Alexanderr
Unavailable
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Posts
- 21,140
- Reputation
- 41,450
His under eye circles are rather insignificant since they’re not as bad as you proclaim them to be. They’re average at worst. Obviously they’ll be more pronounced in black-white pictures or where he’s 80+ years…
“Weak lower third”
This is exactly what I meant with PSL rotting one’s mind. It seems you’re so engrossed within the ideology that every lower third that doesn’t look like Henry Cavil’s is weak.
His lower third isn’t the strongest but it’s good enough.
Obviously he’ll have wrinkles if you purposefully choose pictures where he’s raising his eyebrows or is an old man.
As for upper eyelid exposure, yet another classic example, upper eyelid exposure isn’t inherently bad. He doesn’t even have much upper eyelid exposure.
Now unto his height…
He’s 5’10, so what?
He was born 80+ years ago where the average height was significantly lower across the globe. 5’10 back then would be about the equivalent of 6’2 now.
You see him as a old eyesore but I see him as an old man with a legendary career, who’s done and had it all. Money, fame, women etc…
He’s notorious for his looks 50+ years after his prime, was a sex symbol across Europe in the 60’s and still has hundreds of thousands of women who adore him.
The man has good coloring, hair, ratios, decent features and great cheekbones. Which all nicely compliment each other to make a very good looking face.
Hell, I have nothing to prove.
You and a few dozen other users might think he looks a bit above average at best but there’d be millions of women across several generations who’d happily disagree with you.
Most importantly, he still has HAIR at 80 something, let’s see how your scalp looks in 60 years.
