At what point is your height exactly a neutral and no more a negative?

Seppukucel

Seppukucel

Banned
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Posts
590
Reputation
1,130
170? 175? 177? 180?
 
6'4

nah but real talk its like 5'11
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: MusicMaxxingMidget, Patrick Baitman, Ryanmcgg0139 and 6 others
Depends on a region tbh
In Europe usually you can see 180 minimum requirement

But you can fraud from 175, bitches knows shit about measurements
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seppukucel
6"0 tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Subhuman trash
I know a guy who is 5'11 but honestly doesnt seem to have any problem with ladies , i guess thats the nuetral zone
 
180

can fraud 6ft, plus you dont get utterly mogged standing with 6ft 1 + 6ft 2 men
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seppukucel
I know a guy who is 5'11 but honestly doesnt seem to have any problem with ladies , i guess thats the nuetral zone
You say it like 5'11 is short
 
  • +1
Reactions: penis3
180

can fraud 6ft, plus you dont get utterly mogged standing with 6ft 1 + 6ft 2 men
I'm 161 I will buy myself Lady Gaga's heels to reach 195
 
  • Woah
Reactions: penis3
5'10
 
  • +1
Reactions: mehman, Deleted member 2100, Shrek2OnDvD and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: mehman and Seppukucel
assuming 5'9.5-5'10 is average height, prob 5'11

it's 1 - 1.5 inches above average and 1 inch below the common standard 6'0

at 5'10 your height is a slight negative and at 6'0 your height is a slight positive
Why would 5'10 be a disadvantage if it's solid average? You're closer to tall than short
 
  • +1
Reactions: mehman
It's probably tall from foids' angles of vision

Im 5'8 and have been called short

my point is. At that height , height is the last reason you'd be rejected for
 
Taller the better
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seppukucel
  • +1
Reactions: Lolcel and Seppukucel
Depends on where you live. I'd assume 5'9 is neutral tending to tall in Asia and South America, whereas it's a pretty mediocre height in Europe
 
6'1"

Cope if you disagree.
 
tbh unless u are fucked up proportion wise anything is fine unless so tall u cant fit in cars or something and more than 2 inches below avg
 
With a lot of my Tinder/Dating App experiments, between 5'8-5'11 seem to be pretty acceptable height ranges if you're average or above average, in which case you better hope you have some other things that boost your status, such as a good job, or something of that nature.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mehman and Deleted member 6095
6'3" is "tall" minimum. There was a scholarship in highschool for being tall (100% srs), and I was pissed bc I didn't meet the requirements at the time, bc I was 6'2.

Also I def caged at the tall scholarship. "Let's give lucky genes people money." But ofc there are plenty of womens only scholarships.

If only there was a microdick scholarship tbh ngl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: audreyen
6'3" is "tall" minimum. There was a scholarship in highschool for being tall (100% srs), and I was pissed bc I didn't meet the requirements at the time, bc I was 6'2.

Also I def caged at the tall scholarship. "Let's give lucky genes people money." But ofc there are plenty of womens only scholarships.

If only there was a microdick scholarship tbh ngl.
6'3 is taller than 95% irl pretty sure. not internet 6'3
tbh no scholarship cuz not tall. couldnt get it even if there was microdick one either :feelsree:fml
 
5’9-5’10 tbh
5’11-6’1 is pretty tall
6’2+ is tall
5’8 & below is manlet
 
  • +1
Reactions: 416_Wavy and Seppukucel

Similar threads

islaymtbs
Replies
24
Views
107
pfl
pfl
supafuckfoids
Replies
3
Views
39
LowTierBateman
LowTierBateman
anemo
Replies
10
Views
56
Splinter901
Splinter901
hopelessmanlet32
Replies
14
Views
62
diosmio
diosmio
Hihi21
Replies
15
Views
68
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top