mcmentalonthemic
WIKID
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2023
- Posts
- 8,901
- Reputation
- 26,078
Incoming "water", but the same people who will reply water is the same people who spend hours arguing against others online.
If there's somebody who believes public nudity shouldn't be illegal, it doesn't matter if kids see, it's natural. They even go out and practice it - should you argue against them? Try and convince them it's disgusting?
No, for 3 reasons.
1: They have already made up their mind.
2: They should be put on the registry, not reasoned with.
3: They do not believe it's true because of logic, or through genuine thought process, they believe in what they believe because they WANT TO.
People will only believe what they want to believe, they will only see what they want to see.
A good example of this is the whole Renae Good Situation.
You can believe what you want to, I'm not going to bore you with my beliefs. You can believe the ICE agent was completely in the right and the woman was careless/even malicious. You could believe the ICE agent broke Rules of Engagement and should be charged. I don't care
But do you notice that EVERYONE who argues the ICE agent broke RoE is a Leftist, and EVERYONE who believes the ICE agent was completely in the right is a Right winger?
Even in real life, my politics is Left-wing adjacent, and I believe the ICE agent broke RoE [again, not here to lecture, believe what you want], but almost all my IRL friends are Right-ish to completely Right wing, and guess what side they're on.
But when I talk to the little left-wing friends I have, you already know what side they're going to be on.
If it was truly as 50/50 and hard to decipher as it was, then maybe 20-45% of right wingers would believe the ICE agent broke RoE, instead of the under 5%.
And If it was truly as 50/50 and hard to decipher as it was, then maybe 20-45% of left wingers would believe the ICE agent abided by RoE, instead of the under 5%.
It's clear 98% of both Left wingers and Right wingers only believe in what they believe in to rep their side, not out of actual critical thought.
Goy Strategy: Convince people.
Then the Goy walks in. The Cattle.
Spends hours and hours trying to argue, convince people, getting mad online.
9,301 people RAGING and arguing towards people who will literally never be convinced.
These are people I agree with by the way, but the fact they are arguing makes them completely retarded.
But, do you spot that?
Amongst the 9,301 Goy cattle arguing, there are 3,510 bots riling them up. AI agents taking advantage of the Cattle. This is our bread and circuses.
AI agent - Wikipedia
"This is the way the jew make money.. and made a fortune in the past ten years„ selling short the shippping futures„ let the goyim deal in the real world,"
- Jeffrey Epstein
AI Agents trying to launder talking points such as "Legal Observer."
Literally like handing out pitchforks to an angry mob.
Here is an AI Agent pretending to be a Right winger. If you have experience with noticing AI, alarm bells will definitely be going off in your head reading this.
Elite Strategy: Circumvent people.
Translation for stupid people: "If your ideology is not the ruling ideology, convincing people you're right is basically useless. You should use technology to amass power to force your ideology's goals."
Peter Thiel ladies and gentlemen. Needs no introduction, but just incase, Co-Founded PayPal with Elon Musk, and founded Palantir, an AI military tracking & data company [employed by the CIA and Israel]
This guy is almost a caricature of a powerful Elite, and he is just laying down the whole formula.
And he did it. He succeeded in this completely. He has used technology to force his ideology, and he is currently still doing this, and there is no amount of people you could try and convince to stop him - a man who did not care to convince literally anyone.
I would not be surprised if his company's data was used for these Agentic AI accounts that these people argue against.
9,300 cattle vs 1 man who couldn't give less of a fuck.
What if you WANT To convince people?
No evidence, no logic, no statistics. NONE OF THAT BULLSHIT.
Going back to what I said at the start, to convince someone, you have to make him WANT to believe you're right. And that's all you need.
I don't mean "Did you know if you'll receive 3 million dollars tomorrow if you give me $5 right now?" type of 'make people want to believe you're right.'
I mean make your idea feel good to believe.
Make your idea feel true to their values, interests, and identity, so agreeing with you feels natural, not forced.
Feed into their insecurities, their wants.
Nazi Strategy
If you're a Nazi, this section might piss you off, but what can I do.
I'm sure you've noticed a huge uptick in Nazi ideology recently.
Back in the day, Nazism in current era was extremely fringe. Nazi protests had 5 Nazi protesters Vs 2,000 counter protesters. Meeting a nazi online was insanely rare.
Nowadays, Nick Fuentes gets 100,000+ live viewers per stream, and every anti-Nazi video gets a bunch of Nazis commenting, completely ratioing the creator to death.
What made so many of these people NAZIS? Was it complex economic theory proving Hitler's National Socialist economic implementations were ideal? Was it dozens of hours of consuming political theory and coming to the conclusion that Nazism is the truth?
No, it was edits like the ones above. That's literally it.
The power, the vibes, the aesthetic, the power of the idea of a pure white homogeneous nation who puts it's people first. That IDEA, that AESTHETIC, that WANT is all that's needed to convince these people.
It is funny because these people who claim to hate jews might be the most Goy-minded of them all.
Trying to convince these people with logic is like trying to make a 4 sided triangle, you can try but you'd be wasting your time.
