Are infraorbital implants alone enough to ascend/chisel?

[oganthropologist]

Had consultation with Pagnoni after he received my CT scans and he basically suggested only minimally prominent infraorbital implants, with nothing along zygos or rest of cheekbones.

According to my scan, my zygos are already prominent, so he thinks more mass might look uncanny. The problem is, I have a good amount of soft tissue/fat despite ~13-14% body fat, so I don't exactly have a chiseled look.

My undereye area could honestly use some more prominence, so infras make sense. But part of me thinks "if I am going to undergo surgical risk and $$$, I may as well risk potentially more upside by extending the implant beyond just orbital rim?"

My goal is to achieve a chiseled chadlite look, which maybe just isn't realistic without drastically increasing botched risk?

 

[kingofkings]

This is one of those situations where a picture is worth 1000 words

My gut says to trust Pagnoni if he's literally saying any bigger will look uncanny, but really hard to say for sure without a picture

 

[lurking truecel]

I mean sounds like 13 k down the drain, just do fat grafts or some other eye surgery instea of some slight infra augmentation

 

[oganthropologist]

I mean sounds like 13 k down the drain, just do fat grafts or some other eye surgery instea of some slight infra augmentation

$18k euros these days. Also unsure if fat grafts achieves the same result from what I'm reading and I don't see much positive anecdotal experience on forums, but I'll keep researching.

Thinking of potentially pushing Pags to add more robustness to the implants, albeit at an aesthetic risk to me.