Are these realistic body counts for a typical western woman after she settles down?

Are these realistic body counts for a typical western woman after she settles down?


  • Total voters
    18
Xangsane

Xangsane

la la la la la
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Posts
152,833
Reputation
130,298
  • Sarah (Body Count: 92): Married Mark, had one child through IVF, and lived a stable, if unremarkable, life.
  • Emma (Body Count: 88): Remained single, had a child via sperm donor at 41, and found fulfillment in her career and motherhood.
  • Hannah (Body Count: 78): Married Raj, an Indian engineer, and had two children, finding happiness in family life.
  • Laura (Body Count: 82): Adopted a child from China, balanced a successful legal career and motherhood.
  • Sophie (Body Count: 72): Married Peter, a divorced man with two children, embracing the role of stepmother.
  • Rachel (Body Count: 68): Married Michael, a fellow software engineer, and had one child through IVF.
  • Amy (Body Count: 100): Remained single and childless by choice, traveling extensively and writing a successful blog.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NZb6Air, nathan, standardcel and 1 other person
0
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan and TechnoBoss
@TechnoBoss why not?
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan and TechnoBoss
Most women do not have that high of a body count. It ranges far more for men. Also, uglier women have more sex because they are easier to attain, and juggernaut Theory. Thy need to prove their self worth by having more sex
 
  • +1
Reactions: Offensive Bias, nathan, blknswag and 1 other person
stfu
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: nathan and not__cel
pat me
Most women do not have that high of a body count. It ranges far more for men. Also, uglier women have more sex because they are easier to attain, and juggernaut Theory. Thy need to prove their self worth by having more sex
what about:

Realistic Estimates for the Women Described:​

Given the urban, active lifestyle and use of dating apps:

  • Sarah: 30-50
  • Emma: 30-50
  • Hannah: 20-40
  • Laura: 25-45
  • Sophie: 30-60
  • Rachel: 20-35
  • Amy: 40-70
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan
@ElTruecel why not?
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan
pat me

what about:

Realistic Estimates for the Women Described:​

Given the urban, active lifestyle and use of dating apps:

  • Sarah: 30-50
  • Emma: 30-50
  • Hannah: 20-40
  • Laura: 25-45
  • Sophie: 30-60
  • Rachel: 20-35
  • Amy: 40-70
@ElTruecel
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ElTruecel
less bodycount for a women just means very high but not in the triple digits tbh
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: nathan and Xangsane
Street Fighter Yes GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: nathan
@Xangsane because it is hardwired into there nature
 
Their body counts are realistic. Their stories, not so much.
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan and Deleted member 45175
Women don't really have a sex drives so i have difficulties believing their numbers get that high unless they are escorts or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: alien
Most girls arent in the 80's and 90's wtf
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan and TechnoBoss
If they're around their mid 20s or older and want a high body count those numbers are easily attainable. It's getting normalised by female influencers like Taylor Swift fucking 100+ different men
 
Hannah (Body Count: 78): Married Raj, an Indian engineer, and had two children, finding happiness in family life.
Stopped reading right there, No western woman especially one with over 78 body count would do this in any scenario JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
the average womens bodycount is like 15 I think
 
female bodycount ranges from 1 to 25

male bodycount usually 0 to 2 for 90%
 
  • +1
Reactions: HumidVent
  • JFL
Reactions: Donquixote
brutally over hope its a lie
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Replies
110
Views
32K
20/04/2008
20/04/2008
Dragon5000
Replies
22
Views
4K
EdgyFashionist
EdgyFashionist
AscendingHero
Replies
85
Views
14K
Deleted member 15854
D
Deleted member 4612
Replies
73
Views
9K
6PSLcel
6PSLcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top