TreFast
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2024
- Posts
- 22
- Reputation
- 15
I was watching some Peter Attia and he was talking about Androgen Receptor (AR) density and how it effects different men's results from taking exogeneous testosterone. He was saying how we what call "high responders", are those who stand to gain much when taking higher doses because their higher androgen receptor density expects higher test levels from their body. So if one has low receptor density, they can be perfectly happy at a lower testosterone level (ex: 400ng/dl).
What's more interesting though is that the AR density is inherited through the X chromosome which is apparently strictly inherited through the mother. This means a son's future athletic performance or strength can more clearly be solved for by figuring out those genes from the mom. Another example is the inheritance of the mitochondria, which is strictly from the mother. So basically it's over for you if your mom had bad genes or bad epigenetics and didn't exercise.
This raises the question of what other traits can we find to more accurately find what our "failos" are and which ones we should see as a sunk cost and not worry about, and which failos we should focus on as there could be a lot to get by fixing it.
Thoughts?
What's more interesting though is that the AR density is inherited through the X chromosome which is apparently strictly inherited through the mother. This means a son's future athletic performance or strength can more clearly be solved for by figuring out those genes from the mom. Another example is the inheritance of the mitochondria, which is strictly from the mother. So basically it's over for you if your mom had bad genes or bad epigenetics and didn't exercise.
This raises the question of what other traits can we find to more accurately find what our "failos" are and which ones we should see as a sunk cost and not worry about, and which failos we should focus on as there could be a lot to get by fixing it.
Thoughts?
