Moneymaxxed
Gold
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2020
- Posts
- 943
- Reputation
- 2,000
They complain that women are entitled and get outraged when they see some “post wall” old divorced woman getting psl 7 chad to fuck her etc.
They go on and on about how it’s a clown world and society is woman centric and women shouldn’t be hypergamous and expect the world of men
The implied message is that women don’t have the value that they think they do and the world is crazy.
But the fucked up thing is, women really do have this value. That’s why men pay the price for them despite extremely annoying or low iq behavior. We define womens’ value by what we are willing to do to get them and vice versa. This giant rationalization/cope is to protect the ego of low value men. If you are born a billionaire chad 0% you’re going to be annoyed by hypergamy and women “being degenerate” because you’re the best and they’re treating you like God.
90% of men being left in the dust for the most part is just due to increased market efficiency. Tinder and other apps allow women (buyers) to fully explore all sellers (men). The result is the best men are being selected more often than was possible before.
There is much more demand for sex and to a lesser degree companionship than women can provide overall. And women only want mates superior to themselves by nature. Nature and evolution did not design this to be fair or make anyone happy. It only made us survive and reproduce.
I have a lot of empathy for the bottom 50% of men as it’s basically over unless they climb. Which knocks another guy down to the bottom 50%. Half of men at least always get basically nothing. 40% get barely anything. 9% get treated ok. And 1% absolutely dominate everything. That’s just how it is. There’s no right or wrong to this
They go on and on about how it’s a clown world and society is woman centric and women shouldn’t be hypergamous and expect the world of men
The implied message is that women don’t have the value that they think they do and the world is crazy.
But the fucked up thing is, women really do have this value. That’s why men pay the price for them despite extremely annoying or low iq behavior. We define womens’ value by what we are willing to do to get them and vice versa. This giant rationalization/cope is to protect the ego of low value men. If you are born a billionaire chad 0% you’re going to be annoyed by hypergamy and women “being degenerate” because you’re the best and they’re treating you like God.
90% of men being left in the dust for the most part is just due to increased market efficiency. Tinder and other apps allow women (buyers) to fully explore all sellers (men). The result is the best men are being selected more often than was possible before.
There is much more demand for sex and to a lesser degree companionship than women can provide overall. And women only want mates superior to themselves by nature. Nature and evolution did not design this to be fair or make anyone happy. It only made us survive and reproduce.
I have a lot of empathy for the bottom 50% of men as it’s basically over unless they climb. Which knocks another guy down to the bottom 50%. Half of men at least always get basically nothing. 40% get barely anything. 9% get treated ok. And 1% absolutely dominate everything. That’s just how it is. There’s no right or wrong to this
