Angularity and Misc > Dimo and Harm

[ChangPilled_]

While most people tend to think harmony and dimorphism are the most important pillars for your PSL rating, it's actually your angularity. If we objectively look at most peoples facial harmony, it tends to range from 50% to 70%, with even chads like Jordan barrett possessing subpar harmony compared to others. Still people treat this as the most important pillar when some random guy off the street could possibly have over 70-80% harmony and you wouldtn even bat an eye. The only issue mainly occurs when major facial harmony measurements are way off like FWHR, and Canthal tilt, as well as eye spacing etc thats when the facial harmony issues really matter but if you have the essentials with subpar harmony for the rest of your measurements you will most likely be fine.

on the flip side, having HIGH ANGULARITY is extremely difficult and the most valuable in terms of attractiveness because people can instantly see that having a low facial adiposity immediately makes a face more attractive. There has never been even anyone 7+ nevertheless 8+ rating/10 with a body fat percentage over 20%. It's simply impossible. Even if your body fat percentage is low, it does not even guarantee that your facial angularity will be top tier. Thats why having amazing angularity is one of the core things separating chads from normies, because ultimately beauty lies in the bone structure and angularity relies solely on your bones.

Additionally, facial miscillaneous features is almost as important as having good angularity because people tend to realize if you have bad misc more so than if you have bad harmony. For example, if someone's eyes are too wide set, but they have perfect misc, to the average person they will immediately think that person would dbe attractive despite their eye spacing if they have good misc. Additionally, a chad could have perfect harmony, but say his misc is horrible, acne, redness, skin peeling, poor eyebrows, wrinkles and so on, (bad misc doesn't only mean bad skin it could mean nasal tip as well, bulbosity, ears being flared technically is a misc issue, which combines with harmony to a degree) People will think that person would be significantly less attractive than the person with numerous harmony issues with good misc. Ultimately, someone with 8/10 misc but 5/10 harmony would be perceived as more attractive than someone with 5/10 misc and 8/10 harmony. (assuming the other pillars are the same)

The thing with dimorphism is that yes it is still extremely important however these days the rise of the pretty boy archetype and fluidity within what is considered attractive can change a lot from hypermasculine to pretty boy looks, which makes dimorphism a lot less essential than misc and angularity IMO. Additionally someone with too high dimorphism like Louis Allen iii could be perceived as too intimidating and ultimately undesirable to a lot of people despite theoretically being "High PSL". While having high dimorphism is important, it does not override the need for great facial angularity and misc. I would say that it would probably help out more than harmony or at least be equal.

Ultimately having a good balance between the four pillars is ideal, however its overwhelmingly prevalent that in order to be considered highly attractive, facial misc and angularity are the two pillars that would make you stand out the furthest, and are also unironically the things you can end up changing the most.

 

[recessed_00]

While most people tend to think harmony and dimorphism are the most important pillars for your PSL rating, it's actually your angularity. If we objectively look at most peoples facial harmony, it tends to range from 50% to 70%, with even chads like Jordan barrett possessing subpar harmony compared to others. Still people treat this as the most important pillar when some random guy off the street could possibly have over 70-80% harmony and you wouldtn even bat an eye. The only issue mainly occurs when major facial harmony measurements are way off like FWHR, and Canthal tilt, as well as eye spacing etc thats when the facial harmony issues really matter but if you have the essentials with subpar harmony for the rest of your measurements you will most likely be fine.

on the flip side, having HIGH ANGULARITY is extremely difficult and the most valuable in terms of attractiveness because people can instantly see that having a low facial adiposity immediately makes a face more attractive. There has never been even anyone 7+ nevertheless 8+ rating/10 with a body fat percentage over 20%. It's simply impossible. Even if your body fat percentage is low, it does not even guarantee that your facial angularity will be top tier. Thats why having amazing angularity is one of the core things separating chads from normies, because ultimately beauty lies in the bone structure and angularity relies solely on your bones.

Additionally, facial miscillaneous features is almost as important as having good angularity because people tend to realize if you have bad misc more so than if you have bad harmony. For example, if someone's eyes are too wide set, but they have perfect misc, to the average person they will immediately think that person would dbe attractive despite their eye spacing if they have good misc. Additionally, a chad could have perfect harmony, but say his misc is horrible, acne, redness, skin peeling, poor eyebrows, wrinkles and so on, (bad misc doesn't only mean bad skin it could mean nasal tip as well, bulbosity, ears being flared technically is a misc issue, which combines with harmony to a degree) People will think that person would be significantly less attractive than the person with numerous harmony issues with good misc. Ultimately, someone with 8/10 misc but 5/10 harmony would be perceived as more attractive than someone with 5/10 misc and 8/10 harmony. (assuming the other pillars are the same)

The thing with dimorphism is that yes it is still extremely important however these days the rise of the pretty boy archetype and fluidity within what is considered attractive can change a lot from hypermasculine to pretty boy looks, which makes dimorphism a lot less essential than misc and angularity IMO. Additionally someone with too high dimorphism like Louis Allen iii could be perceived as too intimidating and ultimately undesirable to a lot of people despite theoretically being "High PSL". While having high dimorphism is important, it does not override the need for great facial angularity and misc. I would say that it would probably help out more than harmony or at least be equal.

Ultimately having a good balance between the four pillars is ideal, however its overwhelmingly prevalent that in order to be considered highly attractive, facial misc and angularity are the two pillars that would make you stand out the furthest, and are also unironically the things you can end up changing the most.

everything matters, the jordan barrett example you gave was bullshit coz the reason he looked so bad was coz his angularity was like 1, ofc if your angularity score or any other score of the 4 pillars - harmony,dimo, angularity, features would be so low then obv you'd look very bad, angularity infact is the least important among the 4 pillars , coz it is the easiest to fraud

look at chris hemsworth in this image, his angularity is below a 5 or at max a 5 easily and yet he is objectively, easily an above avg looking guy coz his dimorphism saves him