Deleted member 14160
12 PSL
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2021
- Posts
- 7,264
- Reputation
- 22,088
I read the sticky threads about ideal ratios and measurements, so at the gym I asked to
borrow the caliper shit and got as many measurements as I could remember.
- Bizygomatic Distance: 15cm exact.
- PFL: ~35mm (held it as close as I could to ends of eye without poking)
- IPD: 70mm
- Bigonial: 12.9 cm flexed and 12.5cm unflexed masseter
- 15mm philtrum
- .4667 ES ratio
- ~2.2 Fwhr
- ~1 Midface ratio
- ~2.667 Chin/Philtrum
Based on this and a few other charts My measurements are all 2 or more standard deviations from mean
But apparently "averageness" of faces leads to them looking good.
Should extreme measurements, in theory atleast, Be harmonious if they fit ideal ratios?
borrow the caliper shit and got as many measurements as I could remember.
- Bizygomatic Distance: 15cm exact.
- PFL: ~35mm (held it as close as I could to ends of eye without poking)
- IPD: 70mm
- Bigonial: 12.9 cm flexed and 12.5cm unflexed masseter
- 15mm philtrum
- .4667 ES ratio
- ~2.2 Fwhr
- ~1 Midface ratio
- ~2.667 Chin/Philtrum
Based on this and a few other charts My measurements are all 2 or more standard deviations from mean
But apparently "averageness" of faces leads to them looking good.
Should extreme measurements, in theory atleast, Be harmonious if they fit ideal ratios?
Last edited: