GuyFromSingapore
Nordid + Faelid / Aryan Indian
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
- Posts
- 17,897
- Reputation
- 13,850
Is supporting White only for White countries policies "racist" and "hateful"?, would not racism mean going your way out to deliberately hurt someone of another race out of hatred instead of loving your own race?
Is choosing to save the life of a human being over an ape speciesm towards apes or genuine altruism for fellow humans and favouring them over others owing to shared similarity?
Can we not then make this more insular and include people of our own race as our own first priority owing to more closely shared genes compared to other humans?
Are the newscasters' anti-racism the default position of the average White person and therefore reflective of that or instead propaganda of those who consider racism to be a threat to be eliminated through criminalization and therefore controlling speech?
Which ethnic group has the most to lose with "racism"? Which ethnic group has been perspecuted the most by groups with strong ethnocultural identity for millenia? Which group seeks to eliminate "racism" not out of genuine altruism for the human species as a whole but to protect and shield it's own interests. If they are against "racism" out of genuine altruism why don't they go to the most impoverished and intellectually backwards countries and contribute freely to their education. Why don't they donate to charities to lend a helping hand?
A society where everyone helps their fellow man and protect's his rights and respects him is a society that the elites fear.
They cry about "racism" but instead of furthering the human species as a whole with the highest possible quality of education that promotes critical thinking which would allow us to see through propaganda and deception easily. An intelligent mind is fiercely independent and extremely hard to control. Something that the elites fear. You can domesticate animals but you cannot domesticate humans because humans are more intelligent, independent, self-reflaxive and believe in private property and rights.
Is choosing to save the life of a human being over an ape speciesm towards apes or genuine altruism for fellow humans and favouring them over others owing to shared similarity?
Can we not then make this more insular and include people of our own race as our own first priority owing to more closely shared genes compared to other humans?
Are the newscasters' anti-racism the default position of the average White person and therefore reflective of that or instead propaganda of those who consider racism to be a threat to be eliminated through criminalization and therefore controlling speech?
Which ethnic group has the most to lose with "racism"? Which ethnic group has been perspecuted the most by groups with strong ethnocultural identity for millenia? Which group seeks to eliminate "racism" not out of genuine altruism for the human species as a whole but to protect and shield it's own interests. If they are against "racism" out of genuine altruism why don't they go to the most impoverished and intellectually backwards countries and contribute freely to their education. Why don't they donate to charities to lend a helping hand?
A society where everyone helps their fellow man and protect's his rights and respects him is a society that the elites fear.
They cry about "racism" but instead of furthering the human species as a whole with the highest possible quality of education that promotes critical thinking which would allow us to see through propaganda and deception easily. An intelligent mind is fiercely independent and extremely hard to control. Something that the elites fear. You can domesticate animals but you cannot domesticate humans because humans are more intelligent, independent, self-reflaxive and believe in private property and rights.
