Andrew Tate is legit low IQ

Salieri

Salieri

Lookism Refugee 10khitman
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Posts
1,891
Reputation
3,027
Watched him vs hasan, its actually insane how legit retarded he is. His tiktok clips are funny asf, but watching him actually talk seriously is just painful, even with xqc he was struggling but xqc somehow managed to troll harder 🤦‍♀️. Hasan tho has at least 100 iq so tate just got flattened and looked like a pussy calling him "not fun" etc after realizing how doomed it was and how retarded he looked 🤣

men should stick with jordan peterson still for confidence and motivation etc, ik he said some dumb shit about things outside of psychology but realistically i think hes overhated and he has legit value in some ways for young men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nisse, LooksOrDeath, Daniel Plainview and 5 others
tate won the debate
 
  • +1
Reactions: betrayed by 5‘8, MoggerGaston, TsarTsar444 and 9 others
I haven't watched the video yet, but I'm guessing that little peanut head Hassan was discussing political topics that he is an expert in? Yeah, when your whole life is watching CNN,l and Fox, you're going to sound smarter talking about those subjects
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: kuroro, Daniel Plainview, seimakkak and 4 others
tate won the debate
how do u even remember to breath

I haven't watched the video yet, but I'm guessing that little peanut head Hassan was discussing political topics that he is an expert in? Yeah, when your whole life is watching CNN,l and Fox, you're going to sound smarter talking about those subjects
no lol they were actually discussing fundamentals of knowledge and information which is literally just raw iq and nothing else at that point. tate was just saying some fake woke shit about personal experience and ignoring statistics, i can see where hes coming from but he should have just conceded, it was hard to watch. and the way he ended things was beta asf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath and subhuman incel
they’re all retarded but they’re entertaining
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17920, Daniel Plainview, fauxfox and 5 others
how do u even remember to breath


no lol they were actually discussing fundamentals of knowledge and information which is literally just raw iq and nothing else at that point. tate was just saying some fake woke shit about personal experience and ignoring statistics, i can see where hes coming from but he should have just conceded, it was hard to watch. and the way he ended things was beta asf.
Lol sounds funny, I gotta watch it
 
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman incel and Salieri
how do u even remember to breath


no lol they were actually discussing fundamentals of knowledge and information which is literally just raw iq and nothing else at that point. tate was just saying some fake woke shit about personal experience and ignoring statistics, i can see where hes coming from but he should have just conceded, it was hard to watch. and the way he ended things was beta asf.
you can prove any point by bringing stats to support your view but personal experieces what matter at the end, i can bring bluepill stats that disprove the blackpill but my personal experience tells otherwise does that mean its wrong, no.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksOrDeath and subhuman incel
was just saying some fake woke shit about personal experience and ignoring statistics
that’s literally Hasans entire business model
 
  • JFL
Reactions: fauxfox, Danish_Retard, ShowerMaxxing and 3 others
you can prove any point by bringing stats to support your view but personal experieces what matter at the end, i can bring bluepill stats that disprove the blackpill but my personal experience tells otherwise does that mean its wrong, no.
the stats support the blackpill; height = higher salary, lower risk of suicice, etc...

u can walk outside and see the earth is flat, but if u use the real knowledge and objective info, u know its round. its the same point hasan made, how can u even argue it? idek.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath, Danish_Retard and subhuman incel
A person shouldent be able to lose against hasan.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox, Deleted member 19997, metagross and 1 other person
the stats support the blackpill; height = higher salary, lower risk of suicice, etc...

u can walk outside and see the earth is flat, but if u use the real knowledge and objective info, u know its round. its the same point hasan made, how can u even argue it? idek.
buddy, there's stats support bleu pilled ideas that inceltears often bring them, which one you trust ? the ones that support your personal experience, its the only thing that matter
 
A person shouldent be able to lose against hasan.
i dont think hasan is very smart but somehow andrew was just on another level of dumb 🤷‍♀️
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath, Danish_Retard, Deleted member 19997 and 1 other person
buddy, there's stats support bleu pilled ideas that inceltears often bring them, which one you trust ? the ones that support your personal experience, its the only thing that matter
like what stat
 
buddy, there's stats support bleu pilled ideas that inceltears often bring them, which one you trust ? the ones that support your personal experience, its the only thing that matter
No, there aren't. All statistics prove the blackpill.
If there is anything that suggests otherwise, there is likely a methodological error there. Like, maybe some study where women were asked what they look for in a man and they say: "Confidence and personality" and then redditors are like: "Look what this study says! Women like personality! :feelsgood::feelsuhh:"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Racky, vaninskybird, LooksOrDeath and 3 others
No, there aren't. All statistics prove the blackpill.
If there is anything that suggests otherwise, there is likely a methodological error there. Like, maybe some study where women were asked what they look for in a man and they say: "Confidence and personality" and then redditors are like: "Look what this study says! Women like personality! :feelsgood::feelsuhh:"
 
No, there aren't. All statistics prove the blackpill.
If there is anything that suggests otherwise, there is likely a methodological error there. Like, maybe some study where women were asked what they look for in a man and they say: "Confidence and personality" and then redditors are like: "Look what this study says! Women like personality! :feelsgood::feelsuhh:"
you can bring stats to any worldview you want lil bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: EasternRightWinger15
No, there aren't. All statistics prove the blackpill.
If there is anything that suggests otherwise, there is likely a methodological error there. Like, maybe some study where women were asked what they look for in a man and they say: "Confidence and personality" and then redditors are like: "Look what this study says! Women like personality! :feelsgood::feelsuhh:"

you belive this bs ?

HhahahaHAHAHAHA READ LIKE A FUCKING BOOK

@metagross

Clapping Applause GIF
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Racky, LooksOrDeath, Danish_Retard and 1 other person
Yeah, peanut head Hassan won, but that was the lamest debate... Personal experience vs studies, how did they come up with this debate topic?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Salieri
Yeah, peanut head Hassan won, but that was the lamest debate... Personal experience vs studies, how did they come up with this debate topic?
cause all tate does is use anecdotal evidence and hasan wanted to adress it 🤷‍♀️
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16984
Watched him vs hasan, its actually insane how legit retarded he is. His tiktok clips are funny asf, but watching him actually talk seriously is just painful, even with xqc he was struggling but xqc somehow managed to troll harder 🤦‍♀️. Hasan tho has at least 100 iq so tate just got flattened and looked like a pussy calling him "not fun" etc after realizing how doomed it was and how retarded he looked 🤣

men should stick with jordan peterson still for confidence and motivation etc, ik he said some dumb shit about things outside of psychology but realistically i think hes overhated and he has legit value in some ways for young men.
Comment 1657763381VTXdCVd2C6RTTJjUn8MDkL
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Salieri
Watched him vs hasan, its actually insane how legit retarded he is. His tiktok clips are funny asf, but watching him actually talk seriously is just painful, even with xqc he was struggling but xqc somehow managed to troll harder 🤦‍♀️. Hasan tho has at least 100 iq so tate just got flattened and looked like a pussy calling him "not fun" etc after realizing how doomed it was and how retarded he looked 🤣

men should stick with jordan peterson still for confidence and motivation etc, ik he said some dumb shit about things outside of psychology but realistically i think hes overhated and he has legit value in some ways for young men.
andrew is not smart. he talks fast and normies think that makes him smart- he's pretty cringe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Salieri
andrew was absolutely losing the debate and couldnt cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Salieri
link to the debate?
 
  • +1
Reactions: stevielake
Andrew has far too much ego to actually have a debate. he is uninterested in exploring ideas and finding truth, only being the infallible internet guru
 
and I dont even like hasan i think hes a bitch
 
DNR but Tate mogs Pitt
 
Yeah man the first thing I thought of when I saw Andrew Tate was "Wow, what a well-read intelligent man!"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Salieri
Watched him vs hasan, its actually insane how legit retarded he is. His tiktok clips are funny asf, but watching him actually talk seriously is just painful, even with xqc he was struggling but xqc somehow managed to troll harder 🤦‍♀️. Hasan tho has at least 100 iq so tate just got flattened and looked like a pussy calling him "not fun" etc after realizing how doomed it was and how retarded he looked 🤣

men should stick with jordan peterson still for confidence and motivation etc, ik he said some dumb shit about things outside of psychology but realistically i think hes overhated and he has legit value in some ways for young men.
Andrew Tate thought he was the smartest person in the world in one video I saw him make.
Then proceeds to tell everyone how China and Islam will dominate the world.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Prince charming
I haven't watched the video yet, but I'm guessing that little peanut head Hassan was discussing political topics that he is an expert in? Yeah, when your whole life is watching CNN,l and Fox, you're going to sound smarter talking about those subjects
It was about if women are better drivers than men and I like Andrew but he definitely lost
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16984 and Salieri
it was sad to watch tate lose over such stupid mistake.. he was right and he could have defended really well.
there are so many studies countering each other.. just because its a stat or study does not mean its a bible..
 
it was sad to watch tate lose over such stupid mistake.. he was right and he could have defended really well.
there are so many studies countering each other.. just because its a stat or study does not mean its a bible..
He is personal experience > studies
 
Jp is my role model
No not Jordan Peterson
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Can’t take any non black pilled man too seriously tbh.

They harp on about the importance of empirical data but the moment you show them blackpill studies that go against their world view they always fall back on anecdotes. “Muh I know a manlet that slays! It’s your personality inkwell!”
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Racky, TsarTsar444, stevielake and 3 others
He is personal experience > studies
yeah but he knew that is bullshit even while he is saying that.
thats why he got all sarcastic and said i went upto the space and blabla at the end.

all this because he did not prepare to backup his claim prior to the debate, and as soon as he heard there is a study proving women are better driver he did not take the option to even find flaws in the study. he got scared by the fact there was a study proving that..
meanwhile study was proving women are 'safer drivers' not more skilled drivers technique wise
 
I saw the hasan "debate".

He decided to cite graphs with fatal car accidents which doesn't account for all the non fatal crashes. Since non-fatal crashes happen more than fatal crashes Hasan skewed the definition of debate to fit his narrative.

If women crash more times than men but men die more times than women in a car accidents doesn't that still mean women drivers are still shit drivers?
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Racky and RecessedChinCel
I saw the hasan "debate".

He decided to cite graphs with fatal car accidents which doesn't account for all the non fatal crashes. Since non-fatal crashes happen more than fatal crashes Hasan skewed the definition of debate to fit his narrative.

If women crash more times than men but men die more times than women in a car accidents doesn't that still mean women drivers are still shit drivers?
Reminds me of the suicide rates tbh.

4/5 suicides are men despite the fact that women “attempt” suicide more often than men.

Which means two things

1) Women are shit at killing themselves and always choose less effective methods like Overdosing on medication

2) They dont actually want to kill themselves and make “attempts” to garner attention.

But people like Hassan would use women suicide attempt rates to prove women have it harder than men or other stupid shit.

Foids are literally worse at everything than men even roping jfl.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath, Elvisandreaa, Deleted member 19398 and 1 other person
Can’t take any non black pilled man too seriously tbh.

They harp on about the importance of empirical data but the moment you show them blackpill studies that go against their world view they always fall back on anecdotes. “Muh I know a manlet that slays! It’s your personality inkwell!”
That's why we are above, because we simply refuse to cry and we take actions.

Coping is a sin,and the reality is what it is.
 
the stats support the blackpill; height = higher salary, lower risk of suicice, etc...

u can walk outside and see the earth is flat, but if u use the real knowledge and objective info, u know its round. its the same point hasan made, how can u even argue it? idek.
The who is a better driver statistic isn’t accurate. Men might Crash more cars every year but men also drive much more often. There are more men Than women in total and in relationships men are the drivers, very few women drive for ”fun”and more men own cars etc etc

Still even If accounting for those factors we still probably Cause more crashes but thats because we drive much faster which doesn’t make men worse drivers as If you’d tell an average man and women to park a car chances are the man Will do it better. If you tell an average man and Woman to race a track or avoid an accident men Will do it better.

Personal experience matters because statistiks doesn’t always show the whole picture. In my family my mom has crashed 2 cars and isn’t a gen z so she admits she’s rather have a Male driver which is common sense. Generally speaking a lot of These Young girls sit way to close to the wheel and are using their phones when driving which is why i can recall a dussin of accidents that wouldn’t count as Crashes. Female friends driving into their garage port, backing up into a wall, scratching the side of a parked car etc etc.
 
Stats are kinda meaningless tbh because theres stats that can support any argument. You just pick selectively enough and now you're a 'winner' according to the 'stats'.

Actual scientific studies usually have conclusions that are weak asf. They tend to never draw any hard conclusions.

meanwhile you have the wombo-retarded social/psychology studies that are entirely unreproduceable that will make the most controversial and retarded claims.

Same with politicians taking the scientific studies with weak conclusions and drawing strong conclusions from them.
 
Last edited:
Stats are kinda meaningless tbh because theres stats that can support any argument. You just pick selectively enough and now you're a 'winner' according to the 'stats'.

Actual scientific studies usually have conclusions that are weak asf. They tend to never draw any hard conclusions.

meanwhile you have to wombo-retarded social/psychology studies that are entirely unreproduceable that will make the most controversial and retarded claims.

Same with politicians taking the scientific studies with weak conclusions and drawing strong conclusions from them.
😹😹😹
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
1
Views
187
Deleted member 94583
D
yandex99
Replies
18
Views
1K
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
IntelligentCel
Replies
37
Views
3K
chriswalkerthegoat
chriswalkerthegoat
D
Replies
66
Views
3K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top