Alex Schlab facial analysis

Dude no offense but you are not a 7.25 by any means
I think schlab is high 7 low 8 btw this was before I had ideal measurements for asians
 
I was in the photo I measured , but I am usually 6.75~ high htn range
I think he is 1.5 point higher than you meaning he is 8 and you 6.5. There is a significant difference in atractiveness between him and you
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
I think he is 1.5 point higher than you meaning he is 8 and you 6.5. There is a significant difference in atractiveness between him and you
Ok think what you want lmao the maths doesn’t lie , but he is an 8 I just didn’t have a formula for Asian people
 
I would say this is what peak female gaze would look like
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
Ok think what you want lmao the maths doesn’t lie , but he is an 8 I just didn’t have a formula for Asian people
Bruh Im just saying my honest opinion and most people wont agree with the fact of you being low chadlite, at least not yet. You are the perfect example of htn literally. Harmony wise you are chadlite at least for sure but you just dont look like chadlite
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
Bruh Im just saying my honest opinion and most people wont agree with the fact of you being low chadlite, at least not yet. You are the perfect example of htn literally. Harmony wise you are chadlite at least for sure but you just dont look like chadlite
I am just young and pretty boy archetype and maybe that doesn’t fit your ideals - I am not low chadlite ik that I am high htn tho according to the maths
 
I am just young and pretty boy archetype and maybe that doesn’t fit your ideals - I am not low chadlite ik that I am high htn tho according to the maths
I Guess Im obssesed with the masculine dimorphic archetype , you def enter more in the pretty boy archetype and maybe thats why im slightly underrating you but idk
 
frontal harmony 74.3%
side harmony 88.9%

overall harmony 80%

Dimorphism 6/10
Angularity 8/10
Misc 8.5/10

overall score 7.65 a 1/2000 face

(0.4 x 8) + (0.2 x 6) + (0.25 x 8) + (0.15 x 8.5) = 7.65

can I rate correctly?
in some photos his angularity is closer to a 6.75 which would bring his rating down to a 7.35

View attachment 3626711View attachment 3626710
How did you get to those ratings? What features are viewed in harmony, what in dimorphism, what in angularity and what is misc? How did you conclude the weight of each category in overall attractivness?
 

Similar threads

R
Replies
20
Views
2K
Rabbi
Rabbi
Yusu
Replies
6
Views
2K
Deleted member 1849
D
Deleted member 1973
Replies
11
Views
962
Deleted member 1973
Deleted member 1973
Spartacus1-
Replies
10
Views
1K
Spartacus1-
Spartacus1-
Deleted member 5187
Replies
40
Views
5K
Cope
Cope

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top