punishment and laws.
All of these points don't matter. What matters is that morals are subjective.
Stealing might be good for me if I need to survive for example if I have no food etc. but its bad to the person who is being robbed etc.
Ethics only exist because of religions and genetic predispositions. So because they are man made and sometimes inherited they are not objective.
"If morality is nothing more than power then words like wrong, crime,jstice and human rights are meaningless sounds"
Yes exactly. It's not what I believe is right but it's how it is. All your points are opinions. Your "morals" and "ethics" don't matter unless you can enforce them
Let's look at Israel again. Killed tens of thousands of kids men and women and still they are the good guys in all media organizations in USA and Europe. Why? Because they have the most power and influence. Even when they commit the most "immoral" and "evil" acts no one punishes them.
Because you cannot punish someone stronger than you. Your laws and ethics apply to goyim slaves only. To keep the sheeple in line. Meanwhile they rape and drink the blood of kids and no one bats an eye. And everyone who tries to stop them commits suicide.
At the end of the day what we think is moral doesn't matter. If someone who is killing you doesn't believe in morality then it doesn't exist. It's just a man made idea. Nothing more

What politicsLol, okay
If your view were correct, morality would not exist at all only force.
But the moment you live in a society you are no longer just a biological animal acting on instinct you are a moral agent, moral agents are beings capable of understanding harm, responsibility, and consequences and ethics exist precisely because humans live together and their actions affect others
If morality were purely subjective then society itself would be impossible, trust cooperation responsibility justice and accountability would collapse
here would be no reason not to kill, steal, rape, or enslave others beyond fear and fear is not morality it is coercion
A society without objective ethics is not a society it is a battlefield where only the strongest survive In such a world concepts like crime injustice guilt or human rights are meaningless sounds because nothing is truly wrong only inconvenient for those without power
Yet you yourself act as if moral standards exist you condemn atrocities, you appeal to injustice and you criticize power abd that is only possible if there are standards above power
the moment you call something evil or injsut you admit that morality does not depend on who is strongest
Power explains what happens and norality Confusing the two destroys ethics entirely
Btw please stop bringing up politics in a debate about abortion.