Any online forums specifically dedicated to IQ?

simply cope though, an iq test measures iq :lul:

but yeah sometimes many of us do overcomplicate things, but that's also an indicator of slight ADHD, no?

if you're confident in the answer you know the answer. as simple as that, no need for overcomplicating if you know the answer. unless you suffer from anxiety or ADHD where your mind simply wanders

Can you have low latent inhibition and ADHD at the same time?
 
  • +1
Reactions: proxxyy11
developing my own test that measures g factor per subtest fairly well. i'll be creating my own subtests and measurements to what i deem necessary/important to measure and do better than the average person.

e.g. crystallized/verbal ability, fluid reasoning, visual-spatial ability, working memory, processing speed, quantative reasoning.

if scored low on the subtests that I've developed, they have the chance to show credentials from other IQ tests (only accepted would be WAIS or Stanford-Bidet, both which would have to be professionally proctored - and obviously i'd allow those who are already in high IQ societies such as MENSA or triple nine with proof) or just academic/career credentials, such as a high-level uni and major that demonstrates hard work which is easily as respected.


those who find the forum somewhat are, those who pass my personalized IQ test definitely are. Great method of funneling those who are like-minded


would never call you a retard, was making a tldr. sorry it came out that way.
academic/career credentials :feelswat:, so, say olympia academy came back, say it was einstein and his bros, are you referring to something closer to that? im trying to get you to formalize a intuitive thought u have that you arent explaining, which is the purpose for this, like... are you going to talk about intellectual pursuits? ive been in communities who are focused on their cognitive performance/iq/etc, its just a com full of self diagnosed psuedo intellectual people who post or are apart of it solely for stroking their egos and to make the larp sound more believable in their head


honestly, it sounds like you just want a place to talk to mature people, not incels
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore, buccalfatremoval and proxxyy11
IMG 0953

Lamest shit I’ve ever read.
Org niggas and their obsession with believing their smart.
I fucking hate yall
 
  • +1
Reactions: proxxyy11
What may be a surprise to you is obvious to others. You have no basis to be standing on this high ground.
might wanna read it again I said its not a surprise brah
 
  • Love it
Reactions: proxxyy11
What may be a surprise to you is obvious to others. You have no basis to be standing on this high ground.
holy autism i hope u get bullied in ur day to day life fuck nigga
 
holy autism i hope u get bullied in ur day to day life fuck nigga
You ask for IQ forums and get upset once I speak like a normal human being. Ever consider you're not wanted in those places..?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: esoterik
You ask for IQ forums and get upset once I speak like a normal human being. Ever consider you're not wanted in those places..?
your a plague to society
 
  • JFL
Reactions: proxxyy11 and topology
And you insult me..? :lul::lul::lul::lul:
have u always acted like this? or is this a bit, i dont know who you are but if this is how you actually act then im suprised i havent ran into your retarded ass before
 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: proxxyy11 and topology
have u always acted like this? or is this a bit, i dont know who you are but if this is how you actually act then im suprised i havent ran into your retarded ass before
Called being busy. I make money and don't have time for this nonsense every day. Ever thought of being productive..?
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore
academic/career credentials :feelswat:, so, say olympia academy came back, say it was einstein and his bros, are you referring to something closer to that?
sure, or even a 4.0 gpa, good/decent college, decent job, etc. literally anything don't think i'd have a strict standard tbf. just whatever i find that would serve value.

im trying to get you to formalize a intuitive thought u have that you arent explaining,
my verbal reasoning IQ is actually 100, so I might get this wrong, but doesn't intuition imply no thoughts behind it? i don't really get what you mean by this.

which is the purpose for this, like... are you going to talk about intellectual pursuits?
idk if it really is this hard for you to understand, and no I'm not being mean or rude or even trying to be (my social cues are disgustingly bad so sorry if I am), but isn't it obvious that I just want to have philosophical conversations, possibly mathematical ones and discuss theory, different, authors, literature, politics, eugenics, and just genuine intellectual conversations from those who share similar interests to me and will actually feed me different perspectives? and have a place where others can do the same?

the amount of people i've tried to talk to on here and other forums in terms of intellectual content is genuinely laughable. people are get normal concepts and ideas that should be universal completely backwards and most the time have no idea what you're saying and, again not trying to be rude, are just simply retarded. and i think you've most likely encountered people like this as well.

it's kind of like why create Mensa? to be with others who will provide value and interesting conversations, to see different interests from non-low IQ people or midwits.

intellectual pursuits work to, maybe finding a career and helping others to figure out what to do in life, get through mid-life crises and help others.

ive been in communities who are focused on their cognitive performance/iq/etc, its just a com full of self diagnosed psuedo intellectual people who post or are apart of it solely for stroking their egos and to make the larp sound more believable in their head
i'll be pretty strict in attempting to filtering people like this out ngl, i hate pseuds that try to make each and every concept as convoluted as possible to make it seem like they're a high IQ fucking god that no one else can understand

honestly, it sounds like you just want a place to talk to mature people, not incels
not completely wrong, i hate reading posts about dick, pussy, not being good looking enough, wanting to rope, etc.

i understand this is a looksmaxxing forum but it does get very very fucking annoying. genuinely 0 users here that I find that actually made an interesting thread that I enjoyed, except for one that I'm pretty sure is long gone by now.

if i attempt to go out of my way to find people who value the same things as me, why not simply just create a forum designated for everything that I want myself? pretty sure there are a lot of others who are hyper-obsessive and autistic about my interests as well.

not autistic as in i'm larping ND just obsessive I meant.

ok idk if that answered ur question sorry for the rant
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore and esoterik
You ask for IQ forums and get upset once I speak like a normal human being. Ever consider you're not wanted in those places..?
i'm sure my mind, thoughts, and opinions are heavily desired if one were to witness it.

i'm the pinnacle of human being and evolution. keep coping buddy. you're an autistic freak who gets bullied irl

no wonder you're on a looksmaxxing forum. sure you have an .is account too faggot
 
have u always acted like this? or is this a bit, i dont know who you are but if this is how you actually act then im suprised i havent ran into your retarded ass before
genuinely fucking crying this niggas the epitome of reddit
 
  • Love it
Reactions: esoterik
philosophical conversations, possibly mathematical ones and discuss theory,
"Hey, what's your favorite math theory? Oh wow, me too!"

What is there to discuss..? Math is likely the most objective subject there is. You'd be debating whether the Collatz conjecture is true or not...?

Yikes..

i'm sure my mind, thoughts, and opinions are heavily desired if one witnessed it.

i'm the pinnacle of human being and evolution. keep coping buddy. you're an autistic freak who gets bullied irl

no wonder you're on a looksmaxxing forum. sure you have a .is account too faggot
my social cues are disgustingly bad so sorry if I am
You're projecting just a tiny bit...
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore
"Hey, what's your favorite math theory? Oh wow, me too!"

What is there to discuss..? Math is likely the most objective subject there is. You'd be debating whether the Collatz conjecture is true or not...?

Yikes..
why exactly a theorem is true and help each other better understand, sure an AI is more efficient to do so, but sometimes I crave help and interaction from others who know exactly what I'm talking about. not many of my friends irl study similar concepts as me.

so, yes, exactly.

sure this is wishful thinking and the forum will probably never reach that level if i do create it, and new theorems are constantly proved. would be interesting to see a community attempt to prove one together.

the millennium prize problems also exist, waiting for a group of people to come together and solve it. sure we'll never reach a conclusion but the journey would be fun.

You're projecting just a tiny bit...
having bad social cues does not in and of itself mean you have autism.

i've simply been told i'm a bit rude irl, possibly due to others being too sensitive or genuinely not seeing that i'm mean to others. regardless i've been tested and deemed not autistic, also evident from my social interactions and the amt of irl friends i have.

surely i couldn't be autistic, or even a freak like you, to have a thriving social life - could I?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: topology
why exactly a theorem is true and help each other better understand, sure an AI is more efficient to do so, but sometimes I crave help and interaction from others who know exactly what I'm talking about. not many of my friends irl study similar concepts as me.
:lul:

So you have no friends. Got it. That's what you crave, a friend group who has interests similar to yours. You wear a mask all day and wonder why you're so miserable.

having bad social cues does not in and of itself mean you have autism.

i've simply been told i'm a bit rude irl, possibly due to others being too sensitive or genuinely not seeing that i'm mean to others. regardless i've been tested and deemed not autistic, also evident from my social interactions and the amt of irl friends i have.

surely i couldn't be autistic, or even a freak like you, to have a thriving social life - could I?
It's very clear you have some sort of a severe mental handicap. You're below average IQ too which is the worst part. You're the type who thinks they're not apart of the crowd. Big yikes.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: resting, GuyFromSingapore and proxxyy11
:lul:

So you have no friends. Got it. That's what you crave, a friend group who has interests similar to yours. You wear a mask all day and wonder why you're so miserable.


It's very clear you have some sort of a severe mental handicap. You're below average IQ too which is the worst part. You're the type who thinks they're not apart of the crowd. Big yikes.
did i strike a nerve nigga :lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: esoterik
wow this so entertaining
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: resting and proxxyy11
sure, or even a 4.0 gpa, good/decent college, decent job, etc. literally anything don't think i'd have a strict standard tbf. just whatever i find that would serve value.
what ever you find of value? :ROFLMAO:
my verbal reasoning IQ is actually 100, so I might get this wrong, but doesn't intuition imply no thoughts behind it? i don't really get what you mean by this.
intuition isn't thoughtless, its a conclusion you have without verbalizing, what u did

idk if it really is this hard for you to understand, and no I'm not being mean or rude or even trying to be (my social cues are disgustingly bad so sorry if I am), but isn't it obvious that I just want to have philosophical conversations, possibly mathematical ones and discuss theory, different, authors, literature, politics, eugenics, and just genuine intellectual conversations from those who share similar interests to me and will actually feed me different perspectives? and have a place where others can do the same?
dude.... that is a reading group, you dont need a psychometric gate for that, i thought you meant a com where u all glaze each other and have a ranking system of who ever self diagnosed number is higher, now im rofling about this because i did this same exact shit when i was 13, you dont need a proctored WAIS to argue about spinoza, you need someone who has read spinoza, i think you would be surprised at the "intelligent" people in your life that would score a low score on a test because they said something smart because they have accumulated knowledge

the reason why i was confused and not understanding is because your asking and your intentions are 2 different things

the amount of people i've tried to talk to on here and other forums in terms of intellectual content is genuinely laughable. people are get normal concepts and ideas that should be universal completely backwards and most the time have no idea what you're saying and, again not trying to be rude, are just simply retarded. and i think you've most likely encountered people like this as well.
well, tbf, your talking to lazy teenagers who have lives and have girlfriends and are normal people
it's kind of like why create Mensa? to be with others who will provide value and interesting conversations, to see different interests from non-low IQ people or midwits.

intellectual pursuits work to, maybe finding a career and helping others to figure out what to do in life, get through mid-life crises and help others.


i'll be pretty strict in attempting to filtering people like this out ngl, i hate pseuds that try to make each and every concept as convoluted as possible to make it seem like they're a high IQ fucking god that no one else can understand
how are you going to filter out people if your looking for convos that are based on crystalized intelligence? are you just going to remove people who have little life experience?

i think u just want someone who has life experience, reads stuff, curious, has accumulated knowledge and is willing to have a serious debate/convo with you
not completely wrong, i hate reading posts about dick, pussy, not being good looking enough, wanting to rope, etc.

i understand this is a looksmaxxing forum but it does get very very fucking annoying. genuinely 0 users here that I find that actually made an interesting thread that I enjoyed, except for one that I'm pretty sure is long gone by now.

if i attempt to go out of my way to find people who value the same things as me, why not simply just create a forum designated for everything that I want myself? pretty sure there are a lot of others who are hyper-obsessive and autistic about my interests as well.

not autistic as in i'm larping ND just obsessive I meant.

ok idk if that answered ur question sorry for the rant
i dont want to be rude and i dont know how old you are, but, your putting too much importance on trying to measure cognitive abilities, especially when it doesnt matter or something u cant really measure, humans have 2 things happening, they have the hardware of the brain, the actual components, yk, working memory, stuff like that, those are actually varied and yk, measurable, varied, but mostly, if your a normal human, it doesnt matter if you have above average or average working memory, we also have the software of the brain, our cognitive traits, preference, cognitive personality, thats what matters FAR FAR more, and its not really limited, i hypothesize that newton, einstein etc had normal hardware, due to empirical accounts and observations, of average or below average performance in a given domain, but they had software changes like obsession, curiosity, things like that, they worked by far more than anyone else, newton dedicated his life to his work, had books in his house rather than family pictures, these people are not special, they just have accumulated knowledge, what you are looking for in someone, i think you putting value in random shit like fluid reasoning or verbal reasoning for convos talking about some random philosophical shit is just.... not needed lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: resting and proxxyy11
what ever you find of value? :ROFLMAO:
yes i mean i am the owner of the forum

intuition isn't thoughtless, its a conclusion you have without verbalizing, what u did
is it not simply emotion and first instinct? i thought that's what it meant

dude.... that is a reading group, you dont need a psychometric gate for that, i thought you meant a com where u all glaze each other and have a ranking system of who ever self diagnosed number is higher, now im rofling about this because i did this same exact shit when i was 13, you dont need a proctored WAIS to argue about spinoza, you need someone who has read spinoza, i think you would be surprised at the "intelligent" people in your life that would score a low score on a test because they said something smart because they have accumulated knowledge

the reason why i was confused and not understanding is because your asking and your intentions are 2 different things
sure but a midwit and a lower iq person would understand less on what "spinoza" was talking about in comparison to someone of higher IQ, is this not water knowledge?

the reason why i was confused and not understanding is because your asking and your intentions are 2 different things
how exactly

well, tbf, your talking to lazy teenagers who have lives and have girlfriends and are normal people
are you calling me not normal lmao

how are you going to filter out people if your looking for convos that are based on crystalized intelligence? are you just going to remove people who have little life experience?
honestly tbf i dislike verbal iq as well, not because i scored low but because you're right - it's simply life experience. won't measure that most likely

i think u just want someone who has life experience, reads stuff, curious, has accumulated knowledge and is willing to have a serious debate/convo with you
doesn't everyone? what better way to find that then searching for someone like that myself through a forum?

i dont want to be rude and i dont know how old you are, but, your putting too much importance on trying to measure cognitive abilities, especially when it doesnt matter or something u cant really measure, humans have 2 things happening, they have the hardware of the brain, the actual components, yk, working memory, stuff like that, those are actually varied and yk, measurable, varied, but mostly, if your a normal human, it doesnt matter if you have above average or average working memory, we also have the software of the brain, our cognitive traits, preference, cognitive personality, thats what matters FAR FAR more, and its not really limited, i hypothesize that newton, einstein etc had normal hardware, due to empirical accounts and observations, of average or below average performance in a given domain, but they had software changes like obsession, curiosity, things like that, they worked by far more than anyone else, newton dedicated his life to his work, had books in his house rather than family pictures, these people are not special, they just have accumulated knowledge, what you are looking for in someone, i think you putting value in random shit like fluid reasoning or verbal reasoning for convos talking about some random philosophical shit is just.... not needed lol
which is why credentials are also included to be admitted. surely if one is curious enough about an intellectual topic they have something to show for it? after years of accumulating knowledge? or have they simply been bums their entire life and genuinely have have nothing to show?

also cognitive abilities is definitely something you can measure, wdym?

also philosophy is a high IQ major, meaning someone that is not at least above average will have trouble understanding concepts. again a water idea/concept. they have ceiling gaps that others don't. pretty sure this is obvious.

also would love the main idea to be about eugenics and advancing society by breeding for specific traits, one being IQ.

sure there are outliers like you've mentioned, someone that is 100 IQ and loves Kant for example and knows everything about him, or is a math fiend, etc. sure there are outliers that you've mentioned where someone is 140 IQ and knows absolutely nothing about anything.

but the einstein and newton examples you gave, none of their work wouldn't have been possible without their IQ, which is why they have been theorized to be high IQ. idk if you're saying that you need to be high iq and motivated to accomplish something great in life or what, but yea agreed.

except motivation can't be measured, so best next step is simply just IQ and credentials.

again i stand by literally everything i said, idrk what you dislike about it. is this a personal problem or do you hate an idea of mine? or simply just want to understand more about my opinions/thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: esoterik
iqmaxx.org
 
  • +1
Reactions: proxxyy11
i dont want to be rude and i dont know how old you are
also this was really rude ngl, you're directly targetting each idea that i've deemed to be true and are making it seem like i have 0 true knowledge about the real world and what exactly i'm talking about (implied due to thinking i'm young and saying you've had the same ideas as me when you were 13)

idk if you meant it to be rude, you said that you didn't, but it was very.

i'm 17 going on 18. idk if your respect for me was already fairly low, or if it's even lower now, not sure. but hopefully it's not too low
 
  • +1
Reactions: esoterik
ur prob loq iq

if not larp join mensa
 
yes i mean i am the owner of the forum


is it not simply emotion and first instinct? i thought that's what it meant


sure but a midwit and a lower iq person would understand less on what "spinoza" was talking about in comparison to someone of higher IQ, is this not water knowledge?


how exactly


are you calling me not normal lmao


honestly tbf i dislike verbal iq as well, not because i scored low but because you're right - it's simply life experience. won't measure that most likely


doesn't everyone? what better way to find that then searching for someone like that myself through a forum?


which is why credentials are also included to be admitted. surely if one is curious enough about an intellectual topic they have something to show for it? after years of accumulating knowledge? or have they simply been bums their entire life and genuinely have have nothing to show?

also cognitive abilities is definitely something you can measure, wdym?

also philosophy is a high IQ major, meaning someone that is not at least above average will have trouble understanding concepts. again a water idea/concept. they have ceiling gaps that others don't. pretty sure this is obvious.

also would love the main idea to be about eugenics and advancing society by breeding for specific traits, one being IQ.

sure there are outliers like you've mentioned, someone that is 100 IQ and loves Kant for example and knows everything about him, or is a math fiend, etc. sure there are outliers that you've mentioned where someone is 140 IQ and knows absolutely nothing about anything.

but the einstein and newton examples you gave, none of their work wouldn't have been possible without their IQ, which is why they have been theorized to be high IQ. idk if you're saying that you need to be high iq and motivated to accomplish something great in life or what, but yea agreed.

except motivation can't be measured, so best next step is simply just IQ and credentials.

again i stand by literally everything i said, idrk what you dislike about it. is this a personal problem or do you hate an idea of mine? or simply just want to understand more about my opinions/thoughts?
ah, i see what your doing, okay, you prioritize internal reasoning over empirical experience
like, no, a midwit who knows spinoza more than a "high iq" person would still know and argue better, i think you care more about internal reasoning, like when i told you about intuition, your response was that your "verbal reasoning" was low, not that you didnt know what intuition was, thats kinda what i mean, your putting too much emphasis on human reasoning and human ability to internalize things

u treat empirical claims as self evident, whether recreational spinoza comprehension is bounded by g, whether motivation can be measured, whether selecting on IQ works as advertised, those all have literatures, your deducing answers from the concept instead of checking, like your literally just not looking things up

also, its not that i have a personal problem with you or your ideas, i do want to understand your ideas, but the reason why my responses are quite dry and empty is because this is just empiricism vs rationalism (or well, a priori vs a posteriori since u mentioned kant), you simply seem to care more about how people reason inside than how we meet conclusions empirically, and really, this isnt even exactly empiricism vs rationalism since at least a rationalist has a positive view about a priori justification

i think your a intelligent person, i just think you care too much about stuff that doesn't matter, but ofc, we have our own views, and thats fine
 
Last edited:
also this was really rude ngl, you're directly targetting each idea that i've deemed to be true and are making it seem like i have 0 true knowledge about the real world and what exactly i'm talking about (implied due to thinking i'm young and saying you've had the same ideas as me when you were 13)

idk if you meant it to be rude, you said that you didn't, but it was very.

i'm 17 going on 18. idk if your respect for me was already fairly low, or if it's even lower now, not sure. but hopefully it's not too low
why would i have less respect for you defending your own ideas? im not arguing in bad faith, i probably respect you more than anyone else in this thread because u have your own ideas; what i meant earlier by the same ideas is, i was just confused at first at what u were saying, i dont think your young per say, but, i meant it more so i thought you were younger because this sort of argument is more so of a intro/generic debate in a philosophical sense (not that im implying your a lower skill level, im sure your more capable of interesting or thought provoking topics, its just my first impression/convo with you is this topic, so im unsure of how you are as a person)

anyway its 4am and i can barely think so tmr will prob be more comprehensible if we talk again
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: proxxyy11
why would i have less respect for you defending your own ideas? im not arguing in bad faith, i probably respect you more than anyone else in this thread because u have your own ideas; what i meant earlier by the same ideas is, i was just confused at first at what u were saying, i dont think your young per say, but, i meant it more so i thought you were younger because this sort of argument is more so of a intro/generic debate in a philosophical sense (not that im implying your a lower skill level, im sure your more capable of interesting or thought provoking topics, its just my first impression/convo with you is this topic, so im unsure of how you are as a person)

anyway its 4am and i can barely think so tmr will prob be more comprehensible if we talk again
but bc it's an intro of philosophy does it mean that it's low level to actually believe in idrk what ur saying

if athiesm is low level philosophy it doesn't mean one shouldn't hold opinions and ideas relative to it, same with plato and aristotle. they're literally beginner levels but their philosophies are still incorporated and used to this day.

and i am a philosophy major believe it or not lmao, so idk i don't personally think any of my ideas are "low level", generic, sure, but maybe because the arguments are generic that there's some truth in them? which is why they're constantly spewed?

ie. eugenics - normal amongst edgelords, but theoretically, a very good idea if implemented. generic? sure. does it disqualify the idea as a whole bc a lot of people believe in it? definitely fucking not

rape? bad? yes. does everyone or most people think so? fucking duh. does it disqualify it as an argument or a subset for one's moral compass? definitely fucking not
 
trick question it actually isnt
 
  • +1
Reactions: resting
no wonder you cant find any :ROFLMAO:
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
1
Views
12
kalzin
K
the zodiac
Replies
8
Views
74
Vannx
Vannx
selqa
Replies
10
Views
87
howuglyami
howuglyami
Cicukomp
Replies
2
Views
24
ESR
ESR
DrRodger
Replies
15
Views
148
Went2Jupiter
Went2Jupiter

Users who are viewing this thread

  • resting
Back
Top