Are the ratings here biased heavily?

TurkMogger

TurkMogger

Bronze
Joined
Jan 30, 2024
Posts
377
Reputation
251
As people almost everyone is trying to optimize their looks. Some are blessed to be born HTN or chadlite or even chad, some are born LTN and MTN and everyone is trying to level up their looks. I have seen many times people underrate here, I am unsure if this is due to jealousy. I have seen chadlite individual being rated MTN+ to low HTN.
 
  • +1
Reactions: neverchadlite, Heinrich Schmidt, PrinceofDarkness and 4 others
Yeah probably
 
Most ratings here are EXTREMELY biased and inaccurate. There are good ones though, especially me :feelshmm:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bleachmaxxer69, h111, Tallman and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: user123456
Below htn = kys/subhuman in this forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: VolcelFTW and wishIwasSalludon
No. There are biased ratings (A lot) but because the rats, also known as the raters doesn't like that particular pheno or feel appeal to the race

Being a Chadlite is very difficult. Low HTN is the beggining of Good Looking at first sight for the majority of people.
 
As people almost everyone is trying to optimize their looks. Some are blessed to be born HTN or chadlite or even chad, some are born LTN and MTN and everyone is trying to level up their looks. I have seen many times people underrate here, I am unsure if this is due to jealousy. I have seen chadlite individual being rated MTN+ to low HTN.
No they’re completely accurate

You’re just not ready for the truth

IMG 3883
 
I had a thread where everyone was rating me htn and chadlite but there was one dude saying mtn. Point is, most people try to be honest, but there will also be jealous people that get upset you mog them.
 
As people almost everyone is trying to optimize their looks. Some are blessed to be born HTN or chadlite or even chad, some are born LTN and MTN and everyone is trying to level up their looks. I have seen many times people underrate here, I am unsure if this is due to jealousy. I have seen chadlite individual being rated MTN+ to low HTN.
Generally there are people on this forum whose judgement can be trusted a little more. But there are also people who sometimes underestimate or overestimate others. It happened to me when I asked for opinions of my face, in general everyone gave me honest opinions, and most of them categorized me as MTN, but Petsmart for no reason listed me as LTN, I asked him for explanations, he didn't give them, and then I go to see his last posts and he had listed someone as MTN, being that someone much less attractive than me; I can say that I am very critical of my appearance, so I know when I'm prettier than someone or not.

The particular thing is that there are no clear motives. In general when I comment on a post that asks for a rating, I don't just say "XTN", I try to give an explanation, maybe an argument as to why that rating. It should be a rule to give a justification.
 
  • +1
Reactions: neverchadlite and bleachmaxxer69
Can you give me an example of chadlite?
 

Similar threads

Clavicular
Replies
260
Views
5K
A23ghskung
A
D
Whitepill FUCK PSL
Replies
32
Views
897
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
dragomaxxer
Replies
104
Views
3K
HTN_Mentalcel
HTN_Mentalcel
ManletJordanBarrett
Replies
50
Views
2K
ManletJordanBarrett
ManletJordanBarrett
NitoRump
Replies
16
Views
666
chawaje
chawaje

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top