![RoyaleWithCheese](/data/avatars/l/16/16280.jpg?1722714097)
RoyaleWithCheese
Will become Chad or die trying.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2021
- Posts
- 1,998
- Reputation
- 2,761
Infraorbital rim implants are so fucking expensive. Are the results really better than just doing fat grafting?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think his before picture looks much better. I’m certain he got an additional surgery, not just infras. Maybe almond eye surgery or whatever the fuck it’s called
before he looked like a doomer and now he looks like a total creep. before better
Idk but for some reason before looks better, also his face shape looks different maybe thats why
They are not 20-30k more like 10-15k. If custom made. Which is the only way.Fat grafting is like $10k. With implants we can add another $20-30k on top of that.
Has anyone on this forum actually gotten infras?
Yes.Fat grafting is like $10k. With implants we can add another $20-30k on top of that.
Has anyone on this forum actually gotten infras?
Have you? If so, do you have a results thread by any chance?Yes.
Do you have any examples in mind you could link?Yes.
For example this dude got infras and looks uncanny:
However he also got buccal fat removal, midface fat grafting, necklift, jaw fillers, and rhino.
Fat grafting is like $10k. With implants we can add another $20-30k on top of that.
Has anyone on this forum actually gotten infras?
@VenatorLuparius , I remember seeing your post when you were still recovering. Did you ever share updated pics with swelling gone?Yes. @VenatorLuparius has
Have you got any good before pics/vids of this guy? Right now I can’t spot much uncannyness. Would have to see his base.
Yeah, he looks worse in the video he took himself. Still, no professionally taken photos would make me look like that.He looks better for sure, but perhaps it’s telling that they used only professionally taken and edited after pics. You can only get a fair comparison with identical angles and lighting.
This is a good point. There are many examples where they do look good put in. But most of the time due to implant design imperfections fat grafts and/or midface lifts are mandatory. And again, there are many examples where they can look good and natural after those grafts. But you lose facial fat and the skin sags back down as you age, so you condemn yourself to needing more and more procedures as you get older simply in order to keep the implant looking natural.The fact that infraorbital implants already look uncanny as soon as they are put in combined with the prospect that with aging and fat loss and bone resorption they can look even more unnatural is more than enough to put me off them. The fillers and fat transfers also don't really work in this area from what I've read. I think the only prospects are eye specific surgeries like canthoplasty and lower eyellid retraction for improving this area without looking bogged.
worded perfectly to demonstrate how grotesque it is to do this to yourselfThis is a good point. There are many examples where they do look good put in. But most of the time due to implant design imperfections fat grafts and/or midface lifts are mandatory. And again, there are many examples where they can look good and natural after those grafts. But you lose facial fat and the skin sags back down as you age, so you condemn yourself to needing more and more procedures as you get older simply in order to keep the implant looking natural.
Not to mention most people will probably need two designs to get an implant that can THEN be fixable with fat grafts. Especially if your skin is thin. And depending on your skin laxity, your skin may sag down further from having to open up your mouth to install and remove implants each time due to release of facial holding ligaments.
Lmao I thought the samebefore he looked like a doomer and now he looks like a total creep. before better