are minoxidil eyebrows permanent/

[wristcryy]

I have been using topical minox for 3 months and im already happy with my results. Will the hair fall off if i stop.? Read a few times here that i have to use it for a year to become permanent

 

[holy]

no.

 

[longjohnmong]

no, but it's like $5 of minox per year, so who cares

 

[gofortheeyes]

Are you able to first use it 2x per day then after you're content with density, just apply it once per day, or even only 5x per week for maintencance

 

[meathead]

I have been using topical minox for 3 months and im already happy with my results. Will the hair fall off if i stop.? Read a few times here that i have to use it for a year to become permanent

its permanent

low dht concentration

only scalp isnt permanent cause high dht concentration

 

[wristcryy]

no, but it's like $5 of minox per year, so who cares

i heard it causes bloating

 

[FBl]

sematary skinwalker

 

[longjohnmong]

i heard it causes bloating

you're a fucking retard

 

[J99]

You have to use it long enough for it to be “permanent” otherwise you’re wasting your time

 

[wristcryy]

you're a fucking retard

ok thanks for elaborating

 

[wristcryy]

sematary skinwalker

hauughhhhhhhhhhh

 

[wristcryy]

Are you able to first use it 2x per day then after you're content with density, just apply it once per day, or even only 5x per week for maintencance

i use it once a day already and i have good results

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

After a year of using it yes it’s permanent

 

[wristcryy]

You have to use it long enough for it to be “permanent” otherwise you’re wasting your time

how long tho

 

[holy]

its permanent

low dht concentration

only scalp isnt permanent cause high dht concentration

this is top notch broscience right here.

1. minoxidil doesn’t work like that

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth in hair that’s already in a dormant phase. the catch is that it needs continued use to maintain the results. when you stop applying it, the follicles that depended on that extra stimulation go back to their original lazy state. this applies to eyebrows, scalp, or anywhere else you slap that stuff on. there’s no special “permanence pass” for eyebrow hairs.

2. “low dht concentration” = meaningless drivel

low dht concentration in your eyebrows doesn't magically makes the hair permanent. that is so wrong. eyebrow hair growth isn’t regulated by dht in the same way scalp hair is. sure, dht primarily impacts terminal hair on the scalp, but that doesn’t mean minoxidil-induced eyebrow growth suddenly defies biology and becomes “permanent.” dht levels don’t dictate how long artificially stimulated hair growth will last. it’s all about follicle dependence on minoxidil.

3. the same rules apply everywhere

minoxidil affects follicles the same way regardless of location. the principle doesn’t change because the hair happens to be above your eyes instead of on your head. when you stop using minoxidil, any new growth reverts because the follicles are no longer getting their artificial boost. whether it’s eyebrows, beard, or scalp, the mechanism stays consistent.

4. science vs. pseudo-bro logic

if your theory were true, dermatologists and actual scientists would be shouting it from the rooftops. instead, every legit source says the same thing: stop using minoxidil, and the results fade over time. full stop. no exceptions for “low dht concentration zones” because that’s not how follicle biology works.

 

[ajd]

no, but it's like $5 of minox per year,

Its annoying to apply. But where does it cost 5$ per year? I pay like 15$ per month

 

[ajd]

this is top notch broscience right here.

1. minoxidil doesn’t work like that

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth in hair that’s already in a dormant phase. the catch is that it needs continued use to maintain the results. when you stop applying it, the follicles that depended on that extra stimulation go back to their original lazy state. this applies to eyebrows, scalp, or anywhere else you slap that stuff on. there’s no special “permanence pass” for eyebrow hairs.

2. “low dht concentration” = meaningless drivel

low dht concentration in your eyebrows doesn't magically makes the hair permanent. that is so wrong. eyebrow hair growth isn’t regulated by dht in the same way scalp hair is. sure, dht primarily impacts terminal hair on the scalp, but that doesn’t mean minoxidil-induced eyebrow growth suddenly defies biology and becomes “permanent.” dht levels don’t dictate how long artificially stimulated hair growth will last. it’s all about follicle dependence on minoxidil.

3. the same rules apply everywhere

minoxidil affects follicles the same way regardless of location. the principle doesn’t change because the hair happens to be above your eyes instead of on your head. when you stop using minoxidil, any new growth reverts because the follicles are no longer getting their artificial boost. whether it’s eyebrows, beard, or scalp, the mechanism stays consistent.

4. science vs. pseudo-bro logic

if your theory were true, dermatologists and actual scientists would be shouting it from the rooftops. instead, every legit source says the same thing: stop using minoxidil, and the results fade over time. full stop. no exceptions for “low dht concentration zones” because that’s not how follicle biology works.

Makes sense. So there would be a way of just maintaining the results through less frequent application then?

 

[holy]

less frequent application

doesn’t work. minoxidil isn’t cumulative. it’s a constant boost.

skip too much, and the follicles revert to baseline. if u want to keep the gains, you'd have to commit to regular use, or say goodbye to that growth. biology doesn’t do shortcuts.

 

[ajd]

doesn’t work. minoxidil isn’t cumulative. it’s a constant boost.

skip too much, and the follicles revert to baseline. if u want to keep the gains, you'd have to commit to regular use, or say goodbye to that growth. biology doesn’t do shortcuts.

So you basically have to keep growing thicker thicker hair then? Or just completely lose the hair? If you continue to apply the minoxidil will your hair not continue to get thicker or will it plateau?

 

[holy]

So you basically have to keep growing thicker thicker hair then? Or just completely lose the hair? If you continue to apply the minoxidil will your hair not continue to get thicker or will it plateau?

with minoxidil, hair growth can improve over time but only to the limits of your follicles. it won’t keep getting endlessly thicker but plateau once your follicles reach their max potential. stop using it, and you’ll lose the gains. keep applying, and you maintain what you’ve achieved, no magic beyond that.

 

[longjohnmong]

Its annoying to apply. But where does it cost 5$ per year? I pay like 15$ per month

i'm talking about eyebrows. it's like 1/8 teaspoon of foam per day. takes 5 seconds to apply

 

[ajd]

with minoxidil, hair growth can improve over time but only to the limits of your follicles. it won’t keep getting endlessly thicker but plateau once your follicles reach their max potential. stop using it, and you’ll lose the gains. keep applying, and you maintain what you’ve achieved, no magic beyond that.

Your an intelligent user, rather rare. Thanks

 

[J99]

Also another alternative is castor oil which does work and

this is top notch broscience right here.

1. minoxidil doesn’t work like that

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth in hair that’s already in a dormant phase. the catch is that it needs continued use to maintain the results. when you stop applying it, the follicles that depended on that extra stimulation go back to their original lazy state. this applies to eyebrows, scalp, or anywhere else you slap that stuff on. there’s no special “permanence pass” for eyebrow hairs.

2. “low dht concentration” = meaningless drivel

low dht concentration in your eyebrows doesn't magically makes the hair permanent. that is so wrong. eyebrow hair growth isn’t regulated by dht in the same way scalp hair is. sure, dht primarily impacts terminal hair on the scalp, but that doesn’t mean minoxidil-induced eyebrow growth suddenly defies biology and becomes “permanent.” dht levels don’t dictate how long artificially stimulated hair growth will last. it’s all about follicle dependence on minoxidil.

3. the same rules apply everywhere

minoxidil affects follicles the same way regardless of location. the principle doesn’t change because the hair happens to be above your eyes instead of on your head. when you stop using minoxidil, any new growth reverts because the follicles are no longer getting their artificial boost. whether it’s eyebrows, beard, or scalp, the mechanism stays consistent.

4. science vs. pseudo-bro logic

if your theory were true, dermatologists and actual scientists would be shouting it from the rooftops. instead, every legit source says the same thing: stop using minoxidil, and the results fade over time. full stop. no exceptions for “low dht concentration zones” because that’s not how follicle biology works.

i agree but on the face is different from the scalp. After using it for a prolonged period you have “terminal hairs” (I’m referring to the face not scalp) would castor oil be better?

 

[_Tigrim_]

no, but it's like $5 of minox per year, so who cares

Where are you getting minox for $5?

 

[piec]

this is top notch broscience right here.

1. minoxidil doesn’t work like that

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth in hair that’s already in a dormant phase. the catch is that it needs continued use to maintain the results. when you stop applying it, the follicles that depended on that extra stimulation go back to their original lazy state. this applies to eyebrows, scalp, or anywhere else you slap that stuff on. there’s no special “permanence pass” for eyebrow hairs.

2. “low dht concentration” = meaningless drivel

low dht concentration in your eyebrows doesn't magically makes the hair permanent. that is so wrong. eyebrow hair growth isn’t regulated by dht in the same way scalp hair is. sure, dht primarily impacts terminal hair on the scalp, but that doesn’t mean minoxidil-induced eyebrow growth suddenly defies biology and becomes “permanent.” dht levels don’t dictate how long artificially stimulated hair growth will last. it’s all about follicle dependence on minoxidil.

3. the same rules apply everywhere

minoxidil affects follicles the same way regardless of location. the principle doesn’t change because the hair happens to be above your eyes instead of on your head. when you stop using minoxidil, any new growth reverts because the follicles are no longer getting their artificial boost. whether it’s eyebrows, beard, or scalp, the mechanism stays consistent.

4. science vs. pseudo-bro logic

if your theory were true, dermatologists and actual scientists would be shouting it from the rooftops. instead, every legit source says the same thing: stop using minoxidil, and the results fade over time. full stop. no exceptions for “low dht concentration zones” because that’s not how follicle biology works.

you are a complete retard the results of minoxidil do stay permament atleast partially as long as you achieve terminal follicles through long use

you cant do that on scalp because the follicle is permamently damaged with DHT

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth

holy fuck what a clueless cretin you are, u think minoxidil works through stimulating le bludflow. the irony of u calling someone a broscientist

 

[holy]

you are a complete retard the results of minoxidil do stay permament atleast partially as long as you achieve terminal follicles through long use

you cant do that on scalp because the follicle is permamently damaged with DHT

holy fuck what a clueless cretin you are, u think minoxidil works through stimulating le bludflow. the irony of u calling someone broscientist

Another retard who doesn't know how minox works. Fucking idiot.

u think minoxidil works through stimulating le bludflow

Are you actually retarded? Do you seriously think that blood flow doesn’t matter when it comes to minoxidil? Are we living in some alternate universe where oxygen and nutrients have no effect on cell function? Minoxidil DOES work by increasing blood flow to the scalp or wherever you apply it, which enhances the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to hair follicles. That’s LITERALLY what helps hair grow out of the dormant phase. When a retard like you tries to challenge the actual mechanism of action, it’s either because you:

1. Haven’t read the science
or
2. You’re too caught up in your own pseudo-science bubble.

terminal follicles

Doesn't appear out of thin air, dumbfuck.

Minoxidil can stimulate hair growth and encourage the hair to go from a thin, soft regrowth (vellus) to thicker, stronger hairs (terminal). But that process is reliant on CONTINUED USE.
The longer you use it, the more hair follicles may respond by growing thicker hair. Once you stop, it's game over. The follicles that were not naturally inclined to grow hair are going to shut down again. This myth of "muh terminal follicles stick around permanently!" is straight-up fucking ignorant. Just because something looks “terminal” doesn’t mean it has magically defied the laws of biology.

And that’s not even touching the nonsense about scalp follicles being:

permamently damaged with scar tissue

That’s a whole new level of out-of-touch.

clueless cretin

You don’t understand the science or have the facts straight, dumbfuck. Read up on how minoxidil works.

It's funny how people who lack actual knowledge think their misconceptions are the gospel truth. Absolute retards.

If you want to argue that minoxidil might eventually result in more terminal-like hairs with prolonged use, that’s SOMEWHAT reasonable. But it’s not permanent. Not even close. If you stop using it, you’re gonna shed the hair that grew under its influence. Simple as that. There’s no magical “scar tissue” conspiracy that somehow keeps those hairs stuck around. Hair growth has a cycle, and minoxidil only affects it while you’re actively using it. No use? No results. It's as straightforward as that. If you can't understand that, believe in fairy tales.

 

[piec]

Another retard who doesn't know how minox works. Fucking idiot.



Are you actually retarded? Do you seriously think that blood flow doesn’t matter when it comes to minoxidil? Are we living in some alternate universe where oxygen and nutrients have no effect on cell function? Minoxidil DOES work by increasing blood flow to the scalp or wherever you apply it, which enhances the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to hair follicles. That’s LITERALLY what helps hair grow out of the dormant phase. When a retard like you tries to challenge the actual mechanism of action, it’s either because you:

1. Haven’t read the science
or
2. You’re too caught up in your own pseudo-science bubble.




Doesn't appear out of thin air, dumbfuck.

Minoxidil can stimulate hair growth and encourage the hair to go from a thin, soft regrowth (vellus) to thicker, stronger hairs (terminal). But that process is reliant on CONTINUED USE.
The longer you use it, the more hair follicles may respond by growing thicker hair. Once you stop, it's game over. The follicles that were not naturally inclined to grow hair are going to shut down again. This myth of "muh terminal follicles stick around permanently!" is straight-up fucking ignorant. Just because something looks “terminal” doesn’t mean it has magically defied the laws of biology.

And that’s not even touching the nonsense about scalp follicles being:

That’s a whole new level of out-of-touch.



You don’t understand the science or have the facts straight, dumbfuck. Read up on how minoxidil works.

It's funny how people who lack actual knowledge think their misconceptions are the gospel truth. Absolute retards.

If you want to argue that minoxidil might eventually result in more terminal-like hairs with prolonged use, that’s SOMEWHAT reasonable. But it’s not permanent. Not even close. If you stop using it, you’re gonna shed the hair that grew under its influence. Simple as that. There’s no magical “scar tissue” conspiracy that somehow keeps those hairs stuck around. Hair growth has a cycle, and minoxidil only affects it while you’re actively using it. No use? No results. It's as straightforward as that. If you can't understand that, believe in fairy tales.

what a retard you are is actually insane, u think typing 50 lines of text will somehow make your complete bullshit credible

 

[holy]

what a retard you are is actually insane, u think typing 50 lines of text will somehow make your complete bullshit credible

Then debunk it, fatass.

 

[piec]

Then debunk it, fatass.

what debunk even? you wrote a whole bunch of nothing

apply lotensin to your scalp retard see if it grows hair

 

[holy]

what debunk even? you wrote a whole bunch of nothing

Explain how, piec. Explain how I wrote a whole bunch of nothing.

 

[piec]

Explain how, piec. Explain how I wrote a whole bunch of nothing.

you think im gonna explain basic concepts like scar tissue replacing hair follicles and minoxidil not working through bludflow, i just cba talking to someone who lacks such surface level knowledge. its like speaking to a toddler, a delusional one at that

 

[raleqtambrobret]

Explain how, piec. Explain how I wrote a whole bunch of nothing.

both me and everyone I know who have been on minox long-term have gotten permanent results

you're not smart because you copy pasted information from webmd

 

[holy]

you think im gonna explain basic concepts like scar tissue replacing hair follicles and minoxidil not working through bludflow, i just cba talking to someone who lacks such surface level knowledge. its like speaking to a toddler, a delusional one at that

Until you debunk what I said. you're below me nigga.

 

[holy]

both me and everyone I know who have been on minox long-term have gotten permanent results

you're not smart because you copy pasted information from webmd

- appeal to personal experience fallacy.
just because a few people had a certain experience doesn't mean it applies to everyone, especially when it contradicts established scientific understanding.
- just because you think your results are permanent doesn't make it true.

it's fucking hilarious responding to you retards. I don't take you seriously.

copy pasted information from webmd

*states information backed by science*

"You're reusing info from webmd! "

 

[raleqtambrobret]

- appeal to personal experience fallacy.
just because a few people had a certain experience doesn't mean it applies to everyone, especially when it contradicts established scientific understanding.
- just because you think your results are permanent doesn't make it true.

it's fucking hilarious responding to you retards. I don't take you seriously.

if thousands of people experience the same anecdote then something surely must be going on, right?
or are you just going to blindly follow the sayings of biased sponsored scholars?

*states information backed by science*

"You're reusing info from webmd! "

show me said information then
from what i could process from glancing at the book that you've written here, you're just regurgitating information from the little infographic google gives you when you search for something you low iq mong.

 

[holy]

if thousands of people experience the same anecdote then something surely must be going on, right?

That's... not how it works.

omg this niggas dumb

Just because a large number of people believe something doesn't make it automatically true.

A "popular anecdote" is STILL an anecdote. Without proper scientific control and evidence, it's just a bunch of people telling each other a story

Thousands of people used to believe the earth was flat, too, dumbfuck.

Popularity doesn't equal truth.

or are you just going to blindly follow the sayings of biased sponsored scholars?

Right, because actual research and evidence-backed studies are clearly the product of some conspiracy.

Nigga it's clear you're retarded. Good luck with your unverified beliefs.

“sponsored scholars,” They STILL have to present evidence to back up their claims, and guess what’s actually funded by research? Science, not random retards with zero credentials trying to sell you snake oil.

show me said information then
from what i could process from glancing at the book that you've written here, you're just regurgitating information from the little infographic google gives you when you search for something you low iq mong.

love how you’ve gone from ‘science is biased’ to ‘show me the info’, expected classic flip-flop from a retard.

My information is from actual studies and research that’s been peer-reviewed.

- Yip, L., et al. (2012): Published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, a highly respected journal in the field of dermatology.
- Ponce-Oliveira, R.M., et al. (2016): Published in the International Journal of Trichology, a journal dedicated to hair science and research.
- Messenger, A.G., et al. (2011): Published in the British Journal of Dermatology, another well-regarded journal in the field.

They all come to the same conclusion: the effects are temporary and require continuous use to maintain them.

 

[raleqtambrobret]

That's... not how it works.

omg this niggas dumb

Just because a large number of people believe something doesn't make it automatically true.

A "popular anecdote" is STILL an anecdote. Without proper scientific control and evidence, it's just a bunch of people telling each other a story

Thousands of people used to believe the earth was flat, too, dumbfuck.

Popularity doesn't equal truth.



Right, because actual research and evidence-backed studies are clearly the product of some conspiracy.

Nigga it's clear you're retarded. Good luck with your unverified beliefs.

“sponsored scholars,” They STILL have to present evidence to back up their claims, and guess what’s actually funded by research? Science, not random retards with zero credentials trying to sell you snake oil.



love how you’ve gone from ‘science is biased’ to ‘show me the info’, expected classic flip-flop from a retard.

My information is from actual studies and research that’s been peer-reviewed.

- Yip, L., et al. (2012): Published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, a highly respected journal in the field of dermatology.
- Ponce-Oliveira, R.M., et al. (2016): Published in the International Journal of Trichology, a journal dedicated to hair science and research.
- Messenger, A.G., et al. (2011): Published in the British Journal of Dermatology, another well-regarded journal in the field.

They all come to the same conclusion: the effects are temporary and require continuous use to maintain them.

i was just pulling your leg buddy
you're no fun to bait though, 20+ minute responses turn me off

have a good one

 

[holy]

i was just pulling your leg buddy
you're no fun to bait though, 20+ minute responses turn me off

have a good one

Still made me pull out scientific studies to debunk the claims people always use so it was really no big deal.

You got me tho

 

[piec]

My information is from actual studies and research that’s been peer-reviewed.

- Yip, L., et al. (2012): Published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, a highly respected journal in the field of dermatology.
- Ponce-Oliveira, R.M., et al. (2016): Published in the International Journal of Trichology, a journal dedicated to hair science and research.
- Messenger, A.G., et al. (2011): Published in the British Journal of Dermatology, another well-regarded journal in the field.

link them maybe you fucking retard

 

[piec]

That's... not how it works.

omg this niggas dumb

Just because a large number of people believe something doesn't make it automatically true.

A "popular anecdote" is STILL an anecdote. Without proper scientific control and evidence, it's just a bunch of people telling each other a story

Thousands of people used to believe the earth was flat, too, dumbfuck.

Popularity doesn't equal truth.



Right, because actual research and evidence-backed studies are clearly the product of some conspiracy.

Nigga it's clear you're retarded. Good luck with your unverified beliefs.

“sponsored scholars,” They STILL have to present evidence to back up their claims, and guess what’s actually funded by research? Science, not random retards with zero credentials trying to sell you snake oil.



love how you’ve gone from ‘science is biased’ to ‘show me the info’, expected classic flip-flop from a retard.

My information is from actual studies and research that’s been peer-reviewed.

- Yip, L., et al. (2012): Published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, a highly respected journal in the field of dermatology.
- Ponce-Oliveira, R.M., et al. (2016): Published in the International Journal of Trichology, a journal dedicated to hair science and research.
- Messenger, A.G., et al. (2011): Published in the British Journal of Dermatology, another well-regarded journal in the field.

They all come to the same conclusion: the effects are temporary and require continuous use to maintain them.

what the fuck are you even talking about you absolute moron? you didnt link nor refer to a single study. not a single one is posted in this thread

 

[DR. NICKGA]

this is top notch broscience right here.

1. minoxidil doesn’t work like that

minoxidil is a vasodilator that promotes blood flow to hair follicles, stimulating growth in hair that’s already in a dormant phase. the catch is that it needs continued use to maintain the results. when you stop applying it, the follicles that depended on that extra stimulation go back to their original lazy state. this applies to eyebrows, scalp, or anywhere else you slap that stuff on. there’s no special “permanence pass” for eyebrow hairs.

2. “low dht concentration” = meaningless drivel

low dht concentration in your eyebrows doesn't magically makes the hair permanent. that is so wrong. eyebrow hair growth isn’t regulated by dht in the same way scalp hair is. sure, dht primarily impacts terminal hair on the scalp, but that doesn’t mean minoxidil-induced eyebrow growth suddenly defies biology and becomes “permanent.” dht levels don’t dictate how long artificially stimulated hair growth will last. it’s all about follicle dependence on minoxidil.

3. the same rules apply everywhere

minoxidil affects follicles the same way regardless of location. the principle doesn’t change because the hair happens to be above your eyes instead of on your head. when you stop using minoxidil, any new growth reverts because the follicles are no longer getting their artificial boost. whether it’s eyebrows, beard, or scalp, the mechanism stays consistent.

4. science vs. pseudo-bro logic

if your theory were true, dermatologists and actual scientists would be shouting it from the rooftops. instead, every legit source says the same thing: stop using minoxidil, and the results fade over time. full stop. no exceptions for “low dht concentration zones” because that’s not how follicle biology works.

Its not about bloodflow

Minoxidil has a other powerfull growth mechanism that take place

 

[longjohnmong]

Where are you getting minox for $5?

I usually scrounge around on ebay or wherever until I find a deal. Last time I bought it on Mercari. 1 can would last you more than a year if you're just using it on eyebrows.

Which, by the way, is the best way to buy anything. Just bought a nearly new $1400 vacuum for $170.

 

[holy]

link them maybe you fucking retard

I gave you sources which would lead to the link.

I'm not gonna hold your dick for you so you can finally learn how to piss.

 

[piec]

I gave you sources which would lead to the link.

I'm not gonna hold your dick for you so you can finally learn how to piss.

you are genuinely retarded, all u did was provide names of some of the researchers, u think they never were in another study?

like what am i even supposed to do with this u imbecile

 

[holy]

you are genuinely retarded, all u did was provide names of some of the researchers, u think they never were in another study?
View attachment 3321712
like what am i even supposed to do with this u imbecile

Are you fucking sped?

I didn’t just name-drop researchers. I mentioned REAL STUDIES from respected journals, not random names.

The fact that you can’t even find them in a basic google search says more about your research skills than the validity of the sources.

- PubMed
- ResearchGate
- A LITERAL Library database

instead of google searches, you absolute retard.

pro tip: scientific literature isn’t gonna show up like you expect it.

 

[wristcryy]

j

Are you fucking sped?

I didn’t just name-drop researchers. I mentioned REAL STUDIES from respected journals, not random names.

The fact that you can’t even find them in a basic google search says more about your research skills than the validity of the sources.

- PubMed
- ResearchGate
- A LITERAL Library database

instead of google searches, you absolute retard.

pro tip: scientific literature isn’t gonna show up like you expect it.

just link the study moron

 

[piec]

Are you fucking sped?

I didn’t just name-drop researchers. I mentioned REAL STUDIES from respected journals, not random names.

The fact that you can’t even find them in a basic google search says more about your research skills than the validity of the sources.

- PubMed
- ResearchGate
- A LITERAL Library database

instead of google searches, you absolute retard.

pro tip: scientific literature isn’t gonna show up like you expect it.

its funny how highly u think of urself that someone will waste their time researching ur garbage instead of providing a link

 

[piec]

I mentioned REAL STUDIES from respected journals, not random names.

where the fuck are they then? 0 real studies sent

 

[holy]

its funny how highly u think of urself that someone will waste their time researching ur garbage instead of providing a link

Wait, let me ask you this:

Do you disregard sources?

 

[piec]

Wait, let me ask you this:

Do you disregard sources?

i disregard garbage sources because i can read and comprehend scientific literature. thats why i ask you to link the studies, because i want to read them instead of looking at the title and making my conclusion u retard