Anyone heard this new cope for black people?

[Deleted member 5189]

WE WAS DA MOORZ

WE WAS DA TARTARIANZ

 

[Deleted member 14774]

They were everything

 

[Deleted member 5189]

They were everything

They probably even think they're African

 

[Gengar]

Actually, I think SOME black people could claim to be Moors. Moors were basically Islamic North Africans. While North Africans are generally brown, some also have noticeable Subsaharan ancestry so they could appear to be black as well.

 

[Deleted member 5189]

Actually, I think SOME black people could claim to be Moors. Moors were basically Islamic North Africans. While North Africans are generally brown, some also have noticeable Subsaharan ancestry so they could appear to be black as well.

Who actually were the Moors? Is it a theory or is there proof they existed

 

[Beetlejuice]

The UK was build by blacks

 

[Mouthbreath]

Moor is considered an insult in germany

 

[Deleted member 5189]

Moor is considered an insult in germany

What it means?

 

[Mouthbreath]

What it means?

 

[Deleted member 21340]

the funniest thing about the "we wuz ..." cope from african americans is that the majority of them are mixed with north western european thanks to the slave owners being horny degenerates
most slave owners were affluent individuals who descended from european aristocracy meaning african americans literally descend from european royalty, nobles and aristocrats yet they choose to larp as egyptians and moors

 

[Gengar]

Who actually were the Moors? Is it a theory or is there proof they existed

The Moors were the Islamic North Africans (only Morocco/Algeria, I think, could also be Libya and Tunisia, not sure) who ended up conquering parts of Southern Europe (Portugal, Spain and Italy). The proof for this are the reconquests by Southern Europeans. But to claim they were all black since they were Africans is very misleading. Their descendents aren't as soy as black people here in the Netherlands. We had these chocolate deserts called "negerzoenen" (translated as "negro kisses") due to black SJWs they finally changed the name to just "zoenen" (translated as "kisses"). Meanwhile there was another desert called "Moorkoppen" (translated as "Moore heads") but North Africans haven't complained about this, despite both being "racist" in essence. We also have something called "Jodenkoeken" (translated as "Jew cookies") but that one hasn't raised any controversy either, mainly because the creator was Jewish himself and gave it that name.

 

[ConspiracyTheory]

 

[BoneDensity]

who descended from european aristocracy meaning african americans literally descend from european royalty, nobles and aristocrats yet they choose to larp as egyptians and moors

Sure but that's not special pretty much every european is descended from royalty.

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Sure but that's not special pretty much every european is descended from royalty.

no theyre not
most europeans descend from peasants, serfs and farmers
if your family isn't rich nor affluent its unlikely you descended from royalty or even nobility for that matter
whereas most african americans do because of their slave owner heritage

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Sure but that's not special pretty much every european is descended from royalty.

which is why i find it funny when people larp as their "mighty" ancestors
"my ancestors were greek philosphers" "my ancestors were english nobles and kings" etc like no they weren't, your ancestors were serfs picking wheat in the fields for master

 

[BoneDensity]

no theyre not
most europeans descend from peasants, serfs and farmers
if your family isn't rich nor affluent its unlikely you descended from royalty or even nobility for that matter
whereas most african americans do because of their slave owner heritage

Look into it mate - if you go back to the 9th century almost all people with at least 1 european descendant are descended from the nobility at that time. It's nothing special. What is special is being a descendant of royalty/nobility through an unbroken male line.

 

[Growth Plate]

no theyre not
most europeans descend from peasants, serfs and farmers
if your family isn't rich nor affluent its unlikely you descended from royalty or even nobility for that matter
whereas most african americans do because of their slave owner heritage

You just created a new cope for african americans tbh

 

[Deleted member 21340]

You just created a new cope for african americans tbh

its not even cope because its true
african americans need to take pride in their aristocrat white european heritage and start larping as nazis instead of moors tbhngl

 

[fauxfox]

Actually, I think SOME black people could claim to be Moors. Moors were basically Islamic North Africans. While North Africans are generally brown, some also have noticeable Subsaharan ancestry so they could appear to be black as well.

The only black people that can claim this and the egyptian shit are Sudanese and horn africans tbh.

 

[Growth Plate]

The only black people that can claim this and the egyptian shit are Sudanese and horn africans tbh.

It's over of you need to claim anything

Tall, rich, 6psl+ and wide framed moggers are seen as impressive without saying a word

 

[fauxfox]

It's over of you need to claim anything

Tall, rich, 6psl+ and wide framed moggers are seen as impressive without saying a word

Yeah claiming the achievements of others is cope. And if someone wants to claim the achievements of others that they share ties with, they need also claim that groups wrongdoings.

 

[Deleted member 16369]

This is one of their oldest copes

 

[Yuhbwoynadia]

My ancestor was a moor

 

[Racky]

The only black people that can claim this and the egyptian shit are Sudanese and horn africans tbh.

Most people identified as "black Moors" by European sources were perhaps slave soldiers. Some were of East African origins(especially Nubians before the 13th century) but some were West African Sahelians acquired through the trans-Saharan trade, West Africa which back then was known as "Sudan" (bilal es-Sudan). Even to this day the black diaspora in some Nafri countries especially Morocco claims Sahelian origins.

related anecdote from the conquest of Spain by Umayyad :

 

[the BULL]

The UK was build by blacks

And indians

 

[Kooshin]

The only black people that can claim this and the egyptian shit are Sudanese and horn africans tbh.

hahahaha

 

[Kooshin]

The only black people that can claim this and the egyptian shit are Sudanese and horn africans tbh.

Us horn of Africans don't need to claim Moor, because we have the Land of Punt, Askum, Damot, etc... Also, we were not enslaved, and we enslaved Europeans. North Africans & Horn of Africans were the only ones in Africa to enslave whites, while west/central/south were enslaved by them.

 

[Racky]

horn of africans were never enslaved in history.

There were plenty of "Habshi" slaves in the Arabic world. Some of the most popular figures in Islamic history had Abyssianian slave origins
It's good to be proud of who you are but you don't gotta distort history and tell such ridiculous lies. Only Somali people were rarely enslaved by others which I guess you are happy about, Kooshin. Oromo people though were commonly enslaved both outside and in the Horn.

Us horn of Africans don't need to claim Moor, because we have the Land of Punt, Askum, Damot, etc... Also, we were not enslaved, and we enslaved Europeans.
View attachment 1904082

FulI account :

Accept Terms and Conditions on JSTOR

JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

www.jstor.org

So basically they captured a few people from a British ship that was swept up by the current to the coast of Mogadishu, then turning them into slaves. Bravo !
Shit like this happened in other parts of Africa too, it's nothing special(or to be proud of) to capture people who are often weak/unharmed.
"evidence abound, dating back to the initial contacts between Europeans and West Africans, that Europeans were held variously as captives, hostages, prisoners, and as slaves and their release was sometimes tied to ransom payment."
"Reports of European captives continued into the nineteenth century resulting in friction between West African chiefs and Europeans on the eve of European conquest of Africa"

Ransoming White Captives: An Episode in Anglo-Asante Relations, 1869-1874 on JSTOR

Olatunji Ojo, Ransoming White Captives: An Episode in Anglo-Asante Relations, 1869-1874, African Economic History, Vol. 42 (2014), pp. 109-135

www.jstor.org

Also it's false Horn Africans are the only ones who practiced slavery on non-Africans. Not that this is important or to gloat over
"It is interesting to note the great demand of the Mali people for Turkish, Ethiopian, and other slave-girls, and also for eunuchs and Turkish boys. The slave trade thus went in both directions."
- The Cambridge history of Africa: From c. 1600 to c. 1790, pp 90

According to Al-Umari about the Mansa :

In Borno :
"Les esclaves européens envoyés par le pacha de Tripoli aux sultans du Borno"

Chapitre 5. Mobilités plurielles

On écrit l’histoire, mais on l’a toujours écrite du point de vue des sédentaires, et au nom d’un appareil unitaire d’État, au moins possible même quand on parlait de nomades. Ce qui manque, c’est une Nomadologie, le contraire d’une histoire1.Carte 19 — Monde Borno-centré et routes commerciales

books.openedition.org

 

[Kooshin]

There were plenty of "Habshi" slaves in the Arabic world. Some of the most popular figures in Islamic history had Abyssianian slave origins
It's good to be proud of who you are but you don't gotta distort history and tell such ridiculous lies. Only Somali people were rarely enslaved by others which I guess you are happy about, Kooshin. Oromo people though were commonly enslaved both outside and in the Horn.

FulI account :

Accept Terms and Conditions on JSTOR

JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

www.jstor.org

So basically they captured a few people from a British ship that was swept up by the current to the coast of Mogadishu, then turning them into slaves. Bravo !
Shit like this happened in other parts of Africa too, it's nothing special(or to be proud of) to capture people who are often weak/unharmed.
"evidence abound, dating back to the initial contacts between Europeans and West Africans, that Europeans were held variously as captives, hostages, prisoners, and as slaves and their release was sometimes tied to ransom payment."
"Reports of European captives continued into the nineteenth century resulting in friction between West African chiefs and Europeans on the eve of European conquest of Africa"

Ransoming White Captives: An Episode in Anglo-Asante Relations, 1869-1874 on JSTOR

Olatunji Ojo, Ransoming White Captives: An Episode in Anglo-Asante Relations, 1869-1874, African Economic History, Vol. 42 (2014), pp. 109-135

www.jstor.org

Also it's false Horn Africans are the only ones who practiced slavery on non-Africans. Not that this is important or to gloat over
"It is interesting to note the great demand of the Mali people for Turkish, Ethiopian, and other slave-girls, and also for eunuchs and Turkish boys. The slave trade thus went in both directions."
- The Cambridge history of Africa: From c. 1600 to c. 1790, pp 90

According to Al-Umari about the Mansa :

In Borno :
"Les esclaves européens envoyés par le pacha de Tripoli aux sultans du Borno"

Chapitre 5. Mobilités plurielles

On écrit l’histoire, mais on l’a toujours écrite du point de vue des sédentaires, et au nom d’un appareil unitaire d’État, au moins possible même quand on parlait de nomades. Ce qui manque, c’est une Nomadologie, le contraire d’une histoire1.Carte 19 — Monde Borno-centré et routes commerciales

books.openedition.org

Brah white people enslaved million west/central africans why should you care if Somalis enslaved europeans, you should be happy at that. they gloat over enslaving west/central africans I should gloat over enslaving white people

 

[CopeMoreCumskins.]

its not even cope because its true
african americans need to take pride in their aristocrat white european heritage and start larping as nazis instead of moors tbhngl

Jfl brain dead baboon take (this post and your other one). There were actual studies done on this. Southern AA actually have MUCH lower European ancestry than North African Americans. Even though the South was MUCH more prominent in slavery. Why? The dates associated with the admixture and what i said above...would imply that most of the admixing was "consensual" and not widespread. The large amounts of admixture you see in certain regions today happened well after slavery.




Why wouldn't you take pride in the Moorish history (which is the biggest portion of the DNA of most blacks, obviously) over the Germanic Savage dogs who were civilized by them and would still be shitting in their mud huts and wearing bear skins if not for the influence/conquering of their people. Lmao, nobody cares about what they did literally 7 centuries later.

They were conquered and civilized by Moors/Romans/Huns first before they did any conquering themselves. Everything MOST of Europe has today is due to other cultures/civilizations lifting them up. Notice Europeans all use "arab" numerals and not European numerals. Right? That is how history is, things wax and wane.


Even the stereotypes that cumskins use today are all regurgitated and projection of what their past Conquerors Associated them with. Romans, for example, described the Germanic tribes as savage animals pale of skin and lacking of any intellect or Pose, And described the "Nubians" As cunning and intelligent. The exact opposite. The exact opposite of the "stereotype" today too. Moors and Muslims called them beasts/apes/animals. See the correlation? Lmao. Whites were abused and conquered for most of Modern History, all the shit that they bark today is mostly just their school shooter DNA attempting to help them cope with their abused history by projecting it.