
ikramy
5,10 natural gymmaxed 11% bf
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2025
- Posts
- 1,497
- Reputation
- 1,606
Ah, great now we’ve got the philosophy major from Reddit stepping in to save his buddy with a word salad. You’re basically saying “truths are just sensory-based logical sentences” while casually admitting they shift with time, context, and subjective anchorage. Congratulations you’ve just defined relativism, not truth. You admit that your entire worldview rests on unprovable axioms, then act like that’s a mic drop. It’s not. That’s like saying, “We’re all making things up, but I’m doing it in a more rational tone.” If truth changes with the moment, then it was never truth to begin with just temporary agreement. And if your anchoring point is arbitrary, then so is everything you derive from it. Thanks for stepping in, though it really helped prove my point.Truths are not eternal in any way.
Truths are logical sentences who are verified by human senses, the sentence is a formula made of language that has a sintaxis (like what I'm saying right now) and it can't prove or disprove beings.
They don't hold up any metaphysical form.
The subject of the sentence is not a being that has to be discovered, rather a point of anchorage where a certain number of logical sentences are valid.
You need to believe in something without proving it, an axiom. Then you can use the axiom to say whatever is true or false. This axiom can never be proven or disproved, it's up to you. Senses give you certainty in a moment but the moment changes and your beliefs also change. Other people can agree or not, the ones who agree share the same axioms.