Are you guys pro eugenics?

botchedbytufano

botchedbytufano

Zephir
Joined
May 28, 2026
Posts
1,829
Reputation
2,453
I would bet most of this site would be for sterilization
 
  • +1
Reactions: lol, Shrek2OnDvD and _Jason_
i'm pro genetic modification and transhumanism
 
  • +1
Reactions: lol, Dnag, _Jason_ and 2 others
not me personally

we should get rid of diseases and prevent them ofc, but killing people because they’re not 6’2 or gl is insane
 
  • +1
Reactions: zudlife, Dnag, _Jason_ and 1 other person
أنا أضحك عليك
1791216126992
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
yes. eugenics for Whites. Total sterilisation of Non-Whites with some exceptions ofc.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, botchedbytufano and Hernan
Ofcourse, that’s a pretty important aspect of bp and lookism.
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Jason_ and botchedbytufano
not me personally

we should get rid of diseases and prevent them ofc, but killing people because they’re not 6’2 or gl is insane
Not killing them but prevent them from breeding
 
  • +1
Reactions: zudlife
نعم. تحسين النسل للبيض. التعقيم الكامل لغير البيض مع بعض الاستثناءات بالطبع.
لا أريد التعقيم، أرجوكم لا تفعلوا ذلك بي
 
not me personally

we should get rid of diseases and prevent them ofc, but killing people because they’re not 6’2 or gl is insane
Thats not how eugenics work
 
  • +1
Reactions: zudlife, Beastimmung and botchedbytufano
  • +1
Reactions: zudlife and botchedbytufano
not me personally

we should get rid of diseases and prevent them ofc, but killing people because they’re not 6’2 or gl is insane
Literally no eugenicist supported that.

Huge straw man
 
  • +1
Reactions: lol, zudlife and botchedbytufano
I would bet most of this site would be for sterilization
People who are classified(very subjective) as inferior in terms of looks, health, inteligence and other genetic mutations should not reproduce to limit their inferior genes interfering with potentially good genetically traits. Obviously they should not be murdered, because that would be considered inhumane and hard to apply (personally wouldn't support murder due to genetic inferiority), but they should limit reproduction either by law or my education about their inferiority. It would create new social issues due to implematations of new categorisation system in addition to social and economic. A lot of nuances but in conclusion people with inferior genetical traits should not create a possiblity of that gene existing, hence not passing it down to offspring.

holy yap
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
People who are classified(very subjective) as inferior in terms of looks, health, inteligence and other genetic mutations should not reproduce to limit their inferior genes interfering with potentially good genetically traits. Obviously they should not be murdered, because that would be considered inhumane and hard to apply (personally wouldn't support murder due to genetic inferiority), but they should limit reproduction either by law or my education about their inferiority. It would create new social issues due to implematations of new categorisation system in addition to social and economic. A lot of nuances but in conclusion people with inferior genetical traits should not create a possiblity of that gene existing, hence not passing it down to offspring.

holy yap
The question is how will the initial unfit population handle their hornyness and desires to reproduce
 
The question is how will the initial unfit population handle their hornyness and desires to reproduce
That is one of the large amount of problems with promotion of eugenics. We could argue that widespread education of such issue of gentic inferiority would benefit in in combination with government supporting the promotion of it to younger population in elementary/secondary education facilities - but that raises immediate problem of modern day leftism - those leaches leaning left and Pro-Immigration and Pro-RGBT+ and other faggotry would most certanly oppose that and if we attempt to implement such they won't let that happen. Second issue - I would assume most people are familiar with the government interest of keeping the population inferior(especially in the intelectual category due to the benefits provided to them) people easily manipulatable and those who wouldn't be considered bright by any means benefit the state and those ruling. So it would be practically impossible to pull off. Unless someone will place a dictator and we will live in monarchy where such laws would not be opposed.

The people in this current day and age are extra horny and would fuck even a pillow atp. so that would not be easy to combat, could be fixed with rewiring the women's brain to oppose even the basic hypergamy and honestly lower their egos. Because the reason why males don't experience love and levels of hornines skyrocket is because women want more than they deserve especially in the dating marketplace. If that would be combated first out of ∞ steps would be taken.
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
I would bet most of this site would be for sterilization
Yes, I'm my world only beautiful Europeans would exist and have full control in society, select ethnics (except niggers) who meet racial beauty standards would allowed to exist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
no
im anti eugenics and pro racism

anti eugenics is what works for a 1st world society, meaning every man gets a wife and family and in return he helps uphold society/defends society/maintains society

What we have now in the 1st world is pro eugenics(aka hypergamy) and anti racism (aka pro immigration). A total shitshow
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano and kali_yuga88
no
im anti eugenics and pro racism

anti eugenics is what works for a 1st world society, meaning every man gets a wife and family and in return he helps uphold society/defends society/maintains society

What we have now in the 1st world is pro eugenics(aka hypergamy) and anti racism (aka pro immigration). A total shitshow
If America was the way it was in the 50s would you still be against it? Now where all white genes are needed and facing near extinction I could see your view
 
  • +1
Reactions: sonic55555
Eugenics is literally based asf.
When it existed in the US subhuman could not breed and become a majority, now that’s exactly what’s happening
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
Eugenics is literally based asf.
When it existed in the US subhuman could not breed and become a majority, now that’s exactly what’s happening
Do you also Support euthanization of vegetables
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slavurik
If America was the way it was in the 50s would you still be against it? Now where all white genes are needed and facing near extinction I could see your view
i believe the 1950 is exactly what i described
 
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
Eugenics is literally based asf.
When it existed in the US subhuman could not breed and become a majority, now that’s exactly what’s happening
you dont understand what eugenics means in this framework. eugenics means hypergamy, aka women filtering out 80% of men from the genepool because they arent "chads"

eugenics in this context is VERY VERY BAD for white society
 
you dont understand what eugenics means in this framework. eugenics means hypergamy, aka women filtering out 80% of men from the genepool because they arent "chads"

eugenics in this context is VERY VERY BAD for white society
Nigger ur retarded asf this shit applies only on poor non-white ill people. They mostly euthanised and castrated poor non-white and mentally ill women and men. This is a completely good thing. They literally saved children from living in hell in a poor and abused household.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: botchedbytufano
practicing eugenics actually helped white society lol. It’s the reason we heavily restricted immigration
i want immigration totally restricted. but thats not the main issue rn. the main issue with society is female hypergamy and 80% of men being eugenically dismissed by the foid gender
 
i want immigration totally restricted. but thats not the main issue rn. the main issue with society is female hypergamy and 80% of men being eugenically dismissed by the foid gender
eugenics would of solved this issue lol. It filters out weak and ugly that’s the whole point
 

Similar threads

roidar
Replies
0
Views
15
roidar
roidar
pwoanfrdg
Replies
27
Views
101
Rira84
Rira84
bIiss
Replies
0
Views
16
bIiss
bIiss
Ꭰarwin
Replies
10
Views
63
emogymmaxx
emogymmaxx
IndecentEyes
Replies
0
Views
25
IndecentEyes
IndecentEyes

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top