Absolutely the worst phenotype you can have as a curry

This is the sole reason why your forehead is so so beautiful
Why do you keep insisting that my forehead is beautiful when it very clearly isn't? You're being very insulting.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alpha, Deleted member 16275, StrangerDanger and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: LiteralCaucasian
Yes, that's right, the pigment is needed to cover you from sunlight, but if you're outside for long enough (like me in Antalya or Batumi), it will wear off over time.
Makes sense, since I rot inside 24/7.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiteralCaucasian
Why do you keep insisting that my forehead is beautiful when it very clearly isn't? You're being very insulting.
It is, stop resisting my compliment. You are obsessing with your hairline and forgetting to acknowledge how beautiful your actual frontal bone is, it’s like being obsessed with your pubes when you got a 9x6 inch monster cock
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Chadeep, Deleted member 25938 and 4 others
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StrangerDanger

you are not aborignal,you got western indo mealinid phenotype
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275
It is, stop resisting my compliment. You are obsessing with your hairline and forgetting to acknowledge how beautiful your actual frontal bone is, it’s like being obsessed with your pubes when you got a 9x6 inch monster cock
Why do you kick me while I'm down? Is this amusing to you?
I lose all respect for you because how of amusing this is for you tbh
Thank you.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: alpha, Deleted member 16275 and StrangerDanger
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: alpha, Deleted member 16275 and LiteralCaucasian
Elabroate how
logically, insulting users on their looks, trolling, gaslighting, bullying should be considered equally as immoral and rude as racism for you

it doesnt make sense to be sensitive to only racism, its just so stupid man. either stop doing all of them or none.
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Deleted member 17872
logically, insulting users on their looks, trolling, gaslighting, bullying should be considered equally as immoral and rude as racism for you

it doesnt make sense to be sensitive to only racism, its just so stupid man. either stop doing all of them or none.
@David Rothschild Elab on the laughter, Sir!
 
logically, insulting users on their looks, trolling, gaslighting, bullying should be considered equally as immoral and rude as racism for you

it doesnt make sense to be sensitive to only racism, its just so stupid man. either stop doing all of them or none.
False equivalence. We get it you are a racist. But stop lumping racism and trolling as same. Both are bad but one is worse.

And @StrangerDanger is a white supermacist by the way
 
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Deleted member 16275
Im so fucking confused and what are you down for
Do south asians have bad maxilla or bad malars. Like besides nose what is it that separates them from menas
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275
False equivalence. We get it you are a racist. But stop lumping racism and trolling as same. Both are bad but one is worse.

And @StrangerDanger is a white supermacist by the way
Cope @StrangerDanger is unequivocally impartial when he is not being intentionally gaslighter
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16275 and Deleted member 17872
Cope @StrangerDanger is unequivocally impartial when he is not being intentionally gaslighter
He hates jews and asians. And tries to appropriate non-whites.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 23399 and Deleted member 16275
Cope @StrangerDanger is unequivocally impartial when he is not being intentionally gaslighter
do you think the whole fraud accusation ordeal is intentional on his part?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23399
do you think the whole fraud accusation ordeal is intentional on his part?
No it’s completely justified @StrangerDanger i will soon show stranger fully unfrauded video at all angles after which he will accept me again as his foremost disciple
 
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Deleted member 16275
No it’s completely justified @StrangerDanger i will soon show stranger fully unfrauded video at all angles after which he will accept me again as his foremost disciple
There's an alternative. Just get your face on an editorial and fraud as much as you want, and he'll rate you all the same.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16275
It's completely fine. If it's directed at homosexual acts and not against homosexual people.
Whats the logic behind that tf??

wait.. if you're a jew and you dont like homosexual acts, dont you hate tel aviv being called the gay capital or whatever?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23399 and Deleted member 17872
Is not being racist one way or another really possible when there's such differences between the races in terms of looks, IQ, height, general behavioral traits etc.? @Shieda_Kayn
There are far more differences between inbetween different individuals of a race than there is between races.

Race is a social construct anyway. And is not accepted as a biological classification by the scientific community.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275 and Deleted member 23399
Is not being racist one way or another really possible when there's such differences between the races in terms of looks, IQ, height, general behavioral traits etc.? @Shieda_Kayn
There are far more differences between inbetween different individuals of a race than there is between races.

Race is a social construct anyway. And is not accepted as a biological classification by the scientific community.
David is correct
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Deleted member 16275
There are far more differences between inbetween different individuals of a race than there is between races.
Do you anything to kinda prove this, like an example or something, to convince someone?

And Why even is there such a massive gap in IQ, between europeans and blacks for example?
And why did one particular race, europeans, get to colonise the entire world almost, while none else came close?
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: StrangerDanger
Do you anything to kinda prove this, like an example or something, to convince someone?
However, in a reanalysis of data from 377 microsatellite loci typed in 1056 individuals, Europeans proved to be more similar to Asians than to other Europeans 38% of the time (Bamshad et al. 2004; population definitions and data from Rosenberg et al. 2002).
The fact that, given enough genetic data, individuals can be correctly assigned to their populations of origin is compatible with the observation that most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them. It is also compatible with our finding that, even when the most distinct populations are considered and hundreds of loci are used, individuals are frequently more similar to members of other populations than to members of their own population. Thus, caution should be used when using geographic or genetic ancestry to make inferences about individual phenotypes.
And Why even is there such a massive gap in IQ, between europeans and blacks for example?
There is maybe some difference in intelligence between races but IQ is a bogus measure. A d north Europeans who are now considered intelligence were considered by Aristotle as dumb and incapable of civilization. So it's all relative.
And why did one particular race, europeans, get to colonise the entire world almost, while none else came close?
No. Mongols almost colonized the whole old world. Europe was Ottomans bitch for centuries. Arabs did it for a short time. Now Jews are more powerful than anybody. And it's seems the future belongs to China.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Deleted member 25663 and Deleted member 16275
Don't know what the fuck @David Rothschild and @inferiorpispot234 are arguing about. Not a single pixel but thank you for bumping the thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23399, Deleted member 16275 and Deleted member 17872
Don't know what the fuck @David Rothschild and @inferiorpispot234 are arguing about. Not a single pixel but thank you for bumping the thread
I will reply to your pms ASAP. I just got busy in a debate
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Deleted member 16275
It is, stop resisting my compliment. You are obsessing with your hairline and forgetting to acknowledge how beautiful your actual frontal bone is, it’s like being obsessed with your pubes when you got a 9x6 inch monster cock
Bro just let him continue his Arvid wannabe fantasies with his BDD quirkiness and all
 
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger
wbu? do you have any slightly racist beliefs?
I don’t care about systemic things tbh
I don’t spend any time thinking about macro issues only really care about myself and my issues lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275
IQ is a bogus measure
Wdym?
A d north Europeans who are now cosnidered intelligence were considered by Aristotle as dumb and incapable of civilizations
And he was wrong, right? look how capable of development they really are
No. Mongols almost colonized the whole old world. Europe was Ottomans bitch for centuries. Arabs did it for a short time. Now Jews are more powerful than anybody. And it's seems the future belongs to China
Seems consistent with my point tbh. Literally all the races you mention are high IQ, that's why they were able to conquer so much.

And the one race that you mention as ruling europe for only a short amount of time is the one thats got the lowest average IQ out of all the ones you mentioned :lul:
Coincidence? I sure wish it was but.. I cant seem to be able to convince myself tbh

Still all the races are caucasoid for the most part
Explain to me how Caucasoids and Blacks (Africans, Aborigines etc.) are equal enough? the difference is just way too much between them
 
Last edited:
I don’t care about systemic things tbh
I don’t spend any time thinking about macro issues only really care about myself and my issues lol
You literally have like probably 20k posts in total on an "self-improvement" forum (infested with racists). You 100% must have some opinions tbh, but ok if you dont wanna answer the question
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23399
You literally have like probably 20k posts in total on an "self-improvement" forum (infested with racists). You 100% must have some opinions tbh, but ok if you dont wanna answer the question
7k on old account and 750 here. Almost 80% of it has been satirical/parody to critisize hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance of the retards that make up vast majority of this forum. @David Rothschild would know.
And probably 20% is genuinely liking male aesthetics.
I've never genuinely participated in these other meta forum topics and don't care to since I don't hold any firm beliefs one way or the other about them. Kind of why I like @StrangerDanger so much as a user.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, StrangerDanger, Deleted member 16275 and 1 other person
Wdym?

And he was wrong, right? look how capable of development they really are

Seems consistent with my point tbh. Literally all the races you mention are high IQ, that's why they were able to conquer so much.

And the one race that you mention as ruling europe for only a short amount of time is the one thats got the lowest average IQ out of all the ones you mentioned :lul:
Coincidence? I sure wish it was but.. I cant seem to be able to convince myself tbh

Still all the races are caucasoid for the most part
Explain to me how Caucasoids and Blacks (Africans, Aborigines etc.) are equal enough? the difference is just way too much between them

Mongols and Chinese are both East Asian. East Asians are the only race to have been consistently near or at the top for all of history, not any other race who has dominated and then fallen. China will stay consistent like it has throughout all of history, and with mass globalization, modernization, modern technology, and the communication and access to other countries it has today that it never had in the past, it will very likely hold that position at the top for all time with maybe one contender that props up from time to time, like the Jews or high caste Indians for example. Anyways, refer to the first part of this post to clear things up.


The hierarchy goes Mongoloids > Caucasoids > Negroids in terms of both intelligence and brain size actually. Mongoloids and Caucasoids both have potential, Negroids and Australoids are the only ones who haven't come close to dominating anything given their low IQs. Mongolids and Caucasoids are much closer to each other than they are to the other two races. Here's something interesting actually.

"Lynn's meta-analysis lists the average IQ scores of East Asians (105), Europeans (99), the Inuit (91), Southeast Asians and indigenous peoples of the Americas each (87), Pacific Islanders (85), Middle Easterners, South Asians and North Africans each (84), East and West Africans (67), Australian Aborigines (62) and Bushmen and Pygmies (54).[69][70][71]"

Notice how the top 6 highest IQ races on average are all Mongoloid besides Europeans, the middle 3 are Caucasoid, and the bottom 5 are all Negroid or Australoid? The individual matters more than the race (seeing as how South Asians in the west are MUCH more intelligent on average), but looking at the averages shows a lot. There are pretty clear differences between each race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and Deleted member 16275
According to IQ tests i’m smarter than Richard Feynman. IQ test have shown to be have any correlation to job performance. Only thing it can predict is academic success because well if you are good at taking a test you are gonna do well academically. It’s circular.
And he was wrong, right? look how capable of development they really are
Not for his time tho. My point is if north Europeans who were one time were considered dumb can become the winners of the world. So can any "race". It's a great underdog story. A race which was considered inferior by everybody turned everything around and become their masters.
Seems consistent with my point tbh. Literally all the races you mention are high IQ, that's why they were able to conquer so much.
When did turks and arabs become high iq?
And the one race that you mention as ruling europe for only a short amount of time is the one thats got the lowest average IQ out of all the ones you mentioned :lul:
Coincidence? I sure wish it was but.. I cant seem to be able to convince myself tbh
you are vile racist and extremely stupid
Still all the races are caucasoid for the most part
No turks and mongols aren’t. But caucasian itself is a stupid classification.
Explain to me how Caucasoids and Blacks (Africans, Aborigines etc.) are equal enough? the difference is just way too much between them
How are they not? Jfl you are Indian. Most white people consider consider themselves closer to blacks than indians and arabs despite them being “caucasians”
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, StrangerDanger and Deleted member 16275
When did turks and arabs become high iq?
I just meant turks as it becomes clear later in my message

And why exactly are Turks high iq? Hmm? Cus maybe they're caucasoid + mongoloid. A mix of 2 high IQ races?
you are vile racist and extremely stupid
No i just want answers to questions that ive gotten as a result of being on this site, and in general too a little bit tbh
No turks and mongols aren’t.
Assume i said caucasoid/mongoloid since both are high IQ races.
How are they not?
IQ
But caucasian itself is a stupid classification.
Why?
 
According to IQ tests i’m smarter than Richard Feynman. IQ test have shown to be have any correlation to job performance. Only thing it can predict is academic success because well if you are good at taking a test you are gonna do well academically. It’s circular.

Not for his time tho. My point is if north Europeans who were one time were considered dumb can become the winners of the world. So can any "race". It's a great underdog story. A race which was considered inferior by everybody turned everything around and become their masters.

When did turks and arabs become high iq?


you are vile racist and extremely stupid

No turks and mongols aren’t. But caucasian itself is a stupid classification.

How are they not? Jfl you are Indian. Most white people consider consider themselves closer to blacks than indians and arabs despite them being “caucasians”

Was it a real verified IQ test or some online one? Anyways, any Caucasoids or Mongoloids both have potential and can both become intelligent. Look at the very low average IQ of Southeast Asians and South Asians in their home countries, but at look how they're higher IQ and make more money than every other race in the west on average. Jews actually originate from Arabs if I'm not mistaken. Arabs are Caucasoids very likely were intelligent during their golden ages, but now their countries are complete war torn poverty ridden shitholes and many sub-Saharan Africans have moved in and intermixed with them. You're 100% correct that Western and Northern Europeans were considered dumb and uncivilized and inferior by other races and were behind the Middle East and East Asia for 99% of history yet rose up and ran the world in the past few centuries, just like how MENA are completely the other way around. The Mongols ruled the world, starting from obscure hut dwelling nomads yet beat technologically superior armies that outnumbered them ten to one. They had the biggest contiguous empire and completely cucked the Arabs who cucked and enslaved pretty much every other race besides the East Asians. The Mongols spread more of their genetics than any other group in history and left the biggest genetic mark of all time on the world in only a century, but look where they're at now. However, what do all of these groups I mentioned have in common? They're Mongoloid or Caucasoid, who are much closer to each other than they are to the Negroids or Australoids and diverged from each other much later in history. Tell me, what Negroid or Australoid majority country has EVER conquered a non Negroid or Australoid majority country? When have they ever made an impact on the rest of the world in all of history? Exactly. Just like there are differences between wolves and poodles, there are differences between human races even if the individual matters more than the race. However, I will admit the differences are becoming less pronounced since the playing field is becoming more level for all races.

1677358716654
 
However, what do all of these groups I mentioned have in common? They're Mongoloid or Caucasoid, who are much closer to each other than they are to the Negroids or Australoids and diverged from each other much later in history. Tell me, what Negroid or Australoid majority country has EVER conquered a non Negroid or Australoid majority country? When have they ever made an impact on the rest of the world in all of history?
This is my main question that troubles me @David Rothschild

Why is there such discrepancy in IQ between caucasoids/mongoloids and negroids/austroloids?
Whatever the reason, how is it possible to see them as equal enough to avoid having slightly racist beliefs really?
 
Was it a real verified IQ test or some online one? Anyways, any Caucasoids or Mongoloids both have potential and can both become intelligent. Look at the very low average IQ of Southeast Asians and South Asians in their home countries, but at look how they're higher IQ and make more money than every other race in the west on average. Jews actually originate from Arabs if I'm not mistaken. Arabs are Caucasoids very likely were intelligent during their golden ages, but now their countries are complete war torn poverty ridden shitholes and many sub-Saharan Africans have moved in and intermixed with them. You're 100% correct that Western and Northern Europeans were considered dumb and uncivilized and inferior by other races and were behind the Middle East and East Asia for 99% of history yet rose up and ran the world in the past few centuries, just like how MENA are completely the other way around. The Mongols ruled the world, starting from obscure hut dwelling nomads yet beat technologically superior armies that outnumbered them ten to one. They had the biggest contiguous empire and completely cucked the Arabs who cucked and enslaved pretty much every other race besides the East Asians. The Mongols spread more of their genetics than any other group in history and left the biggest genetic mark of all time on the world in only a century, but look where they're at now. However, what do all of these groups I mentioned have in common? They're Mongoloid or Caucasoid, who are much closer to each other than they are to the Negroids or Australoids and diverged from each other much later in history. Tell me, what Negroid or Australoid majority country has EVER conquered a non Negroid or Australoid majority country? When have they ever made an impact on the rest of the world in all of history? Exactly. Just like there are differences between wolves and poodles, there are differences between human races even if the individual matters more than the race. However, I will admit the differences are becoming less pronounced since the playing field is becoming more level for all races.

View attachment 2091468
Too much dumb shit. Indians aren’t Caucasoid despite the misunderstanding.
Also all SSA aren’t negroid. Only west africaners are. Anyway racial classification is dumb. Ethiopia conquered Yemen. Nubia conquered Egypt. Tamils conquered South East Asia.

Plus the australoid were the first seafarers.

The wolf poodle analogy is stupid because they have far more genetic drift and can’t reproduce with each other.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur

Similar threads

VisageVirtuoso√
Replies
30
Views
9K
handsomegrapist
handsomegrapist
D
Replies
40
Views
5K
currywhowillascends
C
enchanted_elixir
Replies
25
Views
4K
Deleted member 26622
D
D
Replies
17
Views
5K
SurgeryEnjoyer
SurgeryEnjoyer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top