illusion
Forefront of the Anti-Rotter Movement
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Posts
- 1,143
- Reputation
- 8,598
This thread has been a concept and in the making itself, for a very long time. Unfortunately, I did have to tank my reputation quite a bit to gain the final amounts of personally collected field-reported naturalistic observations on the behaviors of pedophiles/pedophile adjacent groups (if you've been here for a few weeks, you'll know what I'm talking about.) However, I've had this thread in mind ever since I first initially saw that infamous clip of Goatis saying "You'd have to be severely mentally ill, not to find a 15 year old girl attractive." I, from the very start have fundamentally disagreed with any "primal" ideology saying that the prime age for reproduction is within the mid teens (15 - 17) and all scientific evidence proves this. So let's get straight into exactly what this subhuman condition is, how it forms, how it works, and what the truth is about it and the people that have it.
_______
So what is pedophilia?
Before getting into anything, we have to firstly lay down what the general definition of a pedophile is, both socially and literally. If we take this from a literal perspective, the direct meaning of the word "pedophile/pedophilia" is: a psychological disorder characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children (typically age 13 or younger).
However, there is also the social definition of "pedophile," since the other words that describe the attraction to minors within their early, mid, and late teens (such as Ephebophilia) is long, and annoying to use, society slaps the word "pedophile" on anyone who is largely above the age of being a minor, who is with anyone under the age of 18, which is the age of consent in most major developed countries, why do I say most? Because obviously there are countries like Germany who technically have it at "14" but that is largely irrelevant since it just means a 14 year old can sleep with another 14 - 16 year old. It does not mean a 40 year old can be with a 14 year old, do not get it mixed up as a lot of iqlets like doing to try and "prove a point."
So what definition will be using for "pedophilia" in this thread? Well, the most efficient way for me to relay all of the information I have, is simply if we view pedophilia through a less strict societal definition (so something like 18 x 14/15 year old would be considered pedophilia, obviously there are exemptions depending on the age, the very cap is a 17 year old dating a 19/20 year old, at 17x21, it becomes weird, as that's a sophomore/junior in college dating someone fresh out or still in highschool.) Why will we give it the societal definition? Because pedophilic behavior is also largely dependent on the major maturity gap, why is a 18 year old and 15 year old bad? Because that's a college student dating a sophomore in highschool, someone who needs to start worrying about bills and large payments is dating someone who probably finds sex jokes funny, it's a major gap in power, which causes grooming, which is one of the main pillars for pedophilia to occur.
_______
How do you detect if a relationship is pedophilic?
There are 4 main pillars to a pedophilic relationship, being:
1. Chronological Age Gap/Development Milestones
2. Inherent Power Imbalance
3. Coercion/Grooming/Isolation Tactics
4. Violation of Informed Consent
I will go into each of these in better detail below.
------------------------------------
1. Chronological Age Gap & Developmental Milestones
The most straightforward metric is the absolute age difference, but this is evaluated through the lens of developmental stages rather than just numbers. There are 2 things that go into determining this.
Minority Status: One individual is legally and developmentally a minor (under 18), while the other is an adult (above 18.)
Life-Stage: Even a gap that seems small numerically (21-year-old and a 15-year-old) represents a massive chasm in cognitive development, life experience, and brain maturation. The adult has navigated independent milestones (financial choices, legal rights, high school graduation) that the minor has not yet encountered.
2. Inherent Power Imbalance
In any adult-minor dynamic, an equal partnership is structurally impossible. The adult possesses systemic advantages that tilt the scale entirely in their favor:
Authority & Experience: The adult has greater cognitive maturity, emotional regulation capacity, and world experience, which can easily be used to gain absolute control in the relationship.
Resource Control: Adults usually hold the financial means, transportation, housing, and legal autonomy. This creates a dependency loop where the minor relies on the adult for mobility, gifts, or validation, absolving their ability to freely give or withdraw consent.
3. Coercion, Grooming, and Isolation
Healthy, regular relationships are built on mutual growth, however, adult-minor relationships almost always rely on specific behavioral patterns to establish and maintain control.
Nature of Grooming Behaviors: The nature of grooming exhibits the adult targeting a vulnerable minor, showering them with excessive attention or gifts (love-bombing), and gradually pushing physical or emotional boundaries.
Social Isolation: The adult encourages the minor to keep the relationship a secret or actively drives a wedge between the minor and their peers, parents, and everyone/anyone that would cause the minor to not solely rely on the influence of the grooming adult. By convincing the minor that "no one else understands our love," the adult ensures their influence remains unchecked.
4. Violation of Informed Consent
From both a legal and ethical standpoint, a minor is deemed incapable of providing informed consent to a relationship with an adult.
Cognitive Asymmetry: A minor cannot fully grasp, understand, or comprehend the long-term emotional, psychological, or social consequences of the relationship.
Illusion of Choice: Even if a minor insists they "wanted" the relationship or feel they are mature for their age, societal and psychological consensus views this as a byproduct of the power dynamic and grooming process, rather than free, uncoerced choice. This "illusion of choice" is often exploited by pedophiles today to try and guilt trip and manipulate regular people into saying that the minor in question actually "wanted" the relationship. This is of course, a lie. It's on the same level of idiocy as saying a man/woman wanted to be assaulted because "their body got aroused."
___________
Now that we have gotten the boring stuff out of the way (although the previously mentioned material is absolutely important if you ever want to detect a pedophilic, nefarious relationship dynamic,) it is time to get into the good stuff, the absolute annihilation and the total subhumanity of both pedophiles and pedophilia.
So let's look at our average pedophile:
This is your "average pedophile," as we can see, this "man" (who actually was arrested on charges of pedophilia and minor assault among other things,) is easily a turbo subhuman. But this isn't just a stereotype, pedophiles are all inherently subhuman at base, a few outliers (like Hullo recently, who's LHTN - MHTN max, do not change the average.)
Pedophiles are Significantly Shorter on Average
Major studies on the physical height in pedophilic and hebephilic sexual offenders have shown that said offenders tend to be, on average, an entire inch shorter non-pedophilic offenders. Assuming that the average height is anywhere from 5'6 - 5'8, this means that pedophiles are anywhere from 5'5 - 5'7 on average. This also means that in countries where the average is shorter (such as countries like Timor and the Phillipines where the average height is 5'3,) pedophiles tend to be roughly 5'1 - 5'2, which is a subhuman height. Don't rule out that this statistic is a bell-shaped curve, meaning that there is a much larger number of short pedophiles than pedophiles that are even slightly above average height. This means that the vast majority of pedophiles are turbomanlets. (Source 1, Source 2. JFL at the title of source two being "Further Evidence of Atypical Physical Development Early in Life.")
Pedophiles tend to have Physical Irregularities (MPAs)
Of course, we have to include the fact that pedophiles tend to have varying levels of physical irregularities, you can almost sense these people half the time. In clinical assessments, pedophiles show a higher prevalence of MPAs. These are superficial, non-harmful deviations in physical development, this can range anywhere from large, protruding, asymmetrical ears, to asymmetrical eyes. This is obviously, a subhuman trait. These things are formed within the womb meaning these people are born with subhuman traits. (Source 1, Source 2.)
Average Eye Area of a Pedophile JFL:
Pedophiles are Fat on Average:
As we can clearly see from the reference photo I used above of the "average pedophile," it is no surprise to anyone that pedophiles are overweight on average. In neurodevelopmental clinical profiles, the average BMI for individuals diagnosed with pedophilic disorder was recorded at 25 (±5). This places the group average right on the range of "overweight," which is classified between 25 - 29 BMI. This means that a good chunk of pedophiles are also much over this, into 30 BMI, hitting the "Obese" category. The existence of the average BMI, which is already overweight and unhealthy, means that there are more fat pedophiles than skinny or even regular ones combined (remember the bell shaped curve.) This fits in right with the psychological profile (which we will go over later) of the pedophile, which is one of a very weak, defeated, cucked man who needs to assert dominance over something. (Source.)
Pedophiles are Significantly Below Average Intelligence on Average, as well a Signficiant Amount of them being Neurodivergent (Autistic and liketype diseases):
Again, not a surprise. Pedophiles are clearly low IQ, but how much? Well studies consistently show that individuals with a primary sexual interest in children score, on average, 10 to 15 IQ points lower than the general population. Assuming the average IQ is roughly 90 - 100, this means that the average pedophile ranges from an IQ of 75 (borderline/mentally disabled) - 85 (not disabled, but very stupid.) Again, let's not forget the bell-shaped curve, since the average runs right at roughly 10 - 15 IQ points (which is a whole standard deviation) this means that pedophiles are often skewed to be even more moronic, and a good chunk of them are 20 - 25 IQ points below average. This of course, means that a good chunk of pedophiles are clinically mentally disabled and are beaten in IQ by chimpanzees. This is hilarious for the same reason all the previous ones are, that there are more pedophiles that could clinically register as disabled than ones that are normal. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5, Source 6.)
They also have impaired executive functioning. Neuropsychological testing frequently reveals deficits in memory, cognitive flexibility, and impulse control, which are governed by the prefrontal cortex (Source.)
They have reduced white matter in the brain as well, Neuroimaging studies have identified significant structural differences in the brain's white matter (the cabling tissue that connects different brain regions), suggesting a disruption in neural connectivity. (Source.)
And the best of all, while it seems comedic, pedophiles also have a high rate of head injuries as children. Data indicates a significantly higher prevalence of head injuries sustained before the age of 13 among pedophilic men. (Source.)
Now onto the inherent neurodivergence of pedophiles:
Clinical trials have proved time and time again that there is a strong, correlated overlap between pedophiles and mental neurodivergence disorders, such as ADHD and Autsim Spectrum Disorder. Specifically, they share overlapping clinical features, brain abnormalities, and high comorbidity rates, as well as overall behavior similarities. However it is not just an overlap, on studies done, researchers discovered that approximately 25% (one quarter) of the pedophilic clinical group officially met the diagnostic criteria for either Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This means that 1 in every 4 pedophiles is behaviorally the exact same as an aspie. To simplify, pedophiles exhibit aspie traits majorly and 25% of them fully fit the criteria for someone who is actually autistic or has ADHD. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5.)
Obviously this should come at absolutely no surprise to anyone, if you've ever interacted with any of those edgy users here, you can very easily tell most of these guys are socially isolated losers who are fundamentally incapable of existing within modern society, let's take a look at the profile of one of our aspiring future mods known as "@lol" here on the forum (or at least, that's what he wants to be!.)
As we can see from the screenshot, our aspiring future mod "lol" exhibits basically every trait I just listed as far as neurological stuff goes for pedophilia.
Anyways, back onto the subhumanity of the pedophile! These next ones will be a bit more rapid-fire.
Pedophiles are Poorer on Average and Live in Poorer Areas:
A comprehensive community-level study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) combined RSO residential tracking with U.S. Census data across ten states. The regression analysis proved that lower median household income directly predicted significantly higher rates of registered offender residency in nine out of the ten states. Further research has also proved that offenders cluster firmly within much poorer residential demographics as far as housing and spending go. So TL;DR: Pedophiles are poor on average, they live in much worse environments, proving that a stable house cannot craft such degeneracy. (Source 1, Source 2.)
Pedophiles Struggle with Relationships and have Issues Pleasing their (Adult) Partners:
Criminological and psychological studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with pedophilic disorder or histories of child sexual offenses experience profound deficits in forming and maintaining stable adult romantic relationships. These people are unable to please their partners, are unable to perform in bed (unsurprising, considering most of them are probably flaccid dicklets,) and are unable to understand and comprehend adult relationship dynamics. This has a number of causes, for example, that they are usually neurodivergent and low in IQ, so it is not a huge surprise that they cannot handle adult stuff.
However, we can get into it a lot more specifically. There is a direct link between the failure of pedophilic individuals in adult relationships and their inability to please adult partners through intimacy.
According to comprehensive clinical research, individuals convicted of sexual offenses display highly problematic intimacy dispositions. The study notes that their inability to satisfy adult intimacy needs makes them structurally highly vulnerable to relationship failure and instability. (Source.)
Pedophiles also struggle to maintain intimacy, and they become sexually isolated in normal relationships which causes them to be severely depressed as well as their partners to build resentment towards them, this further cements their uselessness in relationships and makes it incredibly hard for one of these individuals to be successful in regular human activities. (Source.)
Pedophiles Struggle Significantly more with Suicidal Ideation and Commit Suicide Frequently:
This is tragic, as all human life is precious, however it is expected. I'll be very brief on this.
Research indicates that suicide risk in this pedophilic demographics spikes dramatically due to intense public exposure, legal consequences, severe social stigma, and the loss of personal and professional status. Some studies report completed suicide rates for specific typologies of child sex offenders to be 100 to 183 times higher than those in the general population. Research on incarcerated sex offenders has found that approximately 14% to 18% report at least one suicide attempt during their lifetime. Alongside pedophilic disorder, this population often struggles with clinical depression, anxiety, internalized shame, and substance use, all of which elevate suicide risk. This should be a very obvious observable trope among all pedophiles, because they are all internally ashamed of being how disgusting they are. Due to their internalized hatred and disgust towards themselves, they are incapable of having a positive self image. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5, Source 6, Source 7.
_______
The Utter Annihilation of ALL Pro-Pedophilia Coping Mechanisms: All Myths Debunked
Now that we’ve established that the average pedophile is a short, fat, severely ND, poor, low IQ, and majorly deformed “man,” we have to take away what little they have left, being their coping mechanisms for why they are like this and how they explain their behavior. There are 5 main myths/coping mechanisms that these subhumans utilize to try and pass off their disgusting behavior and try to make us look like we’re the “mentally ill” ones.”
Said mechanisms are:
1. “It’s natural bro. Evolution makes us attracted to them, laws are just artificial social constructs made to block us from what we’re made to do! Teen girls are the most fertile at 15.”
2. A historical/cultural appeal. The “we used to do it!” argument.
3. Biological Determinism - That pedophilia is decided at birth and that it’s “incurable” and that they’re “predisposed” to it.
4. Direct Minimization and Attempted Mocking/Degradation of “Normies” to try and make their actions seem more reasonable and that we’re just “overreacting.”
All of these of course, are wrong. All will be disproven below:
————————
1. The “Natural Argument”
This was largely popularized into normie theories by Goatis quite a bit back with his “you’d have to be severely mentally ill, not to find a 15 year old girl attractive” clip, however it has existed as a concept for a very long time. Pedophiles try to argue that evolution and nature are the causes of pedophilia, and that it’s a social construct that pedophilia is wrong. This is insanely wrong, the main 2 ways they try to prove that it’s “natural” is through:
1. Pedophilia happening in nature (with penguins, dolphins, certain great apes, etc.)
2. That 15 year olds are the most fertile and “suitable” for bearing children.
|
1. Firstly we must tackle the “nature” argument, as it is moronic. Yes, pedophilia happens in nature, however it isn’t anymore natural there than it is here. Pedophilia has zero reproductive advantage and it is done by more evolved animals (such as penguins and dolphins) because they are smarter and capable of committing meaningless actions. What does this mean? It means they are doing it for no reason. If something was “natural,” according to all rules of nature, it would be efficient. However this is not the case, with pedophilia within animals and humans, if the victim is impregnated, not only do they have a massive chance of dying and taking the baby with them, it is also incredibly unstable.
It’s also important to mention here that these same animals also partake in eating their own shit, necrophilia, and cannibalism, which are all 100% not natural. Do you really want to compare yourself to an animal that frequently eats its own defecation? Considering that the average pedophile is borderline mentally disabled, this may just be the case for them.
Rather than being a "natural variation," a landmark neuroimaging study published confirms that pedophilic disorder is explicitly linked to neurodevelopmental abnormalities. (Source.)
Additional clinical research published establishes that pedophilia correlates heavily with physical markers of disrupted prenatal brain development during the first trimester. These markers include as we’ve previously stated, a statistically lower total IQ, higher rates of left-handedness, and structural brain deviations. This reinforces the medical reality that the condition is a pathology of brain development correlated to a neurological miswiring rather than a natural biological instinct. So to simplify, pedophilia isn’t natural even as an instinct whatsoever. (Source.)
|
Secondly, we must tackle the old myth of “15 year olds are the most fertile and suitable of having children.” This is just blatantly false, the hormonal levels of teenagers are incredibly unstable (causing the moody teenager trope we see en masse today) and the body itself is barely into puberty (roughly 2 - 3 years in,) meaning that it physically cannot be tuned to bear a child efficiently. While it is technically possible, the “technicality” of it directly contradicts the “natural” argument since natural would require it to be efficient and ideal, and the pregnancy of a mid stage teenager fits neither of these. The actual start of the years of peak fertility age range for women happens roughly between the ages of 18 - 21, and the peak for both genders is roughly at age 30. (Source.)
To give a more clinical, exact picture here, comprehensive global reviews of human reproductive health demonstrate that 15-year-olds undergo a period of "adolescent subfecundity," characterized by highly irregular, anovulatory menstrual cycles. Biologically, the human body at 15 is still dedicating primary energy to its own skeletal and neurological maturation, meaning reproductive capacity is underdeveloped compared to an adult in their 20s. According to clinical data published, a woman's peak window for natural, complication-free conception spans from her early to mid-20s, achieving up to an 85% success rate within one year of trying. This success rate and lack of major complication issues is something a 15 year old (or any range of teenager) is simply unable to replicate, as again, it isn’t natural. (Source.)
——————
2. The “We Used to Do it” Historical Argument
This is directly tied to the previous one and they’re used to explain each other, but since we’ve totally disproven the viability of a child as a successful mate, we can easily single this one out.
Pedophiles usually point to history and say that marriages between older people and children were quite common, however this is a very unviable argument. These marriages were not done out of love, vitality, or on any structural or medical base. Child marriages were dictated by survival, property consolidation, political alliances, and drastically shorter life expectancies, rather than an endorsement of pedophilic desires. Obviously, if the average lifespan is cut in half to 40 - 50, the average marriage age range is going to be cut down in half too, from 25 - 30 to roughly 15 - 18. Whatever hormonal differences we had back then don’t matter, as these do not exist today. It is not like any of us ever experienced a timeline where marriage to a child was okay, so these people have nothing to look back on to solidify their claims. And besides, this was a time range where people believed in witches and evil spells, and the average IQ was much lower than it is today.
Some pedophiles try pointing out other countries today that have lower ages of consent, however again, this is a massive fallacy. 95% of these countries are third world deathtraps where the average life expectancy is 50 - 60 already, not to mention the people of these countries are largely uneducated and driven by arbitrary historical norms and under constant terrorism and fear. The countries that are exempt from this (like Japan until recently,) are developed yet they have an immensely high suicide rate and poor mental standards of living. And besides, pointing out a single outlier within such a massive range proves that it’s just a coping mechanism, not a serious argument. This is how most of the conversations with these turbo IQlets go:
——————
3. The “Biological Determinism” Argument (“It’s incurable! We were predestined for this.)
This is the second most utilized excuse, especially in the manosphere where we reside. Let’s see an example of pedophiles using this excuse:
This 2-man jerkoff was under my anti-porn megathread (go read it if you haven’t already,) and these two copecels commenting saying that porn addiction doesn’t cause pedophilia and that pedophilia is “acquired at birth,” while we know from previous sources within this thread that pedophiles do experience some certain markers within the womb, this does not “predispose them” to being indisputable pedophiles. There’s a reason I included “on average,” because there’s a very sizable chunk of pedophiles that don’t have these things happen in the womb.
Are some people more prone to developing pedophilic interests than others? Yes, but that does not correlate with biological predisposition, why? Because of what you have to do to actually develop it. Nobody wakes up one day and decides “hey prepubescent children are so attractive,” it’s developed overtime through the brain’s neuroplasticity, how? Through things like severe porn addiction and childhood trauma, neither of which are “developed in the womb.”
What these copecels fail to comprehend is that nobody goes up against their natural instincts immediately, it’s built up over time. If you watch porn, you’re inevitably going to go through porn escalation, and end up watching things intended for pedophiles, and make that the standard in your brain through neural rewiring. Millions upon millions of people have these same markers that supposedly “predetermine” if someone is going to be a pedophile, yet they are completely fine. Markers determine the general existence and extent of risk, they do NOT make someone a pedophile.
Even if someone does possess the markers and the “urges,” they could simply not act on it. Just because they may have it, doesn’t make it any more excusable. People have thousands of urges a day, from wanting to beat up their coworker to cheating on their girlfriend, yet they don’t act on these because they are unacceptable. You are a grown human, you should be able to comprehend that they are simply things you cannot do, no matter what.
———————
4. Direct Minimization of their Actions and the Attempted Mocking/Degradation of Normies - The “Moralcuck” Argument
This one doesn’t need a source, I’m sure you’re seen it. How many times I’ve seen someone on the forum call another a “moralcuck” for disliking pedophilia, I cannot possibly count them all. This one is super straightforward, they adopt the normie’s sarcasm and figures of speech and use it to mock anti - pedophilia arguments by framing the opposition as a “normie who’s cucked by society.”
A moronic argument, but it works somehow on here because people are deathly afraid of being viewed as “cucks” and “normies” which is ironic because pedophiles themselves are cucks at very high rates. How are you so terrified of being branded as “normal” that you’ll excuse baseless arguments in support of pedophilia? There’s a reason every human has an inherent hatred for this disgusting status of being a “pedophile,” even pedophiles themselves.
There’s no debunking to be had here, they’re hanging off on strings with this “argument,” moralcucking isn’t real, the only cucks are the pedophiles and the pseudo-intellectuals who are desperate for attention and acceptance so they agree with said pedophiles and their moronic, baseless arguments and reasoning.
__________
My Personal Observations of the Minds of Pedophiles
So now that we’ve taken away what little any pedophile had to hang onto, what is left? Well of course we must understand that curing a pedophile is extremely hard. I’ve been fascinated with the concept of curing one for a very long time, and for the last months, I’ve been observing ones on this forum, to see how they act, to try and understand where it comes from, and how it manifests within people.
From my naturalistic observations of these users, I can say fully that everything I’ve stated above about pedophiles is 100% true. They are low iq, ugly, social rejects who blatantly admit to their own subhumanity on the daily yet they try to claim some sort of superiority on users (trust me when I say this, these users are 100% pedophiles.)
Yet of course, I'm very sure that if this thread does well, they will be in my replies waffling on and on about how they "aren't pedophiles" and how I can't "prove it" (even though you can by just looking at their post history, I can give an example right now:
Why do they deny it so much? If it's truly something that "isn't bad," why is it denied so much? We have nazis, communists, and all sorts of extremists on here that own up to their own beliefs and go as far as post their own faces here, yet apparently the upholders of the righteous "natural way of life" immediately deny that they are pedophiles whenever they are excused.
There are 2 main reasons for this, firstly, it's obviously banned on the forum. They would be banned permanently if they outright admitted it, and the second reason is because they are subconsciously ashamed. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, and the people with this mental disorder must cope to the grave with their existence. They hate the label of "pedophile" and go as far as to give themselves their own disgusting "pride" flag and to try and rename themselves to "MAPs" (Minor Attracted Person.) They are subconsciously fully aware that they are doing something wrong, yet they refuse to admit it to themselves and others.
My Behavior regarding these individuals:
The only reason I’m nice to any of them is just because constant isolation from the general public causes people to go into an echo chamber where the only people they can talk to are the ones who agree with them, so giving them as a more regular dose of human interaction on a small scale is necessary to prevent radicalization. That and because I've needed to collect my final bits of information for this part of the thread throughout a few weeks of close up observation of their behavior. I can say, that it has been very successful, besides my reputation tanking quite a bit due to "muh neutrality" which I had to uphold to maintain my position.
However, while I believe we should still treat these people with somewhat levels of humanity and even kindness occasionally, they are still severely cognitively impairedcels who are useless to society and should be fully ostracized, they should not feel welcome in any normal place where they may be able to continue their predatory behavior.
It is very unfortunate that it has to be this way, as I've interacted with adjacent ones (like Bryce) who are surprisingly down to Earth and human, it is very upsetting for me to see how they are like, and I do wish for change in their lives. This thread is not meant to make fun of anyone, it is highlighting a tragic developmental condition that causes people to be perma-subhumans.
_________
Final Thoughts
Pedophilia is subhuman, it has always been subhuman and it will always be subhuman. If you are a pedophile, it is frankly over, you should isolate yourself from society until your brain fries over all the neural networks that are causing you to be a truecel tier subhuman within society, as frankly, you will never be accepted or find any type of success within your life. At the very most, you will be a chronically online porn addict who posts memes about Peter Scully online and fiercely defends themselves when called a pedophile and you'll have your group of fellow mentally ill subhumans who will be hated majorly, just like you, and will only ever exist online. (Does that ring a bell?) So if that's the life of your dreams, then go for it, but if not, then make a change in your life. You can start here, with a previous thread of mine on porn addiction and how to stop: https://looksmax.org/threads/anti-p...-of-porn-addiction-how-to-quit-gtfih.2071000/
As people, we must all band together to protect those that are precious, therefore, the life and safety of children is invaluable. We must create a society where the future and safety of our children are protected and guaranteed, no matter what the costs. Never let any person try to influence you to have an opposing opinion on this, remember who is sitting behind the screen calling you a "moralcuck" for wanting the lives and safety of children to be intact:
I will say it again:
We MUST ensure the safety and livelihood of our children, so that the human race may grow and thrive. The vulnerable must be protected. Do not let anyone EVER convince you otherwise. It is up to YOU to defend the future, as it is up to me and everyone else, we CANNOT succeed as a society without the protection of the ones who hold the future of our species.
@Hernan @Pony @tuberculosisinmybal @HtnceI @Jgns
_______
So what is pedophilia?
Before getting into anything, we have to firstly lay down what the general definition of a pedophile is, both socially and literally. If we take this from a literal perspective, the direct meaning of the word "pedophile/pedophilia" is: a psychological disorder characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children (typically age 13 or younger).
However, there is also the social definition of "pedophile," since the other words that describe the attraction to minors within their early, mid, and late teens (such as Ephebophilia) is long, and annoying to use, society slaps the word "pedophile" on anyone who is largely above the age of being a minor, who is with anyone under the age of 18, which is the age of consent in most major developed countries, why do I say most? Because obviously there are countries like Germany who technically have it at "14" but that is largely irrelevant since it just means a 14 year old can sleep with another 14 - 16 year old. It does not mean a 40 year old can be with a 14 year old, do not get it mixed up as a lot of iqlets like doing to try and "prove a point."
So what definition will be using for "pedophilia" in this thread? Well, the most efficient way for me to relay all of the information I have, is simply if we view pedophilia through a less strict societal definition (so something like 18 x 14/15 year old would be considered pedophilia, obviously there are exemptions depending on the age, the very cap is a 17 year old dating a 19/20 year old, at 17x21, it becomes weird, as that's a sophomore/junior in college dating someone fresh out or still in highschool.) Why will we give it the societal definition? Because pedophilic behavior is also largely dependent on the major maturity gap, why is a 18 year old and 15 year old bad? Because that's a college student dating a sophomore in highschool, someone who needs to start worrying about bills and large payments is dating someone who probably finds sex jokes funny, it's a major gap in power, which causes grooming, which is one of the main pillars for pedophilia to occur.
_______
How do you detect if a relationship is pedophilic?
There are 4 main pillars to a pedophilic relationship, being:
1. Chronological Age Gap/Development Milestones
2. Inherent Power Imbalance
3. Coercion/Grooming/Isolation Tactics
4. Violation of Informed Consent
I will go into each of these in better detail below.
------------------------------------
1. Chronological Age Gap & Developmental Milestones
The most straightforward metric is the absolute age difference, but this is evaluated through the lens of developmental stages rather than just numbers. There are 2 things that go into determining this.
Minority Status: One individual is legally and developmentally a minor (under 18), while the other is an adult (above 18.)
Life-Stage: Even a gap that seems small numerically (21-year-old and a 15-year-old) represents a massive chasm in cognitive development, life experience, and brain maturation. The adult has navigated independent milestones (financial choices, legal rights, high school graduation) that the minor has not yet encountered.
2. Inherent Power Imbalance
In any adult-minor dynamic, an equal partnership is structurally impossible. The adult possesses systemic advantages that tilt the scale entirely in their favor:
Authority & Experience: The adult has greater cognitive maturity, emotional regulation capacity, and world experience, which can easily be used to gain absolute control in the relationship.
Resource Control: Adults usually hold the financial means, transportation, housing, and legal autonomy. This creates a dependency loop where the minor relies on the adult for mobility, gifts, or validation, absolving their ability to freely give or withdraw consent.
3. Coercion, Grooming, and Isolation
Healthy, regular relationships are built on mutual growth, however, adult-minor relationships almost always rely on specific behavioral patterns to establish and maintain control.
Nature of Grooming Behaviors: The nature of grooming exhibits the adult targeting a vulnerable minor, showering them with excessive attention or gifts (love-bombing), and gradually pushing physical or emotional boundaries.
Social Isolation: The adult encourages the minor to keep the relationship a secret or actively drives a wedge between the minor and their peers, parents, and everyone/anyone that would cause the minor to not solely rely on the influence of the grooming adult. By convincing the minor that "no one else understands our love," the adult ensures their influence remains unchecked.
4. Violation of Informed Consent
From both a legal and ethical standpoint, a minor is deemed incapable of providing informed consent to a relationship with an adult.
Cognitive Asymmetry: A minor cannot fully grasp, understand, or comprehend the long-term emotional, psychological, or social consequences of the relationship.
Illusion of Choice: Even if a minor insists they "wanted" the relationship or feel they are mature for their age, societal and psychological consensus views this as a byproduct of the power dynamic and grooming process, rather than free, uncoerced choice. This "illusion of choice" is often exploited by pedophiles today to try and guilt trip and manipulate regular people into saying that the minor in question actually "wanted" the relationship. This is of course, a lie. It's on the same level of idiocy as saying a man/woman wanted to be assaulted because "their body got aroused."
___________
Now that we have gotten the boring stuff out of the way (although the previously mentioned material is absolutely important if you ever want to detect a pedophilic, nefarious relationship dynamic,) it is time to get into the good stuff, the absolute annihilation and the total subhumanity of both pedophiles and pedophilia.
So let's look at our average pedophile:
This is your "average pedophile," as we can see, this "man" (who actually was arrested on charges of pedophilia and minor assault among other things,) is easily a turbo subhuman. But this isn't just a stereotype, pedophiles are all inherently subhuman at base, a few outliers (like Hullo recently, who's LHTN - MHTN max, do not change the average.)
Pedophiles are Significantly Shorter on Average
Major studies on the physical height in pedophilic and hebephilic sexual offenders have shown that said offenders tend to be, on average, an entire inch shorter non-pedophilic offenders. Assuming that the average height is anywhere from 5'6 - 5'8, this means that pedophiles are anywhere from 5'5 - 5'7 on average. This also means that in countries where the average is shorter (such as countries like Timor and the Phillipines where the average height is 5'3,) pedophiles tend to be roughly 5'1 - 5'2, which is a subhuman height. Don't rule out that this statistic is a bell-shaped curve, meaning that there is a much larger number of short pedophiles than pedophiles that are even slightly above average height. This means that the vast majority of pedophiles are turbomanlets. (Source 1, Source 2. JFL at the title of source two being "Further Evidence of Atypical Physical Development Early in Life.")
Pedophiles tend to have Physical Irregularities (MPAs)
Of course, we have to include the fact that pedophiles tend to have varying levels of physical irregularities, you can almost sense these people half the time. In clinical assessments, pedophiles show a higher prevalence of MPAs. These are superficial, non-harmful deviations in physical development, this can range anywhere from large, protruding, asymmetrical ears, to asymmetrical eyes. This is obviously, a subhuman trait. These things are formed within the womb meaning these people are born with subhuman traits. (Source 1, Source 2.)
Average Eye Area of a Pedophile JFL:
Pedophiles are Fat on Average:
As we can clearly see from the reference photo I used above of the "average pedophile," it is no surprise to anyone that pedophiles are overweight on average. In neurodevelopmental clinical profiles, the average BMI for individuals diagnosed with pedophilic disorder was recorded at 25 (±5). This places the group average right on the range of "overweight," which is classified between 25 - 29 BMI. This means that a good chunk of pedophiles are also much over this, into 30 BMI, hitting the "Obese" category. The existence of the average BMI, which is already overweight and unhealthy, means that there are more fat pedophiles than skinny or even regular ones combined (remember the bell shaped curve.) This fits in right with the psychological profile (which we will go over later) of the pedophile, which is one of a very weak, defeated, cucked man who needs to assert dominance over something. (Source.)
Pedophiles are Significantly Below Average Intelligence on Average, as well a Signficiant Amount of them being Neurodivergent (Autistic and liketype diseases):
Again, not a surprise. Pedophiles are clearly low IQ, but how much? Well studies consistently show that individuals with a primary sexual interest in children score, on average, 10 to 15 IQ points lower than the general population. Assuming the average IQ is roughly 90 - 100, this means that the average pedophile ranges from an IQ of 75 (borderline/mentally disabled) - 85 (not disabled, but very stupid.) Again, let's not forget the bell-shaped curve, since the average runs right at roughly 10 - 15 IQ points (which is a whole standard deviation) this means that pedophiles are often skewed to be even more moronic, and a good chunk of them are 20 - 25 IQ points below average. This of course, means that a good chunk of pedophiles are clinically mentally disabled and are beaten in IQ by chimpanzees. This is hilarious for the same reason all the previous ones are, that there are more pedophiles that could clinically register as disabled than ones that are normal. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5, Source 6.)
They also have impaired executive functioning. Neuropsychological testing frequently reveals deficits in memory, cognitive flexibility, and impulse control, which are governed by the prefrontal cortex (Source.)
They have reduced white matter in the brain as well, Neuroimaging studies have identified significant structural differences in the brain's white matter (the cabling tissue that connects different brain regions), suggesting a disruption in neural connectivity. (Source.)
And the best of all, while it seems comedic, pedophiles also have a high rate of head injuries as children. Data indicates a significantly higher prevalence of head injuries sustained before the age of 13 among pedophilic men. (Source.)
Now onto the inherent neurodivergence of pedophiles:
Clinical trials have proved time and time again that there is a strong, correlated overlap between pedophiles and mental neurodivergence disorders, such as ADHD and Autsim Spectrum Disorder. Specifically, they share overlapping clinical features, brain abnormalities, and high comorbidity rates, as well as overall behavior similarities. However it is not just an overlap, on studies done, researchers discovered that approximately 25% (one quarter) of the pedophilic clinical group officially met the diagnostic criteria for either Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This means that 1 in every 4 pedophiles is behaviorally the exact same as an aspie. To simplify, pedophiles exhibit aspie traits majorly and 25% of them fully fit the criteria for someone who is actually autistic or has ADHD. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5.)
Obviously this should come at absolutely no surprise to anyone, if you've ever interacted with any of those edgy users here, you can very easily tell most of these guys are socially isolated losers who are fundamentally incapable of existing within modern society, let's take a look at the profile of one of our aspiring future mods known as "@lol" here on the forum (or at least, that's what he wants to be!.)
As we can see from the screenshot, our aspiring future mod "lol" exhibits basically every trait I just listed as far as neurological stuff goes for pedophilia.
Anyways, back onto the subhumanity of the pedophile! These next ones will be a bit more rapid-fire.
Pedophiles are Poorer on Average and Live in Poorer Areas:
A comprehensive community-level study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) combined RSO residential tracking with U.S. Census data across ten states. The regression analysis proved that lower median household income directly predicted significantly higher rates of registered offender residency in nine out of the ten states. Further research has also proved that offenders cluster firmly within much poorer residential demographics as far as housing and spending go. So TL;DR: Pedophiles are poor on average, they live in much worse environments, proving that a stable house cannot craft such degeneracy. (Source 1, Source 2.)
Pedophiles Struggle with Relationships and have Issues Pleasing their (Adult) Partners:
Criminological and psychological studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with pedophilic disorder or histories of child sexual offenses experience profound deficits in forming and maintaining stable adult romantic relationships. These people are unable to please their partners, are unable to perform in bed (unsurprising, considering most of them are probably flaccid dicklets,) and are unable to understand and comprehend adult relationship dynamics. This has a number of causes, for example, that they are usually neurodivergent and low in IQ, so it is not a huge surprise that they cannot handle adult stuff.
However, we can get into it a lot more specifically. There is a direct link between the failure of pedophilic individuals in adult relationships and their inability to please adult partners through intimacy.
According to comprehensive clinical research, individuals convicted of sexual offenses display highly problematic intimacy dispositions. The study notes that their inability to satisfy adult intimacy needs makes them structurally highly vulnerable to relationship failure and instability. (Source.)
Pedophiles also struggle to maintain intimacy, and they become sexually isolated in normal relationships which causes them to be severely depressed as well as their partners to build resentment towards them, this further cements their uselessness in relationships and makes it incredibly hard for one of these individuals to be successful in regular human activities. (Source.)
Pedophiles Struggle Significantly more with Suicidal Ideation and Commit Suicide Frequently:
This is tragic, as all human life is precious, however it is expected. I'll be very brief on this.
Research indicates that suicide risk in this pedophilic demographics spikes dramatically due to intense public exposure, legal consequences, severe social stigma, and the loss of personal and professional status. Some studies report completed suicide rates for specific typologies of child sex offenders to be 100 to 183 times higher than those in the general population. Research on incarcerated sex offenders has found that approximately 14% to 18% report at least one suicide attempt during their lifetime. Alongside pedophilic disorder, this population often struggles with clinical depression, anxiety, internalized shame, and substance use, all of which elevate suicide risk. This should be a very obvious observable trope among all pedophiles, because they are all internally ashamed of being how disgusting they are. Due to their internalized hatred and disgust towards themselves, they are incapable of having a positive self image. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4, Source 5, Source 6, Source 7.
_______
The Utter Annihilation of ALL Pro-Pedophilia Coping Mechanisms: All Myths Debunked
Now that we’ve established that the average pedophile is a short, fat, severely ND, poor, low IQ, and majorly deformed “man,” we have to take away what little they have left, being their coping mechanisms for why they are like this and how they explain their behavior. There are 5 main myths/coping mechanisms that these subhumans utilize to try and pass off their disgusting behavior and try to make us look like we’re the “mentally ill” ones.”
Said mechanisms are:
1. “It’s natural bro. Evolution makes us attracted to them, laws are just artificial social constructs made to block us from what we’re made to do! Teen girls are the most fertile at 15.”
2. A historical/cultural appeal. The “we used to do it!” argument.
3. Biological Determinism - That pedophilia is decided at birth and that it’s “incurable” and that they’re “predisposed” to it.
4. Direct Minimization and Attempted Mocking/Degradation of “Normies” to try and make their actions seem more reasonable and that we’re just “overreacting.”
All of these of course, are wrong. All will be disproven below:
————————
1. The “Natural Argument”
This was largely popularized into normie theories by Goatis quite a bit back with his “you’d have to be severely mentally ill, not to find a 15 year old girl attractive” clip, however it has existed as a concept for a very long time. Pedophiles try to argue that evolution and nature are the causes of pedophilia, and that it’s a social construct that pedophilia is wrong. This is insanely wrong, the main 2 ways they try to prove that it’s “natural” is through:
1. Pedophilia happening in nature (with penguins, dolphins, certain great apes, etc.)
2. That 15 year olds are the most fertile and “suitable” for bearing children.
|
1. Firstly we must tackle the “nature” argument, as it is moronic. Yes, pedophilia happens in nature, however it isn’t anymore natural there than it is here. Pedophilia has zero reproductive advantage and it is done by more evolved animals (such as penguins and dolphins) because they are smarter and capable of committing meaningless actions. What does this mean? It means they are doing it for no reason. If something was “natural,” according to all rules of nature, it would be efficient. However this is not the case, with pedophilia within animals and humans, if the victim is impregnated, not only do they have a massive chance of dying and taking the baby with them, it is also incredibly unstable.
It’s also important to mention here that these same animals also partake in eating their own shit, necrophilia, and cannibalism, which are all 100% not natural. Do you really want to compare yourself to an animal that frequently eats its own defecation? Considering that the average pedophile is borderline mentally disabled, this may just be the case for them.
Rather than being a "natural variation," a landmark neuroimaging study published confirms that pedophilic disorder is explicitly linked to neurodevelopmental abnormalities. (Source.)
Additional clinical research published establishes that pedophilia correlates heavily with physical markers of disrupted prenatal brain development during the first trimester. These markers include as we’ve previously stated, a statistically lower total IQ, higher rates of left-handedness, and structural brain deviations. This reinforces the medical reality that the condition is a pathology of brain development correlated to a neurological miswiring rather than a natural biological instinct. So to simplify, pedophilia isn’t natural even as an instinct whatsoever. (Source.)
|
Secondly, we must tackle the old myth of “15 year olds are the most fertile and suitable of having children.” This is just blatantly false, the hormonal levels of teenagers are incredibly unstable (causing the moody teenager trope we see en masse today) and the body itself is barely into puberty (roughly 2 - 3 years in,) meaning that it physically cannot be tuned to bear a child efficiently. While it is technically possible, the “technicality” of it directly contradicts the “natural” argument since natural would require it to be efficient and ideal, and the pregnancy of a mid stage teenager fits neither of these. The actual start of the years of peak fertility age range for women happens roughly between the ages of 18 - 21, and the peak for both genders is roughly at age 30. (Source.)
To give a more clinical, exact picture here, comprehensive global reviews of human reproductive health demonstrate that 15-year-olds undergo a period of "adolescent subfecundity," characterized by highly irregular, anovulatory menstrual cycles. Biologically, the human body at 15 is still dedicating primary energy to its own skeletal and neurological maturation, meaning reproductive capacity is underdeveloped compared to an adult in their 20s. According to clinical data published, a woman's peak window for natural, complication-free conception spans from her early to mid-20s, achieving up to an 85% success rate within one year of trying. This success rate and lack of major complication issues is something a 15 year old (or any range of teenager) is simply unable to replicate, as again, it isn’t natural. (Source.)
——————
2. The “We Used to Do it” Historical Argument
This is directly tied to the previous one and they’re used to explain each other, but since we’ve totally disproven the viability of a child as a successful mate, we can easily single this one out.
Pedophiles usually point to history and say that marriages between older people and children were quite common, however this is a very unviable argument. These marriages were not done out of love, vitality, or on any structural or medical base. Child marriages were dictated by survival, property consolidation, political alliances, and drastically shorter life expectancies, rather than an endorsement of pedophilic desires. Obviously, if the average lifespan is cut in half to 40 - 50, the average marriage age range is going to be cut down in half too, from 25 - 30 to roughly 15 - 18. Whatever hormonal differences we had back then don’t matter, as these do not exist today. It is not like any of us ever experienced a timeline where marriage to a child was okay, so these people have nothing to look back on to solidify their claims. And besides, this was a time range where people believed in witches and evil spells, and the average IQ was much lower than it is today.
Some pedophiles try pointing out other countries today that have lower ages of consent, however again, this is a massive fallacy. 95% of these countries are third world deathtraps where the average life expectancy is 50 - 60 already, not to mention the people of these countries are largely uneducated and driven by arbitrary historical norms and under constant terrorism and fear. The countries that are exempt from this (like Japan until recently,) are developed yet they have an immensely high suicide rate and poor mental standards of living. And besides, pointing out a single outlier within such a massive range proves that it’s just a coping mechanism, not a serious argument. This is how most of the conversations with these turbo IQlets go:
——————
3. The “Biological Determinism” Argument (“It’s incurable! We were predestined for this.)
This is the second most utilized excuse, especially in the manosphere where we reside. Let’s see an example of pedophiles using this excuse:
This 2-man jerkoff was under my anti-porn megathread (go read it if you haven’t already,) and these two copecels commenting saying that porn addiction doesn’t cause pedophilia and that pedophilia is “acquired at birth,” while we know from previous sources within this thread that pedophiles do experience some certain markers within the womb, this does not “predispose them” to being indisputable pedophiles. There’s a reason I included “on average,” because there’s a very sizable chunk of pedophiles that don’t have these things happen in the womb.
Are some people more prone to developing pedophilic interests than others? Yes, but that does not correlate with biological predisposition, why? Because of what you have to do to actually develop it. Nobody wakes up one day and decides “hey prepubescent children are so attractive,” it’s developed overtime through the brain’s neuroplasticity, how? Through things like severe porn addiction and childhood trauma, neither of which are “developed in the womb.”
What these copecels fail to comprehend is that nobody goes up against their natural instincts immediately, it’s built up over time. If you watch porn, you’re inevitably going to go through porn escalation, and end up watching things intended for pedophiles, and make that the standard in your brain through neural rewiring. Millions upon millions of people have these same markers that supposedly “predetermine” if someone is going to be a pedophile, yet they are completely fine. Markers determine the general existence and extent of risk, they do NOT make someone a pedophile.
Even if someone does possess the markers and the “urges,” they could simply not act on it. Just because they may have it, doesn’t make it any more excusable. People have thousands of urges a day, from wanting to beat up their coworker to cheating on their girlfriend, yet they don’t act on these because they are unacceptable. You are a grown human, you should be able to comprehend that they are simply things you cannot do, no matter what.
———————
4. Direct Minimization of their Actions and the Attempted Mocking/Degradation of Normies - The “Moralcuck” Argument
This one doesn’t need a source, I’m sure you’re seen it. How many times I’ve seen someone on the forum call another a “moralcuck” for disliking pedophilia, I cannot possibly count them all. This one is super straightforward, they adopt the normie’s sarcasm and figures of speech and use it to mock anti - pedophilia arguments by framing the opposition as a “normie who’s cucked by society.”
A moronic argument, but it works somehow on here because people are deathly afraid of being viewed as “cucks” and “normies” which is ironic because pedophiles themselves are cucks at very high rates. How are you so terrified of being branded as “normal” that you’ll excuse baseless arguments in support of pedophilia? There’s a reason every human has an inherent hatred for this disgusting status of being a “pedophile,” even pedophiles themselves.
There’s no debunking to be had here, they’re hanging off on strings with this “argument,” moralcucking isn’t real, the only cucks are the pedophiles and the pseudo-intellectuals who are desperate for attention and acceptance so they agree with said pedophiles and their moronic, baseless arguments and reasoning.
__________
My Personal Observations of the Minds of Pedophiles
So now that we’ve taken away what little any pedophile had to hang onto, what is left? Well of course we must understand that curing a pedophile is extremely hard. I’ve been fascinated with the concept of curing one for a very long time, and for the last months, I’ve been observing ones on this forum, to see how they act, to try and understand where it comes from, and how it manifests within people.
From my naturalistic observations of these users, I can say fully that everything I’ve stated above about pedophiles is 100% true. They are low iq, ugly, social rejects who blatantly admit to their own subhumanity on the daily yet they try to claim some sort of superiority on users (trust me when I say this, these users are 100% pedophiles.)
Yet of course, I'm very sure that if this thread does well, they will be in my replies waffling on and on about how they "aren't pedophiles" and how I can't "prove it" (even though you can by just looking at their post history, I can give an example right now:
Why do they deny it so much? If it's truly something that "isn't bad," why is it denied so much? We have nazis, communists, and all sorts of extremists on here that own up to their own beliefs and go as far as post their own faces here, yet apparently the upholders of the righteous "natural way of life" immediately deny that they are pedophiles whenever they are excused.
There are 2 main reasons for this, firstly, it's obviously banned on the forum. They would be banned permanently if they outright admitted it, and the second reason is because they are subconsciously ashamed. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, and the people with this mental disorder must cope to the grave with their existence. They hate the label of "pedophile" and go as far as to give themselves their own disgusting "pride" flag and to try and rename themselves to "MAPs" (Minor Attracted Person.) They are subconsciously fully aware that they are doing something wrong, yet they refuse to admit it to themselves and others.
My Behavior regarding these individuals:
The only reason I’m nice to any of them is just because constant isolation from the general public causes people to go into an echo chamber where the only people they can talk to are the ones who agree with them, so giving them as a more regular dose of human interaction on a small scale is necessary to prevent radicalization. That and because I've needed to collect my final bits of information for this part of the thread throughout a few weeks of close up observation of their behavior. I can say, that it has been very successful, besides my reputation tanking quite a bit due to "muh neutrality" which I had to uphold to maintain my position.
However, while I believe we should still treat these people with somewhat levels of humanity and even kindness occasionally, they are still severely cognitively impairedcels who are useless to society and should be fully ostracized, they should not feel welcome in any normal place where they may be able to continue their predatory behavior.
It is very unfortunate that it has to be this way, as I've interacted with adjacent ones (like Bryce) who are surprisingly down to Earth and human, it is very upsetting for me to see how they are like, and I do wish for change in their lives. This thread is not meant to make fun of anyone, it is highlighting a tragic developmental condition that causes people to be perma-subhumans.
_________
Final Thoughts
Pedophilia is subhuman, it has always been subhuman and it will always be subhuman. If you are a pedophile, it is frankly over, you should isolate yourself from society until your brain fries over all the neural networks that are causing you to be a truecel tier subhuman within society, as frankly, you will never be accepted or find any type of success within your life. At the very most, you will be a chronically online porn addict who posts memes about Peter Scully online and fiercely defends themselves when called a pedophile and you'll have your group of fellow mentally ill subhumans who will be hated majorly, just like you, and will only ever exist online. (Does that ring a bell?) So if that's the life of your dreams, then go for it, but if not, then make a change in your life. You can start here, with a previous thread of mine on porn addiction and how to stop: https://looksmax.org/threads/anti-p...-of-porn-addiction-how-to-quit-gtfih.2071000/
As people, we must all band together to protect those that are precious, therefore, the life and safety of children is invaluable. We must create a society where the future and safety of our children are protected and guaranteed, no matter what the costs. Never let any person try to influence you to have an opposing opinion on this, remember who is sitting behind the screen calling you a "moralcuck" for wanting the lives and safety of children to be intact:
I will say it again:
We MUST ensure the safety and livelihood of our children, so that the human race may grow and thrive. The vulnerable must be protected. Do not let anyone EVER convince you otherwise. It is up to YOU to defend the future, as it is up to me and everyone else, we CANNOT succeed as a society without the protection of the ones who hold the future of our species.
@Hernan @Pony @tuberculosisinmybal @HtnceI @Jgns
Last edited:
