Afganistan is more white than south Europe and jewsa

mr007

mr007

Tall big ass only
Joined
Aug 29, 2024
Posts
7,844
Reputation
9,846
5b69d6bfd9fc690bb15ed8ecc6537f3a



Average afgani man btw
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Chadeep, Baeseth, blinkers and 3 others
those are the true ancestors not whatever is in germany right now
 
I thought Afghanistan was just terrorists with ak-47 like csgo
 
These make up an extreme minority of afghan population though, meds arent white but the afghan isnt much better anyway
 
These make up an extreme minority of afghan population though, meds arent white but the afghan isnt much better anyway
not extreme, pashtuns are always fair skinned.

blonde is rare in general
 
These make up an extreme minority of afghan population though, meds arent white but the afghan isnt much better anyway
And if you plot these guys on a g25 chart they will still show a lot of distance towards modern europeans with high IE (russians, north germans,baltics etc)
 
These make up an extreme minority of afghan population though, meds arent white but the afghan isnt much better anyway
Afgan have much more steppe ancestry than meds . Sure they are minority.
 
Pashtuns are light brown
and fair skinned

light brown isn’t far from fair anyway

the man u posted is either pashtun or nuristani, he looks extremely nuristani but could easily be pashtun
 
  • +1
Reactions: mr007
not extreme, pashtuns are always fair skinned.

blonde is rare in general
Afgan is not pashtun only. And tajiks have much higher steppe ancestry than pashtuns. But both are short
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quetila
And if you plot these guys on a g25 chart they will still show a lot of distance towards modern europeans with high IE (russians, north germans,baltics etc)
do u even know how affinity works? they don’t show affinity because they’re Zagrosian and AASI too
 
Afgan is not pashtun only. And tajiks have much higher steppe ancestry than pashtuns. But both are short
nerfed by the other components and probably dysgenics? because of war
 
Afgan is not pashtun only. And tajiks have much higher steppe ancestry than pashtuns. But both are short
Europeans all primarily derive from 4 main components (during the neolithic/early bronze age) that they all have varying degrees of-
WSH (Western Steppe Herders, genetics term for indo europeans/steppe)
WHG (Western Hunter Gatherers)
EHG (Eastern Hunter Gatherers)
ANF (Anatolian farmers obv)
Most people attempt to define who is "genetically european" in terms of how much of their ancestry comes from these 3 groups, with all other ancestry as "Non European".

However, these groups have all been in Europe for varying amounts of time, and some are a lot more distant from non-Europeans. It basically goes like this in terms of how distinctly European they are: WHG>EHG>WSH>>>ANF
A pure ANF population, like Sardinians, is not particularly distant from middle easterners because Anatolian farmers split into a European & middle eastern branch relatively recently.

Due to this, because northern Europeans have more ancestry from groups that have been in Europe for longer, they are "whiter" in my opinion as opposed to meds.

The same can be applied to non-european ancestry. Being 12% nigger is obviously gonna make someone a lot less european-shifted than being 12% lebanese or something, which is why a group that's even 30% WSH/Indo-European like northern pashtuns is "non white" because the rest of their ancestry is very very distant from europeans
 
nerfed by the other components and probably dysgenics? because of war
Prolly punjabis are much taller than pashtuns despite having same environment.

Punjabi jats are even taller than southern Europeans.

But maybe because Punjab is farmland and most are farmers and plane field and domesticing large animals help people to grow taller.

Punjabi jats born and raised in west are taller than whites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quetila
Europeans all primarily derive from 4 main components (during the neolithic/early bronze age) that they all have varying degrees of-
WSH (Western Steppe Herders, genetics term for indo europeans/steppe)
WHG (Western Hunter Gatherers)
EHG (Eastern Hunter Gatherers)
ANF (Anatolian farmers obv)
Most people attempt to define who is "genetically european" in terms of how much of their ancestry comes from these 3 groups, with all other ancestry as "Non European".

However, these groups have all been in Europe for varying amounts of time, and some are a lot more distant from non-Europeans. It basically goes like this in terms of how distinctly European they are: WHG>EHG>WSH>>>ANF
A pure ANF population, like Sardinians, is not particularly distant from middle easterners because Anatolian farmers split into a European & middle eastern branch relatively recently.

Due to this, because northern Europeans have more ancestry from groups that have been in Europe for longer, they are "whiter" in my opinion as opposed to meds.

The same can be applied to non-european ancestry. Being 12% nigger is obviously gonna make someone a lot less european-shifted than being 12% lebanese or something, which is why a group that's even 30% WSH/Indo-European like northern pashtuns is "non white" because the rest of their ancestry is very very distant from europeans
Not reading all that pal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quetila
Not reading all that pal
The TLDR is that even though they have 30 or so steppe they are still extremely far away as they lack far more genetic components that make up modern "white" ancestry
 
The TLDR is that even though they have 30 or so steppe they are still extremely far away as they lack far more genetic components that make up modern "white" ancestry
which is retarded, because what makes whites unique is Steppe anyway

the reason Anglo-Saxons excluded southern europeans is because they felt allowed by the lack of phenotypical traits in common (which is downstream of the Yamnaya culture invasion)

the whole reason we’re calling this man “white” is because the whole white argument revolves around Steppe roots

“white” is a very retarded term.
 
which is retarded, because what makes whites unique is Steppe anyway

the reason Anglo-Saxons excluded southern europeans is because they felt allowed by the lack of phenotypical traits in common (which is downstream of the Yamnaya culture invasion)

the whole reason we’re calling this man “white” is because the whole white argument revolves around Steppe roots

“white” is a very retarded term.
I'm not saying that meds are white though, I don't think they are but pashtuns are still very distant from modern north euros, also blonde and light haired traits didnt come from yamnaya they came from the corded ware which selected heavily for it and absorbed the northern globular amphora who had it as well, the yamnaya were relatively swarthy to a degree and it was corded ware that spread these traits in modern euros, but yes white is a very convoluted term to define
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quetila

Similar threads

EuphoricAsianNormie
Replies
19
Views
173
inyerta
inyerta
mr007
Replies
16
Views
63
PrinceLuenLeoncur
PrinceLuenLeoncur
Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Replies
16
Views
118
Gengar’s Ghost
Gengar’s Ghost
Hess
Replies
9
Views
47
Hess
Hess
tgun564636
Replies
3
Views
46
Joeseminate
Joeseminate

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top