Accepting/consenting to modern dating is cucked - your ancestors would've called you a cuck (BRUTAL)

irrumator praetor

irrumator praetor

Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Posts
5,393
Reputation
6,637
This video from PGM got me thinking


If you seriously sat down with your ancestors/older generations of men and explained modern dating to them, they would simply call you a cuck. First of all, if you told them all of society is like this, they would call your society insane for all collectively agreeing to this cucking. They would not believe that all men in this society are consenting cucks, but WE are.

This is the iron law of the looksmatch, its also the pinkpill:
all women will end up settling for their own looksmatch (or below, depending how hard they deride their value). They will also hate their looksmatch and will act accordingly (they'll hate your guts) because chad used them and they have unrealistic fantasies of chad committing his worthwhile life to that retarded and delusional MTB.

Ofc we are far beyond arguing if this is dysgenic or not, obviously it is. It leads to lower birthrates, and with feminism it leads to females being UNABLE to form stable long term relationships.

So instead of having a system of decency, we have all the oofy doofies pimping their looksmatches out for Chad until they get their turn with their LTR. Thats cucking with extra steps, all because we're "moral" and giving them the right to choose in an environment where the playing field is levelled/dynamics are levelled/men have no advantage they'd naturally have in the sexual marketplace/women are masculinized and men are feminized (baphomet system).

So because these forces have achieved their goal, and ALL women are troubled mentally, we have this modern hell. Its perfectly described here, a tranny goatman pedophile:

if this symbolism isn't evident to you then what are you doing:lul:

Instead of simplyfing and making dating efficient, we "let them choose" but in reality they always had the ability to choose, rather lets call it what it is, WE ENABLE THEM TO WHORE THEMSELVES OUT to their lusts, before ending up EXACTLY WHERE THEY WOULD'VE ENDED UP ANYWAY if there were decency laws, no feminism, no dating hookup culture etc. WE ARE ALL CUCKS. The sooner all western and european faggots accept this, "free and cosmopolitan" faggots accept this, the fact we all whore our generations of women out to chads FOR FREE, for no fucking reason as theres nothing moral about this, free or liberal, "muh sophisticated" fuck you faggot. Its only profitable for rich people because they're pimping YOUR WOMEN OUT not theirs, JFL. Thats why its "sophisticated, western liberal and cosmpolitan" yea also its CAPITALISTIC because they're whoring your women out for profit (profit in the form of the looksmaxing industry: makeup, pharma, etc). Oh but if you say all these things foids will give you the "side eye" IDGAF. If you tell women to stop whoring themselves out to chad ofc they'll give you the "side eye", but if the "side eye" works on you, YOU'RE A PUSSY WHIPPED FAGGOT. A TOTAL FAGGOT. Hence you're a CUCK. This is a CUCK society. Men foolishly accepted this (in the past) thinking THEY would be the ones slaying, THEY wouldn't be the ones paying the price in LTR stability (so at the receiving end of this arrangement - a cuck). They all thought they'd fool the OTHER GUY, and they would be fine. THAT is who your older generation is when this shit was established. WELL, IT DIDN'T WORK OUT THAT WAY. So lets get with the times, drop the copes, and see it for what it is.

It may be water, but it needs to be made evident and explained.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Kazey, dyingrich, Vantablack and 34 others
All that yap for me to say

DNR
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: mogdog, Deleted member 342376, yochico_yojordan and 4 others
  • +1
Reactions: Oopity
Dating, for women, looks like this after they exit puberty: essentially an endless competition for best possible experiences, as many chads as possible, getting a highscore (bodycount) and what I posted about in a previous thread of mine, trials to learn manipulating men, and finally then settling down for their looksmatch (what I mentioned). Originally, afaik, the dating period was meant for finding the ideal partner or seeing if a person is the right fit for you or not, but as soon as the expectation to marry early ended, the time for dating (which would've been maybe a year or 2 max) extended to your 30s (so by like 10x lol instead of marrying by 22 you marry by 30 LOL) and dating didn't stay about finding the right person, it became: who has the sharpest jawline, the biggest dick, seeing how far the foid can go before she has to settle into the patriarchal slavery (a family) even though divorce courts are all feminist as well as the laws, even though everything favors the foid.

So foids after puberty run a marathon until they're 30. Dating in school etc. dating as early as possible also became a thing slowly, beyond simple crushes, as decency also deroded, and younger and younger foids started dressing inappropriately, as school became a place for inter-foid competition and a trial-period of the dating marathon they'd run from their 20s to their 30s. Ofc during the early period we had gender separated schooling too. So you see how this all progressed and devolved
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: mogdog, Vantablack, Maruosa and 9 others
Men literally did this to themselves
 
  • +1
Reactions: mogdog, Maruosa, Luquier and 4 others
what are we supposed to do now

left with the sins of our fathers :feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maruosa, yochico_yojordan, Divineincel and 1 other person
Dating in school etc. dating as early as possible also became a thing slowly, beyond simple crushes, as decency also deroded, and younger and younger foids started dressing inappropriately, as school became a place for inter-foid competition and a trial-period of the dating marathon they'd run from their 20s to their 30s.
yes, the past few years i was in school it was horrible.

i cant tell you the amount of young girls that were pretty much identical to miami whores, part of the reason why i left my school
 
  • +1
Reactions: mogdog, Luquier, Divineincel and 1 other person
the true bp , everyone looksmaxxes and shit but they never think about these things it's crazy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maruosa, d0ctorgk, vermicel and 1 other person
Dating is a low testosterone trait.

Water Day Loop GIF by Pi-Slices
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Vantablack, Maruosa, Luquier and 5 others
Even Chad doesn't benefit from this, everyone loses, because its not like chad gets a perfect mentally stable virgin. He gets radical feminist stacy whose been pimped out to other chads like him. But its pretty weird that you gotta explain to others that even chad doesn't benefit, as if all these arguments aren't enough, as if your own displeasure is not enough of an argument. The "eugenics-cucks". Thats some serious subconscious cuck mentality, "if im not winning but someone else is the system is still working bro!" jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vantablack, Maruosa, arch_caelum and 11 others
So instead of having a system of decency, we have all the oofy doofies pimping their looksmatches out for Chad until they get their turn with their LTR
:lul: True as fuck. Imagine getting your first girlfriend at 30--the fate of many men.

and dating didn't stay about finding the right person
Yeah. That was one of the benefits that western relationships had for a short time. You could actually get to know who you were marrying and do family planning so your children had better lives, a virtuous thing to do. In the late nineteenth century, the parents of children from the lower classes and village folks arranged their children marriages, because life was so hardcore and there were no washing machines or indoor plumbing. After the war and in the fifties, life was easy, penicillin had been invented, but the attitudes of harder times and no birth control pill meant that women and men still had the goal of family and future in mind. Now it's super hedonistic possibly owing to how easy life has become with antibiotics and fossil fuels. Women are encouraged to find themselves (in many one night stands) rather than encouraged to plan for the future.

seeing how far the foid can go before she has to settle into the patriarchal slavery
Yeah man. Civilization is actively asphyxiating itself by teaching new women that family and children are oppression. The immigrants coming in from poorer countries will have their second-generation women act the same. I wonder what it will be like when all countries have the infrastructure of the West which is the infrastructure that grows a huge population of incels and these harems of young women and the Chads of social media.

the fact we all whore our generations of women out to chads FOR FREE
We don't. The women make their own choices with their own smartphones and cellar network connections and dating apps or social media accounts. If they whore themselves out to Chads, that was their choice. We, most guys, all incels don't factor into this at all, besides enriching them if they open their OnlyFans.

I agree. But you're missing the point that you have no choice in the matter besides MGTOW (that's MSTOW if incels do it), because the telecommunications and transportation technology and infrastructure is here and the women make their own money at their jobs and make their own choices on how many times and years that they want their face or hole is plastered in cum before they see the wrinkles and feel their overies shrinking.

So don't blame the man. Don't blame us. No man who is blackpilled would choose this world of limitless connectivity, because it's what makes the average man have literally no value and be instantly replaced. If it were possible and if it were my choice to ban computer networks and shut people into the cities that they were born in I'd do it to give us incels a chance at a future.

Even Chad doesn't benefit from this
Too far. This is now coping. The thing is women actually like being in the vicinity of Chad. His face and frame makes her comfortable and feel okay. Chad gets sex on tap when he's young, and then commits to one slay he calls the one when his wrinkles have come in. I would like to believe Chad is suffering, but that's really not the case if you meet any of them.

Men literally did this to themselves
Technically. I mean, as somebody based once said in live chat, "men built the tools of their own obsolescence."

Dating is a low testosterone trait.
Dating is a low bone-mass trait you mean :chad::chad::chad:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Maruosa, SoundnVision, fxckz and 3 others
@Sicilian Cyclops
@Acquiescence
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acquiescence
@Sicilian Cyclops
@Acquiescence
I see no feasible solution to all this

Try to carve out an individual win condition in as much is possible for yourself, and let the greater forces at play collide and explode
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zukiteru, mrdouchebag and Lookologist003
We don't. The women make their own choices with their own smartphones and cellar network connections and dating apps or social media accounts. If they whore themselves out to Chads, that was their choice. We, most guys, all incels don't factor into this at all, besides enriching them if they open their OnlyFans.

I agree. But you're missing the point that you have no choice in the matter besides MGTOW (that's MSTOW if incels do it), because the telecommunications and transportation technology and infrastructure is here and the women make their own money at their jobs and make their own choices on how many times and years that they want their face or hole is plastered in cum before they see the wrinkles and feel their overies shrinking.

So don't blame the man. Don't blame us. No man who is blackpilled would choose this world of limitless connectivity, because it's what makes the average man have literally no value and be instantly replaced. If it were possible and if it were my choice to ban computer networks and shut people into the cities that they were born in I'd do it to give us incels a chance at a future.
I blame all of us, including myself, my own whole family and just everyone in general, because we act upon this by giving our CONSENT. Every day, with every cope, we give our consent. We consent to the cucking, the consent is collective. We could change all of this in a few weeks, but we choose not to. We agree to the cucking, all of us, even if I disagree on the individual level, you or me.

The answer also isn't to regress in technology, its to un-subvert the laws and society. If we lose the tech, we lose out.:blackpill:

Too far. This is now coping. The thing is women actually like being in the vicinity of Chad. His face and frame makes her comfortable and feel okay. Chad gets sex on tap when he's young, and then commits to one slay he calls the one when his wrinkles have come in. I would like to believe Chad is suffering, but that's really not the case if you meet any of them.
I was talking about the scenario of LTR. His marriage with stacy will nonetheless be UNSTABLE. > Brad Pitt, Tom Brady. They traded many ONS for a stable family, this is at the highest level
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
I see no feasible solution to all this

Try to carve out an individual win condition in as much is possible for yourself, and let the greater forces at play collide and explode
thats if raising awareness and enacting change is impossible, by a lot of men uniting to overturn the status quo
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003 and Acquiescence
btw im talking about like political protests not some neo-hitlerite resurrection and end times eschatology
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acquiescence
thats if raising awareness and enacting change is impossible, by a lot of men uniting to overturn the status quo
I’m not going to say it’s impossible but highly, highly unlikely
 
  • +1
Reactions: jonbonjovi and irrumator praetor
dnr tldr pls
 
dnr tldr pls
title is tldr

we need to return to tradition jfl thats the tldr and modern dating = cucking

its just a long ass post detailing how modern dating is cucking, nothing new though

actually modern dating = pimping out your looksmatch before you two finally LTR
 
ancestors lived in the rapepill
 
  • JFL
Reactions: irrumator praetor
I see no feasible solution to all this

Try to carve out an individual win condition in as much is possible for yourself, and let the greater forces at play collide and explode
Men will bend, and being the stepdad or having no girlfriend throughout your teens and twenties will become commonplace and will be the status quo of the coming decades.

In a grander way it makes me think that our civilization will slowly erode like the fall of Rome. Strangled not by bureaucrats, but by Chads hands on the necks and hair of women who would have been married and not having children at age fourty.

The answer also isn't to regress in technology, its to un-subvert the laws and society. If we lose the tech, we lose out.:blackpill:
The answer is complicated and invokes human nature. I don't think you respect that it is the satellites and telephone lines that enable Zoomer women to forgo 99% of mankind entirely and focus on the couple tens of millions of Chads who speak their language (and I have heard of a Chad sex story where the woman didn't even speak the same language as the Chad who banged her ass). The system of Zoomer sex is that the Chads are passed around like a hot potato, and each woman gets a six to twelve week churn with him. Each woman does that for five guys or something until 30. Sometimes they become jaded and decide to skip any conceptions of family and determine that they're going to use guys for sex. Then they write to a female magazine about how their ex stole their childbearing years or something that they had control over the course of.

We could change all of this in a few weeks
Please explain how, because I've explained how we can not: the technology and internet wires we are using right now. You say its not telecommunications tech. Then what is it?

FACEandLMS's Four Pillars at the beginning of WAW6 captures the reason for inceldom in the West in four points
Pillars

It's many MGTOW talking-points completed and complied with blackpilled looks pill shit, and it is the shrine of reason in our new era of smartphones. The points are labeled chronologically: (1) Since we came down from the trees; (2) since the Industrial Revolution, heat engines, and cheap energy, men's muscles are increasingly needed less in rich countries as tertiary and services industry grows; (3 and 4) since very recent political changes and the mass proliferation of landlines (80s), then cellphones (90s), then smartphones (2000s), then social media (2010s).

I mean, how you could claim that this isn't cause and effect and is instead some enemy that incels can unite against, I would like to know.

we need to return to tradition
Again, the departure from tradition was because of technology enabling new ways of life. Technology is the driver of all this. You mustn't have a very strong image of the past or of times before you if you think that the tradition of child brides didn't come about because of necessity and survival. Western marriages used to have a dowry because so much was at stake, it was the survival of the father's bloodline, so he would pay to make sure that the new family can have a home.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Maruosa and irrumator praetor
They thought by liberating women sexually will make sex easy but they went for chad instead
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luquier, mrdouchebag, MoggedSubhuman and 1 other person
Fuck everyone
 
  • JFL
Reactions: irrumator praetor
The answer is complicated and invokes human nature
I agree, in the sense that the part of human nature I think would be necessary to invoke would be the part where we make a conscious effort, despite new technology, to keep women in check. Look at the israelis, how they adapted, their birth rates are still normal. How are they still able to benefit from modern technology while it enslaves us? Its a skill issue, subversion aside. Our fault, our weakness, we.


I don't think you respect that it is the satellites and telephone lines that enable Zoomer women to forgo 99% of mankind entirely and focus on the couple tens of millions of Chads who speak their language (and I have heard of a Chad sex story where the woman didn't even speak the same language as the Chad who banged her ass).

Yes but theres a whole system that supports this exact behavior because this behavior is intended. And without the backbone of that system, it can't continue


The system of Zoomer sex is that the Chads are passed around like a hot potato, and each woman gets a six to twelve week churn with him. Each woman does that for five guys or something until 30. Sometimes they become jaded and decide to skip any conceptions of family and determine that they're going to use guys for sex. Then they write to a female magazine about how their ex stole their childbearing years or something that they had control over the course of.
yea its pretty brutal and its gonna get worse before we see consequences that will follow


Please explain how, because I've explained how we can not: the technology and internet wires we are using right now. You say its not telecommunications tech. Then what is it?

FACEandLMS's Four Pillars at the beginning of WAW6 captures the reason for inceldom in the West in four points
Pillars

It's many MGTOW talking-points completed and complied with blackpilled looks pill shit, and it is the shrine of reason in our new era of smartphones. The points are labeled chronologically: (1) Since we came down from the trees; (2) since the Industrial Revolution, heat engines, and cheap energy, men's muscles are increasingly needed less in rich countries as tertiary and services industry grows; (3 and 4) since very recent political changes and the mass proliferation of landlines (80s), then cellphones (90s), then smartphones (2000s), then social media (2010s).

I mean, how you could claim that this isn't cause and effect and is instead some enemy that incels can unite against, I would like to know.
I meant change in a political sort of way, because at the end of the day, majority of men still have the physical power necessary to control the state. It would be a powerful struggle against the state, but its possible with conscious effort and popular support/blackpill.

In the FaceAndLMS presentation you have shown, from the points 2 and 3 there was a conscious effort to undermine men and get us where we are today, as our position today is a long lasting project. Thats saying, it could've been avoided, but wasn't.

Yes, in SMV men are needed less due to technological advancement, but its more like, men are needed in a different kind of way rather than the ogre primal way of hunting etc. Men still are the majorty stakeholders on power, if they're able to coordinate. You can argue against this with issues of class and wealth differences, but nonetheless, if men are able to wrestle their way out of this, men are able to make a change. You can also argue that technology controls us rather than that we control technology, but then how is it that we can engineer society how we want it to be with laws and intention? Why haven't we descended into anarchy yet, with how many guns anyone can get, and overwhelm police departments? Yet we still choose order. In a similar way could we curb something as retarded as foids
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
Without doubt
Back in the day 1 bc meant u were hoe now everything is normal and u can fuck millions of men
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
This video from PGM got me thinking


If you seriously sat down with your ancestors/older generations of men and explained modern dating to them, they would simply call you a cuck. First of all, if you told them all of society is like this, they would call your society insane for all collectively agreeing to this cucking. They would not believe that all men in this society are consenting cucks, but WE are.

This is the iron law of the looksmatch, its also the pinkpill:
all women will end up settling for their own looksmatch (or below, depending how hard they deride their value). They will also hate their looksmatch and will act accordingly (they'll hate your guts) because chad used them and they have unrealistic fantasies of chad committing his worthwhile life to that retarded and delusional MTB.

Ofc we are far beyond arguing if this is dysgenic or not, obviously it is. It leads to lower birthrates, and with feminism it leads to females being UNABLE to form stable long term relationships.

So instead of having a system of decency, we have all the oofy doofies pimping their looksmatches out for Chad until they get their turn with their LTR. Thats cucking with extra steps, all because we're "moral" and giving them the right to choose in an environment where the playing field is levelled/dynamics are levelled/men have no advantage they'd naturally have in the sexual marketplace/women are masculinized and men are feminized (baphomet system).

So because these forces have achieved their goal, and ALL women are troubled mentally, we have this modern hell. Its perfectly described here, a tranny goatman pedophile:

if this symbolism isn't evident to you then what are you doing:lul:

Instead of simplyfing and making dating efficient, we "let them choose" but in reality they always had the ability to choose, rather lets call it what it is, WE ENABLE THEM TO WHORE THEMSELVES OUT to their lusts, before ending up EXACTLY WHERE THEY WOULD'VE ENDED UP ANYWAY if there were decency laws, no feminism, no dating hookup culture etc. WE ARE ALL CUCKS. The sooner all western and european faggots accept this, "free and cosmopolitan" faggots accept this, the fact we all whore our generations of women out to chads FOR FREE, for no fucking reason as theres nothing moral about this, free or liberal, "muh sophisticated" fuck you faggot. Its only profitable for rich people because they're pimping YOUR WOMEN OUT not theirs, JFL. Thats why its "sophisticated, western liberal and cosmpolitan" yea also its CAPITALISTIC because they're whoring your women out for profit (profit in the form of the looksmaxing industry: makeup, pharma, etc). Oh but if you say all these things foids will give you the "side eye" IDGAF. If you tell women to stop whoring themselves out to chad ofc they'll give you the "side eye", but if the "side eye" works on you, YOU'RE A PUSSY WHIPPED FAGGOT. A TOTAL FAGGOT. Hence you're a CUCK. This is a CUCK society. Men foolishly accepted this (in the past) thinking THEY would be the ones slaying, THEY wouldn't be the ones paying the price in LTR stability (so at the receiving end of this arrangement - a cuck). They all thought they'd fool the OTHER GUY, and they would be fine. THAT is who your older generation is when this shit was established. WELL, IT DIDN'T WORK OUT THAT WAY. So lets get with the times, drop the copes, and see it for what it is.

It may be water, but it needs to be made evident and explained.

dnr but i agree with the title so thats good enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
Why haven't we descended into anarchy yet, with how many guns anyone can get, and overwhelm police departments? Yet we still choose order. In a similar way could we curb something as retarded as foids
There is only one way to kill the beast that men have created, and it's to take out the organs of the machine.
You must either
  1. Sever all phone lines and destroy the internet
  2. Burn all computers and smartphones
  3. Prohibit all social media and OLD
  4. Create an economic landscape such that women depend on a man to survive
There is no other way. Men can only try erase the marketplaces that they've made for women to shop for men like they do dresses. But it's futile because of the the free market.

You can't do 1 for so many reasons. How would you feel if you couldn't reach the ambulance service?
2 could be possible, but ludicrously infeasible. Do a reverse 2008 and tell everybody to put away the things that have quite literally never been away from them longer than a day. Yeah good luck with convincing men to do that.
3 is in motion in small degree. But these things are so large that they're like a mold.
4 is impossible because our cities would devolve into Calcutta, India with all of the poverty and crime that would create. The introduction of the welfare state is spilled milk.

So the beast is indestructible and he will bring change to the status quo of family and male female relationships over the next decade.

We can't all go back to working in horrendous conditions in coal mines and foundries and undo years of economic development and specialization. If you go to poor parts of poor countries, women are pressured to get with a guy for stability. But we live in rich countries with many luxuries, cheap food and section 8 housing.

I think your argument is that we can undo this. But we can't undo it for the points I listed above.

Yes but theres a whole system that supports this exact behavior because this behavior is intended. And without the backbone of that system, it can't continue
It's getting very conspiratorial. The behavior is intended? It seems like a freak accident to me. Freak accident and the consequences of enterprise in the free market. Online dating on a phone is right up women's alley. And they love the attention they get from TikTok and Instagram and the shareholders of those companies who advertise cosmetics and cope supplements love the dividends.

Why do you think it is intended and who intends it?

Look at the israelis, how they adapted, their birth rates are still normal. How are they still able to benefit from modern technology while it enslaves us?
I'm not so familiar with the statistics authority of that country. And the Middle East is hard to compare to the West. I can't comment as I'm not equipped with the facts necessary. Though I do seem to remember that Rehab Room did a piece with the details in this video.

 
Last edited:
After reading this, I've had an epiphany, unironically.
I'll start by stating the obvious. If your wife is getting porked by another dude, you're a cuck,
However, here is where the epiphany emerged.
Back in the olden days, most men got with their wives very young and their wives were virginal maidens.
So when someone porked your wife behind your back, he was porking a woman who had only been with you her entire life up to that point, thus making you a cuck.
Meanwhile today most wives are run through already, whether it's 10 guys or 100 guys, it doesn't really matter. Plenty of dicks have passed inside of them.
Married men nowadays are cucks by default. Their wives had already been porked by god knows how many guys before they even got married to them.

Unless you marry a virgin, you are essentially a cuck, no ifs or buts. Welcome to cuckcity central, cuck.

Funny GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maruosa, MoggedSubhuman, arch_caelum and 2 others
There is only one way to kill the beast that men have created, and it's to take out the organs of the machine.
You must either
  1. Sever all phone lines and destroy the internet
  2. Burn all computers and smartphones
  3. Prohibit all social media and OLD
  4. Create an economic landscape such that women depend on a man to survive
There is no other way. Men can only try erase the marketplaces that they've made for women to shop for men like they do dresses. But it's futile because of the the free market.

You can't do 1 for so many reasons. How would you feel if you couldn't reach the ambulance service?
2 could be possible, but ludicrously infeasible. Do a reverse 2008 and tell everybody to put away the things that have quite literally never been away from them longer than a day. Yeah good luck with convincing men to do that.
3 is in motion in small degree. But these things are so large that they're like a mold.
4 is impossible because our cities would devolve into Calcutta, India with all of the poverty and crime that would create. The introduction of the welfare state is spilled milk.

So the beast is indestructible and he will bring change to the status quo of family and male female relationships over the next decade.
You're talking from a practical perspective, how you would change the situation from this point onwards. I was talking from an idealistic perspective, regarding how things should've/could've been (removed of circumstance). Im talking outside the box, you're talking about current "practical" means, and calling those practical possibilities impractical, which I agree.
We can't all go back to working in horrendous conditions in coal mines and foundries and undo years of economic development and specialization. If you go to poor parts of poor countries, women are pressured to get with a guy for stability. But we live in rich countries with many luxuries, cheap food and section 8 housing.

I think your argument is that we can undo this. But we can't undo it for the points I listed above.
I didn't say so


It's getting very conspiratorial. The behavior is intended? It seems like a freak accident to me. Freak accident and the consequences of enterprise in the free market. Online dating on a phone is right up women's alley. And they love the attention they get from TikTok and Instagram and the shareholders of those companies who advertise cosmetics and cope supplements love the dividends.
tldr kikes and freemasons ever since post ww2 but even shortly before ww2


I'm not so familiar with the statistics authority of that country.
they culture and jurisprudence mog. Only country to be technologically advanced with replacement fertility rates, they selectively use and engineer their usage of tech in order to benefit (what i was talking about)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maruosa and Lookologist003
After reading this, I've had an epiphany, unironically.
I'll start by stating the obvious. If your wife is getting porked by another dude, you're a cuck,
However, here is where the epiphany emerged.
Back in the olden days, most men got with their wives very young and their wives were virginal maidens.
So when someone porked your wife behind your back, he was porking a woman who had only been with you her entire life up to that point, thus making you a cuck.
Meanwhile today most wives are run through already, whether it's 10 guys or 100 guys, it doesn't really matter. Plenty of dicks have passed inside of them.
Married men nowadays are cucks by default. Their wives had already been porked by god knows how many guys before they even got married to them.

Unless you marry a virgin, you are essentially a cuck, no ifs or buts. Welcome to cuckcity central, cuck.

Funny GIF
the game was rigged from the start
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag
I’ve told my mom time and time again that this is the most cucked time period to be a man. A white man at that. She doesn’t have any concept of it though she divorced my dad and wants to remarry jfl. Fuck this fucking country it’s gone to absolutely fucking shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
Good thread though. How the fuck did us men let it get this way? Where did it go so horribly wrong. My ancestors would spit on me for accepting this cuckery
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
tldr kikes and freemasons ever since post ww2 but even shortly before ww2
I don't know any of the arguments, but it seems really stupid to try destroy the civilization that we all benefit from. If Jews wanted to depopulate the Earth that means there will be less scientists to find cures for disease, less surveyors to locate oil deposits needed to heat their mansions, less farmers to operate the tractors, less actors and story writers to entertain them. I can't believe in a conspiracy theory like that because if you benefit from the division of labor, then you need labor to actually divide in the first place, and bipedal robots don't exist yet.

The reason slavery was attractive and widespread throughout antiquity and the colonial ages was because steam engines hadn't been invented and you need humans to do the labor.

After reading this, I've had an epiphany
So few people have read City of Eros. It's mind blowing what women get away with. Many guys married prostitutes without ever knowing in the 19th Century.

Only country to be technologically advanced with replacement fertility rates, they selectively use and engineer their usage of tech in order to benefit (what i was talking about)
My assumption is that it won't stay that way and in the most metropolitan centers it is not that way. How do they engineer their tech to benefit?
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor and mrdouchebag
My assumption is that it won't stay that way and in the most metropolitan centers it is not that way. How do they engineer their tech to benefit?
it will because of religion and i was primarily thinking about the ultra orthodox.
Well they outlaw phones for foids and use flip-phones to dopaminemaxx while benefitting from tech in education etc. lol its very simple bro

I don't know any of the arguments, but it seems really stupid to try destroy the civilization that we all benefit from. If Jews wanted to depopulate the Earth that means there will be less scientists to find cures for disease, less surveyors to locate oil deposits needed to heat their mansions, less farmers to operate the tractors, less actors and story writers to entertain them. I can't believe in a conspiracy theory like that because if you benefit from the division of labor, then you need labor to actually divide in the first place, and bipedal robots don't exist yet.

The reason slavery was attractive and widespread throughout antiquity and the colonial ages was because steam engines hadn't been invented and you need humans to do the labor.
civilization continues because its more about shaping the new israeli empire
 
civilization continues because its more about shaping the new israeli empire
An empire needs a workforce. If women aren't making the next generation, there is no more workforce and there are no elites. So I refuse to believe that the elites are so stupid as to want to kill their own workforce because of one complex or another. No matter which way you look at it, depopulation is a very stupid idea for the rich. They literally benefit more if there are more poor people as in the definition of wealth.

Well they outlaw phones for foids
I've never heard of such a thing. How does that even come to pass? Women in Saudi Arabia are being allowed to drive these days.
 
Even Chad doesn't benefit from this, everyone loses, because its not like chad gets a perfect mentally stable virgin. He gets radical feminist stacy whose been pimped out to other chads like him. But its pretty weird that you gotta explain to others that even chad doesn't benefit, as if all these arguments aren't enough, as if your own displeasure is not enough of an argument. The "eugenics-cucks". Thats some serious subconscious cuck mentality, "if im not winning but someone else is the system is still working bro!" jfl
If you're not JBMAXXING in 2026 what are you doing?!
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
An empire needs a workforce. If women aren't making the next generation, there is no more workforce and there are no elites. So I refuse to believe that the elites are so stupid as to want to kill their own workforce because of one complex or another. No matter which way you look at it, depopulation is a very stupid idea for the rich. They literally benefit more if there are more poor people as in the definition of wealth.
Ok so you're confused as to why western elites are seemingly undermining their own future for the sake of some other elites. Thats because western elites are reactionary to the banking elite, which is also the foreign elite. And if you're confused as to why banking elites are so powerful and why everyone listens to them, thats because historically, whichever nation bankers supported in a war, that nation won. So, local elites had to play ball. In the modern period its less about the threat of war, more about the threat of being assassinated. Also, they have the power to cause financial collapse, etc. So western elites will simply relocate to the new israeli empire
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
Ok so you're confused as to why western elites are seemingly undermining their own future for the sake of some other elites. Thats because western elites are reactionary to the banking elite, which is also the foreign elite. And if you're confused as to why banking elites are so powerful and why everyone listens to them, thats because historically, whichever nation bankers supported in a war, that nation won. So, local elites had to play ball. In the modern period its less about the threat of war, more about the threat of being assassinated. Also, they have the power to cause financial collapse, etc. So western elites will simply relocate to the new israeli empire
tldr even if certain decisions don't make sense for western elites, they have to do what they're told, because its the wish of someone else

Its the wish of someone else because its a geopolitical strategy for israel in the future

hopefully thats enough of an explanation otherwise go watch predictive history because he explains it well
 
And if you're confused as to why banking elites are so powerful and why everyone listens to them, thats because historically, whichever nation bankers supported in a war
What! That's makes no sense. To me that makes no sense. Historically whichever adversary that a bank among banks funded won? That can only be conceivable after the conception of the military-industrial complex if it ever can be. No, banks are a way to regulate an economy. But the economy is very related to the labour that is available. The influence of banks must be related to the size of the economy that they regulate. So why would the elite bankers be so retarded as to want depopulation and a smaller economy. Are they secretly trying to save the planet and stop how much energy we use each day?

This makes no sense. There are no elites if there are no cities and few humans on earth. If we all but 20 000 died any billionaire would be very fucked because that money means absolutely nothing when there is no labor available. This is economic science 101; the very rudiments of any economy, division of labour. These elites must be at risk of choking themselves when they're tying their shoelaces.

they have to do what they're told, because its the wish of someone else
Somebody deathly stupid and takes everything for granted apparently.

hopefully thats enough of an explanation otherwise go watch predictive history because he explains it well
Maybe I will. I don't know if I'm bored enough to pick from that bread basket. I feel like my time would be better spent in realms that I know about, like guy's jawlines and eye areas.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Lookologist003
read up on history
I know plenty. If you want to spread this idea and covert me you give me the references. Who taught you?

Something that I know about history is that money wasn't commonplace outside of cities until about 200 years ago as people in disconnected villages bartered. Banks don't decide who wins a war. It's whoever has the muskets and the manpower, or the atomic bombs. The industry that makes the weapons only thrives in an economy where there are banks, so they can do their business and investments can happen. My point is that banks regulate an economy, but science and the infrastructure of the fabrication of weapons and the battlements are more important than the links between them. Banks might be important if there is much global trade. But you're being so vague that I don't know what era you suppose that banks become the Illuminati and pull all the strings. And even still trade slows down in wartime. Both the idea that banks choose who wins a war and the idea that elite bankers are so clever that they want to shrink the economy so much that they will be plowing the fields for their food themselves are stupid ideas. So I will return to my point that it's the march of science and technology and the forces of curiosity and application in a free market that has caused young women to act the way that they do and my rejection of the conspiracies that it's an easily defined enemy, who's apparently very very stupid and doesn't understand what wealth is in its abstract form.

I'm bored as hell. If you have any arguments that I'm a stupid moron or can find those references, indulge me.
 
This video from PGM got me thinking


If you seriously sat down with your ancestors/older generations of men and explained modern dating to them, they would simply call you a cuck. First of all, if you told them all of society is like this, they would call your society insane for all collectively agreeing to this cucking. They would not believe that all men in this society are consenting cucks, but WE are.

This is the iron law of the looksmatch, its also the pinkpill:
all women will end up settling for their own looksmatch (or below, depending how hard they deride their value). They will also hate their looksmatch and will act accordingly (they'll hate your guts) because chad used them and they have unrealistic fantasies of chad committing his worthwhile life to that retarded and delusional MTB.

Ofc we are far beyond arguing if this is dysgenic or not, obviously it is. It leads to lower birthrates, and with feminism it leads to females being UNABLE to form stable long term relationships.

So instead of having a system of decency, we have all the oofy doofies pimping their looksmatches out for Chad until they get their turn with their LTR. Thats cucking with extra steps, all because we're "moral" and giving them the right to choose in an environment where the playing field is levelled/dynamics are levelled/men have no advantage they'd naturally have in the sexual marketplace/women are masculinized and men are feminized (baphomet system).

So because these forces have achieved their goal, and ALL women are troubled mentally, we have this modern hell. Its perfectly described here, a tranny goatman pedophile:

if this symbolism isn't evident to you then what are you doing:lul:

Instead of simplyfing and making dating efficient, we "let them choose" but in reality they always had the ability to choose, rather lets call it what it is, WE ENABLE THEM TO WHORE THEMSELVES OUT to their lusts, before ending up EXACTLY WHERE THEY WOULD'VE ENDED UP ANYWAY if there were decency laws, no feminism, no dating hookup culture etc. WE ARE ALL CUCKS. The sooner all western and european faggots accept this, "free and cosmopolitan" faggots accept this, the fact we all whore our generations of women out to chads FOR FREE, for no fucking reason as theres nothing moral about this, free or liberal, "muh sophisticated" fuck you faggot. Its only profitable for rich people because they're pimping YOUR WOMEN OUT not theirs, JFL. Thats why its "sophisticated, western liberal and cosmpolitan" yea also its CAPITALISTIC because they're whoring your women out for profit (profit in the form of the looksmaxing industry: makeup, pharma, etc). Oh but if you say all these things foids will give you the "side eye" IDGAF. If you tell women to stop whoring themselves out to chad ofc they'll give you the "side eye", but if the "side eye" works on you, YOU'RE A PUSSY WHIPPED FAGGOT. A TOTAL FAGGOT. Hence you're a CUCK. This is a CUCK society. Men foolishly accepted this (in the past) thinking THEY would be the ones slaying, THEY wouldn't be the ones paying the price in LTR stability (so at the receiving end of this arrangement - a cuck). They all thought they'd fool the OTHER GUY, and they would be fine. THAT is who your older generation is when this shit was established. WELL, IT DIDN'T WORK OUT THAT WAY. So lets get with the times, drop the copes, and see it for what it is.

It may be water, but it needs to be made evident and explained.

Yeah but back then women weren't weren't secure themselves they couldn't work a job and be financially free and didn't have as many opportunities as now so they had to date/marry to men who were more secure even if it meant his looks weren't great while men could choose the baddest bitxh and that is nurture but in today's society women have as much opportunities as men so they don't need a man for security so by nature they choose the guy with best genes.
 
Yeah but back then women weren't weren't secure themselves they couldn't work a job and be financially free and didn't have as many opportunities as now so they had to date/marry to men who were more secure even if it meant his looks weren't great while men could choose the baddest bitxh and that is nurture but in today's society women have as much opportunities as men so they don't need a man for security so by nature they choose the guy with best genes.
missed the point
 
I know plenty. If you want to spread this idea and covert me you give me the references. Who taught you?

Something that I know about history is that money wasn't commonplace outside of cities until about 200 years ago as people in disconnected villages bartered. Banks don't decide who wins a war. It's whoever has the muskets and the manpower, or the atomic bombs. The industry that makes the weapons only thrives in an economy where there are banks, so they can do their business and investments can happen. My point is that banks regulate an economy, but science and the infrastructure of the fabrication of weapons and the battlements are more important than the links between them. Banks might be important if there is much global trade. But you're being so vague that I don't know what era you suppose that banks become the Illuminati and pull all the strings. And even still trade slows down in wartime. Both the idea that banks choose who wins a war and the idea that elite bankers are so clever that they want to shrink the economy so much that they will be plowing the fields for their food themselves are stupid ideas. So I will return to my point that it's the march of science and technology and the forces of curiosity and application in a free market that has caused young women to act the way that they do and my rejection of the conspiracies that it's an easily defined enemy, who's apparently very very stupid and doesn't understand what wealth is in its abstract form.

I'm bored as hell. If you have any arguments that I'm a stupid moron or can find those references, indulge me.
Alr i will read tomorrow ngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
Its just common knowledge if you read history because im talking about how Rothschilds took over
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
This video from PGM got me thinking


If you seriously sat down with your ancestors/older generations of men and explained modern dating to them, they would simply call you a cuck. First of all, if you told them all of society is like this, they would call your society insane for all collectively agreeing to this cucking. They would not believe that all men in this society are consenting cucks, but WE are.

This is the iron law of the looksmatch, its also the pinkpill:
all women will end up settling for their own looksmatch (or below, depending how hard they deride their value). They will also hate their looksmatch and will act accordingly (they'll hate your guts) because chad used them and they have unrealistic fantasies of chad committing his worthwhile life to that retarded and delusional MTB.

Ofc we are far beyond arguing if this is dysgenic or not, obviously it is. It leads to lower birthrates, and with feminism it leads to females being UNABLE to form stable long term relationships.

So instead of having a system of decency, we have all the oofy doofies pimping their looksmatches out for Chad until they get their turn with their LTR. Thats cucking with extra steps, all because we're "moral" and giving them the right to choose in an environment where the playing field is levelled/dynamics are levelled/men have no advantage they'd naturally have in the sexual marketplace/women are masculinized and men are feminized (baphomet system).

So because these forces have achieved their goal, and ALL women are troubled mentally, we have this modern hell. Its perfectly described here, a tranny goatman pedophile:

if this symbolism isn't evident to you then what are you doing:lul:

Instead of simplyfing and making dating efficient, we "let them choose" but in reality they always had the ability to choose, rather lets call it what it is, WE ENABLE THEM TO WHORE THEMSELVES OUT to their lusts, before ending up EXACTLY WHERE THEY WOULD'VE ENDED UP ANYWAY if there were decency laws, no feminism, no dating hookup culture etc. WE ARE ALL CUCKS. The sooner all western and european faggots accept this, "free and cosmopolitan" faggots accept this, the fact we all whore our generations of women out to chads FOR FREE, for no fucking reason as theres nothing moral about this, free or liberal, "muh sophisticated" fuck you faggot. Its only profitable for rich people because they're pimping YOUR WOMEN OUT not theirs, JFL. Thats why its "sophisticated, western liberal and cosmpolitan" yea also its CAPITALISTIC because they're whoring your women out for profit (profit in the form of the looksmaxing industry: makeup, pharma, etc). Oh but if you say all these things foids will give you the "side eye" IDGAF. If you tell women to stop whoring themselves out to chad ofc they'll give you the "side eye", but if the "side eye" works on you, YOU'RE A PUSSY WHIPPED FAGGOT. A TOTAL FAGGOT. Hence you're a CUCK. This is a CUCK society. Men foolishly accepted this (in the past) thinking THEY would be the ones slaying, THEY wouldn't be the ones paying the price in LTR stability (so at the receiving end of this arrangement - a cuck). They all thought they'd fool the OTHER GUY, and they would be fine. THAT is who your older generation is when this shit was established. WELL, IT DIDN'T WORK OUT THAT WAY. So lets get with the times, drop the copes, and see it for what it is.

It may be water, but it needs to be made evident and explained.

I will burn this planet down before I spend another minute living among these mutant normies
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
This post is part of the thread series "Doompill compilation" from here:

:blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 

Similar threads

Big Boss
Replies
5
Views
35
sphenoidnr
sphenoidnr
PeenoResurrected
Replies
296
Views
2K
ngannou
N
I_Hate_Foids
Replies
15
Views
64
shortbeasts.alt
shortbeasts.alt
CelestialEmpire
Replies
4
Views
44
LeonardMariana
LeonardMariana
O
Replies
1
Views
22
Wasq
Wasq

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top