again, such as?
took you some time to find them uht you just larped to sound you know what you're saying and prayed that some obscure research out there would validate what you said without even checking yourself, like if the research was going to manifest itself into existence
YOU DID THE SAME THING BROOOOO
The fact that over all if not most of your comments you're constantly utilizing very specific situations to paint women in a bad image, as if men haven't done the same and trying to use that as an argument. That's biased and a double standard.
It isn't that hard to click on open PubMed, click on a few links and read the abstracts and conclusions section.
i did give personal experiences + studies based on the subject (which you keep ignoring), and already told you that, even if they did were more empathic, it wouldnt be by such a huge margin (exactly like the studies show).YOU DID THE SAME THING BROOOOO
The fact that over all if not most of your comments you're constantly utilizing very specific situations to paint women in a bad image, as if men haven't done the same and trying to use that as an argument. That's biased and a double standard.
"foids are incredibly cruel and shallow" - totally not emotionally charged and biased
" every woman that asked about my height always laughed right after" - you're totally not traumatized by this and are coping by developing a deep resentment to women
"while my own mother gaslighted and always neglected me" - ZERO BIAS bro, trust me
and we can just keep going, you have evidenced something, and I kinda feel bad for you now. You've clearly had negative experienced with women, and that's valid, but your experiences are not science or are things than be extrapolated to literally 50% of the population, you're using incel rhetoric whether you like to admit it or not, you've been hurt and are taking your anger on women through this method, by trying to bring them down.
Men are more cruel (70% of arrests are to men, we do basically all the major violent crimes) and shallow. We're objectively more shallow, women are more selective, but women consider facial attractiveness, height, income, personality, perceived danger, since women carry a much higher burden of reproduction than men, they've biologically adapted to be more selective with their mates, this is true across mammals, reptiles and birds. And while women consider a plethora of different traits, men basically only consider one: Looks. An ugly man isn't completely worth less in society, but an ugly woman basically has nothing because they're valued in that single metric.
It isn't that hard to click on open PubMed, click on a few links and read the abstracts and conclusions section.
and then you proceeded to give me the Incel word. i wll go ahead and state that a lot of incels (the ones who perpetrate violence as revenge) are incredibly fucking shallow and retarded, and never ever sided with them
I'm unsure what studies you're talking about it, personal opinions here do not matter, we're speaking about scientific facts. So far you've provided a ChatGPT take and keep referencing the study of your original post. I'm unsure what "studies" we're talking about here, because I would gladly have addressed them.
So we do agree that they are more empathetic? I never said that they were massively more empathetic, I said that they were more empathetic and that's what the research suggests. Women are more empathetic than men and these findings are statistically relevant, it's a small, but existing difference, that's my whole fucking point.
Ignoring the fact that women also score lower than men in selfishness-based research, you can be both selfish and empathetic (compared to somebody else). What you seem to be getting wrong is mentioning all of these negative traits of women and suggesting that because women have negative traits that they can't be more empathetic than woman.
I have no way of knowing whether you're an incel or not in the truest sense, I'm using it like a buzz word or insult here, I'm using it like a synonym for misogynist, which isn't the necessary definition of the word, but it serves my purposes here. You have an internalized distate for women (or certain women at the very least), and whether consciously or not, it is seeping into your commentaries when you talk about them.
sure, if we are talking about a small margin they might be slightly more empathic than men, that doesnt sound like much of a difference tho.
I mean we also need to be a little more objective here, there are extremes everywhere, do you think most women subscribe to this ideology or even half agree with it? Most of my female friends are apparently repulsed by the idea of modern, extreme feminism. It isn't representative of the majority of the female population
Time will tell, but for now it seems like women always show more and more hypocrisy as they stray further away from their role.
Would you be so kind as to answer?
Same, women are nature and so follow it automatically whilst men are culture.
