D
Deleted member 17430
Manlet
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
- Posts
- 2,316
- Reputation
- 4,435
I was thinking about this lately. Like most men, I believe I would never rape a woman.
But what reason do we use to justify this?
Most would say: Rape is wrong, because you're doing something to someone's body against their will.
Makes sense until now.
But then.....
There's this trope that every teenage boy fantasizes about stopping time and lewding over all the girls in the classroom:
Suddenly, this sounds like something we'd all do. If you could stop time, you could totally see yourself using that power to touch girls bodies. Of course, without their permission. Shouldn't the same logic apply here? It's wrong to touch people's bodies without their consent, right? So why does it suddenly not feel so wrong anymore?
Another example: If you had the power of hypnosis.
Can you tell me that you'd never end up using it to get sex?
Of course you would... Any man would...... and I'll tell you why.
It's because we don't actually care about it being "wrong". Ethics has nothing to do with it. We just don't wanna have to deal with the real life inconveniences of it.
If time is stopped, you can do whatever you want with no consequences. If the girl is hypnotised, she'll enthusiastically fuck you. It doesn't matter if she didn't actually desire that, as long as she doesn't show resistance, it's no problem. You just don't wanna have to deal with the hassle of a girl kicking and screaming to get away. Because it would be a turn off, it'd make you feel unwanted, not to mention the social consequences that could come of it. That's what you really don't want.
Given these points, is it really true that most men would never rape a woman? I don't think so. Given the right circumstances in which the girl isn't showing resistance and the man doesn't believe he will suffer any consequences, I believe most men would have their way with a woman's body regardless of her will.
We are just coping when we say that. We want to believe that we are loyal to our morals. But we are just limited by the consequences of the real world.
But what reason do we use to justify this?
Most would say: Rape is wrong, because you're doing something to someone's body against their will.
Makes sense until now.
But then.....
There's this trope that every teenage boy fantasizes about stopping time and lewding over all the girls in the classroom:
Suddenly, this sounds like something we'd all do. If you could stop time, you could totally see yourself using that power to touch girls bodies. Of course, without their permission. Shouldn't the same logic apply here? It's wrong to touch people's bodies without their consent, right? So why does it suddenly not feel so wrong anymore?
Another example: If you had the power of hypnosis.
Can you tell me that you'd never end up using it to get sex?
Of course you would... Any man would...... and I'll tell you why.
It's because we don't actually care about it being "wrong". Ethics has nothing to do with it. We just don't wanna have to deal with the real life inconveniences of it.
If time is stopped, you can do whatever you want with no consequences. If the girl is hypnotised, she'll enthusiastically fuck you. It doesn't matter if she didn't actually desire that, as long as she doesn't show resistance, it's no problem. You just don't wanna have to deal with the hassle of a girl kicking and screaming to get away. Because it would be a turn off, it'd make you feel unwanted, not to mention the social consequences that could come of it. That's what you really don't want.
Given these points, is it really true that most men would never rape a woman? I don't think so. Given the right circumstances in which the girl isn't showing resistance and the man doesn't believe he will suffer any consequences, I believe most men would have their way with a woman's body regardless of her will.
We are just coping when we say that. We want to believe that we are loyal to our morals. But we are just limited by the consequences of the real world.
