Are there clear chin changes from bonesmashing here?

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-bonesmashing-chin-results-2-yrs-on-off.1839141/post-25815549

chin when not that lean, before maybe 15%

chin at maybe 11%, before, chiseled abs, still tiny and pointy AND UNEVEN vertically

very bloated before

muh overlay all you want, because-


chin now with similar lighting to blue shirt pic above but a bit leaner

me at maybe 18% and very bloated here but after most of bonesmashing gains; least visible due to these conditions and yet vs the before bloated one is still more robust clearly. just look at the bloated earlier and then this one and tell me it isn't wider

not as good lighting for chin in this one

good lighting for chin in this one

the most damning is even in the leanest before pic with physique included the chin was nothing compared to now. this is beyond mere fat loss, which does ofc help chin life everything else, but tbh a joke to attribute it all to this

I tried to representatively show all settings and lightings and conditions fairly here

bonus, the clear asymmetry on height where the right side / my left before was was way shorter and it was very uneven got way better thru targeting this as well

it is hard for me to think that someone can legit look at all this fairly and then still write it entirely off unless they just want to avoid dissonance and must axiomatically assert that this method does not work, otherwise im crazy

 

[Chad]

notice how only greycel retards will vote yes

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

notice how only greycel retires will vote yes

Pure ad hominem, but tbh that's a fair thing to point out for something like this on .org

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

bump, need input

 

[LXR]

No change in chin height

 

[Arabica]

First bonesmashing is cope and as been debunked

Second even so you never bonesmash your entier mandibule includinh the chin (which mostly covered by a large amount of muscle tissues)

Only goys will say yes

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

First bonesmashing is cope and as been debunked

Second even so you never bonesmash your entier mandibule includinh the chin (which mostly covered by a large amount of muscle tissues)

Only goys will say yes

Wollf's law has been debunked
Subperiostal hematoma ossification theory is not impossible but has been challenged hard
The scar tissue buildup theory via collagen fibrous mass over time etc., that has not been debunked
Chin yes only certain parts are bone-accessible enough + you need to be lean if hitting front of it. if hitting bottom or diagonal from front that's easier

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

No change in chin height

I was targeting width, so at the sides/corners of it, and then as for height I was only targeting the side that was less tall in order to even it out, which it massively did
This was off-on over like 3 years

 

[MouthBreathingElite]

I was targeting width, so at the sides/corners of it, and then as for height I was only targeting the side that was less tall in order to even it out, which it massively did
This was off-on over like 3 years

Youve been hitting yourself for 3 years

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

Youve been hitting yourself for 3 years

a few months, stop 2 years, few months, few months off, few months, stopped for a year, now doing jaw corner area after what seem to be legit permanent changes around chin and cheekbones. though probably scar tissue buildup not bone, this seems to make more sense

 

[imontheloose]

thanks 4 ur contribution to science i suppose, but all u did was prove what we were alrdy certain of.

 

[Arabica]

Wollf's law has been debunked
Subperiostal hematoma ossification theory is not impossible but has been challenged hard
The scar tissue buildup theory via collagen fibrous mass over time etc., that has not been debunked
Chin yes only certain parts are bone-accessible enough + you need to be lean if hitting front of it. if hitting bottom or diagonal from front that's easier

HOWEVER wolf's law applies to large bones like the tibia. Its jusy that bonesmash causes traumas and inflammation rather than making yhe bone bigger. Wolf's law says the bone will be stronger and thats true but it will not be bigger

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

thanks 4 ur contribution to science i suppose, but all u did was prove what we were alrdy certain of.

Do you see how the chin height was uneven? And near-even now? How did this magically happen?

 

[notgonnaropeyet]

no

 

[imontheloose]

Do you see how the chin height was uneven? And near-even now? How did this magically happen?

 

[abzz]

View attachment 4648735

yeah that's mint

gcse foundation maths lessons on .org

 

[Aryan Incel]

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-bonesmashing-chin-results-2-yrs-on-off.1839141/post-25815549

chin when not that lean, before maybe 15%

chin at maybe 11%, before, chiseled abs, still tiny and pointy AND UNEVEN vertically

very bloated before

muh overlay all you want, because-


chin now with similar lighting to blue shirt pic above but a bit leaner

me at maybe 18% and very bloated here but after most of bonesmashing gains; least visible due to these conditions and yet vs the before bloated one is still more robust clearly. just look at the bloated earlier and then this one and tell me it isn't wider

not as good lighting for chin in this one

good lighting for chin in this one

the most damning is even in the leanest before pic with physique included the chin was nothing compared to now. this is beyond mere fat loss, which does ofc help chin life everything else, but tbh a joke to attribute it all to this

I tried to representatively show all settings and lightings and conditions fairly here

bonus, the clear asymmetry on height where the right side / my left before was was way shorter and it was very uneven got way better thru targeting this as well

it is hard for me to think that someone can legit look at all this fairly and then still write it entirely off unless they just want to avoid dissonance and must axiomatically assert that this method does not work, otherwise im crazy

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

Gonial/lower ramus area "progress" so far (about 2 months)

https://looksmax.org/threads/pics-bonesmashing-lower-third-progress-2mo.1879565/#post-26297240

*NOT* claiming permanent changes since I am still in the process with this whole area and am actively keeping the swelling alive. But recently I finally felt hard lumps forming in this part of the corner I had been targeting the most. Seems we have scar tissue building up successfully unless it actually is a hematoma.

9% bf and debloated, before. Weak gonial area always really limited me and my lower third even when super lean.

closer to 10-11% (few lbs more) and mostly debloated, now
slightly lower angle but the difference in width and robustness I've been working towards should be obvious. Again still largely swelling at the moment.

again, before about 2mo ago, 9% shredded. the harsh inward curve at the jaw angles from the front was a real limiting looks factor even when shredded and resulted in my side profiles and 3/4ths always looking way better than the front.

Now, again a bit less lean. Still asymmetric though it always has been; am trying to correct this though.

Bonus, another before pic from last summer, I'd say about similar leanness to now, similar weight

I am determined to square up and widen these fucking corner areas

 

[SpectrumAesthetics3]

https://looksmax.org/threads/pics-bonesmashing-lower-third-progress-2mo.1879565/#post-26297538