All actual chads lookalike

[buccalfatremoval]

Looks are objective with a certain measurement ideal and whatnot.

If you put actual chads side by side, there is always similarities.

I’d argue only differences are in some more genetic factors and phenotypes.

These are examples off the top of my head

First is without blending, second 50%, third none.

Same formatting.

This has been discussed before and I always thought about it since there’s such a strict ratio ideal we go off for ratings. And it was brought to my attention again by a good friend.

What’s your opinion on this

 

[𝔻𝕠𝕨𝕟𝕨𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕘𝕣𝕠𝕨𝕥𝕙𝕔𝕖𝕝]

water

 

[Azi.org]

Diffrent features similair ratios

 

[AscendHQ]

water

Det e så jag ser ut typ

 

[maxilexo]

Looks are objective with a certain measurement ideal and whatnot.

If you put actual chads side by side, there is always similarities.

I’d argue only differences are in some more genetic factors and phenotypes.

These are examples off the top of my head

View attachment 5561855View attachment 5561856View attachment 5561857

First is without blending, second 50%, third none.

View attachment 5561860View attachment 5561862View attachment 5561863

Same formatting.

View attachment 5561866View attachment 5561867


This has been discussed before and I always thought about it since there’s such a strict ratio ideal we go off for ratings. And it was brought to my attention again by a good friend.

What’s your opinion on this

this is actually interesting, cause when you look better, you have to try even harder, so there can be a timeline which looking better just changes your face slightly

 

[Gudlifer]

crazy stuff

 

[Amuzant]

Looks are objective with a certain measurement ideal and whatnot.

If you put actual chads side by side, there is always similarities.

I’d argue only differences are in some more genetic factors and phenotypes.

These are examples off the top of my head

View attachment 5561855View attachment 5561856View attachment 5561857

First is without blending, second 50%, third none.

View attachment 5561860View attachment 5561862View attachment 5561863

Same formatting.

View attachment 5561869View attachment 5561866View attachment 5561867


This has been discussed before and I always thought about it since there’s such a strict ratio ideal we go off for ratings. And it was brought to my attention again by a good friend.

What’s your opinion on this

Nigga pointed out the obvious

 

[looksmaxer3431413]

Welcome to dimorphisim brother

 

[Amuzant]

crazy stuff

Yo this shit had my mind blown

 

[Seven]

forgot me.

 

[buccalfatremoval]

Nigga pointed out the obvious

water

I like bringing up interesting topics that haven’t been discussed in a while

 

[Amuzant]

I like bringing up interesting topics that haven’t been discussed in a while

 

[𝔻𝕠𝕨𝕟𝕨𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕘𝕣𝕠𝕨𝕥𝕙𝕔𝕖𝕝]

I like bringing up interesting topics that haven’t been discussed in a while

i know. i like that. i just wanted to take your threads virginity real quick

 

[buccalfatremoval]

Bump

 

[Jason5000]

hope for hardmaxxers ig.

 

[Surfsup]

hope for hardmaxxers ig.

Nah fr lol

 

[simematic]

Looks are objective with a certain measurement ideal and whatnot.

If you put actual chads side by side, there is always similarities.

I’d argue only differences are in some more genetic factors and phenotypes.

These are examples off the top of my head

View attachment 5561855View attachment 5561856View attachment 5561857

First is without blending, second 50%, third none.

View attachment 5561860View attachment 5561862View attachment 5561863

Same formatting.

View attachment 5561869View attachment 5561866View attachment 5561867


This has been discussed before and I always thought about it since there’s such a strict ratio ideal we go off for ratings. And it was brought to my attention again by a good friend.

What’s your opinion on this

chad is almost perfect thats why