Aggressive VS Masculine Features

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

Read post #43 from here:

Measure of Dimorphism - Eye Mouth Eye Angle

(11-12-2015, 05:31 PM)Illuminati Cuntfirmed Wrote: (11-12-2015, 05:29 PM)heilsa Wrote: you need the whole package bruh fwhr 1.93 midface ratio 1 what else do i need everything bruh. top tier maxilla,

web.archive.org

TL;DR

Aggressive features: Compact midface, high fwhr, wide chin, short wide forehead, high T, low inhib, low trust, dominance, bully, high mating success, short term relationships

Masculine features: Long midface, low fwhr, well developed jaw, tall chin, tall narrow forehead, high hgh (tall), trustworthy, calm, leader-like, well-liked, long term relationships


Both are attractive, aggressive features favored for slaying and masculine ones for leading

 

[DrTony]

Doesn't matter. You have to be handsome. This comes from a guy with 69 slays over 18 months and NO "aggressive features"

 

[BigChinHispanic]

shit thread as usual

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

Doesn't matter. You have to be handsome. This comes from a guy with 69 slays over 18 months and NO "aggressive features"

yea i should edit the title

 

[Copemaxxing]

Jfl barrett has all that aggresive features but it makes sense ngl

 

[6ft4]

I have all the masculine features mentioned yet don't look masculine

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

I have all the masculine features mentioned yet don't look masculine

maybe its your eye area, both masc and aggressive faces have dom eyes

 

[Deleted member 6403]

aggressive is masculine, masculine is aggressive

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

aggressive is masculine, masculine is aggressive

incorrect, aggression is not in the masculine index

 

[Deleted member 5683]

I think that could also be Low class vs. High class
Because aggressive features are masculine by default

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

I think that could also be Low class vs. High class
Because aggressive features are masculine by default

i agree with low class high class, but aggressive features are NOT masculine, they have no place in the facial masculinity index

 

[Deleted member 5683]

i agree with low class high class, but aggressive features are NOT masculine, they have no place in the facial masculinity index

How so?

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

How so?

Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not - PubMed

Recently, associations between facial structure and aggressive behaviour have been reported. Specifically, the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is thought to link to aggression, although it is unclear whether this association is related to a specific dimension of aggression, or to a more...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"(iv) the facial masculinity index does not predict dominance or aggression."

 

[Deleted member 2658]

Doesn't matter. You have to be handsome. This comes from a guy with 69 slays over 18 months and NO "aggressive features"

Brb using imagination

 

[godlikesz]

hunter eyes aggresive , hooded eyes masculine

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

hunter eyes aggresive , hooded eyes masculine

what about having both