Are modern women worth looksmaxxing for?

ltnsincebirth

ltnsincebirth

Bronze
Joined
Apr 11, 2025
Posts
315
Reputation
289
The modern dating pool of women. hypergamy ( both for looks , status, money etc) and promiscuity makes almost none of them eligible candidates for marriage in my eyes.


~8–9 million white women ages 18–25 total
~60–70% have had fewer than 5 sexual partners
~30%
identify as Christian




  • Start with ~2.5 million white Christian women (18–25)
  • Apply the same <5 partners rate (≈60–70%)

👉 2.5M × 0.6–0.7 ≈ 1.5–1.75 million
This is just on Moral / Ethnic and religious values. When we account for attractiveness too, the number lowers



  • Base group: ~1.6 million
  • Estimated attractiveness (6/10+): 40% (MTB) ~ 960,000
  • Estimated attractiveness (8/10+) ~ ~10% (HTB) ~ 160,000.


Assuming you live in the United States and you follow the same guidelines in dating / marriage as me your odds of finding a lover that fits these requisites is between 0.2815% - 0.0469% depending if you will settle for a mtb or htb.

Too long didn't read? Awesome. This was purely my frustration and curiosity delved into chatgpt
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeanletMogger and FrancoAgain
doing all these calculations instead of just talking to a girl
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: vortex878, ltnsincebirth, PharmaPhaggot and 7 others
The modern dating pool of women. hypergamy ( both for looks , status, money etc) and promiscuity makes almost none of them eligible candidates for marriage in my eyes.


~8–9 million white women ages 18–25 total
~60–70% have had fewer than 5 sexual partners
~30%
identify as Christian




  • Start with ~2.5 million white Christian women (18–25)
  • Apply the same <5 partners rate (≈60–70%)

👉 2.5M × 0.6–0.7 ≈ 1.5–1.75 million
This is just on Moral / Ethnic and religious values. When we account for attractiveness too, the number lowers



  • Base group: ~1.6 million
  • Estimated attractiveness (6/10+): 40% (MTB) ~ 960,000
  • Estimated attractiveness (8/10+) ~ ~10% (HTB) ~ 160,000.


Assuming you live in the United States and you follow the same guidelines in dating / marriage as me your odds of finding a lover that fits these requisites is between 0.2815% - 0.0469% depending if you will settle for a mtb or htb.

Too long didn't read? Awesome. This was purely my frustration and curiosity delved into chatgpt
no jbg
 
  • +1
Reactions: brotato78
The modern dating pool of women. hypergamy ( both for looks , status, money etc) and promiscuity makes almost none of them eligible candidates for marriage in my eyes.


~8–9 million white women ages 18–25 total
~60–70% have had fewer than 5 sexual partners
~30%
identify as Christian




  • Start with ~2.5 million white Christian women (18–25)
  • Apply the same <5 partners rate (≈60–70%)

👉 2.5M × 0.6–0.7 ≈ 1.5–1.75 million
This is just on Moral / Ethnic and religious values. When we account for attractiveness too, the number lowers



  • Base group: ~1.6 million
  • Estimated attractiveness (6/10+): 40% (MTB) ~ 960,000
  • Estimated attractiveness (8/10+) ~ ~10% (HTB) ~ 160,000.


Assuming you live in the United States and you follow the same guidelines in dating / marriage as me your odds of finding a lover that fits these requisites is between 0.2815% - 0.0469% depending if you will settle for a mtb or htb.

Too long didn't read? Awesome. This was purely my frustration and curiosity delved into chatgpt
MTB is five out of 10 HTB is six out of 10 those ratings are inaccurate. Why are you doing this gray?
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Mavueis
oh bro im not being a fag fuck that
 
And those MTN or htn probably lesbian or settle with BBC, it's over for whitecel
 
And those MTN or htn probably lesbian or settle with BBC, it's over for whitecel
White race will be extinct in 100 years:hnghn:
 
  • +1
Reactions: miketheman and Mavueis
Jbg pill is law :lul:
ah yes let me entertain hypergamy and female worship by subjecting myself to the humiliation ritual which is modern dating
females arent self aware and most of them are retarded or desperate for male validation/attention, whenever anything is ruined; little kids and females are to blame
jbg is law
 
  • JFL
Reactions: brotato78
LTN is in the four range
MTN is in the five range hence the name midtier Normie
HTN is six out of 10 range
You think a 6/10 is considered a "high tier normie" if that was the case 40% of the population would be htb / htn no?
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: SomaliSub5
  • +1
Reactions: miketheman and SomaliSub5
You think a 6/10 is considered a "high tier normie" if that was the case 40% of the population would be htb / htn no?
no retard that's not how attractiveness works. Do you think 10% of the population is genuinely 10 out of 10? No, and neither is 10% of the population one out of 10 either who told you that bullshit
 
  • +1
Reactions: miketheman
what do u think sub5 means, retard
if ur sub5; ure an ltn
it’s not its own separate tier
there's no way 40% of the population is considered to be a htb/htn

if mtn is 5/10 , being slightly above that at 6 would be htn. When you think of a 6/10 you definitely don't think of an attractive person, maybe the argument LHTN or LLHTN is true but idk bro
 
U can increase chances of finding this girl depending on location
 
no retard that's not how attractiveness works. Do you think 10% of the population is genuinely 10 out of 10? No, and neither is 10% of the population one out of 10 either who told you that bullshit
I believe 10% of the population of the youth are htb/htn and less than that (<2%) would be stacy/chad level
 
there's no way 40% of the population is considered to be a htb/htn

if mtn is 5/10 , being slightly above that at 6 would be htn. When you think of a 6/10 you definitely don't think of an attractive person, maybe the argument LHTN or LLHTN is true but idk bro
you're the only one that is saying 40% of the population is HTB htn go back to math class. You clearly have failed.
 
no retard that's not how attractiveness works. Do you think 10% of the population is genuinely 10 out of 10? No, and neither is 10% of the population one out of 10 either who told you that bullshit
this guy lacks common sense
if 5/10 was ltn
what would be bellow it????!???
whats lower than an ltn????

also 5/10 is literally the halfway mark
meaning medium-level attractiveness
and the populations bulk is not even at that
which would set the median at 3-4/10 (ltn-hltn) and the lowest of society between 1 & 2 (lltn to ltn) (5/10 means lmtn in this context which isnt extravagant but its just about above-average)
 
  • +1
Reactions: SomaliSub5
I believe 10% of the population of the youth are htb/htn and less than that (<2%) would be stacy/chad level
LTN = 4-4.9/10
MTN = 5-5.9/10
HTN = 6-6.9/10

get it right
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mavueis
you're the only one that is saying 40% of the population is HTB htn go back to math class. You clearly have failed.
The reason I said that is because if a 6/10 is considered to be a HTN/ HTB this means that someone who is SLIGHTLY better looking than average would be considered a HTN/ HTB , which would put it in the 40th percentile of looks according to that logic.
 
LTN = 4-4.9/10
MTN = 5-5.9/10
HTN = 6-6.9/10

get it right
Dude this has gotta be ragebait. there's no way we're considering a 7/10 woman to be a stacylite
 
The reason I said that is because if a 6/10 is considered to be a HTN/ HTB this means that someone who is SLIGHTLY better looking than average would be considered a HTN/ HTB , which would put it in the 40th percentile of looks according to that logic.
IMG 1496
 
Dude this has gotta be ragebait. there's no way we're considering a 7/10 woman to be a stacylite
7/10 objectively is stacylite/chadlite what lmao

7/10 is very good looking
 
7/10 objectively is stacylite/chadlite what lmao

7/10 is very good looking
The difference between MTN / MTB and Stacy/Chadlite is so much more of a gap than 2 points, unless we possibly mean PSL? But even then PSL only goes to like 7.5
 
The difference between MTN / MTB and Stacy/Chadlite is so much more of a gap than 2 points, unless we possibly mean PSL? But even then PSL only goes to like 7.5
there is no gap, are u retarded? rating someones looks is an objective process that doesnt fluctuate or decline based on their gender or how horny you are. “girl = 2 points more because my dick gets a little stiffy when is see her buiuuhhh:feelsgah::feelsgah::feelsgah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: SomaliSub5
there is no gap, are u retarded? rating someones looks is an objective process that doesnt fluctuate or decline based on their gender or how horny you are. “girl = 2 points more because my dick gets a little stiffy when is see her buiuuhhh:feelsgah::feelsgah::feelsgah:
@SomaliSub5

If we're going off of a more concise guide with PSL ratings and beauty characteristics below is an attachment from a sub that did extensive research on those and more thorough ratings. I did not initially go off of this for the math, but 1/92 women being HTB actually makes sense.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    229.9 KB · Views: 0
IMG 0314
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mavueis

Attachments

  • is-chico-lachowski-not-caucasoid-v0-l14gfzuz8c8c1.webp
    is-chico-lachowski-not-caucasoid-v0-l14gfzuz8c8c1.webp
    90.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652...webp
    68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652...webp
    35.5 KB · Views: 0
  • elias-de-poot.webp
    elias-de-poot.webp
    61.9 KB · Views: 0
If you understand that the real game is STR, then I think so.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mavueis
The difference between MTN / MTB and Stacy/Chadlite is so much more of a gap than 2 points, unless we possibly mean PSL? But even then PSL only goes to like 7.5
PSL scale is retarded
 
10/10 looks doesn't objectively exist tbf
yeah because 10/10 is perfection

there are some ppl that are 9/10 tho

thats why 1-10 scale is better its easier for comparison
 
yeah because 10/10 is perfection

there are some ppl that are 9/10 tho

thats why 1-10 scale is better its easier for comparison
I think 1-10 scale is lowkey hard to maintain because normies have the idea that a 7 is the average so if you called someone a 5/10
90% of the population would assume you're insulting them

I'd say 9/10 women are stacylite and stacy and what differentiates the two between being 10/10 is different preferences in women, ex. some men like goth women, some men like latinas, asian etc. I saw that idea on a looks scale somewhere a few years back and it makes sense tbh
 
I would choose to be chico lachowski over elias de poot in any lifetime. if u showed 100 women the 3 photos beneath and ask who is better looking 9/10 will choose chico
Chico is literally higher psl anyway
 
Unless you have time machine yes
 
Chico is literally higher psl anyway
Elias de poot is kinda uncanny bro. Half the time modeling agencies go for people with interesting bone structure because it's marketable, he mogs the shit out of me but he looks like a twink
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl

Similar threads

JOTAROSON
Replies
8
Views
84
Alexg_lover
Alexg_lover
Bui
Replies
8
Views
78
OCD
OCD
PSLbbc
Replies
71
Views
756
milkshake_addict
M
got.daim
Replies
87
Views
1K
veracious_vamp
veracious_vamp
til<3D
Replies
50
Views
560
tqbiq
tqbiq

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top