cvskll
15 🇱🇹 6’2
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2025
- Posts
- 156
- Reputation
- 52
My family was saying to me today that my younger brother was unlucky to be born with no upper eyelid exposure (hunter eyes) (and i personally think he was gifted with them and that they look great) so i asked them what the problem with it is?? and they all said that it looks ugly on people so I decided to actually test this so i showed them a picture off from reddit with chico who has minimal upper eyelid exposure compared to him morphed with a bad eye area,
and for some reason, all of them chose the right side saying it looks more natural, and that it truly shows off his eyes. They also said that many many people in europe and many influencers spend thousands getting their eyelid hooding to be removed to apparently make them look more “attractive” and imo it’s nonsense and it is not needed at all.
So are “prey eyes” more appealing than “hunter eyes” and that we’ve been brainwashed into thinking eyelid hooding is better and that normal eyes have more appeal or is my family just completely bugging????
and for some reason, all of them chose the right side saying it looks more natural, and that it truly shows off his eyes. They also said that many many people in europe and many influencers spend thousands getting their eyelid hooding to be removed to apparently make them look more “attractive” and imo it’s nonsense and it is not needed at all.
So are “prey eyes” more appealing than “hunter eyes” and that we’ve been brainwashed into thinking eyelid hooding is better and that normal eyes have more appeal or is my family just completely bugging????