
Alexanderr
Admin
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Posts
- 22,318
- Reputation
- 46,895
A woman is attracted not to who you are, but to the emotions you make her feel.
There's a common thread that runs through almost every man's failures with women. It's a pattern of core strategic mistakes, all stemming from one catastrophic misunderstanding: the belief that attraction is something you earn from her.
You are constantly seeking her validation, and the very act of seeking it is what makes you unattractive.
If you're failing, it's (probably) because you are using one of these five failed validation-seeking tactics. I've used them all.
1. The Job Interview Fallacy
This, in particular, is where the blackpill ideology pathologically fails.
You've spent hundreds of hours optimizing the hardware (your looks), believing it is the ultimate tool for finally forcing the world to give you the validation you crave. This isn't an indictment of looks; they absolutely matter.
It's an indictment of a strategy that obsesses over the tool while ignoring the fact that the entire premise (seeking validation) is the very thing killing your results.
This is why you see "average" guys with attractive women time and time again. They're not winning because of their looks; they're winning because they operate from a place of internal validation. They are not seeking her approval; they are determining if she is worthy of theirs.
P.S. Every guy reading this will nod along and recognize these as "bad" habits. But recognition is cheap.
Your Reading Brain just understood this list. Your Swimming Brain (the one that freezes, agrees, and seeks validation in the heat of the moment) didn't learn a damn thing. Don't mistake the map for the territory. This knowledge is useless until you forge it into a habit through repeated, failed experiments in the real world.
There's a common thread that runs through almost every man's failures with women. It's a pattern of core strategic mistakes, all stemming from one catastrophic misunderstanding: the belief that attraction is something you earn from her.
You are constantly seeking her validation, and the very act of seeking it is what makes you unattractive.
If you're failing, it's (probably) because you are using one of these five failed validation-seeking tactics. I've used them all.
But there's a crucial difference between failing and not even trying. Failing means you're in the game, gathering data. Not trying means you're rotting on the sidelines. This list is for those who are ready to get in the game.
1. The Job Interview Fallacy

- What it looks like: Your default first date is "coffee" or "drinks." The entire interaction is a verbal exchange of facts, like a job interview. You try to build a logical case for why she should be attracted to you by listing your accomplishments and qualities.
- Why it Fails: You are trying to convince the "Reading Brain." . Attraction is not a logical decision; it's an emotional response. Emotion is a byproduct of a shared experience, not a shared resume. While you are busy applying for the job of "boyfriend," she is bored.

- What it looks like: You are pathologically agreeable. You mirror all her opinions, laugh at all her jokes, and never offer any form of pushback or teasing. Your primary goal is to be seen as a "nice guy."
- Why it Fails: Your strategy is to avoid a negative signal at all costs. But in doing so, you generate no signal at all. You are invisible. To create a spark, there must be polarity and tension. By avoiding her disapproval at all costs, you guarantee her indifference, which is a faster and more permanent death.

- What it looks like: From the moment you match, she becomes the center of your emotional universe. You text back instantly, are available 24/7, and invest all your mental energy into "winning her over."
- Why it Fails: You are seeking validation by demonstrating how much you value her, hoping she will be so impressed by your devotion that she'll return the favor. She won't. By making her the prize, you automatically define yourself as the contestant. You signal that your own life is empty and that her attention is the most valuable resource you have. This isn't romantic; it's a demonstration of low value.

- What it looks like: You mistake her politeness for genuine interest. You over-analyze her texts for "clues." You live in a world of vague hope ("I think she likes me") instead of seeking clear data.
- Why it Fails: You are so desperate for the validation of her interest that you invent it from ambiguous data. You're afraid to take a real, decisive action (like making a move or asking for a specific second date) because you are terrified that reality will invalidate the hopeful story you've built in your head.

- What it looks like: The interaction begins with you asking, "So, what do you want to do?" You let her dictate the terms, the location, and the flow of the interaction.
- Why it Fails: You are seeking validation by being submissive, hoping she will approve of how accommodating you are. This immediately forces her into the masculine role of the decision-maker and places you in the feminine role of the follower. It is a catastrophic failure to establish your own agency and a powerful signal of passivity.
This, in particular, is where the blackpill ideology pathologically fails.
You've spent hundreds of hours optimizing the hardware (your looks), believing it is the ultimate tool for finally forcing the world to give you the validation you crave. This isn't an indictment of looks; they absolutely matter.
It's an indictment of a strategy that obsesses over the tool while ignoring the fact that the entire premise (seeking validation) is the very thing killing your results.



This is why you see "average" guys with attractive women time and time again. They're not winning because of their looks; they're winning because they operate from a place of internal validation. They are not seeking her approval; they are determining if she is worthy of theirs.
P.S. Every guy reading this will nod along and recognize these as "bad" habits. But recognition is cheap.
Your Reading Brain just understood this list. Your Swimming Brain (the one that freezes, agrees, and seeks validation in the heat of the moment) didn't learn a damn thing. Don't mistake the map for the territory. This knowledge is useless until you forge it into a habit through repeated, failed experiments in the real world.