Any proof of heightmaxxing working?

iloveboobs

iloveboobs

anti carb
Joined
Aug 15, 2024
Posts
3,553
Reputation
7,037
I see so much about heightmaxxing: hgh, insluin, mk 677

But is there any actual big proof of these working, any progress pics/stories?

@TechnoBoss @Jason Voorhees @looksmaxxing223 @wishIwasSalludon @cromagnon
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger, TechnoBoss, heyheyheybro22 and 1 other person

nigga gh therapy causes increase growth in children with ISS who have normal gh levels

In other words there ISS was caused by the lack of sensitivity to gh not low gh itself

So what makes you think that injecting hgh to someone who has a higher sensitivity to gh won’t make them grow when it works on people with a lower gh sensitivity
:lul:
@iloveboobs why no react?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Kostas and iloveboobs
No, but you are comparing a pajeet chemical to hormones
Bruh hgh causes height growth in children with normal gh levels but low sensitivity

So why wouldn’t it work on someone who has a higher sensitivity to gh?

You’re not making any sense
 
  • JFL
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
it takes alot of gh for it to turn into igf-1. using some pajeet chemical won't do that.
Growth hormone is actually not the only factor controlling igf-1 secretion in the circulation Insulin, thyroid hormone and androgens all stimulate igf-1 release
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223 and iloveboobs
Bruh hgh causes height growth in children with normal go levels but low sensitivity

So why wouldn’t it work on someone who has a higher sensitivity to gh?

You’re not making any sense
because the gh does not turn into igf-1 which actually makes the kid taller. If it did work, there would be tons and tons of teen manlets making posts on org showing their height growth, and to date, there's none currently. There was one by a kid who was 4'8 at 14 and he only grew to 5'6 which obviously shows he was gh deficient. I'm not saying hgh doesn't work on gh deficient kids because it does, but it won't work for your typical teen manlet. Also for igf-1 to even be produced, you need tons of different hormones like the thyroid, and androgen receptors. Factoring all of this in, makes it impossible for a child with normal gh level to grow taller just by hgh alone
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Kostas and wishIwasSalludon
because the gh does not turn into igf-1
Nigger even in the kids with a genetic predisposition to having less gh turn into igf-1 it still caused them to grow

So if a kid with a normal gh to igf-1 conversion takes hgh it won’t cause him to grow?:feelsuhh:

Mirin logic
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: iloveboobs and looksmaxxing223
Nigger even in the kids with a genetic predisposition to having less gh turn into igf-1 it still caused them to grow

So if a kid with a normal gh to igf-1 conversion takes hgh it won’t cause him to grow?:feelsuhh:

Mirin logic
You are forgetting the other hormones which stimulate igf-1 as well. The best thing a teen manlet can do is use an ai which makes their plates open for longer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Kostas, wishIwasSalludon and iloveboobs
No it can’t it just causes you to grow, a kid with low hgh levels will grow less than a kid with average hgh levels and a kid with high hgh will grow more than a kid with average hgh levels

Where are you getting the idea that hgh injections won’t do anything if you already have normal high levels. If that were the case acromegaly wouldn’t be a thing:lul:
No it doesn’t work that way. It’s not like every tall men has had abnormal growth hormone levels during development.
Yes and also evolution. Our ancestors had extremely early puberty and probably stopped growing at 13-14
Yeah significantly higher baseline testosterone levels were a reason for this.
They were shorter but much more robust and dimorphic.

It used to be an evolutionary advantage, as they were able to reproduce earlier.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon and looksmaxxing223
You are forgetting the other hormones which stimulate igf-1
The kids had a normal hormone profile and that’s why we have control groups lol

And the kids with the gh therapy grew more than the control groups
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: looksmaxxing223 and iloveboobs
No it doesn’t work that way. It’s not like every tall men has had abnormal growth hormone levels during development.
Nigga I’m talking abt in general which it is true
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: looksmaxxing223 and iloveboobs
Yeah significantly higher baseline testosterone levels were a reason for this.
They were shorter but much more robust and dimorphic.

It used to be an evolutionary advantage, as they were able to reproduce earlier.
yeah, i believe in the future, kids will start to hit puberty at 16,17 or even 18 and finish development maybe in their early-mid 20s because of how low testosterone is becoming. If we still had the enviroment, our ancestors had, we would've probably already finished puberty at like 12 and had kids during our mid teens.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NoaA99 and iloveboobs
insulin workmore than gh for height if u dont have gh deficency

also u need use insulin while on 4+iu gh, every bodybuilder know that u cant produce enough insulin whileon high gh levels
 
insulin workmore than gh for height if u dont have gh deficency

also u need use insulin while on 4+iu gh, every bodybuilder know that u cant produce enough insulin whileon high gh levels
It is uncertain whether insulin stimulates bone directly or indirectly by increasing muscle work and secreting igf-1
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, elemanzelvadre and looksmaxxing223
The kids had a normal hormone profile and that’s why we have control groups lol

And the kids with the gh therapy grew more than the control groups
if they need gh therapy then they dont have a normal hormonal profile but ok
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
It is uncertain whether insulin stimulates bone directly or indirectly by increasing muscle work and secreting igf-1
I think it works by providing nutrients directly to the bones rather than increasing IGF. I'm trying to think simple
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
if they need gh therapy then they dont have a normal hormonal profile but ok
Nigga it could be that they have a lower sensitive to certain horomones which is what caused them to not grow but their hormone levels themselves are fine

how do you explain that the children injected with gh grew more than the control? Other hormones stimulating off doesn’t explain this because they were only injected with gh
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
I think it works by providing nutrients directly to the bones rather than increasing IGF. I'm trying to think simple
It's a really interesting topic if you were to dive deep into it but research is yet uncertain to the direct functions of insulin on longitudinal bone growth
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223
Nigga it could be that they have a lower sensitive to certain horomones which is what caused them to not grow but their hormone levels themselves are fine

how do you explain that the children injected with gh grew more than the control? Other hormones stimulating off doesn’t explain this because they were only injected with gh
thing with having gh defiency is that, it also means other hormones are fucked, especially since gh is such an important hormone in the body. My theory is that the children grew because as you said their other hormones are normal meaning that igf-1 was produced as normal causing them to grow, whereas the other children might also suffer with other hormones being fucked, meaning that igf-1 levels were inhibited causing them to not grow as much.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Kostas and wishIwasSalludon
Hunter gatherers were taller
Most of them weren’t taller than modern human societies.
T- levels are at an all time low, so men maybe have a longer time span to grow their bones, leading to taller average statures but they do not display similar levels of physical dimorphism naturally.
 
whereas the other children might also suffer with other hormones being fucked
they excluded such cases from the study? did you read it? These are otherwise normal children its just they have ISS also the growth velocities were equivalent at baseline

and even if it didnt do you understand how absurd you sound?

You really think that by sheer chance the subjects chosen for the control had enough members in it with some sort of endocrine condition to make it seem like the gh caused the children in the treatment subject to grow?

the gh caused them to grow end of story
My theory is that the children grew
or you can just go with the researchers theory which is that the gh caused them to grow
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kostas
they excluded such cases from the study? did you read it? These are otherwise normal children its just they have ISS also the growth velocities were equivalent at baseline

and even if it didnt do you understand how absurd you sound?

You really think that by sheer chance the subjects chosen for the control had enough members in it with some sort of endocrine condition to make it seem like the gh caused the children in the treatment subject to grow?

the gh caused them to grow end of story

or you can just go with the researchers theory which is that the gh caused them to grow
People with growth hormone insensitivity even at slight which is not rare are not responsive to growth hormone therapy, but usually responsive to treatment with igf-1. However, the response of people with insensitivity, igf-1 therapy is variable and substantially less than that of a GH deficient person treated with growth hormone. Recombinant igf-1 has been used in children with insensitivity to growth hormone. In one study the height velocity increased from 2.7 cm/year to a crazy of 8 cms/year during the first year of treatment and the height velocity remained above baseline for up to eight years following initiation of igf-1 therapy.

You are right at what you're saying but it's all circumstantial and varies from person to person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223 and wishIwasSalludon
they excluded such cases from the study? did you read it? These are otherwise normal children its just they have ISS also the growth velocities were equivalent at baseline

and even if it didnt do you understand how absurd you sound?

You really think that by sheer chance the subjects chosen for the control had enough members in it with some sort of endocrine condition to make it seem like the gh caused the children in the treatment subject to grow?

the gh caused them to grow end of story

or you can just go with the researchers theory which is that the gh caused them to grow
I'll be honest I couldn't be asked reading the study. Not my fault your pajeet ass didn't state that.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
because the gh does not turn into igf-1 which actually makes the kid taller. If it did work, there would be tons and tons of teen manlets making posts on org showing their height growth, and to date, there's none currently. There was one by a kid who was 4'8 at 14 and he only grew to 5'6 which obviously shows he was gh deficient. I'm not saying hgh doesn't work on gh deficient kids because it does, but it won't work for your typical teen manlet. Also for igf-1 to even be produced, you need tons of different hormones like the thyroid, and androgen receptors. Factoring all of this in, makes it impossible for a child with normal gh level to grow taller just by hgh alone
so why not inject igf-1
 
because the gh does not turn into igf-1 which actually makes the kid taller. If it did work, there would be tons and tons of teen manlets making posts on org showing their height growth, and to date, there's none currently. There was one by a kid who was 4'8 at 14 and he only grew to 5'6 which obviously shows he was gh deficient. I'm not saying hgh doesn't work on gh deficient kids because it does, but it won't work for your typical teen manlet. Also for igf-1 to even be produced, you need tons of different hormones like the thyroid, and androgen receptors. Factoring all of this in, makes it impossible for a child with normal gh level to grow taller just by hgh alone
My brain is melting from the retardation
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LegitUser and looksmaxxing223
yeah, i believe in the future, kids will start to hit puberty at 16,17 or even 18 and finish development maybe in their early-mid 20s because of how low testosterone is becoming. If we still had the enviroment, our ancestors had, we would've probably already finished puberty at like 12 and had kids during our mid teens.
thats not true at all, actually. The average age where puberty begins is getting earlier and earlier. Puberty beggining a little bit later is actually a GOOD thing + will make you taller than expected. Early puberty IS the bad thing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmaxxing223

Similar threads

xNexus
Replies
4
Views
164
looksmaxxing223
looksmaxxing223
itsneveroverbigboy
  • Question
Replies
9
Views
289
PsychoH
PsychoH
ElTruecel
Replies
14
Views
287
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho
DORIAN
Replies
12
Views
779
DORIAN
DORIAN
B
Replies
2
Views
128
butteryfingers
B

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top