Are peptides like ghk-cu and cjc-1285 cope or are they worth it if i dont want to take steroids rn?

[morphingtruecel]

Title

 

[bIackpill]

Mf you are the one claiming they work, so you have to show proof. If I want to start selling something on the market I have to prove it's not harmful, it wouldn't make sense if it was the other way around

yes bro injecting testosterone works what the hell are you on? do i really need to explain why testosterone helps muscle syntesis, boosts strenght by alot and has alot of good effects overall? are you braindead? tell me why steroids dont work

 

[Peco]

yeah I never said that this isn't true

just because a bunch of retards are buying overpriced peptides from resellers, doesn't mean that the actual peptide doesn't work

@tension Even if they were overpriced it would be fine if they actually gave the results people advocate. But they don't and that is why they were never popular before looksmaxxing and even now many people doubt their effectiveness. Im sure all the people that think about taking GHK-Cu have moderate to severe acne and if they were to go to a dermatologist they would give them some creams or pills. If you were to read the ingredients of those cream or pills you could find studies similar to the ones you sent me about GHK-Cu on those same ingredients, saying things like they improve collagen production and help with scarring. I think you would agree though that most of these creams and pills are useless (some of them contain ghkcu as well). So then why do you advocate for GHK-Cu and not for skin care ? It seems to me that the logical path that brought you to think ghkcu is good would also bring you to the conclusion that skin care is good.

The reason I think skin care is considered bad while ghkcu is by some considered very good is that skincare is something that everybody has tried, or at least everybody knows someone who has. Most of these people have seen no result and so they come to the conclusion that it is cope. With ghkcu like you said some people are scared by the fact that you need to inject it. That is precisely the reason why it's so popular: the first thought of everyone is "if it works so well why isn't it popular ?" and people in the space like you quickly reply by saying it's because of the injection. That's the reason it is so popular and not seen as a cope by the vast majority of people. Since people are somewhat scared by it they also fall into the logical fallacy of believing that the more harmful a procedure is the more effective it is. If you think about it this is a common pattern seen in all the most popular methods in this community, and especially in those regarded as the most effective. Im sure most of the people that advocate for roids and peptides have never taken them, they plan to do it in the future but the vast majority will never do anything. But despite this, those same people will still talk about them and advocate for them making them more popular. If peptides were as easy to consume as skincare people would call them cope too. Do you really think that the only reason they aren't popular and recommended by most doctors is because they need to be inject. Dont you think they would be used as the primary solution and the pills and creams would become a second option for those who don't want the injections ?

 

[tension]

Do you really think that the only reason they aren't popular and recommended by most doctors is because they need to be inject.

It’s because they can’t patent it and make money off of people

GHK-Cu isn’t used for acne

Most skincare products have bs ingredients in them

Saying that they don’t give results just isn’t true because there are PLENTY on anecdotes that show results and if you don’t believe anecdotal evidence there are SOME studies that support their efficacy

You think the people who get tan using mt2 are just lying about it?

Saying they don’t work at all is just choosing to be ignorant

 

[Peco]

It’s because they can’t patent it and make money off of people

@tension There are plenty of people that make tons of money with peptides what are you saying

Saying that they don’t give results just isn’t true because there are PLENTY on anecdotes that show results and if you don’t believe anecdotal evidence there are SOME studies that support their efficacy

Anectodal evidence is useless and there is plenty of that for skincare as well. There are also SOME studies that support skincare obviously, otherwise why would dermatologists prescribe it.

Peptides and skincare are basically the same thing but because not as many people have tried peptides they are seen as less of a cope. Like I said it's undeniable that the vast majority of people on this forum talking about roids and peptides have never tried them and speak under the assumption that they must be different from things like skincare just because they are perceived as more dangerous. People on this forum think that more side effects = better positive effects, which is clearly a logical fallacy.

 

[tension]

@

@tension There are plenty of people that make tons of money with peptides what are you saying

You said doctors

The people selling peptides aren’t doctors

Anectodal evidence is useless and there is plenty of that for skincare as well. There are also SOME studies that support skincare obviously, otherwise why would dermatologists prescribe it.

I wouldn’t call it useless

When someone who isn’t paid uses something like mt2 and shows that they tanned way better than normal

That shows that something’s working

Peptides and skincare are basically the same thing but because not as many people have tried peptides they are seen as less of a cope.

They aren’t similar at all

Most peptides have nothing to do with skin

Also, skincare products aren’t naturally produced by your body

People on this forum think that more side effects = better positive effects, which is clearly a logical fallacy.

ghk doesn’t have many side effects

Idk why ur so anti-peptide

 

[morphingtruecel]

How old r u? Steroids can be HIGH ROI if youre young

17

 

[morphingtruecel]

nga ghk cu its for the skin
also cjc1295 you want it dac or not

I know its for skin i just asled if its worth it and cjc with dad

 

[morphingtruecel]

cjc is giga cope. low dose hgh probably has less sides anyway. ghkcu is only really good after you've been using it for like 4 months. use tretinoin or tazarotene for skin/acne.

I dont wanna go on accutane tho, and also no way u just said hgh is safer than cjc