At normie SMV graphs

[Tusseleif]

Normies call these SM values in men.

Notice how just a minor percentage of it is looks. How could it possibly be about SMV? It doesn’t even encompass past 40% in the "short term" graph, not to mention long term. This is just Relationship Market Value, how valuable you would be to have a relationship with, short term or long term. Many "relationships" are also dead bedroom relationships. A large part of them would include these SMV graphs because it values looks as lower than resources and personality in terms of sex life.

This is a graph based on age.

Prime age in men in this graph (20s), "peak SMV" is lower than oldcels at 47. Further proof that what normies think of as SMV is simply just RMV. Relationship Market Value. Meaning normies further get strayed into the dark with bluepill ideas.

 

[Deleted member 17174]

 

[MostGLSlayer]

Game is 30% bro.

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Holy shit, just caged IRL @ this

 

[Lawton88]

Normies call these SM values in men.

View attachment 1523877
View attachment 1523878

Notice how just a minor percentage of it is looks. How could it possibly be about SMV? It doesn’t even encompass past 40% in the "short term" graph, not to mention long term. This is just Relationship Market Value, how valuable you would be to have a relationship with, short term or long term. Many "relationships" are also dead bedroom relationships. A large part of them would include these SMV graphs because it values looks as lower than resources and personality in terms of sex life.

This is a graph based on age.
View attachment 1523882

Prime age in men in this graph (20s), "peak SMV" is lower than oldcels at 47. Further proof that what normies think of as SMV is simply just RMV. Relationship Market Value. Meaning normies further get strayed into the dark with bluepill ideas.

Yep most of those graphs are red pill nonsense. The one at the bottom is kind of accurate when it comes to a Chadlite and a Stacy in LTR value as older Chadlites doing alright financially can get with much younger females for marriage. They are crazy as hell when they act like normies get much more value after 30 when all that is happening is a few females then will take advantage of him if he has some money while cheating on him behind his back..

 

[Deleted member 16058]

Delusional idiots...

Looks is at least 60% of the equation with the rest height and frame.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Normies call these SM values in men.

View attachment 1523877
View attachment 1523878

Notice how just a minor percentage of it is looks. How could it possibly be about SMV? It doesn’t even encompass past 40% in the "short term" graph, not to mention long term. This is just Relationship Market Value, how valuable you would be to have a relationship with, short term or long term. Many "relationships" are also dead bedroom relationships. A large part of them would include these SMV graphs because it values looks as lower than resources and personality in terms of sex life.

This is a graph based on age.
View attachment 1523882

Prime age in men in this graph (20s), "peak SMV" is lower than oldcels at 47. Further proof that what normies think of as SMV is simply just RMV. Relationship Market Value. Meaning normies further get strayed into the dark with bluepill ideas.

Tbh it’s not as bad as I thought st least normies acknowledge that looks is the most important for short term