"appeal to nature fallacy"

It's often used in terms of moral arguments.

"It's fine to be a faggot because in nature homosexual acts occur"
"It's fine to rape because in the animal kingdom rape occurs"
 
businessman123 said:
it was a joke. what about someone who is colorblind? their sense of sight is obviously different from the norm, how do you account for that? if our brain is what actually senses and makes sense of the world around us, wouldn't you think it'd be different for people with different neuron pathways altered through experience and genetics?
Click to expand...
When I say senses are objective I specifically mean the natural senses of a natural being. Being colour blind is unnatural
 
Antonio7 said:
Scientists are slaves who follow man-made rules. They are some of the most mentally ill and close-minded people similar to doctors. Not a single study has been done on human consumption of blood. That's because they're brainwashed by morals and too disconnected from reality to even consider it.
Click to expand...
How do you find out then whats healthy to eat and what isn't
 
Aladin said:
It's often used in terms of moral arguments.

"It's fine to be a faggot because in nature homosexual acts occur"
"It's fine to rape because in the animal kingdom rape occurs"
Click to expand...
Morals are man-made and don't exist.

And everything natural is fine because its reality.
 
Antonio7 said:
When I say senses are objective I specifically mean the natural senses of a natural being. Being colour blind is unnatural
Click to expand...
What is objectively natural? don't colorblind people/genetic mutations exist within nature?
 
Beastimmung said:
How do you find out then whats healthy to eat and what isn't
Click to expand...
Consume only what can be found in nature and listen to your natural senses

In nature you would inevitably find yourself eating raw meat and organs and drinking blood.
 
Antonio7 said:
Consume only what can be found in nature and listen to your natural senses

In nature you would inevitably find yourself eating raw meat and organs and drinking blood.
Click to expand...
I would probably drink water in nature
 
So many words to say you never got pussy
 
Antonio7 said:
I believe in creation but I don't believe in any man-made religions
Click to expand...
so you believe in divine spontaneous conception? how is that any more believable than evolution? at least there's proof of evolution existing.
 
businessman123 said:
so you believe in divine spontaneous conception? how is that any more believable than evolution? at least there's proof of evolution existing.
Click to expand...
What's spontaneous conception

What proof is there of evolution?
 
Antonio7 said:
What's spontaneous conception

What proof is there of evolution?
Click to expand...
take the two word's definitions and combine them. fossil records and survival of the fittest.
 
businessman123 said:
take the two word's definitions and combine them. fossil records and survival of the fittest.
Click to expand...
Never seen a fossil with my own eyes so can't comment on them

Everyone is more or less the same in nature amongst their group so one/some of em dying don't make a difference
 
Spontaneous conception is the conception and birth of a subsequent child, after the birth of a child conceived through in vitro fertilisation or other forms of assisted reproductive technology.
 
Antonio7 said:
Never seen a fossil with my own eyes so can't comment on them

Everyone is more or less the same in nature amongst their group so one/some of em dying don't make a difference
Click to expand...
so you're appealing to ignorance at this point lul.
 
Antonio7 said:
Spontaneous conception is the conception and birth of a subsequent child, after the birth of a child conceived through in vitro fertilisation or other forms of assisted reproductive technology.
Click to expand...
Spontaneous generation is a superseded scientific theory that held that living creatures could arise from nonliving matter and that such processes were commonplace and regular. (conception/generation are interchangeable in this case)
 
Primalsplit said:
You got a peer reviewed source for that?
Click to expand...
You can believe that there's no such thing as objective but your natural senses are the closest thing there is to objective
 
Antonio7 said:
You can believe that there's no such thing as objective but your natural senses are the closest thing there is to objective
Click to expand...
Can you link some articles to back up your claims?:soy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

gymcel64
Whitepill if you're a registered user here its most probable that you are unlovable
Replies
23
Views
380
madma
madma
itsoverarthu
Does my logic my sense?
Replies
1
Views
55
KT-34
KT-34
S
Discussion 99% of people are completely brainwashed and have depth, substance, or underlying reason for acting the way they do aside from their biochemical state
Replies
3
Views
276
helloluv
helloluv
Jason Voorhees
JFL India vs Pakistan war has turned into a circus
Replies
15
Views
499
bwrauycnee
bwrauycnee
D
Theory Inceldom is just natural selection doing its job
Replies
8
Views
130
TruER
TruER

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top