All God debates are meaningless

Klasik616

Klasik616

No woman's man
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Posts
29,075
Reputation
64,035
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
 
  • +1
Reactions: White_Bwoi, Shrek2OnDvD, CorinthianLOX and 8 others
I swear a bunch of them use quotes from their own book to prove his existence
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, EmperorVon, King_Schnitzel and 1 other person
it’s just a pointless back and forth between the people talking about it and we will never know
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, EmperorVon and King_Schnitzel
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
Most debates are meaningless because the debate focusses on something that does not exist / has no value or importance such as man-made goods.

One could say good debates are when you gain knowledge, but you could put that at a way rarer probability and assume that everything else is man-made Psyop either way.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: EmperorVon and Klasik616
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
you can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sources
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: EmperorVon and Klasik616
So explain how the universe and all it content came to be without God
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
Most debates are meaningless because the debate focusses on something thst does not exist / has no value or importanch such as man-made goods.

One could say good debates are when you gain knowledge, but you could put that at a way rarer probability and assume that everything else is man-made Psyop either way.
:feelsyay:
:feelsokman:
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: King_Schnitzel and EmperorVon
It’s important to make sure people stop believing in the sky Rabbi
IMG 0597
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser and King_Schnitzel
you can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sources
Increasing or decreasing a belief is cope
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: EmperorVon and King_Schnitzel
you can almost certainly never reach a conclusion but you can always increase the probability of your belief or another belief that you didn't believe in previously to be true by gathering data and synthesising information across various fields and sources
That is the opposite of a belief, no?

A belief is to be believed in without any clear data suggesting an ultimate for its validity.
 
every retard that argues for religion makes me cringe

people are welcome to do mental gymnastics over something that cannot be definitively proven though :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: mtnlol, EmperorVon and King_Schnitzel
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616 and King_Schnitzel
yeah i think all religions are just made up to keep people in line and make money take protestant christian for example lit j made up for money
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616, EmperorVon and King_Schnitzel
meaningless because it doesn't matter if the person you're debating believes
 
That is the opposite of a belief, no?

A belief is to be believed in without any clear data suggesting an ultimate for its validity.
you are correct, it would have been more correct for me to say assumption, but the more data you have on certain assumptions being true and certain assumptions being false, the more some of the assumptions pivot towards a belief and the more others pivot towards being false
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: King_Schnitzel
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
Yeah it’s pretty jester, and even if we can’t prove whether he exists or not, we can at least debunk the stuff that happened in these religious books. Like how does the bible explain real processes like dinosaurs or evolution, which we know are real due to modern science, when it pretty much says god slapped down Adam and Eve as the first beings or whatever. Also there wouldn’t be enough genetic variation for races if they really were the first 2 people I’d guess
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon and Klasik616
every retard that argues for religion makes me cringe

people are welcome to do mental gymnastics over something that cannot be definitively proven though :feelskek:
The funniest is the E crusaders who spread the myth that Hitler was some Aryan Crusader for Christ, he hated Christianity.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: alphamale82
yeah i think all religions are just made up to keep people in line and make money take protestant christian for example lit j made up for money
Atheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to sway
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Klasik616 and EmperorVon
Atheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to sway
That’s not true at all, atheism first started gaining major traction in the Age of Enlightenment in western Europe, it’s predominantly a white thing not Jewish stop lying.
 
Atheism was invented by jews (in correlation to progressivism) to make people less based on themselves and easier to sway
But jews are religious
 
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon
Because you can't prove if he exists or not.
we live on a floating rock in space
with god knows how much milkyways and other planets

doesnt that explain it? who created allat
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
The funniest is the E crusaders who spread the myth that Hitler was some Aryan Crusader for Christ, he hated Christianity.
people can be so fucking retarded sometimes :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon and Klasik616
It's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Klasik616, Mogger2000 and EmperorVon
But jews are religious
Exactly they don’t get this, most of them are very religious and are spreading the end times fervour. It’s also why they believe the goys are beneath them and good sheep to use.
 
It's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
It can raise a question but that’s just it, it doesn’t prove that there’s some intelligent creator
 
  • +1
Reactions: Elegant
we live on a floating rock in space
with god knows how much milkyways and other planets

doesnt that explain it? who created allat
We don’t live on a floating rock, we live on a planet with an atmosphere, gravity and core. That can come into existence without a designer.
 
  • +1
Reactions: barii66
That’s not true at all, atheism first started gaining traction in the Age of Enlightenment in western Europe, it’s predominantly a white thing not Jewish stop lying.
Ye im just shizo posting about jews. fr tho saying religion was made to control masses is spewing elitist propaganda. I have yet to hear in what way religion would be crucial to control the people. and the same people claiming these things almost always fully trust the government which to me is absolutely incredible since they love to talk about the controlling of masses
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
But jews are religious
I mean the race of jews (descendants of Abraham). and I was just shitposting so dont take it seriously❤️
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
Yeah it’s pretty jester, and even if we can’t prove whether he exists or not, we can at least debunk the stuff that happened in these religious books. Like how does the bible explain real processes like dinosaurs or evolution, which we know are real due to modern science, when it pretty much says god slapped down Adam and Eve as the first beings or whatever. Also there wouldn’t be enough genetic variation if they really were the first 2 people I’d guess
It’s worse than that because of the flood meaning there was another mass incest event, if humanity is only a few thousand years old we wouldn’t be alive because of this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LGG
It's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
ayy good argument, i like this one
 
It can raise a question but that’s just it, it doesn’t prove that there’s some intelligent creator
If there is even a slightest possibility of raising a question about it it fully implies that the absolute statement - "God does not exist" is very low iq/egocentric (one of those two), to think you are absolutely sure about such a insanely complex thing you must think very highly of yourself as an intellectual or you are just a brainlet. I support the I am not sure argument completely, just not the midwit whining.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon and shinoxu
It's laughable that you are absolutely sure nothing of greater power/extreme intellect exists when at the same you can also comprehend how different and more complex humans are compared to animals/defect humans, why can't such an observation make you even a little doubtful to if any higher power/complexity greater than humans exists.
Biology
Back then we didn't know about how animals and plants live
Those are real beings we live with they're not possible objects
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon
Ye im just shizo posting about jews. fr tho saying religion was made to control masses is spewing elitist propaganda. I have yet to hear in what way religion would be crucial to control the people. and the same people claiming these things almost always fully trust the government which to me is absolutely incredible since they love to talk about the controlling of masses
I’m not saying that it was cooked up by some emperor. But there’s a good argument to be made that Christianity was actually brought forth to control and dismantle the gentiles.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SkiSquadJPG
I’m not saying that it was cooked up by some emperor. But there’s a good argument to be made that Christianity was actually brought forth to control and dismantle the gentiles.

A jew is not a reliable source as they hate christians and would easily do such a video to sabotage the church (the same way jewish pedos infiltrated it). And besides that video being extremely unreliable there are multiple independent sources way more reliable than what you gave which state that the apostles did believe in the christian doctrine and spread it around mediitereanian and east africa.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
Biology
Back then we didn't know about how animals and plants live
But if such a drastic change was possible, doesn't it intrigue you at least a little if something even more complex is going on out there? Or are the infinite universes too much of a scary concept that they make you limit/disable your curiosity and accept our miniscule planet as absolute proof of nothing greater existing .
 
A jew is not a reliable source as they hate christians and would easily do such a video to sabotage the church (the same way jewish pedos infiltrated it). And besides that video being extremely unreliable there are multiple independent sources way more reliable than what you gave which state that the apostles did believe in the christian doctrine and spread it around mediitereanian and east africa.
JFL, a Jew is not a reliable source, but not the Jewish writers of your bible, not your Jew pope, not your Jew god. JFL at you christcucks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SkiSquadJPG
JFL, a Jew is not a reliable source, but not the Jewish writers of your bible, not your Jew pope, not your Jew god. JFL at you christcucks.
I was reffering to jew as a religious practitioner
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
If there is even a slightest possibility of raising a question about it it fully implies that the absolute statement - "God does not exist" is very low iq/egocentric (one of those two), to think you are absolutely sure about such a insanely complex thing you must think very highly of yourself as an intellectual or you are just a brainlet. I support the I am not sure argument completely, just not the midwit whining.
Well of course, it’s impossible to know or not, but I would think it’s more likely it’s not real. What if I asked u the age old question of “Who made God”? By the argument of no living organism can just randomly begin to exist, then how is he existing. It just doesn’t make logical sense that there is this omnipotent being that just made everything.
 
I was reffering to jew as a religious practitioner
The Jews of the bible were practitioners, Jesus was a literal rabbi btw, look into how Jews made up Jesus as a fake messiah, there are literally zero contemporary sources. And contemporary means from when he was alive so don’t try too use things from after as a supposed rebuttal.
 
Well of course, it’s impossible to know or not, but I would think it’s more likely it’s not real. What if I asked u the age old question of “Who made God”? By the argument of no living organism can just randomly begin to exist, then how is he existing. It just doesn’t make logical sense that there is this omnipotent being that just made everything.
That's why it intrigues me so much, we can't even comprehend the question of who made god/who made the universe, if we can't comprehend such a question it just makes even more sense to me/intrigues me that there are A LOT more questions that we can't comprehend, if we look from our perspective the omnipotent being concept is just silly, but what if it's not silly and it's just that we are so limited that we can't even imagine how that would look (or whatever sense you need to feel/see/smell it, you get the point), I respect the "logical" thinking behind most people that don't believe in higher power, it's just that even our "less complex" world has logical fallacies where logic just isn't the best choice, that is why even if it's very close to none I still leave the possibility of something greater existing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LGG and SkiSquadJPG
The Jews of the bible were practitioners
Water, no point in that statement
Jesus was a literal rabbi btw,
As I said earlier I was refferring to modern practicing jews, Jesus would not be a rabbi today
look into how Jews made up Jesus as a fake messiah
This is just plain wrong as we KNOW for certain through multiple sources that jews condemed the apostles, we know that the rabbis (which you claim would secretly support them) didnt eveen support them privatly or in secret.
there are literally zero contemporary sources. And contemporary means from when he was alive so don’t try too use things from after as a supposed rebuttal.
Once again you make a meaningless statement. sources for what? what are there no contemporary sources of?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
Water, no point in that statement

As I said earlier I was refferring to modern practicing jews, Jesus would not be a rabbi today

This is just plain wrong as we KNOW for certain through multiple sources that jews condemed the apostles, we know that the rabbis (which you claim would secretly support them) didnt eveen support them privatly or in secret.

Once again you make a meaningless statement. sources for what? what are there no contemporary sources of?
Sources for the existence of Jesus. It’s all fake and gay btw wake up.
 
[irrelevant gibberish and spewing same pseudohistorical things over and over]
Even if it was true that the rabbis swayed the jewish masses (which we know they did) to crucify Jesus for the sake of a fake messiah. It would serve no point. Christianity has historically helped europe develop and prosper just like Islam helped the nowadays arab countries during medieval times.(islamic golden age). The idea of a dark age where the church prohibited science is fabricated. virtually ALL scientific documents we have from that time period were written and copied by monks and the inquisition was mainly aimed against pagan rites. In fact we can see a clear societal degeneracy starting around the rennesaince and "enlightment".
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top