Atheism is low iq

[yushmaxx]

Idk. Def not created by a personal god tho

Saying “I dont know” is a perfectly okay response. Religious people cant understand.

 

[ICXCLuvr]

Saying “I dont know” is a perfectly okay response. Religious people cant understand.

They’re stubborn and think that having an “explanation” means they’ve won

 

[Hess]

of course, there’s a million other factors at play here

the better statistic would be is that as we look at different levels of education, religion prevalence crashes by like 60%

vast majority of PhDs are atheists

They also make up 65 percent of nobel prize holders and 56 percent of post graduate degrees today, its not that strong of an argument, if they still make up a majority in a lot of uni level education then it is not some slam dunk against religion, not to mention there is a huge amount of actual atheist skeptics that have debated the issue a lot that have conceded to metaphysics arguments and largely turned more agnostic because of it

(Graham Oppy has been on record saying that christian metaphysics are highly rational, deeply explanatory and structurally sound, antony flew abandoned atheism for deism due to his consession to the teleological argument and metaphysical challenge of how life could emerge from non living matter,quentin smith conceded that scientific discoveries like the big bang lent a dangerous amount of plausibillity to theistic metaphysics, there is a lot more cases like this which one can go on about)

trying to prove which population category is more higher IQ in this case is just a useless debate that proves nothing outside of some adhom dunk out of arrogance, both sides are fairly reasonable and trying to portray your opponent as stupid is just as low IQ (I am a nietzschean so I do not believe in religion either, I just find this arrogrance on atheist sides silly)

 

[Hess]

atheists tend to operate on critical thinking. which is based on skepticism, testing, evidence, etc

religious people on the other hand operate on intuitive thinking. they take things more at face value, with quick judgement and gut feelings

Atheists do this just as much on a variety of topics, this is just a trait for normies, there are so many christian theologians that have extensively used logic to argue for the existence of God that are as logical as atheist skeptics

 

[Askinov]

You are approaching this in a fundamentally wrong way.

The one true god is a cookie monster who lives under my bed, and you have NO evidence to defy its existence.

Atheists have no burden of proof, it falls on the religious man.

science doesn't have reason for what happened before big bang where did it came from will i think it may will do ig

neither the religion has explained who was before god only thing is i saw ts from hinduism and it says the concept of beginning doesn't apply there is no day 1 aka Omni-temporality

at the end i think it comes down to people and they should select what they believe on and can gain advantage on

and if you you just don't follow religion blindly and use it to understand life and stuff and take some helpful advice from it its lit tho

 

[Mogger]

I dont know. Scientists have theories, one day we will figure it out.

When we didnt know how the weather, or rain, or the sun, or natural disasters worked, we blamed it or attributed to god.

Then scientists found the real reasons behind those things.

Humans get smarter and gods domain gets smaller, that is how humanity has been trending for the last 3000 years, its called “god of the gaps”

Even a complete scientific explanation of the universes physical history wouldn’t necesarily answer why physical reality exists at all. The argument for god is about the ultimate explanation of existence and not filling gaps in scientific knowledge.

 

[WonkyChin186]

.

studies show atheists have higher iq

 

[Mogger]

neither the religion has explained who was before god

Things that begin to exist need a cause but God, by definition in classical theism, didn’t begin to exist so it doesn’t need a cause

 

[Hess]

So many low IQ ppl in this thread that are too low IQ to engage in actual skeptic debates that think they have the right to call any side low IQ considering majority of atheist skeptics and theists that debate as their career both concede regularly to both sides and are far more understanding towards one another and agree far more with each other as they both have extremely strong arguments

 

[irisdipigmentation0]

.

reason being?

 

[Mogger]

reason being?

It’s a logical conclusion that god exists

 

[yushmaxx]

science doesn't have reason for what happened before big bang where did it came from will i think it may will do ig

science always finds an answer

we didnt know how clouds formed 100 years ago

give scientists 100 years and we will
know why