AI Advancement is Crazy Accelerated

[Chadeep]

@Jason Voorhees

The Jobs are being Replaced Way too Quickly. People Thought Creative Professionals Would get Upper hand Instead get are the Ones Getting Aced First. ( Copywriters , Graphic Designers etc)

Is there any Job That's Safe from AI?

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

Jobs don’t get replaced by AI. This is basic economics. Why does a landlord charge rent? A landlord doesn’t charge rent at a price no one will buy. If the productivity of a general populus decreases, so does the cost of living. It is just scarcity of resources is decreasing because of AI, it’s not increasing scarcity.

 

[Gonthar]

Is there any Job That's Safe from AI?

Yes, the oldest ones, AI will replace jobs in a last in, first out mannrr, anything that handles information in any way will be replaced by AI, while manual labor jobs won't be replaced too soon, robots are still pretty expensive and limited.

 

[neurosis]

Jobs don’t get replaced by AI. This is basic economics. Why does a landlord charge rent? A landlord doesn’t charge rent at a price no one will buy. If the productivity of a general populus decreases, so does the cost of living. It is just scarcity of resources is decreasing because of AI, it’s not increasing scarcity.

ok nvm youre not even a foid, probably just an autistic mtf pseudo tranny, high on his own supply of HRT

Jobs don’t get replaced by AI

they do. its really as simple as 'can ai do job more effectively than human at a lower cost-> job replaced'

This is basic economics

>unironically believes in economics

ai should eventually lead to the replacement of all jobs and a post-labour economy.

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

ok nvm youre not even a foid, probably just an autistic mtf pseudo tranny, high on his own supply of HRT

they do. its really as simple as 'can ai do job more effectively than human at a lower cost-> job replaced'

>unironically believes in economics

ai should eventually lead to the replacement of all jobs and a post-labour economy.

The cost of living in an area is dictated by the productivity of the inhabitants. Why would someone sell a product if no one will buy it? If people are replaced by AI, then prices will lower relative to the inhabitants. Rich people are only rich because there's not many rich people. Nothing ever changes.

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

ok nvm youre not even a foid, probably just an autistic mtf pseudo tranny, high on his own supply of HRT

they do. its really as simple as 'can ai do job more effectively than human at a lower cost-> job replaced'

>unironically believes in economics

ai should eventually lead to the replacement of all jobs and a post-labour economy.

I’d enjoy a reason other than hating reason for no reason

 

[neurosis]

The cost of living in an area is dictated by the productivity of the inhabitants. Why would someone sell a product if no one will buy it? If people are replaced by AI, then prices will lower relative to the inhabitants. Rich people are only rich because there's not many rich people. Nothing ever changes.

this is me after watching one (1) 'how money works' youtube video

I’d enjoy a reason other than hating reason for no reason

the scarcity of resources will decrease to a point where there is no scarcity. labour (jobs) serve as the distributive function for resources -> infinite resources -> there is no need for an input (labour/jobs)

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

this is me after watching one (1) 'how money works' youtube video

the scarcity of resources will decrease to a point where there is no scarcity. labour (jobs) serve as the distributive function for resources -> infinite resources -> there is no need for an input (labour/jobs)

Your primary defense seems to be ad hominems. I infer that your motive for believing this lie in emotional beliefs in statist conformism.

Jobs only end when there is no more scarcity, and scarcity is essentially desire. First, we must know where jobs originate. Jobs originate from working towards desire and outsourcing other’s labor. Scarcity is not purely material. Desire never ends. If robots can replicate humans 1:1, the same fair competition of resources will exist. Let’s say Alice builds houses, Bob farms food, and John brings water. If Alice finds a way to farm food and build houses, the importantance and wealth of Bob decreasing in direct proportion to their natural right. If Bob, Alice, and John can each individually farm, build houses, and obtain water then there is no need for trade since they already have everything they need. The free market is ALWAYS perfectly and absolutely fair.

 

[neurosis]

Your primary defense seems to be ad hominems

ok but was i right tho (tranny and how money works part)?

 

[R@m@]

We are just prompts!

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

ok but was i right tho (tranny and how money works part)?

I’m not a tranny, I don’t have a degree in finance or economics (though I plan to), but I have read a few books related book on the topic.

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

ok but was i right tho (tranny and how money works part)?

I forgot to address that you think I’m an autist. I’ve gotten two diagnoses of autism, albeit the lowest class of autism on both diagnostics. If Asperger’s was still a diagnosis, I would guess they would classify me as aspie

 

[neurosis]

Your primary defense seems to be ad hominems. I infer that your motive for believing this lie in emotional beliefs in statist conformism.

Jobs only end when there is no more scarcity, and scarcity is essentially desire. First, we must know where jobs originate. Jobs originate from working towards desire and outsourcing other’s labor. Scarcity is not purely material. Desire never ends. If robots can replicate humans 1:1, the same fair competition of resources will exist. Let’s say Alice builds houses, Bob farms food, and John brings water. If Alice finds a way to farm food and build houses, the importantance and wealth of Bob decreasing in direct proportion to their natural right. If Bob, Alice, and John can each individually farm, build houses, and obtain water then there is no need for trade since they already have everything they need. The free market is ALWAYS perfectly and absolutely fair.

just to be clear your argument is that jobs and desire are both interchangeable and constant. desire (immaterial and infinite) therefore has to be equal to an infinite and immaterial source of jobs, correct?

why cant the opposite be true, infinite resources completely satiating all (infinite and immaterial) desires -> essentially they cancel each other out -> no desire -> no jobs.

 

[BonesmashFinalBoss]

Jobs don’t get replaced by AI. This is basic economics. Why does a landlord charge rent? A landlord doesn’t charge rent at a price no one will buy. If the productivity of a general populus decreases, so does the cost of living. It is just scarcity of resources is decreasing because of AI, it’s not increasing scarcity.

Holy cope

 

[SecularIslamist]

Manual labour jobs will be okay for now until robotics is able to advance. AI relies on human data it only reproduces what humans have so far done. Imagine ChatGPT was released in 1995 it would be nothing of use. It's use-case would grow as humans create more stuff hence input data.

Completely automating all human tasks will ironically limit AI. Including those which require creativity. AI cannot replace human intelligence yet - it cannot yet discover a new scientific theory. It can just spit it out. Until we get AGI only then will humans become truly replaceable.

 

[AustrianMogger]

@Jason Voorhees

The Jobs are being Replaced Way too Quickly. People Thought Creative Professionals Would get Upper hand Instead get are the Ones Getting Aced First. ( Copywriters , Graphic Designers etc)

Is there any Job That's Safe from AI?

Looks will become new currency if AGI is ever achived.

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

just to be clear your argument is that jobs and desire are both interchangeable and constant. desire (immaterial and infinite) therefore has to be equal to an infinite and immaterial source of jobs, correct?

why cant the opposite be true, infinite resources completely satiating all (infinite and immaterial) desires -> essentially they cancel each other out -> no desire -> no jobs.

Once desires are fulfilled, no one would want a job because wanting a job originates from desire which is outside of wanting a job of the sake of having a job

 

[neurosis]

Once desires are fulfilled, no one would want a job because wanting a job originates from desire which is outside of wanting a job of the sake of having a job

So if (strong if here) AI leads to infinite recourses (immaterial and material) wouldn't that fulfil all desires and the necessity to get a job.

Therefore it could said that, ai effectively does (and will) replace all jobs.

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

So if (strong if here) AI leads to infinite recourses (immaterial and material) wouldn't that fulfil all desires and the necessity to get a job.

Therefore it could said that, ai effectively does (and will) replace all jobs.

I agree. I believe the original post insinuates that there are negative consequences to this which is why I responded

 

[neurosis]

Jobs don’t get replaced by AI

Therefore it could said that, ai effectively does (and will) replace all jobs.

I agree

?

Jobs only end when there is no more scarcity, and scarcity is essentially desire. First, we must know where jobs originate. Jobs originate from working towards desire and outsourcing other’s labor. Scarcity is not purely material. Desire never ends

wouldn't that fulfil all desires and the necessity to get a job.

I agree

genuinely wtf are you even arguing here, maybe ive misinterpreted it but idk (out of context, idc)

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

?





genuinely wtf are you even arguing here, maybe ive misinterpreted it but idk (out of context, idc)

I trying to argue that desires of all individuals are best fulfilled by increasing innovation in all fields, in this instance its AI

 

[Deleted Member 0927]

?





genuinely wtf are you even arguing here, maybe ive misinterpreted it but idk (out of context, idc)

But I’m also arguing for the continual and inevitable evolution of all states to anarcho-capitalism but that’s not as relevant to this

 

[laworg]

@Jason Voorhees

The Jobs are being Replaced Way too Quickly. People Thought Creative Professionals Would get Upper hand Instead get are the Ones Getting Aced First. ( Copywriters , Graphic Designers etc)

Is there any Job That's Safe from AI?

Legit maybe 10% of digital work is replacable dude stop stressing programming is still at the level of a first year college student and cybersec wont ever get replaced or i hope🫩

 

[neurosis]

I trying to argue that desires of all individuals are best fulfilled by increasing innovation in all fields, in this instance its AI

But I’m also arguing for the continual and inevitable evolution of all states to anarcho-capitalism but that’s not as relevant to this

based