- Mar 10, 2021
GIGA HIGH IQ BOOKMARKED FOR AGESContinuation:
• The evolutionary psychological perspective on wars suggests that the ultimate cause of all intergroup conflict is the relative availability of reproductive women. Polygyny, which allows some men to monopolize all reproductive opportunities and exclude others, should increase the prevalence of civil wars, but not interstate wars, which did not exist in the ancestral environment. The analysis of the Correlates of War data supports both hypotheses derived from the evolutionary psychological perspective; polygyny increases civil wars but not interstate wars. The evolutionary psychological perspective implies that women should be far less resistant to alien rule than men, because they have the option of marrying into the conquering group; however, this sex difference should disappear when women are no longer reproductive. The analysis of the Eurobarometer data from 15 European Union nations strongly confirms this prediction.
• Men and women have more sex when they follow gender norms in the household. This study investigates the links between men’s participation in core (traditionally female) and non-core (traditionally male) household tasks and sexual frequency. Results show that both husbands and wives in couples with more traditional housework arrangements report higher sexual frequency, suggesting the importance of gender display rather than marital exchange for sex between heterosexual married partners.
The data from the previous study seems to change through time.
Husbands are happier and experience more satisfying sex lives when their female partner earns as much or more than they do.
• Benevolent sexism makes men more attractive to women. German female students (total N = 326) rated the likability and typicality of male targets: a nonsexist, a benevolent sexist, a hostile sexist, and (in Studies 2 and 3) an ambivalent sexist. When targets were presented as response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick and Fiske 1996) (Studies 2 and 3), the benevolent sexist was rated to be most likable but least typical, whereas the ambivalent sexist was rated to be highly typical. Thus, women were aware of a link between benevolent and hostile sexism and approved of men’s benevolent sexism.
• Since the women's liberation movement of the 1970s, female happiness has on average declined. The paradox of women’s declining relative well-being is found across various datasets, measures of subjective wellbeing, and is pervasive across demographic groups and industrialized countries. Relative declines in female happiness have eroded a gender gap in happiness in which women in the 1970s typically reported higher subjective well-being than did men. These declines have continued and a new gender gap is emerging − one with higher subjective well-being for men.
Yes, these albums generalize. Not all people, not all women. Just too many.
This is not even half of the total images and screenshots I have. But I don't know how to classify most so I haven't posted them on Imgur or any site yet: I'll link them in this same post when I have them organized.
Women on physical appearance: https://imgur.com/a/7etWL9k
What women want: https://imgur.com/a/TQywc
Women on male virgins: https://imgur.com/a/mVYRo
Women on decency: https://imgur.com/a/1levqkr
More of that: https://imgur.com/a/8KE6j
Why gymceling is a waste of time and effort: https://imgur.com/a/3Tx6X
Women's preference on men's height: https://imgur.com/a/8TJan
What looksmatches are, apparently: https://imgur.com/a/ensLC
Ugly things, ugly words: https://imgur.com/a/e3Yho
Women on sex with children: https://imgur.com/a/b1IpvRS
Women on racism: https://imgur.com/a/jUJP2VG
HOW DO I SAVE THIS ATHLANTIS KNOWLEDGE IF THEY DESTROY THE FORUM