An Honest Conversation about ethnic's mental capacity

6ft4

6ft4

Every Spectrum has a Purgatory Zone
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
9,981
Reputation
25,684
With whites being higher IQ than all ethnics aside from east Asians, it is easy to look at the state of ethnic enclaves in Europe and see first hand just how low the standards are for the environments ethnics are able to maintain. You dont need to travel to outside of a first world country to recognize this.

This difference indicates a stark difference in mental capacity, but it has raised the question about what level of intellect is needed for certain tasks that ethnics manage to be proficient in.

It isn't uncommon to encounter sub Saharan Africans who can speak multiple languages and can speak English to a level where they can be understood and hold conversations.
As an English first language speaker, I was forced to learn a second language from the age of 5 and a third language from the age of 12.
At age 12, there were a number of students in my class who had an exemption from learning languages because they found it too difficult.
These were the lowest intellect students in the class but they had decided in primary school that learning a second language was too difficult for them then they did this for the third language option as well.
It seems some random sub Saharan African can learn languages easier than a 10th percentile intellect white.

The second point is about Paki rape gangs
How do these pakis know what methods work best to gain a child's trust and how do they know the methods they can use to ensure they never escape and remain in fear of them.
Was it a case of them finding it out via trial and error when doing it to non muslims in pakistan then the methods were handed down and spread through word of mouth or are they methods that just come naturally and instinctively to a paki brain?
Having an Aryan brain, the concept of putting on an act or using artificial methods to gain a persons trust with the intention of later abusing them with the sequence being used to cause trauma and fear of of consequences of escaping is something that my mind could never conjure up.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, DieVoGel6949, Chadeep and 15 others
Is this really your first thread back jfl
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, TheLightOfMyLife, Chadeep and 9 others
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mess
amazing thread
the site isnt high iq enough to interact with this thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: DieVoGel6949, Chadeep, Arthur the Egyptian and 3 others
ethnics'*
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, Mess and 6ft4
why are u randomly hyping up sub saharans and then u just continue talking about ethnics being stupid, i agree since i see firsthand how lowiq ethnics are in Sweden but i dont get the subsaharan hype, what purpose does it serve in this text?
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DieVoGel6949, Lord Jeffrey, Chadeep and 4 others
why are u randomly hyping up sub saharans and then u just continue talking about ethnics being stupid, i agree since i see firsthand how lowiq ethnics are in Sweden but i dont get the subsaharan hype, what purpose does it serve in this text?
How are they able to learn languages when their general intellect is so much lower than some whites who struggle to learn languages
What traits are responsible for language learning ability?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile, Chadeep, Arthur the Egyptian and 2 others
why are u randomly hyping up sub saharans and then u just continue talking about ethnics being stupid, i agree since i see firsthand how lowiq ethnics are in Sweden but i dont get the subsaharan hype, what purpose does it serve in this text?
Brotha he just said iq wise they are above a 10th percentile white person
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Mess and albanianblackguy
Brotha he just said iq wise they are above a 10th percentile white person
jfl u got it totally wrong
How are they able to learn languages when their general intellect is so much lower than some whites who struggle to learn languages
What traits are responsible for language learning ability?
maybe some kind of evolution because of following slave orders jfl , following orders = remembering words or sum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Arthur the Egyptian and Mess
This was the conclusion of the Sub-Saharan part
How are they able to learn languages when their general intellect is so much lower than some whites who struggle to learn languages
What traits are responsible for language learning ability?
he literally confirmed here that his question is how they are able to learn languages despite being iq inferior
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mess
Stupid thread, we Pakistanis are Indo-Aryans. And don’t forget that Jews also are higher IQ. Or are you going to claim Jews are white?
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel, LiL 369, Chadeep and 2 others
Damn, you unbanned too. :soy:
 
being multilingual isn't associated with higher iq
 
Stupid thread, we Pakistanis are Indo-Aryans. And don’t forget that Jews also are higher IQ. Or are you going to claim Jews are white?
ashkenazi* jews are higher IQ

and they are white
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: mrriceguyreturn
ashkenazi* jews are higher IQ

and they are white
They’re not white. Ashkenazi Jews have mostly Levantine ancestry. They are partially European, but just like Afro-Americans, the majority of their ancestry is derived from non-European lineages. Besides, if you are falsely going to claim that they are “white,” then you’re indirectly saying that Israelis of Ashkenazi descent are foreign to Israel, which they are not since they’re mostly Levantine in origin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: STAMPEDE, greycel and Arthur the Egyptian
How are they able to learn languages when their general intellect is so much lower than some whites who struggle to learn languages
What traits are responsible for language learning ability?
you know that if you grow up in an environment which has multiple languages you'll know all of the languages at age 4? it's not because they somehow have better language learning capability
 
  • +1
Reactions: Whatever and 6ft4
we are all created equal, btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiL 369
  • +1
Reactions: jogger
We aren't not bro :incel: + love the name remind me of David goggins

i legit have "forum goggins" as my user title on another forum. i'd be ruling europe within 5 years with his mental power
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Arthur the Egyptian
Ashkenazi Jews have mostly Levantine ancestry.
Source? Most estimates say Ashkenazi jews have mostly European ancestry


"Recent modeling suggested that most of the European ancestry in AJ is consistent with Southern European-related sources, and estimated the total proportion of European ancestry in AJ as 50%–70%"

They are partially European, but just like Afro-Americans, the majority of their ancestry is derived from non-European lineages.

Comparing sub-saharan ancestry to middle eastern ancestry is really foolish - middle easterners are genetically close to europeans, while SSAs are about as distant as you can be. Being mixed with levantine people makes you far less non-white, than being mixed with blacks. Also african americans are merely 25% white, as opposed to AJs who are majority white.

Besides, if you are falsely going to claim that they are “white,” then you’re indirectly saying that Israelis of Ashkenazi descent are foreign to Israel, which they are not since they’re mostly Levantine in origin.

Wrong, middle easterners can be white. White is a phenotype. A lot of levantine people look white.

Ashkenazi jews are actually way whiter in their phenotype than any middle easterners and even southern europeans. They have the same frequency of blue eyes as hungarians, to give you perspective.

The fact that AJs are whiter in phenotype than middle easterners and south europeans + being majority european in ancestry, makes a better case for them being european than middle eastern.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411
i legit have "forum goggins" as my user title on another forum. i'd be ruling europe within 5 years with his mental power
I remember going insane at 17 and running 30 km bc of him
Doing insane leg days too
Best motivater out there I did things I didn't think I'm capable of :feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: jogger
The Dravidian brain is incomprehensible to the Aryan.

The Dravidian is a low-functioning Jew, essentially. Both are scheming and evil, the stark difference being the Jew plans decades in advance.

The Aryan cannot comprehend why one would conjure such schemes for momentary craving, as the grooming gangs do, for the Aryan possesses a much greater capacity for rationality.

To understand the brain of a peoples, look at their villages. They are microcosms where the underlying genetic factors which influence behavior can easily be isolated and studied. An African or South Indian village is ripe with rape, murder and incest, while any Aryan counterpart is a high-trust oasis of Europe's Glory of Old.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 6ft4 and first snow
Source? Most estimates say Ashkenazi jews have mostly European ancestry


"Recent modeling suggested that most of the European ancestry in AJ is consistent with Southern European-related sources, and estimated the total proportion of European ancestry in AJ as 50%–70%"



Comparing sub-saharan ancestry to middle eastern ancestry is really foolish - middle easterners are genetically close to europeans, while SSAs are about as distant as you can be. Being mixed with levantine people makes you far less non-white, than being mixed with blacks. Also african americans are merely 25% white, as opposed to AJs who are majority white.



Wrong, middle easterners can be white. White is a phenotype. A lot of levantine people look white.

Ashkenazi jews are actually way whiter in their phenotype than any middle easterners and even southern europeans. They have the same frequency of blue eyes as hungarians, to give you perspective.

The fact that AJs are whiter in phenotype than middle easterners and south europeans + being majority european in ancestry, makes a better case for them being european than middle eastern.
"The Y chromosome of most Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews contains mutations that are common among Middle Eastern peoples, but uncommon in the general European population, according to a study of haplotypes of the Y chromosome by Michael Hammer, Harry Ostrer and others, published in 2000. According to Hammer et al. this suggests that the paternal lineages of Ashkenazi Jews could be traced mostly to the Middle East."


And no, white equals European. Non-Europeans can be white-passing, but that does not mean they're white (read: European).
 
"The Y chromosome of most Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews contains mutations that are common among Middle Eastern peoples, but uncommon in the general European population, according to a study of haplotypes of the Y chromosome by Michael Hammer, Harry Ostrer and others, published in 2000. According to Hammer et al. this suggests that the paternal lineages of Ashkenazi Jews could be traced mostly to the Middle East."


And no, white equals European. Non-Europeans can be white-passing, but that does not mean they're white (read: European).
Ydna isn't how you measure ancestry proportions. Someone who's paternal great grandfather is white, but is otherwise 7/8 black, would have an european Ydna haplogroup. Is he white, then? No, autosomal DNA shows that he is 87.5% black. The Y chromosome is like 2% of people's genome.

AJs are majority european in autosomal DNA.
 
Ydna isn't how you measure ancestry proportions. Someone who's paternal great grandfather is white, but is otherwise 7/8 black, would have an european Ydna haplogroup. Is he white, then? No, autosomal DNA shows that he is 87.5% black. The Y chromosome is like 2% of people's genome.

AJs are majority european in autosomal DNA.
Y-DNA is still very relevant for tracing one's ancestry, and it shows a Middle Eastern origin. They do not have a European origin for this. Only a minority of Ashkenazi Jews have a West European Y-DNA.

When their data is further analyzed, their DNA is still different from actual Europeans due to their Levantine origins. Actual whites do not score any Canaanite ancestry but Ashkenazis and Palestinians both do.
 
Y-DNA is still very relevant for tracing one's ancestry, and it shows a Middle Eastern origin. They do not have a European origin for this. Only a minority of Ashkenazi Jews have a West European Y-DNA.
It's relevant for tracing male lineages. It ignores admixture events where most of the people they mixed with were women. It doesn't tell you anything about ancestry proportions, because Ydna has no proportions. When jews settled in Italy initially, most of the mixing was in the form of Jewish men and Italian women. But with time, they mixed with enough italian women, for their DNA makeup to be majority european, which isn't reflected in the genome when you only look at the male-mediated Y chromosome.

When their data is further analyzed, their DNA is still different from actual Europeans due to their Levantine origins. Actual whites do not score any Canaanite ancestry but Ashkenazis and Palestinians both do.
But it's also (even more) different than middle eastern DNA - middle easterners don't have majority european ancestry, ashkenazi jews do.

If you had to chose what they are (middle eastern or european) based on ancestry proportions, wouldn't you choose the proportion of the two which is bigger? That would be european.
 
It's relevant for tracing male lineages. It ignores admixture events where most of the people they mixed with were women. It doesn't tell you anything about ancestry proportions, because Ydna has no proportions. When jews settled in Italy initially, most of the mixing was in the form of Jewish men and Italian women. But with time, they mixed with enough italian women, for their DNA makeup to be majority european, which isn't reflected in the genome when you only look at the male-mediated Y chromosome.


But it's also (even more) different than middle eastern DNA - middle easterners don't have majority european ancestry, ashkenazi jews do.

If you had to chose what they are (middle eastern or european) based on ancestry proportions, wouldn't you choose the proportion of the two which is bigger? That would be european.
As they are mixed and do not genetically cluster properly with other European populations, it is not as black and white as you make it out to be. If anything, it is best to call them a mixed race type of ethnic group since you cannot place them in any of the two properly.
 
As they are mixed and do not genetically cluster properly with other European populations, it is not as black and white as you make it out to be. If anything, it is best to call them a mixed race type of ethnic group since you cannot place them in any of the two properly.
But you also have the fact that they are very phenotypically white, and being white is a lot about phenotype, along with genotype. If they are whiter, lighter-eyed than middle easterners and south europeans, that tips the scale towards the european side (after already being tipped towards the european side by them being majority european in ancestry). Why do you think all the alt-righters have to look in the "Early life" wikipedia section of famous jewish people, in order to know they're jewish? Because they look white.

Jews also identify as white (92% in the US)
 
you know that if you grow up in an environment which has multiple languages you'll know all of the languages at age 4? it's not because they somehow have better language learning capability

This, learning languages is all about immersion which makes it both easier and more necessary.

I’d also say that English being basically the world’s lingua franca motivates non English speakers to learn it and also demotivates English speakers from being serious about learning other languages, for some it becomes almost a survival mechanism and for others it’s just a hobby.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
With whites being higher IQ than all ethnics aside from east Asians, it is easy to look at the state of ethnic enclaves in Europe and see first hand just how low the standards are for the environments ethnics are able to maintain. You dont need to travel to outside of a first world country to recognize this.

This difference indicates a stark difference in mental capacity, but it has raised the question about what level of intellect is needed for certain tasks that ethnics manage to be proficient in.

It isn't uncommon to encounter sub Saharan Africans who can speak multiple languages and can speak English to a level where they can be understood and hold conversations.
As an English first language speaker, I was forced to learn a second language from the age of 5 and a third language from the age of 12.
At age 12, there were a number of students in my class who had an exemption from learning languages because they found it too difficult.
These were the lowest intellect students in the class but they had decided in primary school that learning a second language was too difficult for them then they did this for the third language option as well.
It seems some random sub Saharan African can learn languages easier than a 10th percentile intellect white.

The second point is about Paki rape gangs
How do these pakis know what methods work best to gain a child's trust and how do they know the methods they can use to ensure they never escape and remain in fear of them.
Was it a case of them finding it out via trial and error when doing it to non muslims in pakistan then the methods were handed down and spread through word of mouth or are they methods that just come naturally and instinctively to a paki brain?
Having an Aryan brain, the concept of putting on an act or using artificial methods to gain a persons trust with the intention of later abusing them with the sequence being used to cause trauma and fear of of consequences of escaping is something that my mind could never conjure up.
Bruh what? I like how most people r just straight up retarded, all you need to do is put on a few "fancy words", hype the reader into casually think he is superior than someone else, and BOOM there you have it, retards are happy and think this guy is high iq :forcedsmile:.

I mean most people reading these threads r just teenagers, that didnt even finish school and literally got here cause they r ugly white dudes, and most of them are 100% socially rejects (People spend way to much time here for this not to be true), and easy to influence to it makes sense...

Speaking on the topic of this thread, most whites, at least from my own experience, cant even learn a 2nd language... In my school days everyone was terrible at english and french too, can tell you, we had 3 years of french no one knows even the basics of it. In my gym if we have a foreigner who wants to sign in or something, they unironicly need to call me, in order to have a relative smooth communication... Ive been to Spain a few times, and even in Barcelona which is supposed to be a tourist friendly city I was surprised by how few people were actually able to speak english.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual and panzer of the Lake
The smartest person i know is a black woman from a low-class background
 
  • JFL
Reactions: panzer of the Lake
Learning a language is about neural plasticity which is highest when you are young. Do you observe sub Saharan Africans learning second or third languages when they are teenagers? And are they doing it out of necessity or in school (i.e., are they being forced or being taught recreationally). Basically I don't think they are actually better at learning languages when compared to 10th percentile intellect whites. Maybe they are I guess but learning languages is more complex.

I don't think small children are hard to manipulate either. If you have the neurochemistry that leads to being a murderer or rapist, you just think about things like how to lure people, sneak around them, break into their homes, how to kill people fastly, etc... Naturally that lends itself to a better capability of doing it.

Its like asking why some black people are good at technically complex tasks seen with sports despite being low IQ. You learn through practice and repetition and an obsessive mind.

Also glad you are back, goat.
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: GigaStacySexual and 6ft4
Learning a language is about neural plasticity which is highest when you are young. Do you observe sub Saharan Africans learning second or third languages when they are teenagers? And are they doing it out of necessity or in school (i.e., are they being forced or being taught recreationally). Basically I don't think they are actually better at learning languages when compared to 10th percentile intellect whites. Maybe they are I guess but learning languages is more complex.

I don't think small children are hard to manipulate either. If you have the neurochemistry that leads to being a murderer or rapist, you just think about things like how to lure people, sneak around them, break into their homes, how to kill people fastly, etc... Naturally that lends itself to a better capability of doing it.

Its like asking why some black people are good at technically complex tasks seen with sports despite being low IQ. You learn through practice and repetition and an obsessive mind.

Also glad you are back, goat.
Wrong lol. language, music, sports, and comedy/NT are all intuition based skills unaffected by iq test taking ability

10th percentile white are retarded acting. 50th percentile blacks are quick thinking and nt
 
  • +1
Reactions: wollet2, LiL 369 and GigaStacySexual
Iq tests questions are selected based on which questions blacks cant answer. If blacks could answer an test question more than whites it would not be selected.

black iq is deflated by 1SD.
 
With whites being higher IQ than all ethnics aside from east Asians, it is easy to look at the state of ethnic enclaves in Europe and see first hand just how low the standards are for the environments ethnics are able to maintain. You dont need to travel to outside of a first world country to recognize this.

This difference indicates a stark difference in mental capacity, but it has raised the question about what level of intellect is needed for certain tasks that ethnics manage to be proficient in.

It isn't uncommon to encounter sub Saharan Africans who can speak multiple languages and can speak English to a level where they can be understood and hold conversations.
As an English first language speaker, I was forced to learn a second language from the age of 5 and a third language from the age of 12.
At age 12, there were a number of students in my class who had an exemption from learning languages because they found it too difficult.
These were the lowest intellect students in the class but they had decided in primary school that learning a second language was too difficult for them then they did this for the third language option as well.
It seems some random sub Saharan African can learn languages easier than a 10th percentile intellect white.

The second point is about Paki rape gangs
How do these pakis know what methods work best to gain a child's trust and how do they know the methods they can use to ensure they never escape and remain in fear of them.
Was it a case of them finding it out via trial and error when doing it to non muslims in pakistan then the methods were handed down and spread through word of mouth or are they methods that just come naturally and instinctively to a paki brain?
Having an Aryan brain, the concept of putting on an act or using artificial methods to gain a persons trust with the intention of later abusing them with the sequence being used to cause trauma and fear of of consequences of escaping is something that my mind could never conjure up.
Total word salad.
Your writing style is verbose and could stand be a lot clearer and more refined.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
Wrong lol. language, music, sports, and comedy/NT are all intuition based skills unaffected by iq test taking ability

10th percentile white are retarded acting. 50th percentile blacks are quick thinking and nt
That was literally my thesis. My first sentence is saying language is affected by neural plasticity which is why people can learn multiple languages when they are young even if they have deficient IQ.

I wouldn't say its intuition based either. Maybe you just mean passive learning. Sports in particular requires a ton of active training though, so does music.
 
Iq tests questions are selected based on which questions blacks cant answer. If blacks could answer an test question more than whites it would not be selected.

black iq is deflated by 1SD.
What about geometric shapes makes it impossible for blacks to answer? Jfl at IQ test makers selecting the geometric shape patterns that blacks can't comprehend and leaving out the ones they can. :lul:
 
I think people really overestimate the actually gap in intelligence that can even exist among people.

Those white people probably could learn other languages given the right drives/circumstances.

As for the paki rape gangs, they probably spent a lifetime building the foundation for manipulation and cruel social tactics as part of their development because that is the kind of life they live. It’s not just a completely novel situation where it would make sense to chalk it up to “IQ”.

You didn’t develop that same foundation because your social groups don’t have the same strategies and you kind of seem mildly autistic.
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
32
Views
439
lightskinniggga
lightskinniggga
got.daim
Replies
9
Views
464
Gaygymmaxx
Gaygymmaxx
got.daim
Replies
3
Views
119
got.daim
got.daim
ggg.tv🤫
Replies
8
Views
529
recai iskender
recai iskender
zemult
Replies
41
Views
913
walidthelooksmaxxer
walidthelooksmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top