are women shit with red flags or are men super good at pretending and Machiavellian

[g4rlic]

im so confused

 

[OhSeeDeeCel]

Go back to .com tight jeans man

 

[g4rlic]

only gl ppl or ppl who have fucked answer. no chuds repeating misinterpreted rehab room shit

 

[OhSeeDeeCel]

omg a chud replied how awful

 

[Wexilarious]

Some girls just like to choose bad things

 

[spongebob]

Whenever I tell girls Im toxic they seem even more interested.
They want chaos and drama. You just have to be goodlooking enough

 

[karmacitathugmaxx]

@hypernormie @edodalic29

 

[g4rlic]

omg a chud replied how awful

yeah

 

[hypernormie]

Even though this seems like an interesting question i'm not even sure what you're asking because this sentence makes no sense e

 

[hypernormie]

Oh ok I get it

Women don't care about red flags

They aren't "shit" with them

They just literally don't care

If you mog, that's all that women care about

YOu shouldn't listen to what women say or their explanations for literally anything they do or any choice they make sexually 95% or more of them have no idea why they make the sexual choices they do and they will just backwards rationalize any decision they make

I can't tell you how many hoes I've slayed while actively demonstrating antisocial or aggressive qualities that would strongly indicate I am either not going to be a faithful long term partner or I would be such an unstable long term partner that it is not worth the risk of trying to settle down with me

Women operate on short term sexual interest primarily the more you mog, the more powerful the interest

This is true for basically every woman

Very very few women can override their desire to have a short term sexual relationship with a mogger by using their rational brains

The reason is that short vs long term relationships are a bit of a meme

There is mogger and there is beta male

At all times you are in one of two camps

A mogger can engage in an LTR but he's always gradually sliding towards beta male when doing so

Because long term relationships themselves are a bit of a meme

They very rarely work out in an ideal fashion

Most long term relationships are one encounter with a mogger away from being destroyed

Just look at the data. Marriages are not stable when women have access to moggers

The more women have gained access to moggers on command, and the more technology has shown them the degree of mogging that is possible, and the more freedom they have to choose among those moggers, the less LTR's occur, and marriage is the ultimate LTR and where all the previous things are true like in the west, marriage is on a rapid decline

So yes women are not bad with red flags and men aren't Machiavellian, well actually chads can be rather Machiavellian because you kind of need to be to slay but it wouldn't really matter either way

When a woman likes you because you mog her other options, her brain tells her to suck and fuck and get creampied, that's all there is to it

The more you mog the more immediate this desire becomes to the point that LTR is a distant imagination, barely actually relevant to her decision making in the moment, or rather the value of being inseminated by a mogger is so powerful that it trump's all other values sort of like in an evolutionary game theory sense

Ideally Chad LTR's I guess but the way it works out is that it's better to get pumped and dumped by Chad than no Chad at all

It's always the best choice to choose Chad

Most women would quite literally prefer to become the single mother to a mogger than settle down with a beta bux

This is reflected in their behavior and their discounting of "red flags"

The evolutionary calculus is simply that Chad's genes are always the best option if you have access to them

 

[g4rlic]

Oh ok I get it

Women don't care about red flags

They aren't "shit" with them

They just literally don't care

If you mog, that's all that women care about

YOu shouldn't listen to what women say or their explanations for literally anything they do or any choice they make sexually 95% or more of them have no idea why they make the sexual choices they do and they will just backwards rationalize any decision they make

I can't tell you how many hoes I've slayed while actively demonstrating antisocial or aggressive qualities that would strongly indicate I am either not going to be a faithful long term partner or I would be such an unstable long term partner that it is not worth the risk of trying to settle down with me

Women operate on short term sexual interest primarily the more you mog, the more powerful the interest

This is true for basically every woman

Very very few women can override their desire to have a short term sexual relationship with a mogger by using their rational brains

The reason is that short vs long term relationships are a bit of a meme

There is mogger and there is beta male

At all times you are in one of two camps

A mogger can engage in an LTR but he's always gradually sliding towards beta male when doing so

Because long term relationships themselves are a bit of a meme

They very rarely work out in an ideal fashion

Most long term relationships are one encounter with a mogger away from being destroyed

Just look at the data. Marriages are not stable when women have access to moggers

The more women have gained access to moggers on command, and the more technology has shown them the degree of mogging that is possible, and the more freedom they have to choose among those moggers, the less LTR's occur, and marriage is the ultimate LTR and where all the previous things are true like in the west, marriage is on a rapid decline

So yes women are not bad with red flags and men aren't Machiavellian, well actually chads can be rather Machiavellian because you kind of need to be to slay but it wouldn't really matter either way

When a woman likes you because you mog her other options, her brain tells her to suck and fuck and get creampied, that's all there is to it

The more you mog the more immediate this desire becomes to the point that LTR is a distant imagination, barely actually relevant to her decision making in the moment, or rather the value of being inseminated by a mogger is so powerful that it trump's all other values sort of like in an evolutionary game theory sense

Ideally Chad LTR's I guess but the way it works out is that it's better to get pumped and dumped by Chad than no Chad at all

It's always the best choice to choose Chad

Most women would quite literally prefer to become the single mother to a mogger than settle down with a beta bux

This is reflected in their behavior and their discounting of "red flags"

The evolutionary calculus is simply that Chad's genes are always the best option if you have access to them

bitter BP holy based. but yeah, tracks on. I was just on Twitter a lot and hear a lot of tiktoks Abt how women are blindsided by Chad, with no signs while every cuck male with a shitty hot woman ik is pretty obviously allowing it and has agency (idubbz, Akash Singh the comedian).

 

[lean is law]

im so confused

No women are rly good at red flag but they have the ability to cope and lie to themselves if the guy is attractive enough

 

[hypernormie]

bitter BP holy based. but yeah, tracks on. I was just on Twitter a lot and hear a lot of tiktoks Abt how women are blindsided by Chad, with no signs while every cuck male with a shitty hot woman ik is pretty obviously allowing it and has agency (idubbz, Akash Singh the comedian).

Human sexual relationships tend toward polygyny

Now I don't mean to induce the naturalistic fallacy here but it is good to understand the constraints of a thing to understand it's tendencies. You may not necessarily be bound by these tendencies in all circumstances (successful LTR's exist and have occured) but you will have to contend with them.

An LTR is a biological process that fulfills certain requirements and exists depending on certain conditions. It is not an independent phenomenon of nature. We are sold LTR's as independent and unconstrained by nature through Disney movies, etc. but this is not the reality when they are observed critically.

Idubbz, Akash, etc. all bought into the belief that LTR's exist independent of conditions and they are paying the price.

 

[romanstock]

They purposely seek out red flags. They purposely seek drama. They want to cause conflict.

 

[PrettyLights]

Oh ok I get it

Women don't care about red flags

They aren't "shit" with them

They just literally don't care

If you mog, that's all that women care about

YOu shouldn't listen to what women say or their explanations for literally anything they do or any choice they make sexually 95% or more of them have no idea why they make the sexual choices they do and they will just backwards rationalize any decision they make

I can't tell you how many hoes I've slayed while actively demonstrating antisocial or aggressive qualities that would strongly indicate I am either not going to be a faithful long term partner or I would be such an unstable long term partner that it is not worth the risk of trying to settle down with me

Women operate on short term sexual interest primarily the more you mog, the more powerful the interest

This is true for basically every woman

Very very few women can override their desire to have a short term sexual relationship with a mogger by using their rational brains

The reason is that short vs long term relationships are a bit of a meme

There is mogger and there is beta male

At all times you are in one of two camps

A mogger can engage in an LTR but he's always gradually sliding towards beta male when doing so

Because long term relationships themselves are a bit of a meme

They very rarely work out in an ideal fashion

Most long term relationships are one encounter with a mogger away from being destroyed

Just look at the data. Marriages are not stable when women have access to moggers

The more women have gained access to moggers on command, and the more technology has shown them the degree of mogging that is possible, and the more freedom they have to choose among those moggers, the less LTR's occur, and marriage is the ultimate LTR and where all the previous things are true like in the west, marriage is on a rapid decline

So yes women are not bad with red flags and men aren't Machiavellian, well actually chads can be rather Machiavellian because you kind of need to be to slay but it wouldn't really matter either way

When a woman likes you because you mog her other options, her brain tells her to suck and fuck and get creampied, that's all there is to it

The more you mog the more immediate this desire becomes to the point that LTR is a distant imagination, barely actually relevant to her decision making in the moment, or rather the value of being inseminated by a mogger is so powerful that it trump's all other values sort of like in an evolutionary game theory sense

Ideally Chad LTR's I guess but the way it works out is that it's better to get pumped and dumped by Chad than no Chad at all

It's always the best choice to choose Chad

Most women would quite literally prefer to become the single mother to a mogger than settle down with a beta bux

This is reflected in their behavior and their discounting of "red flags"

The evolutionary calculus is simply that Chad's genes are always the best option if you have access to them

don’t take this the wrong way because this is by no means the only thing that i concluded from your novel but, does this that we shouldn’t/don’t have to feel bad about leading girls on for sex with practically less than zero percent change of ltring her

 

[hypernormie]

don’t take this the wrong way because this is by no means the only thing that i concluded from your novel but, does this that we shouldn’t/don’t have to feel bad about leading girls on for sex with practically less than zero percent change of ltring her

By leading a girl on you are taking advantage of their belief of the potential for a future relationship. The degree to which that potential ideal was actually possible would be the extent it makes sense to feel bad

If a woman is delusional about the potential for a future it is up to you whether you want to protect her from the consequences of her own delusions by not leading her on or taking advantage of those delusions for personal gain

The delusions exist regardless of whatever decision you choose

Whether or not you believe that to be a moral action or something to feel bad about depends entirely on the moral logic you subscribe to

For example you can argue that it is moral to destroy someone's illusions and accelerate their disillusionment by exposing them to the consequences of their delusions so as to bring them in greater congruence with reality and the possibilities they can actually obtain therein

Or maybe you subscribe to a total harm reduction logic where inflicting harm of any kind should be avoided at all costs where one is aware it is possible

Or maybe you have a mixed strategy where you will try to avoid harm when possible but if the individual does not heed the warnings or show any concern despite an earnest effort to make them aware of the risks, then you absolve yourself of responsibility and let the chips fall where they may

 

[PrettyLights]

By leading a girl on you are taking advantage of their belief of the potential for a future relationship. The degree to which that potential ideal was actually possible would be the extent it makes sense to feel bad

If a woman is delusional about the potential for a future it is up to you whether you want to protect her from the consequences of her own delusions by not leading her on or taking advantage of those delusions for personal gain

The delusions exist regardless of whatever decision you choose

Whether or not you believe that to be a moral action or something to feel bad about depends entirely on the moral logic you subscribe to

For example you can argue that it is moral to destroy someone's illusions and accelerate their disillusionment by exposing them to the consequences of their delusions so as to bring them in greater congruence with reality and the possibilities they can actually obtain therein

Or maybe you subscribe to a total harm reduction logic where inflicting harm of any kind should be avoided at all costs where one is aware it is possible

Or maybe you have a mixed strategy where you will try to avoid harm when possible but if the individual does not heed the warnings or show any concern despite an earnest effort to make them aware of the risks, then you absolve yourself of responsibility and let the chips fall where they may

why do you talk about them like they're ai. this is instruction manual tier levels of literature right here

 

[hypernormie]

why do you talk about them like they're ai. this is instruction manual tier levels of literature right here

I have a strong dopaminergic temperament that produces heightened goal directed behavior

A moderately high IQ

And a strong drive to systemize rather than empathize

Basically I'm very motivated, analytical and logical

This reliably produces dry explanations of topics I find interesting

The topic of interest here is obtaining sex with women

I understand how that may seem strange when applied to women because people don't normally think of other people as logical systems, not are they usually so motivated to exploit said system so aggressively

 

[PrettyLights]

I have a strong dopaminergic temperament that produces heightened goal directed behavior

A moderately high IQ

And a strong drive to systemize rather than empathize

Basically I'm very motivated, analytical and logical

This reliably produces dry explanations of topics I find interesting

The topic of interest here is obtaining sex with women

I understand how that may seem strange when applied to women because people don't normally think of other people as logical systems, not are they usually so motivated to exploit said system so aggressively

its all in the name of the evolutionary pursuit of women so it’s justified to talk about these things without it coming across as strange

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

im so confused

women only care about the looks genetics that will be passed to thier children

everything else is gravy to them

 

[hypernormie]

its all in the name of the evolutionary pursuit of women so it’s justified to talk about these things without it coming across as strange

You don't necessarily need to go so far as to justify the pursuit of sex by imbuing it with evolutionary significance. I certainly don't do this. Sex is just an entertaining pastime, if I was uglier I might have gotten really into chess or something instead.