Apes look more like Caucasians than blacks

[Deleted member 5802]

The only similarities between apes and blacks is the nose and proganthism but this starts to disappear when you compare hairless apes to whites

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIOD PEOPLE HAVE BIGGER EARS ON AVERAGE SUB SAHARAN BLACKS HAVE SMALL EARS

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIODS HAVE MORE DEVELOPED BROW RIDGES THAN SUB SAHARAN BLACKS

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIODS ARE MORE HAIRY THAN BOTH BLACKS AND ASIANS

AND ON AVERAGE MORE APES HAVE LIGHTSKIN AND THIN LIPS WHILE ALL PEOPLE OF SUB SAHARAN AFRICAN HAVE BIG LIPS AND VERY DARK SKINNED

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

You already made this thread like 4 or 5 times

 

[Enfant terrible]

you are mentally ill
and your trolling is bad

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

No suprise, average European has 5% Neanderthal DNA

 

[Pythagoras]

Apes are more advanced

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

There are other features that make blacks resemble apes more so than other races like longer arms and smaller cranium. not to mention the less prominent chin. Europeans actually have the least amount of neanderthal admixture out of the non african races with australian aboriginals have the most. Also, west african populations have 2-19% archaic admixture from an unknown hominin. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc0776

Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations

While introgression from Neanderthals and Denisovans has been documented in modern humans outside Africa, the contribution of archaic hominins to the genetic variation of present-day Africans remains poorly understood. We provide complementary lines of ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[n0rthface]

You can’t handle the mog

 

[Deleted member 15338]

No suprise, average European has 5% Neanderthal DNA
View attachment 1384191

High T

 

[BigBiceps]

No suprise, average European has 5% Neanderthal DNA
View attachment 1384191

More neanderthal = more chad. No wonder Eurasians are smart, since Neanderthals had avg iq of 120, they were also much stronger than homo sapiens. Only "pure" humans are black, you missed the neanderthal jock genetics, and now you're crying jfl.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

There are other features that make blacks resemble apes more so than other races like longer arms and smaller cranium. not to mention the less prominent chin. Europeans actually have the least amount of neanderthal admixture out of the non african races with australian aboriginals have the most. Also, west african populations have 2-19% archaic admixture from an unknown hominin. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc0776

Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations

While introgression from Neanderthals and Denisovans has been documented in modern humans outside Africa, the contribution of archaic hominins to the genetic variation of present-day Africans remains poorly understood. We provide complementary lines of ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Don’t Asians on average also have smaller Chins and some African groups do have more prominent chins.You also do realize that Europeans and Asians also have ghosts populations

 

[Deleted member 5802]

More neanderthal = more chad. No wonder Eurasians are smart, since Neanderthals had avg iq of 120, they were also much stronger than homo sapiens. Only "pure" humans are black, you missed the neanderthal jock genetics, and now you're crying jfl.

If the Neanderthal was so smart how did we homo Sapiens drive it to extinction

 

[reptiles]

The only similarities between apes and blacks is the nose and proganthism but this starts to disappear when you compare hairless apes to whites

View attachment 1384189
View attachment 1384190

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIOD PEOPLE HAVE BIGGER EARS ON AVERAGE SUB SAHARAN BLACKS HAVE SMALL EARS

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIODS HAVE MORE DEVELOPED BROW RIDGES THAN SUB SAHARAN BLACKS

ON AVERAGE CAUCASIODS ARE MORE HAIRY THAN BOTH BLACKS AND ASIANS

AND ON AVERAGE MORE APES HAVE LIGHTSKIN AND THIN LIPS WHILE ALL PEOPLE OF SUB SAHARAN AFRICAN HAVE BIG LIPS AND VERY DARK SKINNED

Apes look ugly as fuck TBQH how did evolution produce species so ugly even australian aboringals mog them you can truly tell they are the unevolved specimens of nature

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

I realize that non africans also carry ghost admixture but 19% is a ton of archaic ancestry. I swear some people on here haven't looked at any genetic or anthropologic data in the last 6 years. A majority of research indicates neanderthal dna is mostly harmful in humans. with maybe a few good genes here and there. The only africans with really prominent chins are caucasian mixed ones. just because the lower mandible projecs forward in a lot of negroes make chin look more prominent but the actual mental protuberance of the chin is less prominent. If more Neanderthal DNA was more chad that would mean australian aboriginals are the most chad and east asians are the second most chad since they have the most. Also, all sub-saharan africans carry trace amounts of neanderthal admixture due to back migration from europe 20,000 years ago

 

[Deleted member 5802]

I realize that non africans also carry ghost admixture but 19% is a ton of archaic ancestry. I swear some people on here haven't looked at any genetic or anthropologic data in the last 6 years. A majority of research indicates neanderthal dna is mostly harmful in humans. with maybe a few good genes here and there. The only africans with really prominent chins are caucasian mixed ones. just because the lower mandible projecs forward in a lot of negroes make chin look more prominent but the actual mental protuberance of the chin is less prominent. If more Neanderthal DNA was more chad that would mean australian aboriginals are the most chad and east asians are the second most chad since they have the most. Also, all sub-saharan africans carry trace amounts of neanderthal admixture due to back migration from europe 20,000 years ago

Sub Saharan Africans only really carry at best 1 percent Neanderthal excluding the Horn. Some African phenotypes without Caucasian admixture do have prominent chins

According to a study published in 2020, there are indications that 2% to 19% (or about ≃6.6 and ≃7.0%) of the DNA of four West African populations may have come from an unknown archaic hominin which split from the ancestor of humans and Neanderthals between 360 kya to 1.02 mya. However, the study also suggests that at least part of this archaic admixture is also present in Eurasians/non-Africans, and that the admixture event or events range from 0 to 124 ka B.P, which includes the period before the Out-of-Africa migration and prior to the African/Eurasian split (thus affecting in part the common ancestors of both Africans and Eurasians/non-Africans).[6][7][8]

So in reality at best sub Saharan Africans have around 7 percent ghost population in these populations were only found in two ethnic groups ( Mende and Yoruba) if you include the arcadic ghost populations in Europeans and the Neanderthal and homo erectus ad mixture you will find that Europeans have more nonhuman population ancestors than sub Saharan Africans.

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

I find that highly implausible. Europeans have like 1.7% neanderthal dna on average according to the most recent science. Europeans look more hominin and less simian on average. You're also forgetting that Europeans have smaller faces on average which is more advanced. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/4/391/273534 our archaic ancestors had larger faces like negroids or australoids.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

I find that highly implausible. Europeans have like 1.7% neanderthal dna on average according to the most recent science. Europeans look more hominin and less simian on average. You're also forgetting that Europeans have smaller faces on average which is more advanced. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/4/391/273534 our archaic ancestors had larger faces like negroids or australoids.

Arcadic humans would most likely resemble the Khoisan people in Africa not negriods or Australiods.

your also forgetting that Africans are the most diverse people in the entire Almost every skull or face shape is found in Africa naturally

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

Modern Khoisan are heavily admixed look at any reconstruction of old fossils they all look australoid

and the diversity of blacks is often exaggerated. but yes to some extent there is a wider variety of skull types

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

I'm not saying genetically they were australoid just phenotypically. btw

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Modern Khoisan are heavily admixed look at any reconstruction of old fossils they all look australoid View attachment 1384332

and the diversity of blacks is often exaggerated. but yes to some extent there is a wider variety of skull types

How is it exaggerated genetically and phenotype wise they are very diverse tbh.

how is the Khoisan heavily admixed they on average have around 4-12 percent Eurasian dna which isn’t enough to fully effect ones phenotype dramatically. Genetically they are the oldest race in the entire world.

the original Europeans had somewhat asatic features

All I’m saying is we truly don’t know what the first homo Sapiens would had really looked like but evidence is pointing to them looking similar to the San

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

From what I read they're 10-30% https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/10/2944/5874945

 

[Deleted member 5802]

I'm not saying genetically they were australoid just phenotypically. btw

Australoids didn’t always look like that genetically speaking their Caucasiods and only developed their primitive phenotype due to the environment of Australia. Looking at the oldest skeleton found in Australia it looks very Caucasiod

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

is that a caucasian or abo

 

[ChristianChad]

If the Neanderthal was so smart how did we homo Sapiens drive it to extinction

nobody defintively knows



neantherdal were one of the more beastly humasn ever
biggest lungs
biggest ribcage
biggest frame/bones
biggest brain
robust skulls with robust chin

 

[ChristianChad]

Australoids didn’t always look like that genetically speaking their Caucasiods and only developed their primitive phenotype due to the environment of Australia. Looking at the oldest skeleton found in Australia it looks very Caucasiod
View attachment 1384364

well that was before they de-evolved

 

[Deleted member 5802]

From what I read they're 10-30% https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/10/2944/5874945

Didn’t see anywhere in your source of the Khoisan having 10-30 percent Eurasian dna. It’s usally at most 14 percent

Researchers find signs of western Eurasian genes in southern African Khoisan tribes

(Phys.org) —A team of researchers with representatives from the U.S., Germany and France has found evidence of western Eurasian genes in Khoisan tribes living in southern Africa. This suggests, the researchers conclude in a paper they've had published in Proceedings of the National Academy of...

phys.org