D
Deleted member 4106
Luminary
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2019
- Posts
- 6,795
- Reputation
- 10,193
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't need to say anything![]()
What about lenny kravitz who has the skull size of the avg 6ft 6 male
while being 5ft9 and had every woman masturbating to him
View attachment 1096387View attachment 1096388
It looks more neotenic, like those big-headed cartoonsright looks more dom/imposing
It looks more neotenic, like those big-headed cartoons
If this were the other way around, you'd say small skull is cope.
If this were the other way around, you'd say small skull is cope.
The reality is that skull size is borderline irrelevant unless on either extreme end because it is the content of the face that matters.
For instance, take a look at this picture and tell me which Skull size mogs:
ABSOLUTELY!!!is skull size subconscious?
If this were the other way around, you'd say small skull is cope.
The reality is that skull size is borderline irrelevant unless on either extreme end because it is the content of the face that matters.
For instance, take a look at this picture and tell me which Skull size mogs:
I think even if you overlap the two heads in editor software, Mahers skull will be significantly bigger still. But yeah, skull size is a small part, to the point I can't say one is better than the other - just that in general, large skulls are correlated with tall men in any absolute sense. But its a bit like wrist size - wrist size CAN indicate height and frame, but not always - which means that focusing on wrist size or skull size just because it is correlated with other factors which are positive like height or frame is pointless.I agree with your point, if it is beautiful, your skull size will be irrelevant unless it is at extremes.
In the case of the image, the difference is not so great, but it is aggravated by the difference in height