Klasik616
No woman's man
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2024
- Posts
- 29,067
- Reputation
- 64,021
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Most debates are meaningless because the debate focusses on something that does not exist / has no value or importance such as man-made goods.Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
you can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sourcesBecause you can't prove if he exists or not.
Most debates are meaningless because the debate focusses on something thst does not exist / has no value or importanch such as man-made goods.
One could say good debates are when you gain knowledge, but you could put that at a way rarer probability and assume that everything else is man-made Psyop either way.
Explain how rabbi Yahweh did itSo explain how the universe and all it content came to be without God
Increasing or decreasing a belief is copeyou can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sources
That is the opposite of a belief, no?you can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sources
Read the bible retard, most scholars agree on Jesus existence.Explain how rabbi Yahweh did it
Why?So explain how the universe and all it content came to be without God
My proof for god, just read the bible bro - ChristcuckRead the bible retard most scholars agree on Jesus existence
you are correct, it would have been more correct for me to say assumption, but the more data you have on certain assumptions being true and certain assumptions being false, the more some of the assumptions pivot towards a belief and the more others pivot towards being falseThat is the opposite of a belief, no?
A belief is to be believed in without any clear data suggesting an ultimate for its validity.
Yeah it’s pretty jester, and even if we can’t prove whether he exists or not, we can at least debunk the stuff that happened in these religious books. Like how does the bible explain real processes like dinosaurs or evolution, which we know are real due to modern science, when it pretty much says god slapped down Adam and Eve as the first beings or whatever. Also there wouldn’t be enough genetic variation for races if they really were the first 2 people I’d guessBecause you can't prove if he exists or not.
The funniest is the E crusaders who spread the myth that Hitler was some Aryan Crusader for Christ, he hated Christianity.every retard that argues for religion makes me cringe
people are welcome to do mental gymnastics over something that cannot be definitively proven though![]()
Concessions acceptedMy proof for god, just read the bible bro - Christcuck
![]()
Atheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to swayyeah i think all religions are just made up to keep people in line and make money take protestant christian for example lit j made up for money
Come up with a better argument than it says god is real in this book written by his followers, JFL at youConcessions accepted
That’s not true at all, atheism first started gaining major traction in the Age of Enlightenment in western Europe, it’s predominantly a white thing not Jewish stop lying.Atheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to sway
But jews are religiousAtheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to sway
we live on a floating rock in spaceBecause you can't prove if he exists or not.
people can be so fucking retarded sometimesThe funniest is the E crusaders who spread the myth that Hitler was some Aryan Crusader for Christ, he hated Christianity.
Exactly they don’t get this, most of them are very religious and are spreading the end times fervour. It’s also why they believe the goys are beneath them and good sheep to use.But jews are religious
It can raise a question but that’s just it, it doesn’t prove that there’s some intelligent creatorIt's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
We don’t live on a floating rock, we live on a planet with an atmosphere, gravity and core. That can come into existence without a designer.we live on a floating rock in space
with god knows how much milkyways and other planets
doesnt that explain it? who created allat
Ye im just shizo posting about jews. fr tho saying religion was made to control masses is spewing elitist propaganda. I have yet to hear in what way religion would be crucial to control the people. and the same people claiming these things almost always fully trust the government which to me is absolutely incredible since they love to talk about the controlling of massesThat’s not true at all, atheism first started gaining traction in the Age of Enlightenment in western Europe, it’s predominantly a white thing not Jewish stop lying.
I mean the race of jews (descendants of Abraham). and I was just shitposting so dont take it seriouslyBut jews are religious

It’s worse than that because of the flood meaning there was another mass incest event, if humanity is only a few thousand years old we wouldn’t be alive because of this.Yeah it’s pretty jester, and even if we can’t prove whether he exists or not, we can at least debunk the stuff that happened in these religious books. Like how does the bible explain real processes like dinosaurs or evolution, which we know are real due to modern science, when it pretty much says god slapped down Adam and Eve as the first beings or whatever. Also there wouldn’t be enough genetic variation if they really were the first 2 people I’d guess
ayy good argument, i like this oneIt's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
If there is even a slightest possibility of raising a question about it it fully implies that the absolute statement - "God does not exist" is very low iq/egocentric (one of those two), to think you are absolutely sure about such a insanely complex thing you must think very highly of yourself as an intellectual or you are just a brainlet. I support the I am not sure argument completely, just not the midwit whining.It can raise a question but that’s just it, it doesn’t prove that there’s some intelligent creator
It's possibleBecause you can't prove if he exists or not.
BiologyIt's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
I’m not saying that it was cooked up by some emperor. But there’s a good argument to be made that Christianity was actually brought forth to control and dismantle the gentiles.Ye im just shizo posting about jews. fr tho saying religion was made to control masses is spewing elitist propaganda. I have yet to hear in what way religion would be crucial to control the people. and the same people claiming these things almost always fully trust the government which to me is absolutely incredible since they love to talk about the controlling of masses
Because no one opinion is gonna change because of someone onlineBecause you can't prove if he exists or not.
I’m not saying that it was cooked up by some emperor. But there’s a good argument to be made that Christianity was actually brought forth to control and dismantle the gentiles.
But if such a drastic change was possible, doesn't it intrigue you at least a little if something even more complex is going on out there? Or are the infinite universes too much of a scary concept that they make you limit/disable your curiosity and accept our miniscule planet as absolute proof of nothing greater existing .Biology
Back then we didn't know about how animals and plants live
JFL, a Jew is not a reliable source, but not the Jewish writers of your bible, not your Jew pope, not your Jew god. JFL at you christcucks.A jew is not a reliable source as they hate christians and would easily do such a video to sabotage the church (the same way jewish pedos infiltrated it). And besides that video being extremely unreliable there are multiple independent sources way more reliable than what you gave which state that the apostles did believe in the christian doctrine and spread it around mediitereanian and east africa.
I was reffering to jew as a religious practitionerJFL, a Jew is not a reliable source, but not the Jewish writers of your bible, not your Jew pope, not your Jew god. JFL at you christcucks.
Well of course, it’s impossible to know or not, but I would think it’s more likely it’s not real. What if I asked u the age old question of “Who made God”? By the argument of no living organism can just randomly begin to exist, then how is he existing. It just doesn’t make logical sense that there is this omnipotent being that just made everything.If there is even a slightest possibility of raising a question about it it fully implies that the absolute statement - "God does not exist" is very low iq/egocentric (one of those two), to think you are absolutely sure about such a insanely complex thing you must think very highly of yourself as an intellectual or you are just a brainlet. I support the I am not sure argument completely, just not the midwit whining.
The Jews of the bible were practitioners, Jesus was a literal rabbi btw, look into how Jews made up Jesus as a fake messiah, there are literally zero contemporary sources. And contemporary means from when he was alive so don’t try too use things from after as a supposed rebuttal.I was reffering to jew as a religious practitioner
That's why it intrigues me so much, we can't even comprehend the question of who made god/who made the universe, if we can't comprehend such a question it just makes even more sense to me/intrigues me that there are A LOT more questions that we can't comprehend, if we look from our perspective the omnipotent being concept is just silly, but what if it's not silly and it's just that we are so limited that we can't even imagine how that would look (or whatever sense you need to feel/see/smell it, you get the point), I respect the "logical" thinking behind most people that don't believe in higher power, it's just that even our "less complex" world has logical fallacies where logic just isn't the best choice, that is why even if it's very close to none I still leave the possibility of something greater existing.Well of course, it’s impossible to know or not, but I would think it’s more likely it’s not real. What if I asked u the age old question of “Who made God”? By the argument of no living organism can just randomly begin to exist, then how is he existing. It just doesn’t make logical sense that there is this omnipotent being that just made everything.
Water, no point in that statementThe Jews of the bible were practitioners
As I said earlier I was refferring to modern practicing jews, Jesus would not be a rabbi todayJesus was a literal rabbi btw,
This is just plain wrong as we KNOW for certain through multiple sources that jews condemed the apostles, we know that the rabbis (which you claim would secretly support them) didnt eveen support them privatly or in secret.look into how Jews made up Jesus as a fake messiah
Once again you make a meaningless statement. sources for what? what are there no contemporary sources of?there are literally zero contemporary sources. And contemporary means from when he was alive so don’t try too use things from after as a supposed rebuttal.
Sources for the existence of Jesus. It’s all fake and gay btw wake up.Water, no point in that statement
As I said earlier I was refferring to modern practicing jews, Jesus would not be a rabbi today
This is just plain wrong as we KNOW for certain through multiple sources that jews condemed the apostles, we know that the rabbis (which you claim would secretly support them) didnt eveen support them privatly or in secret.
Once again you make a meaningless statement. sources for what? what are there no contemporary sources of?
Even if it was true that the rabbis swayed the jewish masses (which we know they did) to crucify Jesus for the sake of a fake messiah. It would serve no point. Christianity has historically helped europe develop and prosper just like Islam helped the nowadays arab countries during medieval times.(islamic golden age). The idea of a dark age where the church prohibited science is fabricated. virtually ALL scientific documents we have from that time period were written and copied by monks and the inquisition was mainly aimed against pagan rites. In fact we can see a clear societal degeneracy starting around the rennesaince and "enlightment".[irrelevant gibberish and spewing same pseudohistorical things over and over]