Attractive People are Better. [TRUTH NUKE]

[cube]

The current blackpill theory goes something as follows.

90% of your value/status/attractiveness is derived from the structure of your face and to a lesser part your body.

Naturally this raises the question: Why are we genetically predisposed to so heavily weigh a collection of things as random as facial angles, bone structure, curvature, things with no realistic function? Why do our instincts beg us to not even associate with ugly people?

Almost all blackpillers and their sub90iq brains will just freeze at this and say "uhh idk" or something retarded about genetics.

The truth is that the face is a representation of who you are, how you think, and how you've led your life. The angles of your face are crafted by your character, they improve/worsten depending on how you think and act.

Try for a week acting out your beliefs, working hard, doing things that make yourself proud, then look in the mirror, you'll see an improvement in your complexion, that solidifies over time.

Attractive people are good, ugly people are bad. Your face is a naked and bare reflection of your soul, and we've evolved over millions of years to spot the imperfections.

(retard colors for attentionspanlets)

 

[VV62]

Just work hard brah

 

[superpsycho]

water

 

[NordicLeonhard]

Aboslute retard its the opposite, How you look will affect how you are treated which will affect how you act. Especially in childhood.

 

[superpsycho]

Just work hard brah

 

[cube]

Aboslute retard its the opposite, How you look will affect how you are treated which will affect how you act. Especially in childhood.

Plenty of people who were ugly in childhood and improved by adolesence. Also I'm not saying its the only factor certainly develeopmental conditions (sleep, hyigene, parents & genes) have a role, but its a driving factor.

Just work hard brah

Not even hard work really, just have character and soul. At some point in your life though you either got it or you didn't.

 

[NordicLeonhard]

Plenty of people who were ugly in childhood and improved by adolesence. Also I'm not saying its the only factor certainly develeopmental conditions (sleep, hyigene, parents & genes) have a role, but its a driving factor.

And there are plenty of people who were very attractive all their lifes yet are still the lowest of the low

You thought you dropped some insane knowledge with this but if you think about it for more then 5 seconds its retarded

 

[sub5outsider]

people assume your personality 90 percent based on your face height race if they dont like what they see they wouldnt even want to know your other 10 percent

 

[cube]

And there are plenty of people who were very attractive all their lifes yet are still the lowest of the lowView attachment 3985098

You thought you dropped some insane knowledge with this but if you think about it for more then 5 seconds its retarded

They are the "lowest of the low" by your unique set of moralizing qualifiers. Genetics and evolution do not care about wether or not you think somebody is good or bad, quality is not determined by morality assesments but by character integration. Picrel is succesfull, intelligent, hard-working, got what he wanted, character-integrated, even if his goals dont align within your personalized value structure.

 

[VV62]

Not even hard work really, just have character and soul. At some point in your life though you either got it or you didn't.

Just have a good character and soul brah

 

[esoterik]

w bluepill & self-delusion, gave me a good laugh, your probably the same type of nigga to believe in zodiac signs

 

[NordicLeonhard]

They are the "lowest of the low" by your unique set of moralizing qualifiers. Genetics and evolution do not care about wether or not you think somebody is good or bad, quality is not determined by morality assesments but by character integration. Picrel is succesfull, intelligent, hard-working, got what he wanted, character-integrated, even if his goals dont align within your personalized value structure.

With that logic most people would be "good" according to yourself, Its just a cop out.

 

[cube]

With that logic most people would be "good" according to yourself, Its just a cop out.

No, most people live in shame, doubt, repressed thoughts, laziness, gluttony, fear, sexually deviant, addicted, isolation... the list goes on. The only people who have managed to properly integrate their psyche are attractive people.

w bluepill & self-delusion, gave me a good laugh, your probably the same type of nigga to believe in zodiac signs

Lets hear your high IQ theory for what drives 90% of human value judgements and has been integrated into our psyche for millions of years, surely you have a good take on this right?

 

[esoterik]

Lets hear your high IQ theory for what drives 90% of human value judgements and has been integrated into our psyche for millions of years, surely you have a good take on this right?

yeah, its called biology dumbass, more attractive partner = beneficial in multiple of ways ( offspring quality, idealization etc)

stop acting like its some unknown esoteric mystery, its the same biological loop that every other animal has

 

[1966Ford]

When I think about an attractive person being the best, I think of TB12 (Tom Brady).

 

[cube]

yeah, its called biology dumbass, more attractive partner = beneficial in multiple of ways ( offspring quality, idealization etc)

stop acting like its some unknown esoteric mystery, its the same biological loop that every other animal has

Just reading you're post I've confirmed you're sub100iq, so I will be blocking you as I dont spend my time with lowiqs.

I've made an argument as to why we find whats considered attractive, attractive. I'm defining attractiveness. I ask you to do the same.

Skipping over entirely on what makes attractive people attractive, why we're attracted to certain facial angles that serve no functional purpose, and you come up with

more attractive partner = beneficial in multiple of ways

When the discussion itself is about why these random facial features make a partner attractive.

Anways later lowiq gl in life being that retarded

 

[esoterik]

Just reading you're post I've confirmed you're sub100iq, so I will be blocking you as I dont spend my time with lowiqs.

I've made an argument as to why we find whats considered attractive, attractive. I'm defining attractiveness. I ask you to do the same.

Skipping over entirely on what makes attractive people attractive, why we're attracted to certain facial angles that serve no functional purpose, and you come up with

more attractive partner = beneficial in multiple of ways

When the discussion itself is centered on why we find certain things attractive.

Anways later lowiq gl in life being that retarded

you asked me about humans value judgement, not some bullshit about souls and morality, you're trying so hard to sound deep you cant even see the obvious answer right in front of your face

your whole argument is built on the idea that facial angles "serve no functional purpose", thats the dumbest shit i've ever heard and it makes me wonder if u bought 2020 join date or your actually that dense, the FUNCTION is to act as a signal, its a billboard for good genes and health (not in the way these retard 2025cels say "good health indicators ", as in a more complex inter-function)

this theory is so fucking retarded that i dont even care anymore that im falling for the ragebait lol, like what tf, so if a good person gets in a car crash and their face is raped, does that mean their soul turned evil? is a baby born with a facial deformity a bad person?

anyway, 8/10 ragebait, did fall for it, and will fall for it again, cause i dont believe there is a world where u actually believe this shit

 

[cube]

you asked me about humans value judgement, not some bullshit about souls and morality, you're trying so hard to sound deep you cant even see the obvious answer right in front of your face

your whole argument is built on the idea that facial angles "serve no functional purpose", thats the dumbest shit i've ever heard and it makes me wonder if u bought 2020 join date or your actually that dense, the FUNCTION is to act as a signal, its a billboard for good genes and health (not in the way these retard 2025cels say "good health indicators ", as in a more complex inter-function)

this theory is so fucking retarded that i dont even care anymore that im falling for the ragebait lol, like what tff, so if a good person gets in a car crash and their face is raped, does that mean their soul turned evil? is a baby born with a facial deformity a bad person?

anyway, 8/10 ragebait, did fall for it, and will fall for it again, cause i dont believe there is a world where u actually believe this shit

'Signals that say "good genes"' are u fucking retarded lmao???

If you could just signal good genes why havent we all evolved to just have them then? you realize how evolution and selection works right? if pandas that had a red circle in their tummy made them 99% more sexually desirable and a signal for "good genes" every single panda would have a red circle in their stomach in 100 years, you cant just "billboard" good genes u fucking doofus, genes are tried and tested against the enviornment and succesful ones are selected. Good genes dont exist in a vaccum, good genes are the ability for a genome to succeed in its current enviornment.

>this theory is so fucking retarded that i dont even care anymore that im falling for the ragebait lol, like what tff, so if a good person gets in a car crash and their face is raped, does that mean their soul turned evil? is a baby born with a facial deformity a bad person?

what is it with lowiq people and the inability to differentiate a trend from its outliers. Ah jerome my black friend is actually a good guy so niggers arent retards and murderers. Istg inability to understand trends and outliers are the #1 "billboard" for lowiqs.

>you asked me about humans value judgement, not some bullshit about souls and morality, you're trying so hard to sound deep you cant even see the obvious answer right in front of your face

What is it with u pathetic people and ur inability to consider anything that goes past pessimistic surface level 50iq dogshit, as soon as you have to consider human nature and evolution its some "deep bullshit".

 

[esoterik]

'Signals that say "good genes"' are u fucking retarded lmao???

If you could just signal good genes why havent we all evolved to just have them then? you realize how evolution and selection works right? if pandas that had a red circle in their tummy made them 99% more sexually desirable and a signal for "good genes" every single panda would have a red circle in their stomach in 100 years

thats not how how evolution works, mutations are random, not on demand, just because a trait is advantageous doesnt mean it magically appears in everyone, there needs to be genetic variation first, then selection acts on it, your literally describing lamarckian evolution which was disproven 200 years ago

, you cant just "billboard" good genes u fucking doofus

yuh, you can, thats literally what peacock tails are lmao. there handicaps that demonstrate genetic quality because only the healthiest can afford such wasteful ornaments, it's called the handicap principle (also for some reason your mixing up biological signals from empirically observable "signals"/billboards, a billboard is something you can see, you need to see someones face inorder to make a judgement, but the contents on their face is the signal itsself)

>this theory is so fucking retarded that i dont even care anymore that im falling for the ragebait lol, like what tff, so if a good person gets in a car crash and their face is raped, does that mean their soul turned evil? is a baby born with a facial deformity a bad person?

what is it with lowiq people and the inability to differentiate a trend from its outliers. Ah jerome my black friend is actually a good guy so niggers arent retards and murderers. Istg inability to understand trends and outliers are the #1 "billboard" for lowiqs.

reply to it instead of jumping around in a base rate fallacy, u underestimate how common peoples faces get fucked up to external factors, so what happens then? are they just shitty people?

 

[cube]

thats not how how evolution works, mutations are random, not on demand, just because a trait is advantageous doesnt mean it magically appears in everyone, there needs to be genetic variation first, then selection acts on it, your literally describing lamarckian evolution which was disproven 200 years ago

yuh, you can, thats literally what peacock tails are lmao. there handicaps that demonstrate genetic quality because only the healthiest can afford such wasteful ornaments, it's called the handicap principle (also for some reason your mixing up biological signals from empirically observable "signals"/billboards, a billboard is something you can see, you need to see someones face inorder to make a judgement, but the contents on their face is the signal itsself)


reply to it instead of jumping around in a base rate fallacy, u underestimate how common peoples faces get fucked up to external factors, so what happens then? are they just shitty people?

>thats not how how evolution works, mutations are random, not on demand, just because a trait is advantageous doesnt mean it magically appears in everyone, there needs to be genetic variation first, then selection acts on it, your literally describing lamarckian evolution which was disproven 200 years ago

Exactly, mutations are random and the positive ones are selected for in nature till they become commonplace, like the way you and me both have 10 fingers, we randomly adapated to the number and it was selected for in the enviornment by being more succesfull than those with other finger counts. This also serves as an example of a functional evolved trait, wheras you're saying that certain bone angles signal good "genes". How do they signal good genes? Do they signal a more effective digestive tract? Higher IQ? If your argument is that facial angles are signals for other genes, then what other genes do they signal, flesh out your argument.

>yuh, you can, thats literally what peacock tails are lmao. there handicaps that demonstrate genetic quality because only the healthiest can afford such wasteful ornaments, it's called the handicap principle (also for some reason your mixing up biological signals from empirically observable "signals"/billboards, a billboard is something you can see, you need to see someones face inorder to make a judgement, but the contents on their face is the signal itsself)

This seems to me like a complete sidetrack, I dont think a 45deg gonial angle over a 32deg one is a "wasteful ornament" its completely irrelevant in terms of function or resource cost which was my argument. It takes no more resources to have an attractive face over an ugly one so it wouldnt serve as an indicator of health or prosperity either.

> reply to it instead of jumping around in a base rate fallacy, u underestimate how common peoples faces get fucked up to external factors, so what happens then? are they just shitty people?

Ill break it down to you step by step since it seems u struggle with basic logic.

My argument: We select for people by their facial angles because they are physiognomical signals for their character. I.e. Good character creates good face.

Your counterpoint: What about deformed people or people that suffer injuries.

People that suffer injuries and get their face destroyed makes it impossible to determine their character facially, this leads to nobody wanting to be around them and they generally being disliked and considered horribly ugly. If we use the face to determine character and we lose access to the face we deal with unknown, and we do not like the uncertainty. Look at a burn victim, would you populate with her? Nobody would, we dislike it when we lose the biggest factor we use to judge people.

Are people bad because they are disfigured or deformed? No, but they are incapable of showing their character through their face, which makes them unjudgeable or unknown, and we do not like this, so they are basically 0/10s, and nobody wants to reproduce with them. Your character -> your face, but your face does not -> your character.