Any promiscuous Stacy exposing parts of her body to the social media has automatically lost 2 SMV points.

Dr. Mog

Dr. Mog

Researcher at moggerdom and zoomerology
Joined
Nov 4, 2022
Posts
3,732
Reputation
8,015
Man’s baseline reputation when he’s born is 0. Whatever he does and succeeds in his life makes him increase his SMV apart from his genetics.

Woman’s baseline reputation when she’s born is already a 10. Whatever she does in her life shows whether she’s preserving it or losing it.

A 5psl HQNP woman has much greater SMV than a 6.5psl promiscuous 1 million snap score/ 25k followers insta baddie. Esp if she’s followed by rappers and NBA athletes her SMV further low in the marriage market. Why so? Because men date and fuck woman whichever they can but woman marry whichever man they can get to settle with.

These 6.5 PSL women showcase parts of their bodies so much, that itself becomes their main stream of income. Any smart man will realise this woman has a higher chance of STDs and her V being loose.

Any man who fails to understand this is either a cuck or a 2 digit IQ NBA athlete. The real rich people who have generational old money assets (not the BS get-rich-fast crypto money assests) have always chosen to settle with a high tier MTB who is petite, private and non-promiscuous. A Stacy with a flashy 100k followers would very easily drop everything in her life and settle with them if she has a chance yet they just end up fucking pop stars, rich fat habibis alike and being a single mother of 3 kids with 4 baby daddies with 18yr contract of child support to fund her new latest Birkins

TL;DR- SMV of a 5 PSL HQNP >>> SMV of a 6.5 PSL promiscuous foid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist and IHATEINDIANS
Man’s baseline reputation when he’s born is 0. Whatever he does and succeeds in his life makes him increase his SMV apart from his genetics.

Woman’s baseline reputation when she’s born is already a 10. Whatever she does in her life shows whether she’s preserving it or losing it.

A 5psl HQNP woman has much greater SMV than a 6.5psl promiscuous 1 million snap score/ 25k followers insta baddie. Esp if she’s followed by rappers and NBA athletes her SMV further low in the marriage market. Why so? Because men date and fuck woman whichever they can but woman marry whichever man they can get to settle with.

These 6.5 PSL women showcase parts of their bodies so much, that itself becomes their main stream of income. Any smart man will realise this woman has a higher chance of STDs and her V being loose.

Any man who fails to understand this is either a cuck or a 2 digit NBA athlete. The real rich people who have generational old money assets (not the BS get-rich-fast crypto money assests) have always chosen to settle with a high tier MTB who is petite, private and non-promiscuous. A Stacy with a flashy 100k followers would very easily drop everything in her life and settle with them yet they just end up fucking pop stars, rich fat habibis alike and being a single mother of 3 kids with 4 baby daddies with 18yr contract of child support to fund her new latest Birkins

TL;DR- SMV of a 5 PSL HQNP >>> SMV of a 6.5 PSL promiscuous foid.
Factual
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist
Make it 20. I hate whores.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: isis_Bleach
Man’s baseline reputation when he’s born is 0. Whatever he does and succeeds in his life makes him increase his SMV apart from his genetics.

Woman’s baseline reputation when she’s born is already a 10. Whatever she does in her life shows whether she’s preserving it or losing it.

A 5psl HQNP woman has much greater SMV than a 6.5psl promiscuous 1 million snap score/ 25k followers insta baddie. Esp if she’s followed by rappers and NBA athletes her SMV further low in the marriage market. Why so? Because men date and fuck woman whichever they can but woman marry whichever man they can get to settle with.

These 6.5 PSL women showcase parts of their bodies so much, that itself becomes their main stream of income. Any smart man will realise this woman has a higher chance of STDs and her V being loose.

Any man who fails to understand this is either a cuck or a 2 digit IQ NBA athlete. The real rich people who have generational old money assets (not the BS get-rich-fast crypto money assests) have always chosen to settle with a high tier MTB who is petite, private and non-promiscuous. A Stacy with a flashy 100k followers would very easily drop everything in her life and settle with them yet they just end up fucking pop stars, rich fat habibis alike and being a single mother of 3 kids with 4 baby daddies with 18yr contract of child support to fund her new latest Birkins

TL;DR- SMV of a 5 PSL HQNP >>> SMV of a 6.5 PSL promiscuous foid.
nah i dont give a shit who she is or what she does
i go based on looks and looks only
thats what ALL women do yk why? because they dont have standards that tell them to act better
they just go based on insinct, so i do too
 
nah i dont give a shit who she is or what she does
i go based on looks and looks only
thats what ALL women do yk why? because they dont have standards that tell them to act better
they just go based on insinct, so i do too
Your whole primal strategy is just monkey see monkey do. IRL the instinct is more than just primal, if you target only looks for marriage/long term dating regardless of the loose V or the bodycount, you are digging your own grave to fall into a court alimony later.
 
being a whore only lowers her rmv not smv. You would still rather fuck a promiscuous htb than a virgin mtb
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top