Anyone here with good bonesmashing results on browridge ?

[gloriouse]

and if you did, does your eyebrow shape improved ?

 

[thereallegend]

The one time is bonesmashed under the brow ridge, it worked too good. I do infras instead.

 

[Deleted member 9670]

bonesmash your suprasnot browridge

 

[Deusmaximus]

Can i be straight forward?
Sometimes when i poo, I use the shaping attachment from my old play doh fun set. I place it on my anus, and make poops in different shapes. Theres nothing strange about that at all. Im an American living in America, and if i want to have poops shaped like stars, I have every right to. The founding fathers would have wanted it that way!

 

[gloriouse]

The one time is bonesmashed under the brow ridge, it worked too good. I do infras instead.

it can't be bone in one time this was swelling

 

[thereallegend]

it can't be bone in one time this was swelling

Either way, I realized I didn't need to be bonesmashing my brow ridge, as it's not one of my failos.

 

[thereallegend]

bonesmash your suprasnot browridge

Not the same thing?

 

[Deleted member 9670]

Not the same thing?

no

 

[thereallegend]

no

the supra is right below the brow ridge right?

 

[Mouthbreath]

I can see clear temporary changes

 

[Deleted member 9670]

the supra is right below the brow ridge right?

Ye it's your orbital

 

[gloriouse]

do someone think its possible to mitigate slight negative hooding by increasing the browridge projection ?

 

[Deleted member 32669]

The one time is bonesmashed under the brow ridge, it worked too good. I do infras instead.

wtf i need brow ridge my supras are fine

 

[Deleted member 25713]

Love people inventing new terms like muh supras. The brow ridge is all one bone it would be silly to augment only one section of it.

 

[gloriouse]

Love people inventing new terms like muh supras. The brow ridge is all one bone it would be silly to augment only one section of it.

increasing only glabella projection seems the best because you can create negative hooding by hitting the outer parts of the browridge

 

[Deleted member 25713]

increasing only glabella projection seems the best because you can create negative hooding by hitting the outer parts of the browridge

Using the term “supraorbital rim” is a useful way to describe the bottom of the brow ridge (supraorbital ridge) directly above the eyelid so I will use it. Hooding shape is determined by the shape of the supras (rims). For most people it is round and for others it has a negative tilt so the skin covers the eyelid this way. If you augment the entire brow ridge evenly (mimicking natural growth patterns) the supra orbital ridge and rims will grow in proportion and the shape of the brow ridge won’t change, hence the hooding shape won’t change. An implant for the entire brow ridge (including “supras”) is the only thing that makes sense.

 

[gloriouse]

Using the term “supraorbital rim” is a useful way to describe the bottom of the brow ridge (supraorbital ridge) directly above the eyelid so I will use it. Hooding shape is determined by the shape of the supras (rims). For most people it is round and for others it has a negative tilt so the skin covers the eyelid this way. If you augment the entire brow ridge evenly (mimicking natural growth patterns) the supra orbital ridge and rims will grow in proportion and the shape of the brow ridge won’t change, hence the hooding shape won’t change. An implant for the entire brow ridge (including “supras”) is the only thing that makes sense.

of course if you augment the entire Browridge the shape won’t change, but lets suppose you have low Supras but high glabella, creating a negative orbital shape. It’s more interesting to try to increase glabella projection to potentially lower it and diminishing the negative shape than enhancing all the Browridge protrusion