All girls are fucking whores (short story inside the women’s bathrooms)

[Zeruel]

One time i went to the girls bathroom to peak on women (I’m a rapist) and it was completely fucking empty, but i did open this one toilet room, because it was particularly smelly. So i open the door and i see a fucking shoe that someone shat on, the shit was covered in cum and as if that wasn’t bad enough some asshole put a pencil on the cummed on shit.

So basically all girls are degenerate whores for Chad that reject the ugly little boy with a small cock.

 

[GriffithMaxx]

Water

 

[Deleted member 1140]

female toilets were much worse than male toilets in my old school. i was the class representative and there was a meeting talking about how girls shat on top of the toilets, next to the toilets etc.

girls are disgusting as fuck

 

[Clown Show]

 

[dreamcake1mo]

You could have explained your point without describing the cum covered shit shoe tbh.

Added no context to the point. I mean, im still trying to figure out how it happened. Did someone shit on the shoe after cumming on it? and cum implies a male ejaculated on the shoe. If so, was this some sort of weird fetish behavior? Because its also likely the same someone cummed on the shoe after shitting on it/vise versa. Or someone shit on the shoe and another cummed on it. Its odd, because id believe the shit triggered the person to drop their shoe, as it would make no sense to abandon a shoe just because cum got on it. But then again, how is it possible to shit on a shoe without a second party? My conclusion leads me to believe the rational answer is someone else intently shitted on the shoe and another cummed on it (as its obvious other men are frequent in this bathroom), and the idea or notion that a couple intentionally choose to decide to shit on a shoe then cum on it is beyond a wild fetish behavior, and moreso childishness degenerate behavior. Either way if the cum implied male ejaculate, then clearly the degenerate behavior is shared between sexes. This dosent really highlight your point and thus this whole cum shit story was better off omitted.

 

[futureashtray]

You could have explained your point without describing the cum covered shit shoe tbh.

Added no context to the point. I mean, im still trying to figure out how it happened. Did someone shit on the shoe after cumming on it? and cum implies a male ejaculated on the shoe. If so, was this some sort of weird fetish behavior? Because its also likely the same someone cummed on the shoe after shitting on it/vise versa. Or someone shit on the shoe and another cummed on it. Its odd, because id believe the shit triggered the person to drop their shoe, as it would make no sense to abandon a shoe just because cum got on it. But then again, how is it possible to shit on a shoe without a second party? My conclusion leads me to believe the rational answer is someone else intently shitted on the shoe and another cummed on it (as its obvious other men are frequent in this bathroom), and the idea or notion that a couple intentionally choose to decide to shit on a shoe then cum on it is beyond a wild fetish behavior, and moreso childishness degenerate behavior. Either way if the cum implied male ejaculate, then clearly the degenerate behavior is shared between sexes. This dosent really highlight your point and thus this whole cum shit story was better off omitted.

tldr not looksmaxxing related

 

[Hellcat]

???