Attractive GIRLS or SEXUAL Activity Accelerates AGING

D

Deleted member 1901

Kraken
Joined
Apr 15, 2022
Posts
12,217
Reputation
14,505
Firstly, you must realize the trade-off relationship between the objective of sexual success and the objective of youthfulness (health) preservation.

The Disposable Soma theory of aging states that:
“Organisms must devote limited resources either to produce more offspring or to live longer. Evolutionarily, it is beneficial to sacrifice the latter for the sake of the former.”

A problem with the Disposable Soma theory of aging is that if the resources were based on energy (measured in calories) then how come caloric restriction extends lifespan? A simple answer could be that the resource is not calories. But I have no lead on what that resource may be.

Well, another theory of aging based on trade-offs between sexual success and longevity is the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging. Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects. Antagonistic Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects, at least one beneficial and at least one detrimental. Usually, detrimental genes will get weeded out of the gene pool, but if that gene is packaged with a benefit as well that outweighs the draw-back, then that gene will be selected for through evolution. So this can relate to aging if a theoretical gene(s) increased reproductive fitness but accelerated aging.

You are hopefully aware of epigenetic alterations, which are alterations of gene expression, not genetic code, during an individual’s lifespan. I theorize that being around attractive females could upregulate genes that increase reproductive fitness, but this would come at the cost of increased aging if they were antagonistic pleiotropic genes that harmed longevity.

Evidence

Being around attractive females can increase testosterone:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18675269/

Based on the premise of the Disposable Soma theory, I speculate this also tells the body to allocate more resources (whatever that may be) to prepare for sexual success, which means less available for retaining your health/youth.

Based on the premise of the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging, I theorize that the increased testosterone either directly or indirectly upregulates genes associated with reproductive fitness, or that the increased testosterone indicates that those genes are being upregulated.

Fruit Fly Experiment:
Researchers exposed 33 day old virgin male fruit flies to female fruit flies for 48 hours (they were allowed to mate) and then all living males were “flash frozen” and their gene expression assayed. “Testis-specific” genes were upregulated and oxidation-reduction processes genes were down-regulated. Oxidation causes aging according to the Free Radical theory of aging so this is bad. Quite a lot of genes were affected and this also suggests that exposure to females in humans would affect gene expression.
1694309310832


Well, how did this affect their lifespan?

The black line is the survivor curve of virgin males and red is the survivorship of mated males (exposed to females from day 21-23)

1694309332756


Practicality:

Well, this suggests that we should avoid attractive females. Us basement dwellers probably already do IRL, but perhaps not online, which could potentially induce a similar response in our bodies. The main question is: to coom or not to coom? Based on the fruit fly study, I would propose NoFap as the answer. But remember the study on exposure of human males to attractive females? That study claims that no sexual activity in the past month increased the testosterone production response to attractive females. NoFap may therefore sensitize one to female exposure, even perhaps it may raise sex drive and therefore more resources will be allocated to the objective of reproduction or more associated genes upregulated. So I would say that reducing sex drive chemically or some other way would be the best option for longevity.

If you’re interested in more interesting anti-aging material:

@howtallareyou @crisis @Ragnar @Eriot Lodger @Nad @Suimaxxer @Kroker @Interested @CoffeeCel @HOLYFUARK @Acne Victim @Osie
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall, mvp2v1, nobodyspecial369 and 12 others
lifefuel for @Splinter901 if he ever stays KHHV
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23472, Splinter901 and Deleted member 1901
aint read a word nigga BIG BOOTY HOES IS ALL THAT MATTERS IN LIFE
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: zeshama, Ams324, SAQUIB66 and 10 others
good thing im a virgin
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, PushingTheLimits and Deleted member 1901
Water my nigga. Water.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30411 and Deleted member 1901
So basically OP states that foids are flies.
 
Water my nigga. Water.
I’m glad you agree. It is kind of intuitive but many people will not have realized this, so my explanation should be helpful.
 
What’s your opinion on fapping bs not fapping or frequency of fapping?
Only benefit I ever got from fapping was that I would go to sleep faster and sleep extremely good. Males should only fap when necessary and def not do it to porn.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, Deleted member 23558 and Deleted member 1901
lifefuel for @Splinter901 if he ever stays KHHV

It just being around says attractive females, this means that if you are attracted to anime grills and u watch anime u age? How does the body know the difference?

1678165557399419
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 31155 and Deleted member 1901
Firstly, you must realize the trade-off relationship between the objective of sexual success and the objective of youthfulness (health) preservation.

The Disposable Soma theory of aging states that:
“Organisms must devote limited resources either to produce more offspring or to live longer. Evolutionarily, it is beneficial to sacrifice the latter for the sake of the former.”

A problem with the Disposable Soma theory of aging is that if the resources were based on energy (measured in calories) then how come caloric restriction extends lifespan? A simple answer could be that the resource is not calories. But I have no lead on what that resource may be.

Well, another theory of aging based on trade-offs between sexual success and longevity is the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging. Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects. Antagonistic Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects, at least one beneficial and at least one detrimental. Usually, detrimental genes will get weeded out of the gene pool, but if that gene is packaged with a benefit as well that outweighs the draw-back, then that gene will be selected for through evolution. So this can relate to aging if a theoretical gene(s) increased reproductive fitness but accelerated aging.

You are hopefully aware of epigenetic alterations, which are alterations of gene expression, not genetic code, during an individual’s lifespan. I theorize that being around attractive females could upregulate genes that increase reproductive fitness, but this would come at the cost of increased aging if they were antagonistic pleiotropic genes that harmed longevity.

Evidence

Being around attractive females can increase testosterone:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18675269/

Based on the premise of the Disposable Soma theory, I speculate this also tells the body to allocate more resources (whatever that may be) to prepare for sexual success, which means less available for retaining your health/youth.

Based on the premise of the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging, I theorize that the increased testosterone either directly or indirectly upregulates genes associated with reproductive fitness, or that the increased testosterone indicates that those genes are being upregulated.

Fruit Fly Experiment:
Researchers exposed 33 day old virgin male fruit flies to female fruit flies for 48 hours (they were allowed to mate) and then all living males were “flash frozen” and their gene expression assayed. “Testis-specific” genes were upregulated and oxidation-reduction processes genes were down-regulated. Oxidation causes aging according to the Free Radical theory of aging so this is bad. Quite a lot of genes were affected and this also suggests that exposure to females in humans would affect gene expression.
View attachment 2424631

Well, how did this affect their lifespan?

The black line is the survivor curve of virgin males and red is the survivorship of mated males (exposed to females from day 21-23)

View attachment 2424632

Practicality:

Well, this suggests that we should avoid attractive females. Us basement dwellers probably already do IRL, but perhaps not online, which could potentially induce a similar response in our bodies. The main question is: to coom or not to coom? Based on the fruit fly study, I would propose NoFap as the answer. But remember the study on exposure of human males to attractive females? That study claims that no sexual activity in the past month increased the testosterone production response to attractive females. NoFap may therefore sensitize one to female exposure, even perhaps it may raise sex drive and therefore more resources will be allocated to the objective of reproduction or more associated genes upregulated. So I would say that reducing sex drive chemically or some other way would be the best option for longevity.

If you’re interested in more interesting anti-aging material:

@howtallareyou @crisis @Ragnar @Eriot Lodger @Nad @Suimaxxer @Kroker @Interested @CoffeeCel @HOLYFUARK @Acne Victim @Osie
no wonder why lots of slayers look older than their actual age and are norwooding harder.
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies, poopoohead, Deleted member 30411 and 1 other person
Firstly, you must realize the trade-off relationship between the objective of sexual success and the objective of youthfulness (health) preservation.

The Disposable Soma theory of aging states that:
“Organisms must devote limited resources either to produce more offspring or to live longer. Evolutionarily, it is beneficial to sacrifice the latter for the sake of the former.”

A problem with the Disposable Soma theory of aging is that if the resources were based on energy (measured in calories) then how come caloric restriction extends lifespan? A simple answer could be that the resource is not calories. But I have no lead on what that resource may be.

Well, another theory of aging based on trade-offs between sexual success and longevity is the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging. Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects. Antagonistic Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects, at least one beneficial and at least one detrimental. Usually, detrimental genes will get weeded out of the gene pool, but if that gene is packaged with a benefit as well that outweighs the draw-back, then that gene will be selected for through evolution. So this can relate to aging if a theoretical gene(s) increased reproductive fitness but accelerated aging.

You are hopefully aware of epigenetic alterations, which are alterations of gene expression, not genetic code, during an individual’s lifespan. I theorize that being around attractive females could upregulate genes that increase reproductive fitness, but this would come at the cost of increased aging if they were antagonistic pleiotropic genes that harmed longevity.

Evidence

Being around attractive females can increase testosterone:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18675269/

Based on the premise of the Disposable Soma theory, I speculate this also tells the body to allocate more resources (whatever that may be) to prepare for sexual success, which means less available for retaining your health/youth.

Based on the premise of the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging, I theorize that the increased testosterone either directly or indirectly upregulates genes associated with reproductive fitness, or that the increased testosterone indicates that those genes are being upregulated.

Fruit Fly Experiment:
Researchers exposed 33 day old virgin male fruit flies to female fruit flies for 48 hours (they were allowed to mate) and then all living males were “flash frozen” and their gene expression assayed. “Testis-specific” genes were upregulated and oxidation-reduction processes genes were down-regulated. Oxidation causes aging according to the Free Radical theory of aging so this is bad. Quite a lot of genes were affected and this also suggests that exposure to females in humans would affect gene expression.
View attachment 2424631

Well, how did this affect their lifespan?

The black line is the survivor curve of virgin males and red is the survivorship of mated males (exposed to females from day 21-23)

View attachment 2424632

Practicality:

Well, this suggests that we should avoid attractive females. Us basement dwellers probably already do IRL, but perhaps not online, which could potentially induce a similar response in our bodies. The main question is: to coom or not to coom? Based on the fruit fly study, I would propose NoFap as the answer. But remember the study on exposure of human males to attractive females? That study claims that no sexual activity in the past month increased the testosterone production response to attractive females. NoFap may therefore sensitize one to female exposure, even perhaps it may raise sex drive and therefore more resources will be allocated to the objective of reproduction or more associated genes upregulated. So I would say that reducing sex drive chemically or some other way would be the best option for longevity.

If you’re interested in more interesting anti-aging material:

@howtallareyou @crisis @Ragnar @Eriot Lodger @Nad @Suimaxxer @Kroker @Interested @CoffeeCel @HOLYFUARK @Acne Victim @Osie
Over for porn users…
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, autistic_tendencies and Deleted member 1901
@Dr. Bludy
 
Lol I don’t agree. Being alone will just make you sad and more stressed aging you more.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 34058, poopoohead, Deleted member 20370 and 2 others
Lol I don’t agree. Being alone will just make you sad and more stressed aging you more.
Fair, being a sex-haver is associated with a reduced rate of all-cause mortality, although confounding factors could easily be responsible for that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and Krakowski
Shit so I fuck bitches AND I get to die sooner? sounds fair to me
 
Shit so I fuck bitches AND I get to die sooner? sounds fair to me
Well fucking bitches may be better than fapping because both are mechanicalistic breeding but the former lacks social interaction.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and vcx
Yo you never responded to my dm
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
@Xangsane i cant reply to your comment for some reason but many slayers party and drink a lot + generally unhealthy lifestyle and that’s why some age bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, Xangsane and Deleted member 1901
@Xangsane i cant reply to your comment for some reason but many slayers party and drink a lot + generally unhealthy lifestyle and that’s why some age bad
True, many confounding factors there. I prefer to look at controlled studies, if they are not in humans, so be it. At least I can draw conclusions for that particular species/strain, and many aging-related pathways/mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and Krakowski
@ph4ntom
 
No fap is cope
It’s just male birth control
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and Deleted member 1901
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: poopoohead, Krakowski and Deleted member 1901
This is interesting. I tried Nofap many times and do feel postive effects at the beginning. More focus and motivation to be productive. But there is always a point where I get so fucking horny and than all I do is think about it until I relapse. it becomes counter productive

At the same time with Fapping it's very easy to fall into the rabbit hole and waste time, get addicted. You also have way less motivation after fapping because you trick your brain into thinking that you just reproduced. and than go at it again

Is reducing sex drive chemically even safe ? or anyone tried it here
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 34058, poopoohead and Deleted member 1901
tldr : being around stacies ages you??
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead
@Xangsane i cant reply to your comment for some reason but many slayers party and drink a lot + generally unhealthy lifestyle and that’s why some age bad
I agree. They think they can hold onto their youth for good. Mum also told me promiscuous men from her era also aged fastest, and norwooded fastest.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, Deleted member 1901, autistic_tendencies and 1 other person
Depends on what you fear/ consider unsafe.
What I mean is can it have long term side effects on you after you eventually stop it to do you get back to normal ?
The fear is that you could still have low libido even after stopping. Or that it interracts with other hormones in your body through the feedback loops causing you harm in other ways
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
I agree. They think they can hold onto their youth for good. Mum also told me promiscuous men from her era also aged fastest, and norwooded fastest.
Very legit , my theory as well , the slayers I know are shadows of their past self , Norwooded aged look tired as shit settled with some mid roaster
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: poopoohead, Xangsane and Krakowski
What do you plan on doing with your extended lifespan?
 
Very legit , my theory as well , the slayers I know are shadows of their past self , Norwooded aged look tired as shit settled with some mid roaster
Exactly which is one reason I am abstinent. Until I marry.

Body count is 1
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies and poopoohead
Firstly, you must realize the trade-off relationship between the objective of sexual success and the objective of youthfulness (health) preservation.

The Disposable Soma theory of aging states that:
“Organisms must devote limited resources either to produce more offspring or to live longer. Evolutionarily, it is beneficial to sacrifice the latter for the sake of the former.”

A problem with the Disposable Soma theory of aging is that if the resources were based on energy (measured in calories) then how come caloric restriction extends lifespan? A simple answer could be that the resource is not calories. But I have no lead on what that resource may be.

Well, another theory of aging based on trade-offs between sexual success and longevity is the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging. Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects. Antagonistic Pleiotropy is when a gene has multiple effects, at least one beneficial and at least one detrimental. Usually, detrimental genes will get weeded out of the gene pool, but if that gene is packaged with a benefit as well that outweighs the draw-back, then that gene will be selected for through evolution. So this can relate to aging if a theoretical gene(s) increased reproductive fitness but accelerated aging.

You are hopefully aware of epigenetic alterations, which are alterations of gene expression, not genetic code, during an individual’s lifespan. I theorize that being around attractive females could upregulate genes that increase reproductive fitness, but this would come at the cost of increased aging if they were antagonistic pleiotropic genes that harmed longevity.

Evidence

Being around attractive females can increase testosterone:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18675269/

Based on the premise of the Disposable Soma theory, I speculate this also tells the body to allocate more resources (whatever that may be) to prepare for sexual success, which means less available for retaining your health/youth.

Based on the premise of the Antagonistic Pleiotropy theory of aging, I theorize that the increased testosterone either directly or indirectly upregulates genes associated with reproductive fitness, or that the increased testosterone indicates that those genes are being upregulated.

Fruit Fly Experiment:
Researchers exposed 33 day old virgin male fruit flies to female fruit flies for 48 hours (they were allowed to mate) and then all living males were “flash frozen” and their gene expression assayed. “Testis-specific” genes were upregulated and oxidation-reduction processes genes were down-regulated. Oxidation causes aging according to the Free Radical theory of aging so this is bad. Quite a lot of genes were affected and this also suggests that exposure to females in humans would affect gene expression.
View attachment 2424631

Well, how did this affect their lifespan?

The black line is the survivor curve of virgin males and red is the survivorship of mated males (exposed to females from day 21-23)

View attachment 2424632

Practicality:

Well, this suggests that we should avoid attractive females. Us basement dwellers probably already do IRL, but perhaps not online, which could potentially induce a similar response in our bodies. The main question is: to coom or not to coom? Based on the fruit fly study, I would propose NoFap as the answer. But remember the study on exposure of human males to attractive females? That study claims that no sexual activity in the past month increased the testosterone production response to attractive females. NoFap may therefore sensitize one to female exposure, even perhaps it may raise sex drive and therefore more resources will be allocated to the objective of reproduction or more associated genes upregulated. So I would say that reducing sex drive chemically or some other way would be the best option for longevity.

If you’re interested in more interesting anti-aging material:

@howtallareyou @crisis @Ragnar @Eriot Lodger @Nad @Suimaxxer @Kroker @Interested @CoffeeCel @HOLYFUARK @Acne Victim @Osie

Interesting study. I am curious if it would do the same with mice. Fixed males do seem to live a little longer in humans based on reports from the past. Aging theories are getting interesting. I agree with the one that says nature doesn't really care about you once you are past your prime reproductive years and it purposely starts the epigenetic down regulation of your body's repair processes to assure your death in a controlled lifespan. It sees that as better for the species survival and doesn't care about the individual after that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and Deleted member 1901
What I mean is can it have long term side effects on you after you eventually stop it to do you get back to normal ?
The fear is that you could still have low libido even after stopping. Or that it interracts with other hormones in your body through the feedback loops causing you harm in other ways
I’m not sure honestly
 
Interesting study. I am curious if it would do the same with mice. Fixed males do seem to live a little longer in humans based on reports from the past. Aging theories are getting interesting. I agree with the one that says nature doesn't really care about you once you are past your prime reproductive years and it purposely starts the epigenetic down regulation of your body's repair processes to assure your death in a controlled lifespan. It sees that as better for the species survival and doesn't care about the individual after that.
Neutered dogs live longer


In humans, It’s not clear if it’s androgens per se that lower life expectancy or sexual development. Low t is correlated with mortality rate in adult males. It’s also not clear if it’s reproductive activity that shortens lifespan or reproductive capability.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lawton88
Interesting.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
not a word of this cope
 
it is explained in the movie LUCY (with morgan freeman)
either chose reproduction or immortality
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies, nobodyspecial369 and Deleted member 1901
Dumbest shit I've read all day, using fruitflies to "prove" something in humans
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top